Skip to main content
Log in

Log-Multiplicative Association Models as Item Response Models

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Log-multiplicative association (LMA) models, which are special cases of log-linear models, have interpretations in terms of latent continuous variables. Two theoretical derivations of LMA models based on item response theory (IRT) arguments are presented. First, we show that Anderson and colleagues (Anderson & Vermunt, 2000; Anderson & Böckenholt, 2000; Anderson, 2002), who derived LMA models from statistical graphical models, made the equivalent assumptions as Holland (1990) when deriving models for the manifest probabilities of response patterns based on an IRT approach. We also present a second derivation of LMA models where item response functions are specified as functions of rest-scores. These various connections provide insights into the behavior of LMA models as item response models and point out philosophical issues with the use of LMA models as item response models. We show that even for short tests, LMA and standard IRT models yield very similar to nearly identical results when data arise from standard IRT models. Log-multiplicative association models can be used as item response models and do not require numerical integration for estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afifi, A.A., & Elashoff, R.M. (1969). Multivariate two sample test with dichotomous and continuous variables. I. The location model. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (1993). Computing conditional maximum likelihood estimates for generalized Rasch models using simple loglinear models with diagonal parameters. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 20, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agresti, A. (2002). Cateogorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E.B. (1983). A general latent structure model for contingency table data. In H. Wainer & S. Messik (Eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement (pp. 117–139). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E.B. (1995). The derivation of polytomous Rasch models. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 271–291). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J. (2002). Analysis of multivariate frequency data using graphical models and generalizations of the RC(M) association model. Psychological Methods, 7, 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J., & Böckenholt, U. (2000). RC regression models for polytomous variables. Psychometrika, 65, 479–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J., Li, Z., & Vermunt, J.K. (2007). Pseudo-likelihood estimation of models in the Rasch family. Journal of Statistical Software. In press.

  • Anderson, C.J., & Vermunt, J.K. (2000). Log-multiplicative association models as latent variable models for nominal and/or ordinal data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 81–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J., & Vermunt, J.K. (2002). Estimation of log-multiplicative association models for really large contingency tables. Psychometric Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariminger, G., & Küsters, U. (1989). Construction principles for latent trait models. Sociological Methodology, 19, 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B.C., & Press, S.J. (1989). Compatible conditional distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 152–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B.C., Castillo, E., & Sarabia, J.M. (1999). Conditional specification of statistical models. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B.C., Castillo, E., & Sarabia, J.M. (2001). Conditionaly specified distributions: An introduction. Statistical Science, 16, 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M.P. (1989). On the bivariate normal distribution and association models for ordinal categorical data. Statistics and Probability Letters, 8, 435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D. (2003). Conceptual issues in psychological measurement. Doctorial dissertation. University of Amsterdam.

  • Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G.J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.H. (1996). The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait for polytomous IRT models. Psychometrika, 61, 445–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.H., & Stout, W. (1993). The asymptotic posterior normality of the latent trait in an IRT model. Psychometrika, 58, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables. Psychometrika, 40, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C.C. (1995). Latent class models. In G. Arminger, C.C. Clogg, & M.E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modelling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311–359). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2000). Introduction to graphical modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L.S., Fainberg, V., Kipnis, V., Midthune, D., & Carroll, R.J. (2004). A new method for dealing with measurement error in explanatory variables of regression models. Biometrics, 60, 172–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Formann, A.K. (1995). Linear logistic latent class analysis and the Rasch model. In G.H. Fischer & I.W. Molenarr (Eds.), Rasch models. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Speed, T.P. (1993). Characterizing a joint probability distribution by conditionals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 55, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1981). Association models and the bivariate normal distribution for contingency tables with ordered categories. Biometrika, 68, 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, T. (1993). Discrete latent variable models. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P.W. (1990). The Dutch Identity: A new tool for the study of item response models. Psychometrika, 55, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, H., & Liu, Y. (1996). A model for multivariate binary response with covariates based on conditionally specified logistic regressions. Statistics & Probability Letters, 31, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B.W. (1993). Conditional association, essential independence and monotone unidimensional item response models. The Annals of Statistics, 21, 1359–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junker, B.W., & Sijtsma, K. (2000). Latent and manifest monotonicity in item response models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelderman, H., & Rukes, C.P.M. (1994). Loglinear multidimensional IRT models for polyotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 59, 149–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1980). Mixtures of continuous and categorical variables in discriminant analysis. Biometrics, 36, 493–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1983). Distance between populations using mixed continuous and categorical variables. Biometrika, 70, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1988). Principles of multivariate analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L. (1996). Graphical models. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L., & Wermuth, N. (1989). Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative. The Annals of Statistics, 17, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG-3; Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, I., & Tate, R.F. (1960). Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 448–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2002). Statistical analysis system, Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAT Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J.L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tettegah, S., & Anderson, C.J. (2007). Pre-service teacher’s empathy and cognitions: Statistical analysis of text data by graphical models. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology. In press.

  • Tjur, T. (1982). A connection between Rasch’s item analysis model and a multiplicative Poisson model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.K. (1997). ℓ EM : A general program for the analysis of categorical data. [Computer software manual.] Tilburg, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.uvt.nl/faculteiten/fsw/organisatie/departementen/mto/software2.html.

  • Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied mathematical multivariate statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Stout, W. (1997). On Holland’s Dutch Identity conjecture. Psychometrika, 62, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn J. Anderson.

Additional information

This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (#SES-0351175) and the University of Illinois Research Board. We thank Ulf Böckenholt and Rung-Ching Tsai for discussions regarding this work.

Requests for reprints should be sent to Carolyn J. Anderson, Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, 1310 South Sixth Street, MC-708, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. E-Mail: cja@uiuc.edu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, C.J., Yu, HT. Log-Multiplicative Association Models as Item Response Models. Psychometrika 72, 5–23 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1419-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1419-2

Key words

Navigation