Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toxic effect of two kinds of mineral collectors on soil microbial richness and activity: analysis by microcalorimetry, microbial count, and enzyme activity assay

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flotation reagents are hugely and increasingly used in mining and other industrial and economic activities from which an important part is discharged into the environment. China could be the most affected country by the resulting pollution. However, their ecotoxicological dimension is still less addressed and understood. This study aimed to analyze the toxic effect of sodium isobutyl xanthate (SIBX) and sodium isopropyl xanthate (SIPX) to soil microbial richness and activity and to make a comparison between the two compounds in regard to their effects on soil microbial and enzymes activities. Different methods, including microcalorimetry, viable cell counts, cell density, and catalase and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrololase activities measurement, were applied. The two chemicals exhibited a significant inhibitory effect (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) to all parameters, SIPX being more adverse than SIBX. As the doses of SIBX and SIPX increased from 5 to 300 μg g−1 soil, their inhibitory ratio ranged from 4.84 to 45.16 % and from 16.13 to 69.68 %, respectively. All parameters fluctuated with the incubation time (10-day period). FDA hydrolysis was more directly affected but was relatively more resilient than catalase activity. Potential changes of those chemicals in the experimental media and complementarity between experimental techniques were justified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33(2):943–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aislabie J, Deslippe JR (2013) Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. In: Dymond JR (ed) Ecosystem services in New Zealand—conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, pp. 143–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajiao AT, Yakubu SE, Umoh VJ, Ameh JB (2014) Enzymatic studies and mineralization potential of Burkholderia cepacia and Corynebacterium kutscheri isolated from refinery sludge. Journal of Microbiology Research 4(2):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (1981) Biodegradation of chemicals of environmental concern. Science 211(4478):132–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • An YJ, Kim M (2009) Effect of antimony on the microbial growth and the activities of soil enzymes. Chemosphere 74(5):654–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aysha OS, Hamsavathani V, Valli S (2015) Biodegradation of xenobiotics: a review on petroleum hydrocarbons and pesticide degradation. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4(11):1791–1808

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran S, Bielińska JE, Oleszczuk P (2004) Enzymatic activity in an airfield soil polluted with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Geoderma 118(3–4):221–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barja I, Núñez L (1999) Microcalorimetric measurements of the influence of glucose concentration on microbial activity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:441–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barros N, Feijoo S, Simoni A et al (2001) Interpretation of the metabolic enthalpy change, ΔHmet, calculated for microbial growth reactions in soils. J Therm Anal Calorim 63:577–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battin TJ (1997) Assessment of fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total esterase activity in natural stream sediment biofilms. Sci Total Environ 198(1):51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck JF, Bradbury CM, Connors AJ et al (1981) Nitrite as antidote for acute hydrogen sulfide intoxication? Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 42(11):805–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braissant O, Wirz D, Göpfert B et al (2010) Biomedical use of isothermal microcalorimeters. Sensors 10(10):9369–9383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braissant O, Bonkat G, Wirz D et al (2013) Microbial growth and isothermal microcalorimetry:. Growth models and their application to microcalorimetric data. Thermochim Acta 555(555):64–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo D, Braissant O, Solokhina A et al (2011) Use of an isothermal microcalorimetry assay to characterize microbial oxalotrophic activity. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 78(2):266–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulatovic M (2007) Handbook of flotation reagents: Chemistry, theory and practice. In: Flotation of Sulfide Ores, first ed, vol. 1. Elsevier Science, The Netherlands, 446 p

  • Burns RG (1982) Enzyme activity in soil: location a possible role in microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 14:423–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Saha N, Roy SS (2016) Role of microbes in soil formation and aggregation. Innovative Farming 1(1):11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Zhuang R, Yao J et al (2014) Short-term effect of aniline on soil microbial activity: a combined study by isothermal microcalorimetry, glucose analysis, and enzyme assay techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21(1):674–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Yao J, Wang F et al (2009) Study on the toxic effects of diphenol compounds on soil microbial activity by a combination of methods. J Hazard Mater 167:846–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Gong W, Mei G et al (2011) Primary biodegradation of sulfide mineral flotation collectors. Miner Eng 24(8):953–955

