Abstract
Infection by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causes the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), which has devastating effects on the host immune system. HIV entry into host cells and subsequent viral replication induce a proinflammatory response, hyperactivating immune cells and leading them to death, disfunction, and exhaustion. Adenosine is an immunomodulatory molecule that suppresses immune cell function to protect tissue integrity. The anti-inflammatory properties of adenosine modulate the chronic inflammation and immune activation caused by HIV. Lack of adenosine contributes to pathogenic events in HIV infection. However, immunosuppression by adenosine has its shortcomings, such as impairing the immune response, hindering the elimination of the virus and control of viral replication. By attempting to control inflammation, adenosine feeds a pathogenic cycle affecting immune cells. Deamination of adenosine by ADA (adenosine deaminase) counteracts the negative effects of adenosine in immune cells, boosting the immune response. This review comprises the connection between adenosinergic system and HIV immunopathogenesis, exploring defects in immune cell function and the role of ADA in protecting these cells against damage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Purine metabolism is involved in a series of physiologic and pathologic events in cells and tissues. Extracellular nucleotides and nucleoside are signaling molecules that act in an autocrine and paracrine way. Under stress, cells release adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to the extracellular medium, which activates P2 purinergic receptors triggering an inflammatory response. ATP levels are controlled by purinergic enzymes: E-NTPDase (EC 3.6.1.5; CD39) converts ATP into ADP (adenosine diphosphate) and AMP (adenosine monophosphate) and E-5′-nucleotidase (EC 3.1.3.5, CD73) converts AMP to adenosine. Adenosine suppresses the proinflammatory response and promotes an anti-inflammatory response through P1 purinergic receptors [1]; this shift ensures protection against tissue damage [2]. However, accumulation of adenosine leads to immunosuppression in cancer [3, 4] and infection [5, 6]. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) (EC 3.5.4.4) controls the extracellular levels by converting adenosine into inosine [6]. A delicate balance is sustained by restraining inflammation while containing excessive immunosuppression.
The first cases of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), a consequence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, appeared in the early 1980s. Since then, research has come a long way unveiling major aspects of HIV pathogenesis along with developing diagnostic and monitoring tools, as well as effective antiretroviral therapy. Nevertheless, HIV genetic variability and host response evasion mechanisms are major challenges for vaccine development and the complete eradication of the virus. HIV targets immune cells by infecting them directly or indirectly causing systemic changes that will affect their function. Despite successful suppression of viremia, chronic inflammation and immune activation persist indicating that immune function is not completely restored by antiretroviral therapy [7, 8]. The purpose of this paper is to review the interface between adenosine signaling and the immunopathogenesis of HIV infection and discuss the effects of adenosine deaminase activity on the HIV-induced immune dysfunction.
Adenosine pathway and immunosuppression
Adenosine-mediated immunosuppression may be beneficial in inflammatory diseases such as autoimmunity, cancer, and infection, promoting tissue protection and regeneration [9]. In fact, low concentrations of adenosine are found in the extracellular environment in physiologic conditions. Upon hypoxia, tissue damage, inflammation, infection, or other causes of stress, adenosine is produced as a consequence of ATP dephosphorylation [10,11,12]. Extracellular adenosine is mainly generated via the CD39/CD73/adenosine pathway, which is activated by high levels of extracellular ATP. Adenosine interacts with adenosine receptors, called P1 receptors, in different types of cells in a variety of tissues, such as heart, brain, and immune system. There are four known types of P1 receptors, A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 [12]; all of them are expressed in immune cells [9]. A2A receptors are key players in the immunomodulatory actions of adenosine to maintain a balance between inflammation and suppression of overactive immune cells [13]. Activation of A2A receptors downregulates the release of proinflammatory mediators and upregulates the release of anti-inflammatory regulators. A2A receptor inhibition extensively affects the immune response, from antigen presentation to T cell activation, expansion, and function [14]. A2A receptors are more directly linked to the suppressive/anti-inflammatory effects of adenosine, while A2B also acts as an anchoring molecule to ADA and improves immune responses [15].
An important mechanism involved in the immunosuppressive effects of adenosine is the production of cyclic AMP (cAMP) by adenyl cyclases (AC). cAMP modulates several processes including the immune response as it influences function, proliferation, and activation of immune cells. Increased adenosine levels raise cAMP production via A2A and A2B receptors, which regulate its own release in immune cells. Elevated levels of cAMP, upon inflammatory and toxic stimuli, are known to have immunosuppressive effects [16, 17].
Adenosine impacts the function, proliferation, and activation of immune cells, modulating and polarizing immune responses. These immunomodulatory effects reflect adenosine-induced changes in the expression of surface molecules and release of chemokines and cytokines by immune cells [18,19,20].
Taken together, upregulation of adenosine and adenosine receptors, and consequent increase in cAMP levels, represent an efficient mechanism of limitation and resolution of inflammation.
Immune response and immunopathogenesis of HIV
Innate and adaptive responses are involved in host defense against HIV. Despite efforts to eradicate the infection, host response is only capable of reducing viral replication and, temporarily, delays the effects of infection. During the course of infection, HIV deploys several evading mechanisms by impairing host response, hiding in reservoirs and securing its own survival and replication [21, 22].
The innate immune response plays an important part in the host response by reducing replication during the acute phase of infection. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize viral particles on the surface of monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and neutrophils, prompting the release of inflammatory mediators. Natural killer (NK) cells are stimulated and detain the virus through cytolytic action and release of cytokines. DCs activate T cells eliciting the assembling of a Th1 response [23,24,25]. Lately, greater attention has been directed to the role of myeloid cells and innate immune response in antiviral response and pathogenesis of HIV infection [24, 26,27,28,29]. DCs and neutrophils modulate T cell function and proliferation [29]. CD4+ T cells activate B cells, which in turn secrete antibodies to neutralize the virus. Cytotoxic effects of CD8+ T cells control disease progression [30].
HIV specifically targets CD4+ T cells [31], but also infects macrophages [32] and DCs [33]. Several other sets of immune cells are affected by the virus: CD8+ T cells [34], monocytes/macrophages [32, 35, 36], B lymphocytes [37], neutrophils [38], natural killer (NK) cells [39], and platelets [40]. In fact, HIV impairs cells that are involved in the host response against itself.
The hallmarks of HIV infection are a progressive loss of the CD4+ T cell pool [31], chronic inflammation, and persistent immune activation, which represent the immunopathogenic triad of HIV infection [41] (Fig. 1). Loss of the protective barrier in the intestinal mucosa, caused by depletion of CD4+ T cells, allows leakage of bacterial products into the bloodstream, activating the innate immune system [42]. The fast cell turnover induced by chronic inflammation and activation results in exhaustion of HIV-specific CD8+ T cells [41].
Adenosine and the immunopathogenesis of HIV
Purine metabolism is involved in the onset of HIV infection as well as in the maintenance of inflammation and immune activation. P2Y2 and P2X1 receptors enable viral entry [43, 44], and the latest is also involved in viral replication as well as P2X7 and P2Y1 [44]. When viral proteins bind to macrophages or CD4+ T cell receptors, ATP is released via pannexin channels, stimulating P2X7 receptor [44, 45]. Subsequent influx of potassium activates the NLRP3 inflammasome that leads to cell death [46, 47]. A recent study has proposed that caspase-1 pathway is an important mechanism of CD4+ T cell depletion by HIV infection, promoting cell death by pyroptosis [48]. Assembly of the inflammasome stimulated by IL-1 secretion is an important part of the antiviral response [46]; a mechanism seized by HIV in order to kill its target cells [48]. Extracellular ATP released by infected cells is degraded by CD39, which is overexpressed and has increased activity during HIV infection [49, 50]. Upregulation of CD39 is associated with HIV disease progression [49]. The effects of CD39 on T cells will be discussed in an upcoming section of this paper. Figure 2 summarizes the purinergic cascade in HIV infection.
