Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects

  • Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study decomposed the determinants of environmental quality into scale, technique, and composition effects. We applied a semiparametric method of generalized additive models, which enabled us to use flexible functional forms and include several independent variables in the model. The differences in the technique effect were found to play a crucial role in reducing pollution. We found that the technique effect was sufficient to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions. On the other hand, its effect was not enough to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and energy use, except for the case of CO2 emissions in high-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agras J, Chapman D (1997) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for energy? An econometric analysis. Working paper. New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Agricultural, Resource and Managerial Economics

  • Antweiler W, Copeland B, Taylor S (2001) Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review 91:877–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Folke C, Holling CS, Janson B, Levin S, Maler K, Perrings C, Pimental D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Economics 15:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azomahou T, Laisney F, Van PN (2006) Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics 90:1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertinelli L, Strobl E (2005) The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parametrically revisited. Economics Letters 88:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock W, Taylor MS (2006) Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. In: Durlauf S, Aghion, P (eds) The handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheremisinoff NP (2001) Handbook of pollution prevention practices (Environmental Science and Pollution Control Series) Marcel Dekker, Cambridge

  • Cole MA (2005) Re-examining the pollution-income relationship: a random coefficients approach. Economic Bulletin 14:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2003) Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46:363–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics 2:401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland B, Taylor S (2004) Trade, growth and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature 42:7–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Mody A, Roy S, Wheeler D (2001) Environmental regulation and development: a cross country empirical analysis. Oxford Development Studies 29:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Hamilton K, Pandey KD, Wheeler D (2006) Environment during growth: accounting for governance and vulnerability. World Development 34:1597–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics 49:431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria C (2008) International trade and the sectoral composition of production. Review of Economics Dynamics 11:192–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty DC, Porter ME (2005) National environmental performance: an empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics 10:391–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel J, Rose A (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. Review of Economics and Statistics 87:85–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F (2006) Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecological Economics 57:152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM (1995) Pollution and growth: what do we know? In: Goldin I, Winters LA (eds) The economics of sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In: Garber P (ed) The Mexico-US free trade agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110:353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkos GE (2003) Environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data model. Environment and Development Economics 8:581–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Selden TM (1995) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefohn AS, Husar JD, Husar RB (1999) Estimating historical anthropogenic global sulfur emission patterns for the period 1850–1990. Atmospheric Environment 33:3435–3444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luzzati T, Orsini M (2009) Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 34:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Managi S (2007) Technological change and environmental policy: a study of depletion in the oil and gas industry. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G, Rotty RM (1984) Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels: a procedure for estimation and results for 1950–82. Tellus 36:232–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G, Boden TA, Andres RJ (2000) Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. In: Trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Millimet DL, List JA, Stengos T (2003) The environmental Kuznets curve: real progress or misspecified models? Review of Economics and Statistics 85:1038–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics 2:465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezek JP, Rogers K (2008) Decomposing the CO2-income tradeoff: an output distance function approach. Environment and Development Economics 13:457–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond AK, Kaufmann RK (2006) Energy prices and turning points: the relationship between income and energy use/carbon emissions. Energy 27:157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee R, Stoker TM, Judson RA (1998) World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950–2050. Review of Economics and Statistics 80:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27:147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46:757–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32:1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2005) Global sulfur emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere 58:163–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI, Common MS (2001) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41:162–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone CJ (1985) Additive regression and other nonparametric models. Annals of Statistics 13:689–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras M, Boyce JK (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurumi T, Managi S (2009) Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: use of energy in developed countries. Working Paper, Yokohama National University

  • Wood SN (2004) Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99:673–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2008) Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 70:495–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Tsurumi, T., Managi, S. Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 11, 19–36 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-009-0159-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-009-0159-4

Key words

Navigation