Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Persistence of high elevation fens in the Southern Rocky Mountains, on Grand Mesa, Colorado, U.S.A.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small headwater fens at high elevations exist in the dry climatic regime of western Colorado, despite increasing demands for water development since the 1800’s. Fens on Grand Mesa have accumulated plant material as peat for thousands of years due to cold temperatures and consistently saturated soils. The peatlands maintain unique plant communities, wildlife habitat, biodiversity, and carbon storage. We located and differentiated 88 fens from 15 wet meadows and 2 marshes on Grand Mesa. Field work included determining vegetation, soils, moisture regimes, and impacts from human activities. All fens were groundwater-supported systems that occurred in depressions and slopes within sedimentary landslide and volcanic glacial till landscapes. Fens occupied 400 ha or less than 1 % of the 46,845 ha research area and ranged in size from 1 to 46 ha. Peat water pH in undisturbed sites ranged from 4.3 to 7.1. Most fens had plant communities dominated by sedges (Carex) with an understory of brown mosses. Variation in vegetation was controlled by stand wetness, water table level, organic C, conductivity (EC), and temperature °C. Fen soils ranged from 13.6 to 44.1 % organic C with a mean of 30.3 %. Species diversity in fens was restricted by cold short growing seasons, stressful anaerobic conditions, and disturbance. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze relationships between vegetation, environmental, and impact variables. Stand wetness, water table level, OC, electrical conductivity (EC), and temperature were used to analyze vegetation variance in undisturbed fens, wet meadows, and marshes. Vegetation composition in impacted fens was influenced by flooding, sedimentation, stand wetness, water table level, OC, EC, and temperature. Hydrologically modified fens supported 58 plant species compared to 101 species in undisturbed fens. Analysis of historical 1936–2007 aerial photographs and condition scalars helped quantify impacts of human activities in fens as well as vegetation changes. Fourteen fens had evidence of peat subsidence, from organic soil collapse, blocks of peat in the margins, soil instability, and differences in surface peat height between the fen soil surface and the annually flooded soil surface. Of 374 ha of fens in the Grand Mesa study area, 294 ha (79 %) have been impacted by human activities such as ditching, drainage, flooding, or vehicular rutting. Many fens had little restoration potential due to severe hydrological and peat mass impacts, water rights, or the cost of restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken SG, Dallwitz MJ, Consaul LL, McJannet CL, Gillespie LJ, Boles RL, Argus GW, Gillett JM, Scott PJ, Elven R, LeBlanc MC, Brysting AK, Solstad H (1999) Flora of the Canadian Arctic Archipelagod, Illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: 29, April 2003. http://www.mun.ca/biology/delta/arcticf/’. Accessed 27 Nov 2007

  • Aldous AR, Bach LB (2014) Hydro-ecology of groundwater-dependent ecosystems: applying basic science to groundwater management. Hydrol Sci J 59:530–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Analytical Software (2007) Statistix 7 software program. Tallahassee. www.statistix

  • Anderson DS, Davis RB (1997) The vegetation and its environments in Maine peatlands. Can J Bot 75:1785–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LE, Crum HA, Buck WR (1990) List of the mosses of North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93(4):448–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armentano TV, Menges ES (1986) Patterns of change in the carbon balance of organic-soil wetlands of the temperate zone. J Ecol 74:755–774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asada T, Warner BG, Schiff SL (2005) Effects of shallow flooding on vegetation and carbon pools in boreal peatlands. Appl Veg Sci 8:199–2008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford BL, Godwin KS (2003) Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23(3):608–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsey K, Kittel G, Decker K, Cooper DJ, Culver D (2003) Field guide to the wetland and riparian plant associations of Colorado. Fort Collins, Colorado Natural Heritage Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA (2011) Restoring sedges and mosses into frost heaving iron fens, San Juan Mountains, Colorado. Mires Peat 8:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Cooper DJ (2003a) Carbon balances of pristine and hydrologically modified fens in the southern Rocky Mountains. Can J Bot 81:477–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Cooper DJ (2003b) Influence of water table levels on CO2 emissions in a Colorado subalpine fen: an in situ microcosm study. Soil Biol Biochem 35:345–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chimner RA, Lemly JM, Cooper DJ (2010) Mountain fen distribution, types and restoration priorities, San Juan Mountains, Colorado, USA. Wetlands 30:763–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson BR, Sorrell BK, Reeves PN, Champion PD, Partridge TR, Clarkson BD (2004) Handbook for monitoring wetland condition. Coordinated Monitoring of New Zealand Wetlands. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. Christchurch

  • Cooper DJ (1990) Ecology of wetlands in Big Meadows, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Biol Rep 90:15