In contrast to murine Tregs, human Tregs rarely coexpress CD4, CD39, and CD73, which is quite intriguing because it contradicts the fact that these cells produce adenosine. But a recent work has shown that CD73 found in exosomes are a source of membrane-tied CD73 that might be used by Tregs to produce adenosine [51]. The expression of CD73 is even lower in different T cell subsets in HIV-infected patients when compared to healthy individuals [18, 52].
A study with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) has shed further light on the importance of adenosine pathway on disease progression [53]. The use of animal models allowed the study of non-progressive and progressive infection, and several parameters were compared between them. As expected, adenosine was shown to suppress inflammation but, unlike in HIV infection, CD39/CD73 coexpression is increased in CD4+ Tregs upon SIV infection. No changes in adenosine levels were observed in lymph nodes, but higher levels were found in the gut mucosal of non-progressive animals when compared to progressive ones. This suggests that elevated adenosine levels are involved in controlling inflammation and immune activation in the gut, exerting an important function of halting disease progression [24]. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of adenosine in HIV. Adenosine is a signaling molecule that could be used as therapy to contain inflammation, as long at its detrimental effects are fully understood and controlled [54].
Adenosine signaling pathway impact on different immune cells during HIV infection
Lymphocytes are very important cells when it comes to immune response to HIV, and, undoubtedly, most damage is inflicted on these cells. However, besides lymphocytes, HIV affects the function of several other immune cells, which may interfere with lymphocyte proliferation, activation, and function. Many immune cells, as they react to a stressor such as HIV, produce adenosine and cAMP causing changes in their own actions and, by altering the microenvironment, affect other cells. On this section, we describe how HIV impairs activation, function, and survival of immune cells, either by affecting the cells directly or indirectly by interfering with the crosstalk between them. We also discuss the physiologic and pathologic role of adenosine and cAMP in each cell type.
Neutrophils
Neutrophils are the first line of defense against pathogens. They are recruited from the bloodstream to the site of inflammation where they engage in phagocytosis, degranulation, and release of NETs (neutrophil extracellular traps). These cells generate ATP and adenosine and express P1 receptors, which in turn regulate several of their functions. Adenosine and adenosine receptors have been implicated in neutrophil chemotaxis [55,56,57], adhesion, phagocytosis, and oxidative burst [58].
It has been proposed that neutrophils detect HIV via Toll-like receptors (TLR), producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and forming NETs to eliminate the virus. HIV also activates host neutrophils by modulating TLR expression, inducing the production of IL-6, TNF-α, and ROS, exacerbating inflammation and downregulating T cell function [59]. An indirect effect of HIV on neutrophils is the stimulation of IL-1 production by DCs, inhibiting NET formation and evading the immune response [60]. In HIV-positive patients, concomitant overexpression of PD-L1 in neutrophils and PD-1 in T cells has been shown to result in downregulation of T cell proliferation and ROS production, further enhancing immunosuppression [28].
Monocytes/macrophages
Macrophages are terminally differentiated cells originated from monocytes. They are phagocytes and APCs involved in the innate and adaptive responses. P1 receptors modulate monocyte differentiation and macrophage function via cAMP. Once exposed to increased c-AMP levels and proinflammatory cues, monocytes augment their production of IL-6 and IL-10 and decrease the production of TNF-α, leading to differentiation and an activated macrophage-like phenotype [16]. A2B receptor expression on macrophages is upregulated by proinflammatory cytokine IFN-ɣ, activating adenyl cyclase and leading to higher levels of cAMP, reducing macrophage proliferation, and contributing to their loss of function [61]. cAMP is involved in macrophage phagocytosis impairment in HIV infection [62] and stimulates replication of latent virus residing in monocyte/macrophages [63].
In the context of HIV infection, monocytes and macrophages are infected, but unlike CD4+ cells, they are not submitted to depletion and act as reservoirs for the virus [35, 64]. Phagocytosis, pathogen killing, chemotaxis, and cytokine production are impaired by HIV [36]. Purine metabolism is an important pathway in the establishment and persistence of HIV infection. The release of ATP to the extracellular milieu is triggered by the contact of HIV proteins with macrophage surface receptors and activates P2 receptors. The activation of these receptors starts a cascade of reactions which are involved in different stages of infection. P2X1 activation was shown to be essential for viral entry, while other P2 receptors are involved in later events of the viral cycle [44]. In addition, a recent study has shown that extracellular ATP may prompt the release of virions from macrophages [65]. ATP release is known to trigger the purinergic cascade, but the roles of CD39, CD73, and adenosine in macrophages are yet to be explored in the context of HIV infection.
Platelets
Apart from controlling bleeding and keeping homeostasis, platelets take part in tissue recovery and response against pathogens, since activated platelets modulate immune responses through recruitment and release of inflammatory mediators [66]. New roles for these cells in HIV infection were proposed recently. While one study showed that platelets may release antiviral factors in an attempt to suppress the virus as it enters the organism [67], another work suggested that HIV is internalized by platelets, favoring cell-to-cell dissemination and persistence [68].
The antithrombotic effect of adenosine is accounted for its ability to inhibit platelet activation via A2A and A2B receptors leading to increased cAMP [69]. Despite the protective role of platelet activation in tissue healing, chronic activation and interaction with other immune cells might be detrimental, exacerbating inflammation [70]. Platelet activation and increased platelet aggregation lead to thrombocytopenia in inflammation, which is also observed in HIV-infected patients [71]. Inflammation and platelet interaction with endothelial cells may explain the increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in HIV positive patients [70, 72].
Dendritic cells
Dendritic cells are responsible for processing antigens, presenting them to T cells and activate T-naïve cells towards a Th1 response, therefore linking innate and adaptive immune responses. The role of DCs in eliciting adaptive immune is impaired by HIV. Instead, the virus infects DCs facilitating transfer to CD4+ T cells taking advantage of DC-T cell interaction [33].
Adenosine, through adenosine receptors, affects chemotaxis, differentiation, and activation of DCs. A1 receptors induce chemotaxis in immature DCs, facilitating migration towards the sites of inflammation. When DCs are stimulated by contact with pathogens, they produce IFN-ɣ, IL-6, and IL-12, prompting T cell activation. In mature DCs, adenosine via A2B receptors downregulates the production of these cytokines, impairing DC function [73]. Activation of A2B receptors and the resultant increase in cAMP, in mature DCs, affects their own immunogenicity and indirectly regulate T cell function [74]. In the presence of adenosine, the capacity of DCs to induce proliferation of T cells is reduced [75, 76]. By reducing DC immunogenicity, cAMP might decrease the transfer of HIV, hindering effective infection. However, once the infection is established, by downregulating T cell function, c-AMP may further impair T cell response [74].
