Skip to main content
Log in

Graphical regression models for polytomous variables

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When modeling the relationship between two nominal categorical variables, it is often desirable to include covariates to understand how individuals differ in their response behavior. Typically, however, not all the relevant covariates are available, with the result that the measured variables cannot fully account for the associations between the nominal variables. Under the assumption that the observed and unobserved variables follow a homogeneous conditional Gaussian distribution, this paper proposesRC(M) regression models to decompose the residual associations between the polytomous variables. Based on Goodman's (1979, 1985)RC(M) association model, a distinctive feature ofRC(M) regression models is that they facilitate the joint estimation of effects due to manifest and omitted (continuous) variables without requiring numerical integration. TheRC(M) regression models are illustrated using data from the High School and Beyond study (Tatsuoka & Lohnes, 1988).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afifi, A.A., & Elashoff, R.M. (1969). Multivariate two sample tests with dichotomous and continuous variables. I. The location model.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 290–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batts, D., & Watts, D.G. (1988)Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. (1994). Individual level models for mobility tables and other cross-classifications.Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C.C., & Shihadeh, E.S. (1994).Statistical models for ordinal variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S.R. (1995). Modeling manifest and latent dimensions of associations in two-way cross-classifications.Sociological Methodology, 24, 30–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, R.D., Hedeker, D., Charles, S.C., & Frisch, P. (1994). A random-effects probit model for predicting medical malpractice claims.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 760–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries.The Annals of Statistics, 13, 10–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R.D. (1994). A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis.Biometrics, 50, 933–944.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1980). Mixtures of continuous and categorical variables in discriminant analysis.Biometrics, 36, 493–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. (1983). Distance between populations using mixed continuous and categorical variables.Biometrika, 70, 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraznowski, W.J. (1988).Principles of multivariate analysis. NY: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L. (1996).Graphical models. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen, S.L., & Wermuth, N. (1989). Graphical models for associations between variables, some of which are qualitative and some quantitative.The Annals of Statistics, 17, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, I., and Tate, R.F. (1960). Multivariate correlation models with mixed discrete and continuous variables.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 448–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasuoka, M.M., & Lohnes, P.R. (1988).Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. (1989). Discussion of paper by van der Heijden, de Falguerolles & de Leeuw.Applied Statistics, 38, 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn J. Anderson.

Additional information

This article was accepted for publication, when Willem J. Heiser was the Editor ofPsychometrika. This research was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (#SBR96-17510 and #SBR94-09531) and the Bureau of Educational Research at the University of Illinois. We thank Jee-Seon Kim for comments and computational assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, C.J., Böckenholt, U. Graphical regression models for polytomous variables. Psychometrika 65, 497–509 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296340

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296340

Key words

Navigation