Abstract
The basic requirement for probiotic bacteria to be able to exert expected positive effects is to be alive; therefore, appropriate quantification methods are crucial. Due to disadvantages of conventional microbiological methods, the bacterial quantification based on the nucleic acid detection is increasingly used. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility to use propidium monoazide (PMA) in combination with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method or LIVE/DEAD BacLight viability kit in combination with flow cytometry (FCM) for determination of probiotic bacteria in a lyophilised product containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis BB-12. In addition, the viability of probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product during 3 months storage was investigated. In the product, the results of real-time PCR quantification of PMA-treated cells did not differ significantly from those of non-treated cells, which indicate that most of the bacterial cells retained the membrane integrity although they have lost the culturability. The results obtained by FCM analysis were comparable with those by PMA real-time PCR. In conclusion, the PMA real-time PCR and FCM determination of the viability of probiotic bacteria could complement the plate count method which considers only the culturable part of the population.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alakomi HL, Mättö J, Virkajärvi I, Saarela M (2005) Application of microplate scale fluorochrome staining assay for the assessment of viability of probiotic preparations. J Microbiol Methods 62:25–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.01.005
Barer MR, Harwood CR (1999) Bacterial viability and culturability. In: Poole KJ (ed) Advances in microbial physiology, 1st edn. Academic, New York, pp 93–137
Ben Amor K, Breeuwer P, Verbaarschot P, Rombouts FM, Akkermans ADL, De Vos WM, Abee T (2002) Multiparametric flow cytometry and cell sorting for the assessment of viable, injured, and dead bifidobacterium cells during bile salt stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5209–5216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.11.5209-5216.2002
Bloomfield SF, Stewart GS, Dodd CE, Booth IR, Power EG (1998) The viable but non-culturable phenomenon explained? Microbiology 144:1–3
Bogovič Matijašić B, Rogelj I (2006) Demonstration of suitability of probiotic products. An emphasis on survey of commercial products obtained on the Slovenian market. Agro Food Ind Hi Tec 17:38–40
Boulos L, Prévost M, Barbeau B, Coallier J, Desjardins R (1999) LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™: application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J Microbiol Methods 37:77–86
Breeuwer P, Abee T (2000) Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques. Int J Food Microbiol 55:193–200
Bunthof CJ, Abee T (2002) Development of a flow cytometric method to analyse subpopulations of bacteria in probiotic products and dairy starters. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2934–2942. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.6.2934-2942.2002
Colwell RR (2000) Viable but nonculturable bacteria: a survival strategy. J Infect Chemother 6:121–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012151
Dodd CE, Sharman RL, Bloomfield SF, Booth IR, Stewart GS (1997) Inimical process: bacterial self-destruction and sub-lethal injury. Trends Food Sci Technol 8:238–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01043-1
FAO/WHO (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Working Group on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food (ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/wgreport2.pdf)
Fasoli S, Marzotto M, Rizzotti L, Rossi F, Dellaglio F, Torriani S (2003) Bacterial composition of commercial probiotic products as evaluated by PCR-DGGE analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 82:59–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00259-3
Furet JP, Quénée P, Tailliez P (2004) Molecular quantification of lactic acid bacteria in fermented milk products using real-time quantitative PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 97:197–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.020
García-Cayuela T, Tabasco R, Peláez C, Requena T (2009) Simultaneous detection and enumeration of viable lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in fermented milk by using propidium monoazide and real-time PCR. Int Dairy J 19:405–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.02.001
Grattepanche F, Lacroix C, Audet P, Lapointe G (2005) Quantification by real-time PCR of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris in milk fermented by a mixed culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:414–421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1705-4
Hein I, Schneeweiss W, Stanek C, Wagner M (2007) Ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide for elimination of unspecific DNA background in quantitative universal real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 71:336–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.09.005
Kell DB, Kaprelyants DH, Weichart DH, Harwood CR, Barer MR (1998) Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73:169–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000664013047
Lahtinen SJ, Gueimonde M, Ouwehand A, Reinikainen JP, Salminen SJ (2005) Probiotic bacteria may become dormant during storage. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1662–1663. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2005.09.001
Lahtinen SJ, Gueimonde M, Ouwehand AC, Reinkainen JP, Salminen SJ (2006) Comparison of four methods to enumerate probiotic bifidobacteria in a fermented food product. Food Microbiol 23:571–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.3.1662-1663.2005