NK cells
NK cells recognize pathogens and exert their cytotoxic and cytolytic effects, thereby combating infection. Interplay with DCs resulting in activation and enhancing of their effector function as well as DC activation and maturation [25]. Impairment of NK cells by HIV infection, as well as disruption of the crosstalk between NK cells and DCs, results in loss of quality of the adaptive immune responses. The mechanisms of which NK cells recognize HIV-infected cells are not well-established to date, but some of them include the expression of important ligands for activating NK cell receptors on infected cells or cross-linking of CD16 mediated by binding of antibodies to HIV-infected cells [25]. The functional deficiency of NK cells during HIV infection is attributed to the reduced cytotoxic capacity, incomplete activation, relocation, an altered balance of NK cells responses, and less responsiveness to type I interferons, which is necessary to NK cytotoxicity and proliferation. All these changes in the functionality of NK cells, combined with a compromised DC function result in deregulation of the crosstalk between NK cells and DCs during HIV infection [25, 39, 77].
A2A adenosine receptor signaling has been implicated in adenosine-mediated inhibition of cytokine production and cytotoxic activity by activated NK cells. The suppression of cytotoxicity seems to be a result of the adenosine interference that affects the process of granule exocytosis. On the other hand, A1 receptor agonists are related to the enhancement of NK cell-cytolytic function [2].
T cells
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are crucial in controlling chronic inflammation by mediating T cell suppression dependently and independently of APCs [78]. Tregs produce extracellular adenosine, which mediates immunosuppression by downregulating immune responses. The increase of adenosine levels is one of the underlying mechanisms involved in Treg function, which affects a wide range of immune cells such as CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, DCs, B cells, macrophages, natural killer (NK), and mast cells [79].
By accessing the sites of inflammation, Tregs block effector cells generating adenosine from 5′-AMP produced by neutrophils for example [80]. Hence, inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β are released [79], and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines IL-12 and TNF-α [19] is reduced.
Adenosine signaling via A2A receptors in Tregs activates adenyl cyclases generating cAMP [81]. Expansion of Tregs and A2A receptors signaling increase the intracellular levels of cAMP, which seems to play an important role on adenosine-mediated immunosuppression [12, 82]. Immunosuppression by Treg mediators impairs the immune response to pathogens and cancer [54]. In fact, the upregulation of A2A receptors and CD39 in Tregs blocks the production of inflammatory mediators IFN-ɣ, TNF-α, and IL-2 in HIV-infected patients [49]. CD39 expression in Tregs is involved in suppression of CD8+ T cell proliferation in HIV infection. Taken together, these findings prove that this pathway is directly involved in the immunosuppressive effects observed in these patients [49].
CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express A2A receptors, and their activation increases the expression of these receptors. There is evidence of preferential depletion of the CD4+ CD73+ T cell pool during HIV infection, independently of viral load levels. Even as CD4+ T cell counts normalize, this specific subset does not recover. Lower counts of CD4+CD73+ T cells reduce adenosine-induced suppression and favor persistent immune activation [18]. Expression of CD73 by CD8+ T cells is downregulated in HIV infection and also correlates with immune activation and disease progression [52]. In conclusion, CD39, CD73, and A2A receptor expression are critical players in effector T cell inhibition and their disrupted function during HIV infection [83].
Chronic exposure to adenosine is related to replicative senescence in CD8+ T cells, causing progressive loss of CD28, a costimulatory molecule involved in T cell response initiation, affecting T cell proliferation, and reducing the activity of telomerase [84], an enzyme responsible for maintaining telomere length during CD8+ T cell expansion in viral infections [85]. These changes not only favor disease progression but also premature aging in HIV-infected individuals [84, 86].
Though low levels of adenosine are produced by these cells, the microenvironment exposes them to adenosine released by several other cells. High levels of adenosine critically affect the function of activated T cells through A2A receptors, impairing their cytokine production and cytotoxic action [87,88,89]. Activated T helper (Th) cells have their production of IL-2, IL-4, IFN-ɣ, and TNF-α significantly reduced [13]. Migration into sites of inflammation is also inhibited by adenosine signaling [90]. T cell activation, proliferation, and cytokine production are also affected by cAMP, and the signaling cascades are triggered by it [17, 74]. HIV-infected CD4+ T cells exhibit amplified A2A expression, increased intracellular cAMP levels, and reduced expression of IL-2 when stimulated, resulting in immunosuppression [91].
B cells
B cells are activated by HIV replication preventing them from delivering a robust antigen response. HIV shortens their replication and proliferation, reduces their diversity, and relocates them away from T cells preventing their interaction [37]. CD4+ T cell depletion, inflammation, and chronic immune activation drive B cells to exhaustion, which results in an attempt to overcome the harmful effects of exacerbated immune activation by elevating expression of inhibitory receptors which make these cells unresponsive [37, 92].
Production of IL-10, as well as other anti-inflammatory mediators, is a characteristic of B regulatory cells or Bregs, which modulate T cell response by downregulating T cell proliferation and cytokine production [93]. This mechanism has been described in HIV-untreated infection, where Breg numbers are elevated and correlate directly with viral load and inversely with T cell response. It has been suggested that HIV may upregulate differentiation of Breg cells as an immune response evasion strategy [94]. Another mechanism of T cell response impairment by B cells is through adenosine. Activated B cells have shown to augment CD39 expression and decreased CD73 expression, modulating T cell responses via 5′AMP and adenosine, which has autocrine and paracrine effects via different P1 receptors [95]. However, in the context of HIV infection, activated B cells have demonstrated downregulation of CD73 and reduced adenosine production in untreated patients, which is related to low CD4+ T cell counts and antibody class switch, showing that a decrease in adenosine levels are just as harmful as an increase [96]. There seems to be a connection between IL-10 production and adenosine since IL-10−/− B cells show a reduced adenosine production due to decreased CD73 production, but further studies are necessary to elucidate these mechanisms [97].
In conclusion, we highlight that the crosstalk among immune cells is essential for an effective response since the mounting of an immune response does not depend on the activation and function of a single type of cell.
ADA influences immune responses
ADA deficiency or loss of activity leads to immunodeficiency and results in accumulation of adenosine accompanied by serious immune dysfunction such as in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) [98]. Lymphocytopenia, characteristic of ADA deficiency, suggests that ADA has an important role in lymphocyte proliferation [99].
Downstream metabolism of adenosine plays an important role in balancing the immunosuppressing effects of adenosine by controlling its extracellular levels. Enzymatic function of ADA controls adenosine levels by irreversibly deaminating adenosine and deoxyadenosine into inosine. Adenosine deamination is performed by two different enzymes, ADA1 and ADA2, which were recently found to bind to distinct immune cells subsets. ADA1 binds to T and natural killer T (NKT) cells, while ADA2 binds to cells that do not express CD26: B cells, neutrophils, monocytes, NK, and CD26-Tregs [100]. ADA2 was previously shown to be secreted by monocytes and DCs [11].
In the context of inflammation, plasma levels of ADA are raised in response to increased levels of adenosine. Production of cytokines by neutrophils and monocytes is restored with elevated concentration of plasmatic ADA2. ADA2 has also an impact on Treg function inhibiting adenosine-mediated activation of these cells [100]. Improvement in Treg generation is also encouraged by deamination of adenosine, as well as memory and effector T cells [101, 102]. Since higher ADA activity is also found in monocytes/macrophages during intracellular infections upon release of adenosine, it is assumed that serum ADA is mostly originated from these cells. Similarly, serum and plasma are rich in ADA2, which is expressed in the surface of these cells [103, 104].