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ (1991) Additions to the peatland flora of the southern Rocky Mountains: habitat descriptions and water chemistry. Madroño 38:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ (1996) Water and soil chemistry, floristics, and phytosociology of the extreme rich High Creek fen, in South Park, Colorado, U.S.A. Can J Bot 74:1801–1811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Andrus R (1994) Patterns of vegetation and water chemistry in peatlands of the west-central Wind River Range, Wyoming. Can J Bot 72:1586–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SV, Jones WM (2004) A plant community classification for Kootenai National Forest peatlands. Unpublished report. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Montana State Library, Helena

  • Cooper DJ, MacDonald LH (2000) Restoring the vegetation of mined peatlands in the southern Rocky Mountains of Colorado, U.S.A. Restor Ecol 8:103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, MacDonald LH, Wenger SK, Woods S (1998) Hydrologic restoration of a fen in Rocky Mt. National Park, Colorado. Wetlands 18:335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Andrus R, Arp CD (2002) Sphagnum balticum in a southern Rocky Mountain iron fen. Madrono 49:186–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Chimner RA, Merritt DM (2012) Mountain wetlands of North America. In: Batzer D, Balswin A (eds) Wetland habitats of North America: ecology and conservation concerns. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper DJ, Wolf EC, Ronayne MJ, Roche JW (2015) Effects of groundwater pumping on the sustainability of a mountain wetland complex, Yosemite National Park, California. J Hydro: Reg Stud 3:87–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Dachnowski-Stokes AP (1941) Peat resources of Alaska. US Dept Agri Tech Bull 769

  • Driver KM (2010) Distinguishing the hydrologic regimes and vegetation of fens and wet meadows in the Rocky Mountains. Thesis Colorado State University, Ft. Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MA (1999) A multi-proxy study of late-quaternary climate history, Grand Mesa, western Colorado. Thesis University of Denver, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Earth Google (2011) Online satellite images of the earth. Google Earth Version 1.3.21.69. Mountain View, CA. http://earth.google.com. Accessed 23 Feb 2011

  • Ewing JM, Vepraskas MJ (2006) Estimating primary and secondary subsidence in an organic soil 15, 20, and 30 years after drainage. Wetlands 26:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage E, Cooper DJ (2006) Carex limosa L. (mud sedge): a technical assessment. Unpublished peer-reviewed document prepared for the USDA Forest Service. Colorado State University, Fort Collins

  • Gignac LD, Gauthier R, Rochefort L, Bubier J (2004) Distribution and habitat niches of 37 peatland Cyperaceae species across a broad geographic range in Canada. Can J Bot 82:1292–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser PH, Wheeler GA, Gorham E, Wright HE Jr (1981) The patterned mires of the Red Lake Peatland, Northern Minnesota: vegetation, water chemistry and landforms. J Ecol 69:575–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heidel B, Jones G (2006) Botanical and ecological characteristics of fens in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Medicine Bow National Forest: Albany and Carbon Counties, Wyoming. Unpublished document. Wyoming Natural Heritage Database, U of Wyoming, Laramie

  • Heidel B, Laursen S (2003) Botanical and ecological inventory of peatland sites on the Medicine Bow National Forest. Unpublished document. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, U of Wyoming. Laramie

  • High Plains Regional Climate Center (2015) National climate services support program. High Plains Regional Climate Center, Lincoln. http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/cgi-bin/cli_perl_lib/cliMAIN.pl?co7656. Accessed 19 April 2015

  • Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden J, Chapman PJ, Labadz JC (2004) Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Prog Phys Geogr 28:95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruby, T (2013) Update on wetland buffers: the state of the science, final report. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #13-06-11

  • Johnson JB (1997) Stand structure and vegetation dynamics of a subalpine treed fen in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. J Veg Sci 8(3):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K, Miller I (2012) Digging Snowmastodon: discovering an ice age world in the Colorado Rockies. Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Steingraeber DA (2003) The vegetation and ecological gradients of calcareous mires in the South Park valley, Colorado. Can J Bot 81:201–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston BC (1987) Plant associations of Region Two, Edition 4. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Office. Publication R2-ECOL-87-2. Lakewood

  • Johnston BC, Stratton BT, Young WR, Mattson LL, Almy JM, Austin G (2012) Inventory of fens in a large landscape of west-central Colorado: Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests. USDA Forest Service

  • Jones WM (2003) Kootenai National Forest peatlands: description and effects of forest management. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Natural Resource Information System, Montana State Library. Helena, MT