Lee JL, Levin RE (2007) Quantification of total viable bacteria on fish fillets by using ethidium bromide monoazide real-time polymerase chain reaction. Int J Food Microbiol 118:312–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.048
Masco L, Huys G, De Brandt E, Temmerman R, Swings J (2005) Culture-dependent and culture-independent qualitative analysis of probiotic claimed to contain bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 102:221–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.018
Masco L, Vanhoutte T, Temmerman R, Swings J, Huys G (2007) Evaluation of real-time PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and recA genes for the enumeration of bifidobacteria in probiotic products. Int J Food Microbiol 113:351–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.021
Maukonen J, Alakomi HJ, Nohynek L, Hallamaa K, Leppämäki S, Mätö J, Saarela M (2006) Suitability of the fluorescence techniques for enumeration of probiotic bacteria in commercial non-dairy drinks and in pharmaceutical products. Food Res Int 39:22–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.05.006
Nebe-von-Caron G, Stephens PJ, Hewitt CJ, Powell JR, Badley RA (2000) Analysis of bacterial function by multi-colour fluorescence flow cytometry and single cell sorting. J Microbiol Methods 42:97–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00181-0
Nocker A, Cheung CY, Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods 67:310–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.015
Nocker A, Sossa KE, Camper AK (2007a) Molecular monitoring of disinfection efficacy using propidium monoazide in combination with quantitative PCR. J Microbiol Methods 70:252–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.014
Nocker A, Sossa-Fernandez P, Burr MD, Camper AK (2007b) Use of propidium monoazide for live/dead distinction in microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5111–5117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02987-06
Nocker A, Mazza A, Masson L, Camper AK, Brousseau R (2009) Selective detection of live bacteria combining propidium monoazide sample treatment with microarray technology. J Microbiol Methods 76(3):253–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.11.004
Nystrom T (2001) Not quite dead enough: on bacterial life, culturability, senescence, and death. Arch Microbiol 176:159–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s002030100314
Ouwehand AC, Tölkkö S, Kulmala J, Salminen E, Salminen E (2000) Adhesion of inactivated probiotic strain to intestinal mucus. Lett Appl Microbiol 31:82–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2000.00773.x
Parvez S, Malik KA, Kang AH, Kim HY (2006) Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J Appl Microbiol 100:1171–1185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02963.x
Pedersen LD (2008) Viable counts by flow cytometry on stressed freeze-dried lactic acid bacteria. In: Abstracts of the 4th international conference of European Federation of Biotechnology, Dresden, Germany
Reid G (2006) Safe and efficacious probiotics: what are they? Trends Microbiol 14:348–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.06.006
Reid G, Sanders ME, Gaskins HR, Gibson GR, Mercenier A, Rastall R, Roberfroid M, Rowland I, Cherbut C, Klaenhammer TR (2003) New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:105–118
Rinttilä T, Kassinen A, Malinen E, Krogius L, Palva A (2004) Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 97:1166–1177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02409.x
Rudi K, Moen B, Dromtorp SM, Holck AI (2005) Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1018–1024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.2.1018-1024.2005
Simmering R, Blaut M (2001) Pro- and prebiotics—the tasty guardian angels? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55(1):19–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000512
Songjinda P, Nakayama J, Tateyama A, Tanaka S, Tsubouchi M, Kiyohara C, Shirakawa T, Sonomoto K (2007) Differences in developing intestinal microbiota between allergic and non-allergic infants: a pilot study in Japan. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71:2338–2342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.70154
Van de Casteele S, Vanheuverzwijn T, Ruyssen T, Van Assche P, Swings J, Huys G (2006) Evaluation of culture media for selective enumeration of probiotic strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in combination with yoghurt or cheese starters. Int Dairy J 16:1470–1476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.12.002
Wagner AO, Malin C, Knapp BA, Illmer P (2008) Removal of free extracellular DNA from environmental samples by ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2537–2539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02288-07
Wang S, Levin RE (2006) Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 64:1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.04.023
Yamamoto H (2000) Viable but nonculturable state as a general phenomenon of non-spore-forming bacteria, and its modelling. J Infect Chemother 6:112–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012149
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d., Ljubljana, Slovenia. Research scientist Tanja Obermajer is greatly acknowledged for her assistance and knowledge of real-time PCR analysis. We also thank Mrs. Alenka Bezek for her technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kramer, M., Obermajer, N., Bogovič Matijašić, B. et al. Quantification of live and dead probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product by real-time PCR and by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84, 1137–1147 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2068-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2068-7