In addition to enzymatic activity, extracellular ADA acts as a costimulatory molecule by binding to CD26 and to A1 and A2B adenosine receptors [105]. This non-enzymatic activity plays a great part in the role of ADA in the immune system. Ecto-ADA may bind to two distinct anchoring proteins: CD26 and adenosine receptors A1 and A2B. A costimulatory signal is triggered when ADA attached to DC surface through A2B receptors binds to CD26 on the surface of T cells. It occurs independently of enzymatic activity and activates T cells [106], enhances the generation of effector T cells, and boosts memory T cell generation [101]. Addition of ADA to cultured DCs with heat-inactivated HIV and T cells has been shown to enhance T cell proliferation and cytokine production [107].
ADA boosts monocyte-derived DCs from HIV-infected patients and healthy individuals, and it happens due to both enzymatic and non-enzymatic activities. It also promotes maturation of DCS, enhances its costimulatory capacity, and polarizes the immune response towards Th1 by stimulating the release of IL-12, TNF-α, and IL-6 [108].
ADA may increase the costimulatory potential of DCs. Another interesting aspect to highlight is that the addition of ADA to immature DC cultures increases Th-1/proinflammatory cytokine release including IL-12, TNF-α, and IL-6. ADA2 increases proliferation of monocyte-activated CD4+ T cells independently of its catalytic action, as well as the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages induced by T cells, and stimulation of macrophage proliferation [11].
Taken together, all this data plus the fact that ADA is already commercially available suggests that ADA would be an effective adjuvant for DC-based and DNA-based anti-HIV vaccine [102, 109].
ADA in the context of HIV pathogenesis
Viral glycoprotein gp120 initiates HIV cell cycle by binding to the CD4 receptor and coreceptors on the surface of the host cell, triggering cell membrane modifications followed by fusion of host and viral membranes [110]. This glycoprotein prevents the interaction between ADA and CD26, which is a costimulatory signal for TCR-mediated T cell activation [111, 112]. This inhibitory effect was described in CD4+ and CD4-T cells, being independent of gp120 binding to CD4 [112]. It seems to be implicated in the impairment of T cell response by HIV. Martinez-Navio et al. (2009) have demonstrated that T cell proliferation is decreased in HIV-infected patients and enhanced when ADA was added to cultures but remained lower in HIV patients than in healthy individuals. Increase in ADA costimulation is associated with lower HIV viral load and higher CD4+ T cell counts. It is worth noting that, in patients under antiretroviral therapy, T cell proliferation is positively correlated with CD4+ T cell count nadir, showing that ADA response is affected by preceding depletion of CD4+ T cells [113].
The occurrence of senescence age markers in HIV-infected individuals has suggested that these individuals might age prematurely or develop age-related diseases earlier in life [7, 114]. Some of the markers that indicate a senescent phenotype are the loss of CD28 costimulatory molecule, inverted CD4:CD8 ratio, an increase in IL-6 e TNF-α, and a decrease of IL-2 production by T cells as well as decreased telomerase activity [7, 84, 86]. Expression of ADA in CD8+CD28+ T cells boosts telomerase activity, counteracting the effects of adenosine in promoting replicative senescence [84]. ADA expression is negatively correlated with CD8+ T activation markers and may help to monitor immune recovery, disease progression, or even age-related diseases in HIV-infected individuals. Activated CD8+ T cells show downregulation of ADA expression in HIV infection, which may be a sign of poor immune restoration. In conclusion, ADA is an emerging biomarker of senescence in HIV-positive individuals [86].
HIV infection disturbs CD26/ADA costimulation, highjacks the immunomodulatory actions of Treg cells, and stimulates the generation of adenosine [108], in addition to downregulate ADA expression in lymphocytes [86]. In contrast, ADA enzymatic activity is reportedly increased in serum [103, 104, 115,116,117,118,119,120] and plasma of HIV patients [121,122,123] to overcome the effects of excessive adenosine levels.
ADA activity in HIV patients has long been evaluated in serum and plasma [121,122,123] lymphocytes [124], erythrocytes [125, 126], and platelets [71]. Correlations between ADA activity and several clinical parameters such as seroconversion [121, 126], prognosis [84, 97,98,99,100, 104, 107], immune activation [118], CD4+ T cell count [115, 118,119,120, 123], viral load [118], CD4/CD8 ratio [119], coinfection [115, 120], and treatment outcome [71, 117, 119, 123] are discussed. Most of these studies aimed to use ADA activity as a biomarker but also helped to understand the pathological processes involved in the infection.
During seroconversion, ADA activity significantly increases in the plasma of HIV-infected patients [121, 122], but the correlation with disease progression had controversial findings. One study has found no changes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients [121], while a more recent study found that ADA activity is incremented in symptomatic individuals [123]. Differences between these findings are certainly due to the use of different methodologies and the variances on the comparison parameters of disease progression. While the first one compared ADA activity with markers of activation, such as β2-microglobulin and neopterin [121], the second relied on a more established marker for prognosis, the CD4+ T cell counts [123]. A third study compared CD4+ T cell counts with β2-microglobulin and ADA activity, where a positive correlation was observed between ADA activity and β2-microglobulin levels as well as a negative correlation between ADA activity and CD4+ T cell counts [115].
Several studies reported an inverse correlation between ADA activity and CD4+ T cell counts in plasma [123] and in serum [115, 118,119,120]. Viral replication also influences ADA activity in serum as it increases with levels of plasma viral load [118]. The CD4/CD8 ratio, an immune recovery and senescence marker, inversely correlates with ADA activity in serum [119]. Increased ADA activity in serum is also associated with an increase in activation markers such as CD14, a marker of monocyte activation and CD38, a marker of CD8+ T cell activation [118].
No significant changes in serum ADA activity were observed when HIV-infected and HIV/tuberculosis-coinfected patients were compared [115]. However, when HIV-infected patients coinfected with hepatitis B or C were compared with HIV-monoinfected patients, the coinfected groups showed significantly higher serum ADA activities [120].
In treated HIV-infected patients, serum and plasma ADA activity levels remain elevated although in a lesser extent [117, 119, 123]. This may be explained by coinfections, antiretroviral toxicity, or simply by the persistent inflammation and immune activation triggered by residual viral replication present even when treatment is successful. Enduring inflammation and immune activation are a topic of utmost clinical importance since they are related to the development of non-AIDS-related diseases and premature aging [8, 127, 128].
Overall, ADA activity in serum and plasma are not specific biomarkers for individual alterations characteristic of HIV disease. Nevertheless, correlation between ADA activity and classical biomarkers used to monitor HIV infection, such as CD4+ T cell counts and viral load, and association with activation markers and CD4:CD8 ratio, is evidence of ADA involvement in every aspect of HIV pathogenesis.
Concluding remarks
HIV infection represents a major challenge for public health, despite all the advances in this area of research. Understanding the pathogenesis of this infection has helped with the development of antiretroviral therapy, as well as with the search for a vaccine and a cure for HIV. Metabolic pathways, such as purine metabolism, play a great part in the immunopathogenesis of HIV [129].
We reviewed the immunopathogenesis of HIV and the role of adenosine and ADA in modulating the immune response to HIV. As part of the purine metabolism, we emphasize the importance of the adenosine pathway in several pathogenic mechanisms used by HIV to impair the host immune response. By counteracting the negative effects of overexposure to adenosine, ADA regulates the response to HIV to restore immune function. Given that ADA is a well-known marker of inflammation and that ADA activity correlates with CD4+ T cell counts and activation markers in HIV infection, we highlight the connection between ADA function and every aspect of the immunopathogenic triad of HIV infection.
