Abstract
The metabolic responses of parental and inhibitors-tolerant yeasts in presence of the combination of three inhibitors (furfural, phenol and acetic acid) during ethanol fermentation were investigated by comparative metabolic profiling. Samples of parental and tolerant yeasts with/without three inhibitors in fermentation medium represented significantly different metabolic states. Further investigation on the specific responses of two strains revealed that the levels of most amino acids, inositol, and phenethylamine were dramatically increased in presence of inhibitors in parental yeast, while they kept relatively stable in tolerant yeast. It suggested that the protein degradation was increased and oxygen stress was induced by combined inhibitors in parental yeast. In addition, carbon metabolism (glycolysis and TCA) and pyrimidine ribonucleotides pathway (uracil and cytosine) were reduced in both strains in presence of combined inhibitors, which was considered as the general stress response. Higher levels of pyridimines in tolerant yeast suggested that they were responsible for counteracting the stress of combined inhibitors. These findings provided new insights into underlying mechanisms of yeast in resistance to the synergistic effects of inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 3-PGA:
-
3-phosphoglycerate
- PEP:
-
Phosphoenolpyruvate
- G3P:
-
Glycerol-3-phosphate
- Glyceral-3P:
-
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
- α-KG:
-
α-ketoglutarate
- OAA:
-
Oxaloacetate
- Val:
-
Valine
- Ala:
-
Alanine
- Leu:
-
Leucine
- Ile:
-
Isoleucine
- Pro:
-
Proline
- Gly:
-
Glycine
- Ser:
-
Serine
- Thr:
-
Threonine
- Pyro:
-
Pyroglutamatic acid
- Asp:
-
Aspartic acid
- Hypro:
-
Hydroxyproline
- GABA:
-
γ-aminobutyric acid
- Cys:
-
Cysteine
- Glu:
-
Glutamic acid
- Phe:
-
Phenyalanine
- Asn:
-
Asparagine
- Orn:
-
Orinine
- Lys:
-
Lysine
- Tyr:
-
Tyrosine
- Trp:
-
Tryptophane
References
Adler, L., Pedersen, A., & Tunblad-Johansson, I. (1982). Polyol accumulation by two filamentous fungi grown at different concentrations of NaCl. Plant Physiology, 56, 139–142.
Ando, S., Arai, I., Kiyoto, K., & Hanai, S. (1986). Identification of aromatic monomers in steam-exploded poplar and their influences on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Fermentation Technology, 64, 567–570.
Bauer, B. E., Rossington, D., Mollapour, M., et al. (2003). Weak organic acid stress inhibits aromatic amino acid uptake by yeast, causing a strong influence of amino acid auxotrophies on the phenotypes of membrane transporter mutants. European Journal of Biochemistry, 270, 3189–3195.
Brewster, J. L., de Valoir, T., Dwyer, N. D., Winter, E., & Gustin, M. C. (1993). An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in yeast. Science, 259, 1760–1763.
Ding, M. Z., Li, B. Z., Cheng, J. S., & Yuan, Y. J. (2010a). Metabolome analysis of differential responses of diploid and haploid yeast to ethanol stress. OMICS, 14, 553–561.
Ding, M. Z., Tian, H. C., Cheng, J. S., & Yuan, Y. J. (2009). Inoculum size-dependent interactive regulation of metabolism and stress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by comparative metabolomics. Journal of Biotechnology, 144, 279–286.
Ding, M. Z., Zhou, X., & Yuan, Y. J. (2010b). Metabolome profiling reveals adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during repeated vacuum fermentations. Metabolomics, 6, 42–55.
Gasch, A. P., Spellman, P. T., Kao, C. M., et al. (2000). Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 11, 4241–4257.
Han, P. P., & Yuan, Y. J. (2009). Metabolic profiling as a tool for understanding defense response of Taxus cuspidata cells to shear stress. Biotechnology Progress, 25, 1244–1253.
Heipieper, H. J., Weber, F. J., Sikkema, J., Keweloh, H., & de Bont, J. A. M. (1994). Mechanisms of resistance of whole cells to toxic organic solvents. Trends in Biotechnology, 12, 409–415.
Hohmann, S. (2002). Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66, 300–372.