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chockalingam E, Subramanian S, Natarajan KA (2003) Studies on biodegradation of organic flotation collectors using bacillus polymyxa. Hydrometallurgy 71(1–2):249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JM, Gillings MR, Altavilla N et al (2001) Potential problems with fluorescein diacetate assays of cell viability when testing natural products for antimicrobial activity. J Microbiol Methods 46(3):261–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dąbrowska D, Kot-Wasik A, Namieśnik J (2004) The importance of degradation in the fate of selected organic compounds in the environment. Part II Photodegradation and Biodegradation Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 13(6):617–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Deo N, Natarajan KA (1998) Biological removal of some flotation collector reagents from aqueous solutions and mineral surfaces. Miner Eng 11(8):717–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dominati E, Patterson M, MacKay A (2010) A framework for classifying and quantifying natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69(9):1858–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edraki M, Baumgartl T, Manlapig E et al (2014) Designing mine tailings for better environmental, social and economic outcomes: a review of alternative approaches. J Clean Prod 84(84):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzner S (2002) Biodegradation of xenobiotics. In: Doelle, Da Silva (eds) Biotechnology. In: Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), developed under the auspices of the UNESCO. Eolss Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2003) Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 35(1):167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher LE, Conley CA, Valdiviasilva JE et al (2011) Determination of low bacterial concentrations in hyperarid Atacama soils: comparison of biochemical and microscopy methods with real-time quantitative PCR. Can J Microbiol 57(11):953–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg WTJ, Dick WA (1983) Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47(5):945–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu P, Feng J, Yang T et al (2015) Comparison of alkyl xanthates degradation in aqueous solution by the O 3, and UV/O 3, processes: efficiency, mineralization and ozone utilization. Miner Eng 81(1):128–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazali FM, Rahman RNZA, Salleh AB et al (2004) Biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil by microbial consortium. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 54(1):61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gianfreda L, Rao MA (2008) Interactions between xenobiotics and microbial and enzymatic soil activity. Crit Rev Env Sci and Techn 38(4):269–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green VS, Stott DE, Diack M (2006) Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: optimization for soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 38(4):693–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbault GG, Kramer DN (1964) Fluoremetric determination of lipase, acylase, alpha- and gamma-chymotrypsin and inhibitors of these enzymes. Anal Chem 36:409–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Z et al (2016) Effect of three typical sulfide mineral flotation collectors on soil microbial activity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23(8):7425–7436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley JR (1972) The use, characteristics and toxicity of mine-mill reagents in the province of Ontario. Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, p. 244

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Urbina R (2003) Recent developments and advances in formulations and applications of chemical reagents used in froth flotation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev 24(2):139–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg RC, MacDonnell MM (2002) Synergy and other ineffective mixture risk definitions. Sci Total Environ 288(1–2):31–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu RZ, Liu JM, Zhai MG (2009) Mineral resources science in China: a roadmap to 2050. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL, Temple KL (1964) Some variables affecting the measurement of “catalase activity” in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 28(2):207–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karakagh RM, Chorom M, Motamedi H et al (2012) Biosorption of Cd and Ni by inactivated bacteria isolated from agricultural soil treated with sewage sludge. Ecohydrology Hydrobiology 12(3):191–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kheyrodin H (2014) Methodology for measurement of enzyme activity in soil. World J Biol Med Science Volume 1(1):18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossoff D, Dubbin WE, Alfredsson M, Edwards SJ, Macklin MG, Hudson-Edwards KA (2014) Mine tailings dams: characteristics, failure, environmental impacts, and remediation. Appl Geochem 51:229–245

  • Krell T (2008) Microcalorimetry: a response to challenges in modern biotechnology. Microb Biotechnol 1(2):126–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li MS, Yang SX (2008) Heavy metal contamination in soils and phytoaccumulation in a manganese mine wasteland, South China. Air, Soil and Water Research 1:31–41

  • Li N, Chen Y, Zhang C et al (2015) Highly sensitive determination of butyl xanthate in surface and drinking water by headspace gas chromatography with electron capture detector. Chromatographia 78:1305. doi:10.1007/s10337-015-2940-9

  • Li YT, Corrine R, Marc B et al (2009) Microbial biomass, enzyme and mineralization activity in relation to soil organic C, N and P turnover influenced by acid metal stress. Soil Biol Biochem 41(5):969–977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ma Z et al (2014) A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: pollution and health risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 468-469:843–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Jing L, Zhang Z et al (2015) Accidental water pollution risk analysis of mine tailings ponds in Guanting reservoir watershed, Zhangjiakou City, China. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 12(12):15269–15284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molina GC, Cayo CH, Rodrigues MAS, Bernardes AM (2013) Sodium isopropyl xanthate degradation by advanced oxidation process. Miner Eng 45:88–93