References
Yegutkin GG (2008) Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade. Biochim Biophys Acta-Mol Cell Res 1783:673–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.01.024
Bours MJL, Swennen ELR, Di Virgilio F et al (2006) Adenosine 5′-triphosphate and adenosine as endogenous signaling molecules in immunity and inflammation. Pharmacol Ther 112:358–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.04.013
Ohta A (2016) A metabolic immune checkpoint: adenosine in tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol 7:109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00109
Vijayan D, Young A, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ (2017) Targeting immunosuppressive adenosine in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 17(12):709–724. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.86
Drygiannakis I, Ernst PB, Lowe D, Glomski IJ (2011) Immunological alterations mediated by adenosine during host-microbial interactions. Immunol Res 50(1):69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-011-8207-0
Ciruela F, Saura C, Canela EI, Mallol J, Lluis C, Franco R (1996) Adenosine deaminase affects ligand-induced signalling by interacting with cell surface adenosine receptors. FEBS Lett 380:219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(96)00023-3
Deeks SG (2013) HIV infection, inflammation, immunosenescence, and aging. Ann Rev Med 62:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042909-093756.HIV
Deeks SG, Tracy R, Douek DC (2013) Systemic effects of inflammation on health during chronic HIV infection. Immunity 39:633–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.001
Ohta A, Sitkovsky M (2014) Extracellular adenosine-mediated modulation of regulatory T cells. Front Immunol 5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00304
Newby AC (1984) Adenosine and the concept of “retaliatory metabolites”. Trends Biochem Sci 9:42–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(84)90176-2
Zavialov AV, Gracia E, Glaichenhaus N, Franco R, Zavialov AV, Lauvau G (2010) Human adenosine deaminase 2 induces differentiation of monocytes into macrophages and stimulates proliferation of T helper cells and macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 88(2):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1109764
Kumar V, Sharma A (2009) Adenosine: an endogenous modulator of innate immune system with therapeutic potential. Eur J Pharmacol 616:7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.05.005
Sitkovsky MV, Ohta A (2005) The ‘danger’ sensors that STOP the immune response: the A2 adenosine receptors? Trends Immunol 26:299–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2005.04.004
Ohta A, Sitkovsky M (2001) Role of G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature 414:916–920. https://doi.org/10.1038/414916a
Liang D, Zuo A, Shao H, Chen M, Kaplan HJ, Sun D (2014) The anti- or pro-inflammatory effect of an adenosine receptor agonist on the Th17 autoimmune response is inflammatory environmental-dependent. J Immunol 193:5498–5505. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1401959
Sciaraffia E, Riccomi A, Lindstedt R, Gesa V, Cirelli E, Patrizio M, de Magistris MT, Vendetti S (2014) Human monocytes respond to extracellular cAMP through A2A and A2B adenosine receptors. J Leukoc Biol 96:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.3A0513-302RR
Arumugham VB, Baldari CT (2017) cAMP: a multifaceted modulator of immune synapse assembly and T cell activation. J Leukoc Biol 101(6):1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.2RU1116-474R
Schuler PJ, Macatangay BJC, Saze Z, Jackson EK, Riddler SA, Buchanan WG, Hilldorfer BB, Mellors JW, Whiteside TL, Rinaldo CR (2013) CD4(+)CD73(+) T cells are associated with lower T-cell activation and C reactive protein levels and are depleted in HIV-1 infection regardless of viral suppression. AIDS 27:1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328360c7f3
Haskó G, Kuhel DG, Chen J, Schwarzschild MA, Deitch EA, Mabley JG, Marton A, Szabó C (2000) Adenosine inhibits IL-12 and TNF-α production via adenosine A 2a receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. FASEB J 14:2065–2074. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.99-0508com
Panther E, Corinti S, Idzko M, Herouy Y, Napp M, la Sala A, Girolomoni G, Norgauer J (2003) Adenosine affects expression of membrane molecules, cytokine and chemokine release, and the T-cell stimulatory capacity of human dendritic cells. Blood 101:3985–3990. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-07-2113
Cadogan M, Dalgleish AG (2017) HIV immunopathogenesis and strategies for intervention. Lancet Infect Dis 8:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70205-6
Swanstrom R, Coffin J (2012) HIV-1 Pathogenesis: the virus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(12):a007443. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007443
Mogensen TH, Melchjorsen J, Larsen CS, Paludan SR (2010) Innate immune recognition and activation during HIV infection. Retrovirology 7:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-7-54
Altfeld M, Gale M (2015) Innate immunity against HIV-1 infection. Nat Immunol 16:554–562. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3157
Altfeld M, Fadda L, Frleta D, Bhardwaj N (2011) DCs and NK cells: critical effectors in the immune response to HIV-1. Nat Rev Immunol 11:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2935
Aggarwal A, McAllery S, Turville SG (2013) Revising the role of myeloid cells in HIV pathogenesis. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 10:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-012-0149-1
Rustagi A, Gale M (2014) Innate antiviral immune signaling, viral evasion and modulation by HIV-1. J Mol Biol 426:1161–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.12.003
Bowers NL, Helton ES, Huijbregts RPH, Goepfert PA, Heath SL, Hel Z (2014) Immune suppression by neutrophils in HIV-1 infection: role of PD-L1/PD-1 pathway. PLoS Pathog 10(3):e1003993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003993
Mehraj V, Jenabian M, Vyboh K, Routy J (2014) Immune suppression by myeloid cells in HIV infection: new targets for immunotherapy. Open AIDS J 29(8):66–78. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874613601408010066
Walker B, McMichael A (2012) The T-cell response to HIV. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(11). https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007054
Douek DC, Brenchley JM, Betts MR, Ambrozak DR, Hill BJ, Okamoto Y, Casazza JP, Kuruppu J, Kunstman K, Wolinsky S, Grossman Z, Dybul M, Oxenius A, Price DA, Connors M, Koup RA (2002) HIV preferentially infects HIV-specific CD4+ T cells. Nature 417:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/417095a
Carter CA, Ehrlich LS (2008) Cell biology of HIV-1 infection of macrophages. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:425–443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162758
Burleigh L, Lozach P-Y, Schiffer C, Staropoli I, Pezo V, Porrot F, Canque B, Virelizier JL, Arenzana-Seisdedos F, Amara A (2006) Infection of dendritic cells (DCs), not DC-SIGN-mediated internalization of human immunodeficiency virus, is required for long-term transfer of virus to T cells. J Virol 80:2949–2957. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.6.2949-2957.2006
Cao W, Mehraj V, Kaufmann DE, Li T, Routy JP (2016) Elevation and persistence of CD8 T-cells in HIV infection: the Achilles heel in the ART era. J Int AIDS Soc 19(1):20697. https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.20697
Kumar A, Abbas W, Herbein G (2014) HIV-1 latency in monocytes/macrophages. Viruses 6:1837–1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/v6041837
Kedzierska K, Crowe SM (2002) The role of monocytes and macrophages in the pathogenesis of HIV-1 infection. Curr Med Chem 9(21):1893–1903. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867023368935