Horváth, I. S., Taherzadeh, M. J., Niklasson, C., & Lidén, G. (2001). Effects of furfural on anaerobic continuous cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 75, 540–549.
Jennings, D. H. (1984). Polyol metabolism in fungi. Advances in Microbial Physiology, 25, 149–193.
Jozefczuk, S., Klie, S., Catchpole, G., et al. (2010). Metabolomic and transcriptomic stress response of Escherichia coli. Molecular Systems Biology, 6, 364.
Keating, J. D., Panganiban, C., & Mansfield, S. D. (2006). Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 93, 1196–1206.
Larsson, S., Cassland, P., & Jonsson, L. J. (2001). Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with enhanced resistance to phenolic fermentation inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates by heterologous expression of laccase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 1163–1170.
Larsson, S., Palmqvist, E., Hahn-Hägerdal, B., et al. (1999). The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enyzme and Microbial Technology, 24, 151–159.
Larsson, S., Quintana-Sáinz, A., Reimann, A., Nilvebrant, N. O., & Jönsson, L. J. (2000). The influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen limited growth and ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 84–86, 617–632.
Li, B. Z., & Yuan, Y. J. (2010). Transcriptome shifts in response to furfural and acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 86, 1915–1924.
Lin, F. M., Qiao, B., & Yuan, Y. J. (2009). Comparative proteomic analysis of tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic Saccharomyces cerevisiae to furfural, a lignocellulosic inhibitory compound. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 3765–3776.
Liu, Z. L. (2006). Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 73, 27–36.
Mandelstam, J. (1963). Protein turnover and its function in economy of cell. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 102, 621–636.
Martinez, A., Rodriguez, M. E., Wells, M. L., et al. (2001). Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnology Progress, 17, 287–293.
Navarro, A. R. (1994). Effects of furfural on ethanol formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mathematical models. Current Microbiology, 29, 87–90.
Oliva, J. M., Sáez, F., Ballesteros, I., et al. (2003). Effect of lignocellulosic degradation compounds from steam explosion pretreatment on ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 105–108, 141–154.
Palmqvist, E., Almeida, J. S., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1999a). Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 62, 447–454.
Palmqvist, E., Grage, H., Meinander, N. Q., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1999b). Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 63, 46–55.
Palmqvist, E., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (2000). Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technology, 74, 25–33.
Pampulha, M. E., & Loureiro-Dias, M. C. (1989). Combined effect of acetic acid, pH and ethanol on intracellular pH of fermenting yeast. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 31, 547–550.
Pampulha, M. E., & Loureiro-Dias, M. C. (1990). Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 34, 375–380.
Pinontoan, R., Krystofova, S., Kawano, T., et al. (2002). Phenylethylamine induces an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ in yeast. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 66, 1069–1074.
Sárvári Horváth, I., Franzén, C. J., Taherzadeh, M. J., Niklasson, C., & Lidén, G. (2003). Effects of furfural on the respiratory metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in glucose-limited chemostats. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4076–4086.
Taherzadeh, M. J., Gustafsson, L., Niklasson, C., & Lidén, G. (2000). Conversion of furfural in aerobic and anaerobic batch fermentation of glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 87, 169–174.
Weber, H., Polen, T., Heuveling, J., Wendisch, V. F., & Hengge, R. (2005). Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: {sigma}S-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. Journal of Bacteriology, 187, 1591–1603.
Willetts, N. S. (1967). Intracellular protein breakdown in non-growing cells of Escherichia coli. Biochemical Journal, 103, 453.
Xia, J. M., & Yuan, Y. J. (2009). Comparative lipidomics of four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different responses to furfural, phenol, and acetic acid. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 57, 99–108.
York, J. D. (2006). Regulation of nuclear processes by inositol polyphosphates. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1761, 552–559.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” Program: 2007CB714301, 2011CBA00802), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program: 20736006, Major International Joint Research Project: 21020102040).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, MZ., Wang, X., Yang, Y. et al. Comparative metabolic profiling of parental and inhibitors-tolerant yeasts during lignocellulosic ethanol fermentation. Metabolomics 8, 232–243 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-011-0303-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-011-0303-6