Skip to main content
Log in

Signal Detection Models with Random Participant and Item Effects

  • Application Reviews and Case Studies
  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The theory of signal detection is convenient for measuring mnemonic ability in recognition memory paradigms. In these paradigms, randomly selected participants are asked to study randomly selected items. In practice, researchers aggregate data across items or participants or both. The signal detection model is nonlinear; consequently, analysis with aggregated data is not consistent. In fact, mnemonic ability is underestimated, even in the large-sample limit. We present two hierarchical Bayesian models that simultaneously account for participant and item variability. We show how these models provide for accurate estimation of participants’ mnemonic ability as well as the memorability of items. The model is benchmarked with a simulation study and applied to a novel data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, J., & Chib, S. (1995). Bayesian residual analysis for binary response regression models. Biometrika, 82, 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W.J., & Draper, D. (2000). Implementation and performance issues in the Bayesian and likelihood fitting of multilevel models. Computer Statistics, 15, 391–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye, L. (1986). Non-uniform random variate generation. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A., & Smith, A.F.M. (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., & Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., Adams, J.K., Iverson, G.J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546–567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M.A., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J.K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 500–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautus, M.J., & Lee, A.L. (1998). The dispersions of estimates of sensitivity obtained from four psychophysical procedures: Implications for experimental design. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 638–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver-operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1210–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobert, J.P., & Casella, G. (1996). The effect of improper priors on Gibbs sampling in hierarchical linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 1461–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1982). Theory of probability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M.J., Hambrick, D.Z., Tuholski, S.W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T.W., & Engle, R.E. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Speckman, P.L., Sun, D., & Rouder, J. (submitted). An objective Bayesian approach for assessing conscious and unconscious processes in human memory.

  • Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (2001). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J.L., & Chappell, M. (1994). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 101, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., & Lewis, P. (1977). Recognition memory in elderly patients with depression and dementia: A signal detection analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 84–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.F., & Grondlund, S.D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G.O., & Sahu, S.K. (1997). Updating schemes, correlation structure, blocking and parametrization for the Gibbs sampler. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Methodological, 59, 291–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J.N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 573–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J.N., Lu, J., Morey, R.D., Sun, D., & Speckman, P.L. (submitted). A hierarchical process dissociation model.

  • Salthouse, T.A. (1996). The processing speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R.M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Gagnon, N., & Richard, E. (2002). Strategies of text retrieval: A criterion shift account. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 41–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spieler, D.H., & Balota, D.A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stretch, V., & Wixted, J.T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1379–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., & Berger, J. (1998). Reference priors under partial information. Biometrika, 85, 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., & Berger, J.O. (2006). Objective priors for the multivariate normal model. Bayesian Statistics, 8.

  • Tanner, J.W.P., & Birdsall, T.G. (1958). Definition of d' and n as psychophysical measures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 922–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W.A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 102–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J. (1928). A generalized product moment distribution in samples from normal multivariate population. Biometrika, 20, 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey N. Rouder.

Additional information

This research is supported by NSF grants SES-0095919 and SES-0351523, NIH grant R01-MH071418, a University of Missouri Research Leave grant and fellowships from the Spanish Ministry of Education and the University of Leuven, Belgium.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rouder, J.N., Lu, J., Sun, D. et al. Signal Detection Models with Random Participant and Item Effects. Psychometrika 72, 621–642 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1350-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-005-1350-6

Key words:

Navigation