Moir S, Fauci AS (2009) B cells in HIV infection and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9:235–245. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2524
Casulli S, Elbim C (2014) Interactions between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and polymorphonuclear neutrophils. J Innate Immun 6:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353588
Brunetta E, Hudspeth KL, Mavilio D (2010) Pathologic natural killer cell subset redistribution in HIV-1 infection: new insights in pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. J Leukoc Biol 88:1119–1130. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0410225
Torre D, Pugliese A (2008) Platelets and HIV-1 infection: old and new aspects. Curr HIV Res 6:411–418. https://doi.org/10.2174/157016208785861140
Appay V, Sauce D (2008) Immune activation and inflammation in HIV-1 infection: causes and consequences. J Pathol 214:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2276
Klatt NR, Funderburg NT, Brenchley JM (2013) Microbial translocation, immune activation and HIV disease. Trends Microbiol 21:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.09.001
Séror C, Melki M-T, Subra F, Raza SQ, Bras M, Saïdi H, Nardacci R, Voisin L, Paoletti A, Law F, Martins I, Amendola A, Abdul-Sater AA, Ciccosanti F, Delelis O, Niedergang F, Thierry S, Said-Sadier N, Lamaze C, Métivier D, Estaquier J, Fimia GM, Falasca L, Casetti R, Modjtahedi N, Kanellopoulos J, Mouscadet JF, Ojcius DM, Piacentini M, Gougeon ML, Kroemer G, Perfettini JL (2011) Extracellular ATP acts on P2Y2 purinergic receptors to facilitate HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med 208:1823–1834. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20101805
Hazleton JE, Berman JW, Eugenin EA (2012) Purinergic receptors are required for HIV-1 infection of primary human macrophages. J Immunol 188:4488–4495. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102482
Orellana JA, Velasquez S, Williams DW, Sáez JC, Berman JW, Eugenin EA (2013) Pannexin1 hemichannels are critical for HIV infection of human primary CD4(+) T lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol 94:399–407. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0512249
Jacob F, Novo CP, Bachert C, Van Crombruggen K (2013) Purinergic signaling in inflammatory cells: P2 receptor expression, functional effects, and modulation of inflammatory responses. Purinergic Signal 9:285–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-013-9357-4
Gombault A, Baron L, Couillin I (2012) ATP release and purinergic signaling in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Front Immunol 3:414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00414
Doitsh G, Galloway NLK, Geng X, Yang Z, Monroe KM, Zepeda O, Hunt PW, Hatano H, Sowinski S, Muñoz-Arias I, Greene WC (2014) Pyroptosis drives CD4 T-cell depletion in HIV-1 infection. Nature 505:509–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12940
Nikolova M, Carriere M, Jenabian MA, Limou S, Younas M, Kök A, Huë S, Seddiki N, Hulin A, Delaneau O, Schuitemaker H, Herbeck JT, Mullins JI, Muhtarova M, Bensussan A, Zagury JF, Lelievre JD, Lévy Y (2011) CD39/adenosine pathway is involved in AIDS progression. PLoS Pathog 7(7):e1002110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002110
Leal DB, Streher CA, Bertoncheli Cde M et al (2005) HIV infection is associated with increased NTPDase activity that correlates with CD39-positive lymphocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1746:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.10.009
Schuler PJ, Saze Z, Hong CS, Muller L, Gillespie DG, Cheng D, Harasymczuk M, Mandapathil M, Lang S, Jackson EK, Whiteside TL (2014) Human CD4+CD39+ regulatory T cells produce adenosine upon co-expression of surface CD73 or contact with CD73+ exosomes or CD73+ cells. Clin Exp Immunol 177:531–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12354
Tóth I, Le AQ, Hartjen P et al (2013) Decreased frequency of CD73+CD8+ T cells of HIV-infected patients correlates with immune activation and T cell exhaustion. J Leukoc Biol 94:551–561. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0113018
He T, Brocca-Cofano E, Gillespie DG, Xu C, Stock JL, Ma D, Policicchio BB, Raehtz KD, Rinaldo CR, Apetrei C, Jackson EK, Macatangay BJC, Pandrea I (2015) Critical role for the adenosine pathway in controlling simian immunodeficiency virus-related immune activation and inflammation in gut mucosal tissues. J Virol 89:9616–9630. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01196-15
Ernst PB, Garrison JC, Thompson LF (2010) Much ado about adenosine: adenosine synthesis and function in regulatory T cell biology. J Immunol 185:1993–1998. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1000108
Chen Y, Corriden R, Inoue Y, Yip L, Hashiguchi N, Zinkernagel A, Nizet V, Insel PA, Junger WG (2006) ATP release guides neutrophil chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 receptors. Science 314(5806):1792–1795. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132559
Junger WG (2008) Purinergic regulation of neutrophil chemotaxis. Cell Mol Life Sci 65(16):2528–2540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-008-8095-1
Kronlage M, Song J, Sorokin L, Isfort K, Schwerdtle T, Leipziger J, Robaye B, Conley PB, Kim HC, Sargin S, Schon P, Schwab A, Hanley PJ (2010) Autocrine purinergic receptor signaling is essential for macrophage Chemotaxis. Sci Signal 3(132):ra55. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000588
Barletta KE, Ley K, Mehrad B (2012) Regulation of neutrophil function by adenosine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32(4):856–864. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226845
Giraldo DM, Hernandez JC, Velilla P, Urcuqui-Inchima S (2015) HIV-1—neutrophil interactions trigger neutrophil activation and Toll-like receptor expression. Immunol Res 64(1):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-015-8691-8
Saitoh T, Komano J, Saitoh Y, Misawa T, Takahama M, Kozaki T, Uehata T, Iwasaki H, Omori H, Yamaoka S, Yamamoto N, Akira S (2017) Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate a host defense response to human immunodeficiency virus-1. Cell Host Microbe 12:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.015
Haskó G, Csóka B, Németh ZH, Vizi ES, Pacher P (2009) A(2B) adenosine receptors in immunity and inflammation. Trends Immunol 30:263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2009.04.001
Azzam R, Kedzierska K, Leeansyah E, Chan H, Doischer D, Gorry PR, Cunningham AL, Crowe SM, Jaworowski A (2006) Impaired complement-mediated phagocytosis by HIV type-1-infected human monocyte-derived macrophages involves a cAMP-dependent mechanism. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 22:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2006.22.619
Chowdhury MIH, Koyanagi Y, Horiuchi S, Hazeki O, Ui M, Kitano K, Golde DW, Takada K, Yamamoto N (1993) cAMP stimulates human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1)from latently infected cells of monocyte-macrophage lineage: synergism with TNF-α. Virology 194:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1993.1265
Fuentes E, Pereira J, Mezzano D, Alarcón M, Caballero J, Palomo I (2014) Inhibition of platelet activation and thrombus formation by adenosine and inosine: studies on their relative contribution and molecular modeling. PLoS One 9(11):e112741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112741
Graziano F, Desdouits M, Garzetti L, Podini P, Alfano M, Rubartelli A, Furlan R, Benaroch P, Poli G (2015) Extracellular ATP induces the rapid release of HIV-1 from virus containing compartments of human macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E3265–E3273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1500656112
Leslie M (2010) Beyond clotting: the powers of platelets. Science 328(5978):562–564. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.328.5978.562
Tsegaye TS, Gnirß K, Rahe-Meyer N et al (2013) Platelet activation suppresses HIV-1 infection of T cells. Retrovirology 10:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4690-10-48
