Skip to main content
Log in

Bioremediation of chromium by novel strains Enterobacter aerogenes T2 and Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 S2

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study had an objective to identify the most potent chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from tannery effluent and apply them for bioremediation of chromium in tannery effluents.

Methods

Two such strains (previously characterized and identified by us)—Enterobacter aerogenes (NCBI GenBank USA Accession no. GU265554) and Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 (NCBI GenBank USA Accession no. GU084179)—showed powerful chromium resistivity and bioremediation capabilities among many stains isolated from tannery waste. Parameters such as pH, concentration of hexavalent chromium or Cr (VI), and inoculum volume were varied to observe optimum bioconversion and bioaccumulation of Cr (VI) when the said strains were grown in M9 minimal salt media. E. aerogenes was used to remediate chromium from tannery effluents in a laboratory level experiment.

Results

Observation by Scanning Electron Microscope and chromium peak in Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopic microanalysis revealed that E. aerogenes helped remediate a moderate amount of Cr (VI) (8–16 mg L−1) over a wide range of pH values at 35–37°C (within 26.05 h). High inoculum percentage of Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 also enabled bioremediation of 8–16 mg L−1 of Cr (VI) over a wide range of temperature (25–37°C), mainly at pH 7 (within 63.28 h). The experiment with real tannery effluent gave very encouraging results.

Conclusion

The strain E. aerogenes can be used in bioremediation of Cr (VI) since it could work in actual environmental conditions with extraordinarily high capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JW, Boothe DH, Suzuki O, Baily GW (2004) Multiple imaging techniques demonstrate the manipulation of surfaces to reduce bacterial contamination and corrosion. J Microsc (Oxf) 216:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge T, McLean J, Phipps D (2000) Isolation and characterization of a chromium-reducing bacterium from chromate copper arsenate-contaminated site. Environ Microbiol 2:611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo FAO, Bento FM, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2003) Chromate reduction by chromium-resistant bacteria isolated from soils contaminated with dichromate. J Environ Qual 32:1228–1233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Paul AK (2010) Occurrence and evaluation of chromium reducing bacteria in seepage water from chromite mine quarries of Orissa, India. J Water Resource Protect 2:380–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhal B, Thatoi H, Das N, Pandey B (2010) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by Bacillus sp. isolated from chromite mine soils and characterization of reduced product. J Chem Technol Biot 85:1471–1479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili A, Mesdaghi Nia A, Vazirinejad R (2005) Chromium removal and recovery from tannery wastewater by precipitation process. Amer J App Sci 2:1380–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli A, Tripathi AK (2002) Bioremediation of toxic chromium from electroplating effluent by chromate-reducing Pseudomonas aeruginosa A2Chr in two bioreactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:416–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He Z, Gao F, Sha T, Hu Y, He C (2009) Isolation and characterization of a Cr (VI)-reduction Ochrobactrum sp. strain CSCr-3 from chromium landfill. J Hazard Mat 163:869–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horitsu H, Futo S, Miyazawa Y, Ogai S, Kawai K (1987) Enzymatic reduction of Cr (VI) by Cr (VI) tolerant Pseudomonas ambigua G-1. Agric Biol Chem 51:2417–2520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu MZC, Norman JM, Faison BD, Reeves ME (1996) Biosorption of uranium by Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain CSU: characterization and comparison studies. Biotechnol Bioeng 51:237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SE, Lee JU, Chon HT, Lee JS (2008) Microbiological reduction of Cr (VI) by indigenous chromium-resistant bacteria in sand column experiments. Environ Geochem Health 30:141–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty PL (1994) Groundwater treatment for chlorinated solvents. In: Matthews JE (ed) Handbook of bioremediation. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, pp 87–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Megharaj M, Avudainayagam S, Naidu R (2003) Toxicity of Cr (VI) and its reduction by bacteria isolated from soil contaminated with tannery waste. Curr Microbiol 47:51–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra S, Doble M (2008) Novel chromium tolerant microorganisms: isolation, characterization and their biosorption capacity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:874–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norris RD (1994) In-situ bioremediation of soils and groundwater contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. In: Matthews JE (ed) Handbook of bioremediation. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, pp 17–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna K, Phillip L (2005) Bioremediation of Cr (VI) in contaminated soils. J Hazard Mat 121:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russel DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. CSHL Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattley WM, Madigan MT (2006) Isolation, characterization, and ecology of cold-active, chemolithotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from perennially ice-covered Lake Fryxell, Antarctica. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(8):5562–5568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinath T, Verma T, Ramteke PW, Garg SK (2002) Chromium (VI) biosorption and bioaccumulation by chromate resistance bacteria. Chemosphere 48:427–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1989) American Public Health Association, Washington DC

  • Sundar K, Vidya R, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2010) High chromium tolerant bacterial strains from Palar River Basin: impact of tannery. Res J Environ Earth Sci 2:112–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker U, Madamwar D (2005) Reduction of toxic chromium and partial localization of chromium reductase activity in bacterial isolate DM1. World J Microb Biot 21:891–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhiguo H, Fenglish F, Tao S, Yuehua H, He C (2009) Isolation and characterization of a Cr (VI)-reduction Ochrobactrum sp. strain CSCr-3 from chromium landfill. J Hazard Mat 163:869–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author JP gratefully acknowledges fellowship provided by the University Grants Commission (UGC), India. The author PS acknowledges a research fund from the UGC and support from Sensor-Hub, CGCRI for characterization and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyabrata Sarkar.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panda, J., Sarkar, P. Bioremediation of chromium by novel strains Enterobacter aerogenes T2 and Acinetobacter sp. PD 12 S2. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19, 1809–1817 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0702-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0702-2

Keywords

Navigation