Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of fluorescent stains for the assessment of viability and metabolic activity of lactic acid bacteria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used as starter or probiotic cultures in the food and pharmaceutical industries and, therefore, rapid and accurate methods for the detection of their viability are of practical relevance. In this study 10 LAB strains, belonging to the genera Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus and Weissella, were subjected to heat and oxidative stresses and cell injury or death was assessed comparing different fluorescent probes (Syto 9; Propidium Iodide, PI; 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, DAPI; 5,(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate, cFDA) to identify the stain combination which most reliably allowed the detection of live/metabolically active and dead cells. Protocols for specimen preparation and staining were optimized and a simple procedure for automated cell counts was developed using NIH ImageJ macros. Cysteine and semi-solid agar solution were efficiently used as anti-fading agent and mounting medium, respectively. The double staining cFDA-PI apparently offered the best and most versatile indication of both cell metabolic activity and membrane integrity. An excellent correlation between manual and automated cell counts for the majority of strain/stain combinations was found. This work provides a simple protocol for specimen preparation and staining based on the use of safe, easy to prepare and inexpensive reagents as compared to other methods. Additionally, the automated cell count procedure developed can be applied to several bacterial species and allows an increase in the number of experimental trials and the reproducibility and sensitivity of the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben Amor KB, Breeuwer P, Verbaarschot P, Rombouts FM, Akkermans ADL, De Vos WM, Abeel T (2002) Multiparametric flow cytometry and cell sorting for the assessment of viable, injured, and dead Bifidobacterium cells during bile salt stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5209–5216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berney M, Weilenmann H, Egli T (2006) Flow-cytometric study of vital cellular functions in Escherichia coli during solar disinfection (SODIS). Microbiol 152:1719–1729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berney M, Hammes F, Bosshard F, Weilenmann H, Egli T (2007) Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/DEAD BacLight Kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3283–3290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjergbaek LA, Roslev P (2005) Formation of nonculturable Escherichia coli in drinking water. J Appl Microbiol 99:1090–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunthof C, Van den Braak S, Breeuwer P, Rombouts FM, Abee T (2000) Fluorescence assessment of Lactococcus lactis viability. Int J Food Microbiol 55:291–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bunthof CJ, van Schalcwijk S, Meijer W, Abee T, Hugenholtz J (2001) Fluorescent method to monitoring cheese starter permeabilization and lysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4264–4271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzerald G, Ross RP (2008) Life under stress: the probiotic stress response and how it may be manipulated. Curr Pharmac Des 14:1382–1399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer AH, Jacobson KA, Rose J, Zeller R (2008) Media for mounting fixed cells on microscope slides. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. doi:10.1101/pdb.ip52