Beck Z, Jagodzinski LL, Eller MA, Thelian D, Matyas GR, Kunz AN, Alving CR (2013) Platelets and erythrocyte-bound platelets bind infectious HIV-1 in plasma of chronically infected patients. PLoS One 8(11):e81002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081002
Johnston-Cox HA, Ravid K (2011) Adenosine and blood platelets. Purinergic Signal 7:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-011-9220-4
Morrell CN, Aggrey AA, Chapman LM, Modjeski KL (2014) Emerging roles for platelets as immune and inflammatory cells. Blood 123:2759–2767. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-11-462432
Rezer JFP, Souza VCG, Thorstenberg MLP, Ruchel JB, Bertoldo TMD, Zanini D, Silveira KL, Leal CAM, Passos DF, Gonçalves JF, Abdalla FH, Schetinger MRC, Leal DBR (2016) Effect of antiretroviral therapy in thromboregulation through the hydrolysis of adenine nucleotides in platelets of HIV patients. Biomed Pharmacother 79:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.02.008
Rezer JFP, Adefegha SA, Ecker A, Passos DF, Saccol RSP, Bertoldo TMD, Leal DBR (2018) Changes in inflammatory/cardiac markers of HIV positive patients. Microb Pathog 114:264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.11.045
Schnurr M, Toy T, Shin A, Hartmann G, Rothenfusser S, Soellner J, Davis ID, Cebon J, Maraskovsky E (2004) Role of adenosine receptors in regulating chemotaxis and cytokine production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood 103(4):1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-06-1959
Moreno-Fernandez ME, Rueda CM, Velilla PA, Rugeles MT, Chougnet CA (2012) cAMP during HIV infection: friend or foe? AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 28:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2011.0265
Panther E, Idzko M, Herouy Y et al (2001) Expression and function of adenosine receptors in human dendritic cells. FASEB J 15:1963–1970. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0169com
Novitskiy SV, Ryzhov S, Zaynagetdinov R et al (2008) Adenosine receptors in regulation of dendritic cell differentiation and function. Blood 112:1822–1831. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-02-136325
Kottilil S, Shin K, Jackson JO, Reitano KN, O'Shea MA, Yang J, Hallahan CW, Lempicki R, Arthos J, Fauci AS (2006) Innate immune dysfunction in HIV infection: effect of HIV envelope-NK cell interactions. J Immunol 176:1107–1114. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.176.2.1107
Vignali DAA, Collison LW, Workman CJ (2008) How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol 8:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2343
Sakaguchi S, Miyara M, Costantino CM, Hafler DA (2010) FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in the human immune system. Nat Publ Gr 10(7):490–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2785
Kobie JJ, Shah PR, Yang L, Rebhahn JA, Fowell DJ, Mosmann TR (2006) T regulatory and primed uncommitted CD4 T cells express CD73, which suppresses effector CD4 T cells by converting 5′-adenosine monophosphate to adenosine. J Immunol 177:6780–6786. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.10.6780
Sitkovsky M, Lukashev D, Deaglio S, Dwyer K, Robson SC, Ohta A (2008) Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists: blockade of adenosinergic effects and T regulatory cells. Br J Pharmacol 153:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjp.2008.23
Bopp T, Dehzad N, Reuter S, Klein M, Ullrich N, Stassen M, Schild H, Buhl R, Schmitt E, Taube C (2009) Inhibition of cAMP degradation improves regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. J Immunol 182:4017–4024. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803310
Deaglio S, Dwyer KM, Gao W, Friedman D, Usheva A, Erat A, Chen JF, Enjyoji K, Linden J, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK, Strom TB, Robson SC (2007) Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J Exp Med 204:1257–1265. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20062512
Parish ST, Kim S, Sekhon RK, Wu JE, Kawakatsu Y, Effros RB (2010) Adenosine deaminase modulation of telomerase activity and replicative senescence in human CD8 T lymphocytes. Immunol 184:2847–2854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015862.Trajectories
Maini MK, Soares MV, Zilch CF et al (1999) Virus-induced CD8+ T cell clonal expansion is associated with telomerase up-regulation and telomere length preservation: a mechanism for rescue from replicative senescence. J Immunol 162(8):4521–4526. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1993.1265
Chou JP, Ramirez CM, Wu JE, Effros RB (2013) Accelerated aging in HIV/AIDS: novel biomarkers of senescent human CD8+ T cells. PLoS One 8(5):e64702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064702
Ohta A, Ohta A, Madasu M, Kini R, Subramanian M, Goel N, Sitkovsky M (2009) A2A adenosine receptor may allow expansion of T cells lacking effector functions in extracellular adenosine-rich microenvironments. J Immunol 183:5487–5493. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901247
Koshiba M, Rosin DL, Hayashi N, Linden J, Sitkovsky MV (1999) Patterns of A2A extracellular adenosine receptor expression in different functional subsets of human peripheral T cells. Flow cytometry studies with anti-A2A receptor monoclonal antibodies. Mol Pharmacol 55:614–624
Gessi S, Varani K, Merighi S, Fogli E, Sacchetto V, Benini A, Leung E, Mac-Lennan S, Borea PA (2007) Adenosine and lymphocyte regulation. Purinergic Signal 3:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-006-9042-y
Linden J, Cekic C (2012) Regulation of lymphocyte function by adenosine. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32:2097–2103. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226837
Jenabian MA, Seddiki N, Yatim A, Carriere M, Hulin A, Younas M, Ghadimi E, Kök A, Routy JP, Tremblay A, Sévigny J, Lelievre JD, Levy Y (2013) Regulatory T cells negatively affect IL-2 production of effector T cells through CD39/adenosine pathway in HIV infection. PLoS Pathog 9(4):e1003319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003319
Moir S, Fauci AS (2014) B-cell exhaustion in HIV infection: the role of immune activation. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 9:472–477. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0000000000000092
Rosser EC, Mauri C (2015) Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity 42:607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005
Liu J, Zhan W, Kim CJ, Clayton K, Zhao H, Lee E, Cao JC, Ziegler B, Gregor A, Yue FY, Huibner S, MacParland S, Schwartz J, Song HH, Benko E, Gyenes G, Kovacs C, Kaul R, Ostrowski M (2014) IL-10-producing B cells are induced early in HIV-1 infection and suppress HIV-1-specific T cell responses. PLoS One 9(2):e89236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089236
Saze Z, Schuler PJ, Hong C-S, Cheng D, Jackson EK, Whiteside TL (2013) Adenosine production by human B cells and B cell–mediated suppression of activated T cells. Blood 122:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-02-482406
Kim E-S, Ackermann C, Tóth I, Dierks P, Eberhard JM, Wroblewski R, Scherg F, Geyer M, Schmidt RE, Beisel C, Bockhorn M, Haag F, van Lunzen J, Schulze zur Wiesch J (2017) Down-regulation of CD73 on B cells of patients with viremic HIV correlates with B cell activation and disease progression. J Leukoc Biol 101:1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.5A0816-346R
Kaku H, Cheng KF, Al-Abed Y, Rothstein TL (2014) A novel mechanism of B-cell mediated immune suppression through CD73-expression and adenosine production. J Immunol 193:5904–5913. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1400336
Sauer AV, Brigida I, Carriglio N, Aiuti A (2012) Autoimmune dysregulation and purine metabolism in adenosine deaminase deficiency. Front Immunol 3:265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00265
Hovi T, Smyth JF, Allison AC, Williams SC (1976) Role of adenosine deaminase in lymphocyte proliferation. Clin Exp Immunol 23:395–403