  • Moreno JL, Hernández T, Pérez A et al (2002) Toxicity of cadmium to soil microbial activity: effect of sewage sludge addition to soil on the ecological dose. Appl Soil Ecol 21(2):149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez-Regueira L, Rodríguez-Añón JA, Proupín-Castiñeiras J et al (2006) Microcalorimetric study of changes in the microbial activity in a humic Cambisol after reforestation with eucalyptus in Galicia (NW Spain). Soil Biol Biochem 38:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okibe N, Johnson DB (2002) Toxicity of flotation reagents to moderately thermophilic bioleaching microorganisms. Biotechnol Lett 24(23):2011–2016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pearse MJ (2005) An overview of the use of chemical reagents in mineral processing. Miner Eng 18(2):139–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Bozo L, Godoy-Faúndez A, Herrera-Urbina R et al (2014) Greening chilean copper mining operations through industrial ecology strategies. J Clean Prod 84(1):671–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rico M, Benito G, Salgueiro AR et al (2008) Reported tailings dam failures: a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context [J]. J Hazard Mater 152(2):846–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rostad CE, Schmitt CJ, Schumacher JG et al (2011) An exploratory investigation of polar organic compounds in waters from a lead zinc mine and mill complex. Water Air Soil Pollut 217(1):431–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnürer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Applied & Environmental Microbiology 43(6):1256–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirdam R, Khanafari A, Tabatabaei A (2006) Cadmium, nickel and vanadium accumulation by three strains of marine bacteria. Iran J Biotechnol 4(3):180–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song HG, Bartha R (1990) Effects of jet fuel spills on the microbial community of soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(3):646–651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stȩpniewska Z, Wolińska A, Ziomek J (2009) Response of soil catalase activity to chromium contamination. J Environ Sci 21(8):1142–1147

  • Sun Z, Forsling W (1997) The degradation kinetics of ethyl-xanthate as a function of pH in aqueous solution. Miner Eng 10(4):389–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher R, Carroll GC (1980) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as an estimator of microbial biomass on coniferous needle surfaces. Microb Ecol 6(3):217–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JP, Wilson B, Mills MS et al (2002) Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biol Biochem 34(3):387–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tse P K (2013) The mineral industry of China. US Geological Survey, Minerals years book 2012

  • Wang F, Yao J, Chen HL et al (2010) Comparative toxicity of chlorpyrifos and its oxon derivatives to soil microbial activity by combined methods. Chemosphere 78:319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xian Y, Wang M, Chen W (2015) Quantitative assessment on soil enzyme activities of heavy metal contaminated soils with various soil properties. Chemosphere 139:604–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua Z, Wenzhu W, Zhou L et al (2010) Interactive effect of dissolved organic matter and phenanthrene on soil enzymatic activities. J Environ Sci 22(4):607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanev SG, Kent UM, Roberts ES et al (2000) Mechanistic studies of cytochrome P450 2B1 inactivation by xanthates. Arch Biochem & Biophys 378(1):157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yong Z, Yao J, Choi MMF et al (2009) A combination method to study microbial communities and activities in zinc contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 169(1–3):875–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhijie WU, Chen LJ et al (2013) Kinetics of catalase and dehydrogenase in main soils of Northeast China under different soil moisture conditions. Agric J 2:113–120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support by the International Joint Key Project from Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (2010DFB23160), Key project from National Science Foundation of China (41430106), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41273092), Public welfare project of Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection (201409042), and Overseas, Hong Kong and Macau Young Scholars Collaborative Research Fund (41328005).We gratefully acknowledge all the supports provided. We are thankful for Dr. Wang Fei, Dr. Weijuan Lin, Mr. Zhimin Yuan, and Mr. Naturinda Norman for their technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Yao.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Robert Duran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bararunyeretse, P., Yao, J., Dai, Y. et al. Toxic effect of two kinds of mineral collectors on soil microbial richness and activity: analysis by microcalorimetry, microbial count, and enzyme activity assay. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 1565–1577 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7905-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7905-5

Keywords

Navigation