  • Gatti M, Bernini V, Lazzi C, Neviani E (2006) Fluorescence microscopy for studying the viability of micro-organisms in natural whey starters. Lett Appl Microbiol 42:338–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giraffa G (2004) Studying the dynamics of microbial populations during food fermentation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:251–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoefel D, Grooby WL, Monis PM, Andrews S, Saint CP (2003) A comparative study of carboxyfluorescein diacetate and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester as indicators of bacterial activity. J Microbiol Meth 52:379–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan TMM, Pyle BH, Camper AK (2010) Specific and rapid enumeration of viable but nonculturable and niableculturable Gram-negative bacteria by using flow cytometry. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5088–5096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaenhammer T, Altermann E, Arigoni F, Bolotin A, Breidt F, Broadbent J, Cano R, Chaillou S, Deutscher J, Gasson M, van de Guchte M, Guzzo J, Hartke A, Hawkins T, Hols P, Hutkins R, Kleerebezem M, Kok J, Kuipers O, Lubbers M, Maguin E, McKay L, Mills D, Nauta A, Overbeek R, Pel H, Pridmore D, Saier M, van Sinderen D, Sorokin A, Steele J, O’Sullivan D, de Vos W, Weimer B, Zagorec M, Siezen R (2002) Discovering lactic acid bacteria by genomics. Curr Pharmac Des 82:29–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer M, Obermajer N, Bogovič Matijašić B, Rogelj I, Kmetec V (2009) Quantification of live and dead probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product by real-time PCR and by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:1137–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer P, Dworkin J (2007) Application of fluorescence microscopy to single bacterial cells. Rev Res Microbiol 158:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morono Y, Takano S, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y, Unno H, Hori H (2004) Application of glutaraldehyde for the staining of esterase-active cells with carboxyfluorescein diacetate. Biotech Lett 26:379–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ono M, Murakami T, Kudo A, Isshiki M, Sawada H, Segawa A (2001) Quantitative comparison of anti-fading mounting media for confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 49:305–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou K, Pratsinis H, Nebe-von-Caron G, Kletsas D, Tsakalidou E (2006) Rapid assessment of the physiological status of Streptococcus macedonicus by flow cytometry and fluorescence probes. Int J Food Microbiol 111:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prado FC, Parada JL, Pandey A, Soccol CR (2008) Trends in non-dairy probiotic beverages. Food Res Int 41:111–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robeson JL, Tilton RD (1995) Effect of concentration quenching on fluorescence recovery after photobleaching measurements. Biophys J 68:2145–2155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saarela M, Rantala M, Hallamaa K, Nohynek L, Virkajärvi I, Mätto J (2004) Stationary-phase acid and heat treatments for improvement of the viability of probiotic lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. J Appl Microbiol 96:1205–1214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song L, Hennink EJ, Young T, Tanke HJ (1995) Photobleaching kinetics of fluorescein in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biophys J 68:2588–2600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straza TRA, Cottrell MT, Ducklow HW, Kirchman DL (2009) Geographic and phylogenetic variation in bacterial biovolume as revealed by protein and nucleic acid staining. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4028–4034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunny-Roberts SO, Knorr D (2008) Evaluation of the response of Lactobacillus rhamnosus VTT E-97800 to sucroseinduced osmotic stress. Food Microbiol 25:183–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Temmerman R, Huys G, Sweengs J (2004) Identification of lactic acid bacteria: culture-dependent and cultureindependent methods. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:348–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer HM, Gänzle M, Vogel RF (2000) Effect of high pressure on the metabolic activity of Lactobacillus plantarum TMW 1460. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3966–3973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veal DA, Deere D, Ferrari B, Piper J, Attfield PV (2000) Fluorescent staining and flow cytometry for monitoring microbial cell. Rev J Immunol Meth 243:191–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams SC, Hong Y, Danavall DCA, Howard-Jones M, Gibson D, Frischer ME, Verity PG (1998) Distinguishing between living and nonliving bacteria: evaluation of the vital stain propidium iodide and its combined use with molecular probes in aquatic samples. J Microbiol Meth 32:225–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zotta T, Parente E, Ricciardi A (2009) Viability staining and detection of metabolic activity of sourdough lactic acid bacteria under stress conditions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1119–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica, Rome, Italy (PRIN2008, 20088SZB9B), and Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Potenza. The support of Università della Basilicata which covered the post-Doc scholarship of Dr. Zotta is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ricciardi.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix: Automated count of bright field and fluorescent images

Appendix: Automated count of bright field and fluorescent images

The macro commands for automated BF count performs the following steps: after converting the RGB colour image in 32 bit gray scale image, background correction, cell pixels are separated from background pixels by a thresholding function which produce a binary image with black cells on a white background. Clustered cells in chain-forming species can be separated from each other by watershed segmentation. The image is calibrated by inserting correction factors for the objective in use (100 × 1.3 NA Plan Fluor oil immersion objective, Nikon) and, finally, objects can be added or removed from images by tuning the “size” and “circularity” parameters. The counts and measures generated are then.

automatically tabulated and can be imported into Excel or other analysis programs. No background subtraction is needed for fluorescent images.

Macro commands for bright field images

  • run(“32-bit”);

  • run(“Subtract Background…”, “rolling = 50 light”);

  • run(“Make Binary”);

  • run(“Watershed”);

  • run(“Set Measurements…”, “area centroid center perimeter circularity feret’s redirect = None decimal = 3”);

  • run(“Set Scale…”, “distance = 1 known = 0.03 pixel = 1 unit = μm”);

  • run(“Analyze Particles…”, “size = 0.10-2 circularity = 0.20–1.00 show = Outlines display clear include summarize”);

Macro commands for epifluorescence images

  • run(“Brightness/Contrast…”);

  • run(“Enhance Contrast”, “saturated = 0.5”);

  • run(“32-bit”);

  • run(“Make Binary”);

  • run(“Watershed”);

  • run(“Set Measurements…”, “area centroid center perimeter circularity feret’s redirect = None decimal = 3”);

  • run(“Set Scale…”, “distance = 1 known = 0.03 pixel = 1 unit = μm”);

  • run(“Analyze Particles…”, “size = 0.10-2 circularity = 0.20–1.00 show = Outlines display clear include summarize”);

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zotta, T., Guidone, A., Tremonte, P. et al. A comparison of fluorescent stains for the assessment of viability and metabolic activity of lactic acid bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28, 919–927 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0889-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0889-x

Keywords

Navigation