Kaljas Y, Liu C, Skaldin M, Wu C, Zhou Q, Lu Y, Aksentijevich I, Zavialov AV (2016) Human adenosine deaminases ADA1 and ADA2 bind to different subsets of immune cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 74(3):555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2357-0
Martinez-Navio JM, Casanova V, Pacheco R, Naval-Macabuhay I, Climent N, Garcia F, Gatell JM, Mallol J, Gallart T, Lluis C, Franco R (2011) Adenosine deaminase potentiates the generation of effector, memory, and regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Leukoc Biol 89:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.1009696
Tardif V, Gary E, Muir R et al (2017) Adenosine DeAminase (ADA) as an adjuvant molecule for human HIV-1 vaccine. J Immunol 198:225.15
Tsuboi I, Sagawa K, Shichijo S, Yokoyama MM, Ou DW, Wiederhold MD (1995) Adenosine deaminase isoenzyme levels in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infections. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2:626–630
Gakis C, Calia G, A N et al (1989) Serum adenosine deaminase activity in HIV positive patients. pdf Panminerva Med 3:107–113
Franco R, Valenzuela A, Lluis C, Blanco J (1998) Enzymatic and extraenzymatic role of ecto-adenosine deaminase in lymphocytes. Immunol Rev 161:27–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.1998.tb01569.x
Pacheco R, Martinez-Navio JM, Lejeune M, Climent N, Oliva H, Gatell JM, Gallart T, Mallol J, Lluis C, Franco R (2005) CD26, adenosine deaminase, and adenosine receptors mediate costimulatory signals in the immunological synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9583–9588. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501050102
Climent N, Martinez-Navio JM, Gil C, Garcia F, Rovira C, Hurtado C, Miralles L, Gatell JM, Gallart T, Mallol J, Lluis C, Franco R (2009) Adenosine deaminase enhances T-cell response elicited by dendritic cells loaded with inactivated HIV. Immunol Cell Biol 87:634–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2009.53
Casanova V, Naval-Macabuhay I, Massanella M, Rodríguez-García M, Blanco J, Gatell JM, García F, Gallart T, Lluis C, Mallol J, Franco R, Climent N, McCormick PJ (2012) Adenosine deaminase enhances the immunogenicity of human dendritic cells from healthy and HIV-infected individuals. PLoS One 7:e51287. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051287
Martinez-navio JM, Climent N, Gallart T et al (2011) An old enzyme for current needs: adenosine deaminase and a dendritic cell vaccine for HIV. Immunol Cell Biol 90:594–600. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.2011.81
Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA (1998) Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 393:648–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/31405
Valenzuela A, Blanco J, Callebaut C et al (1997) Adenosine deaminase binding to human CD26 is inhibited by HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 and viral particles. J Immunol 158:3721–3729
Blanco J, Valenzuela A, Herrera C et al (2000) The HIV-1 gp120 inhibits the binding of adenosine deaminase to CD26 by a mechanism modulated by CD4 and CXCR4 expression. FEBS Lett 477:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01751-8
Pacheco R, Garcia F, Nomdedeu M et al (2009) Immunological dysfunction in HIV-1-infected individuals caused by impairment of adenosine deaminase-induced costimulation of T-cell activation. Immunology 128(3):393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03121.x
Pirrone V, Libon DJ, Sell C, Lerner CA, Nonnemacher MR, Wigdahl B (2013) Impact of age on markers of HIV-1 disease. Future Virol 8:81–101. https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl.12.127
Iñigo MA, de Tejada M, Torres-Tortosa M et al (1992) Serum adenosine deaminase in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Its relationship with CD4+ lymphocytes and beta 2-microglobulin. Med Clin (Barc) 99:766–768
Pérez DOC, Menéndez MM, Irazabal C et al (1996) Adenosine deaminase (ADA) and beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) as discriminating serum markers of progression to AIDS. An Med Interna 13:217–221
Lakshmi LJ, Zephy D, Bhaskar MV (2013) Adenosine deaminase activity in HIV positive cases. Int J Bioassays 02:1553–1556. https://doi.org/10.21746/ijbio.2013.12.0011
Ipp H, Zemlin AE, Glashoff RH, van Wyk J, Vanker N, Reid T, Bekker LG (2013) Serum adenosine deaminase and total immunoglobulin G correlate with markers of immune activation and inversely with CD4 counts in asymptomatic, treatment-naive HIV infection. J Clin Immunol 33:605–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9832-7
Carrera J, Porras JA, Vidal F, Pinto B, Richart C (1995) Evaluation of serum adenosine deaminase as a prognostic marker in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection with zidovudine. Revista clinica espanola, Rev Clin Esp 195:74–77
Abdi M, Rahbari R, Khatooni Z, Naseri N, Najafi A, Khodadadi I (2016) Serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity: a novel screening test to differentiate HIV monoinfection from HIV-HBV and HIV-HCV coinfections. J Clin Lab Anal 30:200–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.21836
Niedzwicki JG, Mayer KH, Abushanab E, Abernethy DR (1991) Plasma adenosine deaminase, is a marker for human immunodeficiency virus-I seroconversion. Am Hematol 37:152–155
Niedzwicki JG, Kouttab NM, Mayer KH, Carpenter CC, Parks RE Jr, Abushanab E, Abernethy DR (1991) Plasma adenosine deaminase2: a marker for human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 4:178–182
Chittiprol S, Satishchandra P, Bhimasenarao RS, Rangaswamy GR, Sureshbabu SV, Subbakrishna DK, Satish KS, Desai A, Ravi V, Shetty KT (2007) Plasma adenosine deaminase activity among HIV1 clade C seropositives: relation to CD4 T cell population and antiretroviral therapy. Clin Chim Acta 377:133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2006.09.006
Murray L, Loftin C, Gwyneth C (1985) Elevated activity adenosine deaminase and purine nucleoside phosphorylase in peripheral blood null lymphocytes from patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Blood 65:1318–1323
Cowan MJ, Bradyt R, Widdert KJ (1986) Elevated erythrocyte adenosine deaminase activity in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Proc Natl Acad U S A 83:1089–1091
Casoli C, Lisa A, Magnani G et al (1995) Prognostic value of adenosine deaminase compared to other markers for progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome among intravenous drug users. J Med Virol 45(2):203–210
Hunt PW, Lee SA, Siedner MJ (2016) Immunologic biomarkers, morbidity, and mortality in treated HIV infection. J Infec Dis 214(2):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiw275
Lederman MM, Funderburg NT, Sekaly RP et al (2013) Residual immune dysregulation syndrome in treated HIV infection. Adv Immunol 119:51–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407707-2.00002-3
Craveiro M, Clerc I, Sitbon M, Taylor N (2013) Metabolic pathways as regulators of HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 8(3):182–189. https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e32835fc53e
Acknowledgments
Programa de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica do Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria (PROIC/UFSM), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Daniela F. Passos declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Viviane M. Bernardes declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Jean L. G. da Silva declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Maria R. C. Schetinger declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Daniela B. R. Leal declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Passos, D.F., Bernardes, V.M., da Silva, J.L.G. et al. Adenosine signaling and adenosine deaminase regulation of immune responses: impact on the immunopathogenesis of HIV infection. Purinergic Signalling 14, 309–320 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-018-9619-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-018-9619-2