Skip to main content
Log in

Coexistence of carnivores in a heterogeneous landscape: habitat selection and ecological niches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Understanding distributional patterns and mechanisms used by species for habitat selection is crucial to adopt effective land management policies in terms of biodiversity conservation. A heterogeneous landscape may allow coexistence of species. That coexistence will be dependent on the availability of the resources in the habitat that has to be sufficient to fulfil their basic needs. The present study aimed to investigate habitat selection, niche breadth and niche overlap of three sympatric carnivore species (Vulpes vulpes, Genetta genetta and Martes foina) in a typically fragmented landscape from Central Portugal, using camera-trapping techniques. The results obtained revealed that the investigated species use the available habitats differently and in a non-random way. The red fox showed the most specialized behaviour, positively selecting coniferous forests. The common genet preferred eucalyptus, avoiding old-growth mixed woodland, in contrast with stone marten that exhibited a strong preference for this late habitat, avoiding eucalyptus. Concerning the niche breadth, the genet had the highest value while the red fox had the lowest one. The results obtained at the camera-trap level showed that the highest niche overlap occurred between the genet and the stone marten which suggests that these species can coexist and share the available resources. Regarding the habitat level, the greatest niche overlap was found for the stone marten and the red fox, indicating the exploration of the same general habitat conditions by both species. The results obtained in the present study support the concept that landscape complexity allows coexistence between species within the same trophic level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson J, Chamberlain M (2007) Space use and habitat selection by female Louisiana black bears in the Tensas river basin of Louisiana. J Wildl Manag 71:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bignal E, McCracken D (2000) The nature conservation value of European traditional farming systems. Environ Rev 8:149–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brangi A (1995) Seasonal changes of trophic niche overlap in the stone marten (Martes foina) and the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a mountainous area of the Northern Apennines (N-Italy). Ital J Mammal 7:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral M, Almeida J, Almeida P, Dellinger T, Ferrand de Almeida N, Oliveira M, Palmeirim J, Queiroz A, Rogado L, Santos-Reis M (eds) (2005) Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagnacci F, Meriggi A, Lovari S (2004) Habitat selection by the red fox Vulpes vulpes (L. 1758) in an Alpine area. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzada J (2002) Genetta genetta (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Palomo L, Gisbert J (eds) Atlas de los mamiferos terrestres de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza-SECEM-SECEMU, Madrid, pp 290–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho J, Gomes P (2004) Feeding resource partitioning among four sympatric carnivores in the Peneda-Gerês National Park (Portugal). J Zool 263:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini P, Lovari S (1991) Environmental factors influencing the use of habitat in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes. J Zool 223:323–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini P, Lovari S (1994) Home range, habitat selection and activity of the red fox in a Mediterranean coastal ecotone. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 39:279–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Debinski D, Holt R (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DGRF (2007) Inventário Florestal Nacional 2005/2006. Direcção-Geral dos Recursos Florestais, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández N, Delibes M, Palomares F (2007) Habitat-related heterogeneity in breeding in a metapopulation of the Iberian lynx. Ecography 30:431–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer D, Manning A (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol Appl 3:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galantinho A, Mira A (2009) The influence of human, livestock, and ecological features on the occurrence of genet Genetta genetta: a case study on Mediterranean farmland. Ecol Res 24:671–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldyn B, Hromada M, Surmacki A, Tryjanowski P (2003) Habitat use and diet of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in an agricultural landscape in Poland. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft 49:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert S (1978) The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth K, Nichols J (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79:2852–2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman M, Sanjayan M, Lowenstein J, Nelson A, Jeo R, Crooks K (2007) Remote camera-trap methods and analyses reveal impacts of rangeland management on Namibian carnivore communities. Oryx 41:70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanszki J, Kormendi S, Hancz C, Zalewski A (1999) Feeding habits and trophic niche overlap in a Carnivora community of Hungary. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 44:429–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin S (1974) Dispersion and population interactions. Am Nat 108:207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucherini M, Lovari S (1996) Habitat richness affects home range size in the red fox Vulpes vulpes. Behav Process 36:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucherini M, Lovari S, Crema G (1995) Habitat use and ranging behaviour of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a Mediterranean rural area: is shelter availability a key factor? J Zool 237:577–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly B (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery W (1980) The use of arboreal runways by the woodland rodents, Apodemus sylvaticus (L.), A. flavicollis (Melchior) and Clethrionomys glareolus (Schreber). Mamm Rev 10:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians G, Wittenberger J (1991) Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am Nat 137:29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otis D, Burnham K, White G, Anderson D (1978) Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildl Monogr 62:3–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Padial J, Avila E, Sanchez J (2002) Feeding habits and overlap among red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stone marten (Martes foina) in two Mediterranean mountain habitats. Mamm Biol 67:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva J (1998) A crise, apocalipse ou advento de uma nova idade, vol 1. Liga de Amigos de Conímbriga, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva J (2004) A relevante biodiversidade da mata. Monumentos 20:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F (1990) Attempt of free ranging readaptation in two small carnivores in Doñana National Park. Mammalia 54:307–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Delibes M (1988) Time and space use by two common genets (Genetta genetta) in the Doñana National Park, Spain. J Mammal 69:635–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomares F, Delibes M (1994) Spatio-temporal ecology and behavior of European genets in southwestern Spain. J Mammal 75:714–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka E (1973) The structure of lizard communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm S, Rosenzweig M (1981) Competitors and habitat use. Oikos 37:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam H, Danielson B (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:50–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ramil-Rego P, Muñoz-Sobrino C, Rodríguez-Guitián M, Gómez-Orellana L (1998) Differences in the vegetation of the North Iberian Peninsula during the last 16,000 years. Plant Ecol 138:41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexstad E, Burnham K (1991) User’s guide for interactive program CAPTURE. Abundance estimation of closed populations. Colorado State University, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinini C, Boitani L (2002) Habitat use by beech martens in a fragmented landscape. Ecography 25:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosalino L, Ferreira D, Leitão I, Santos-Reis M (2010) Usage patterns of Mediterranean agro-forest habitat components by wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Mamm Biol 76:268–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M (1987) Habitat selection as a source of biological diversity. Evol Ecol 1:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Santos-Reis M (2010) Stone marten (Martes foina) habitat in a Mediterranean ecosystem: effects of scale, sex, and interspecific interactions. Eur J Wildl Res 56:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Reis M, Santos M, Lourenço S, Marques J, Pereira I, Pinto B (2005) Relationships between stone martens, genets and cork oak woodlands in Portugal. In: Harrison D, Fuller A, Proulx G (eds) Martens and fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments: an international perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 147–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmento P, Cruz J, Eira C, Fonseca C (2009) Evaluation of camera trapping for estimating red fox abundance. J Wildl Manag 73:1207–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmento P, Cruz J, Eira C, Fonseca C (2010) Habitat selection and abundance of common genets Genetta genetta using camera capture-mark-recapture data. Eur J Wildl Res 56:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafini P, Lovari S (1993) Food habits and trophic niche overlap of the red fox and the stone marten in a Mediterranean rural area. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 38:233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver S, Ostr L, Marsh L, Maffei L, Noss A, Kelly M, Wallace R, Gomez H, Ayala G (2004) The use of camera traps for estimating jaguar Panthera onca abundance and density using capture/recapture analysis. Oryx 38:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNIG (1995) Carta de Ocupação do Solo—COS’90. Instituto Geográfico Português, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Such A, Calabuig G (2003) Dieta de la garduña (Martes foina Erxleben, 1777) en la Serra de la Solana (Sur del País Valencià). Galemys 15:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson W (2004) Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Trolle M, Kéry M (2003) Estimation of ocelot density in the pantanal using capture–recapture analysis of camera-trapping data. J Mammal 84:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg L, Bullock J, Clarke R, Langston R, Rose R (2001) Territory selection by the Dartford warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size. Biol Conserv 101:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira J, Pinto M, Pereira R (eds) (2000) Forests of Portugal. Direcção-Geral das Florestas, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgós E, Casanovas J (1997) Habitat selection of genet Genetta genetta in the mountains of central Spain. Acta Theriol (Warsz) 42:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgós E, García F (2002) Patch occupancy by stone martens Martes foina in fragmented landscapes of central Spain: the role of fragment size, isolation and habitat structure. Acta Oecol 23:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virgós E, Romero T, Mangas J (2001) Factors determining “gaps” in the distribution of a small carnivore, the common genet (Genetta genetta), in central Spain. Can J Zool 79:1544–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Virgós E, Telleria J, Santos T (2002) A comparison on the response to forest fragmentation by medium-sized Iberian carnivores in central Spain. Biodivers Conserv 11:1063–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J (1976) Population responses to patchy environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:81–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove D, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, Martínez-Climent J (2009) Testing for niche segregation between two abundant carnivores using presence-only data. Folia Zool 58:385–395

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to T. Natal-da-Luz for English corrections, and to the anonymous reviewers who made helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to António Alves da Silva.

About this article

Cite this article

Pereira, P., Alves da Silva, A., Alves, J. et al. Coexistence of carnivores in a heterogeneous landscape: habitat selection and ecological niches. Ecol Res 27, 745–753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0949-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-012-0949-1

Keywords

Navigation