  • Kartesz JT (1999) A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill

  • Lamers LPM, Vile MA, Grootjans AP, Acreman MC, van Diggelen R, Evans MG, Richardson CJ, Rochefort L, Kooijman AM, Roelofs JGM, Smolders AJP (2015) Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence-based approach. Biol Rev 90:182–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz S (2003) Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23:517–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly JM (2007) Fens of Yellowstone National Park, USA: regional and local controls over plant species distribution. Thesis Colorado State University, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemly JM, Cooper DJ (2011) Multiscale factors control community and species distribution in mountain peatlands. Botany 89:689–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughlin GF (1918) Mineral resources of the United States, part II—nonmetals. Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 331–356

  • McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NatureServe (2008) An online encyclopedia of life. Version 6.3. Arlington. http://www.NatureServe.org/explorer. Accessed 3 Jan 2008

  • NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service) (1999) Soil taxonomy, a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edn. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland RH (1996) Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J Veg Sci 7:289–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson L, Cooper DJ (2007) The hydrologic and ecological indicators for the restoration of drainage ditches and water diversions in a mountain fen, Cascade Range, California. Wetlands 27:290–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price JS, Rochefort L, Campeau S (2002) Use of shallow basins to restore cutover peatlands: hydrology. Restor Ecol 10(2):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price JS, Cagampan J, Kellner E (2005) Assessment of peat compressibility: is there an easy way? Hydrol Process 19:3469–3475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retzer JL (1954) Glacial advances and soil development, Grand Mesa, Colorado. Am J Sci 252:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocchio J (2004) Wetland classification of Blanca Wetlands, San Luis Valley, Colorado. Unpublished document. Colorado Natural Heritage Program. Ft. Collins

  • Schimelpfenig DW, Cooper DJ, Chimner RA (2014) Effectiveness of ditch blockage for restoring hydrologic and soil processes in mountain peatlands. Restor Ecol 22:257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood JH, Kettridge N, Thompson DK, Morris PJ, Silins U, Waddington JM (2013) Effect of drainage and wildlife on peat hydrophysical properties. Hydrol Process, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Wiley. Online. doi:10.1002/hyp.9820

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel DI (1968) Evaluating cumulative effects of disturbance on the hydrologic function of bogs, fens, and mires. Environ Manag 12:621–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel DI, Glaser P (2006) The hydrology of peatlands. In: Wieder RK, Vitt DH (eds) Boreal Peatland Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes K, Cooper DJ, Weis S, Keeler-Wolf T, Barbour M, Ikeda D, Stout D, Evens J (2013) Fen conservation and vegetation assessment in the National Forests of the Sierra Nevada and adjacent mountains, California. Unpublished document. California Native Plant Society Vegetation Program, Colorado State University, US Forest Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, University of California Davis. Revised public version 2

  • Sjors H (1950) On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in northern Swedish mire waters. Oikos 2:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack NG, Vitt DH, Horton DG (1980) Vegetation gradients of minerotrophically rich fens in western Alberta. Can J Bot 58:330–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Louis VL, Partridge AD, Kelly CA, Rudd JWM (2003) Mineralization rates of peat from eroding peat islands in reservoirs. Biogeochemistry 64:97–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

  • USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service) (1995) National wetland inventory maps. US Dept of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tongeren OFR (1995) Cluster analysis. In: Jongman RHG et al (eds) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Viereck LA, Dyrness CT, Batten AR, Wenzlick KJ (1992) The Alaska vegetation classification. US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Gen Tech Rep, PNWGTR-286. Portland

  • Vitt DH (2000) Peatlands: ecosystems dominated by bryophytes. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitt DH (2014) A key and review of bryophytes common in North American peatlands. In: S. LaGreca (Ed.). Evansia 31:121-156

  • Vitt DH, Chee WL (1990) The relationships of vegetation to surface-water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio 89:87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt DH, Slack NG (1975) An analysis of the vegetation of Sphagnumdominated kettle-hole bogs in relation to environmental gradients. Can J Bot 53:332–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitt DH, Wieder RK (2006) Boreal peatland ecosystems: our carbon heritage. In: R.K. Wieder and D.H. Vitt (Eds.), Ecol Studies

  • Warner BG, Asada T (2006) Biological diversity of peatlands in Canada. Aquat Sci 68:240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber WA, Wittmann RC (2012) Colorado flora: western slope. University Press of Colorado, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber WA, Wittmann RC (2007) Bryophytes of Colorado: mosses, liverworts, and hornworts. Pilgrims Process, Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weixelman DA, Cooper DJ (2009) Assessing proper functioning condition for fen areas in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Ranges in California, a user guide. Vallejo, CA: US Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Gen Tech Rep R5-TP-028

  • Western Regional Climate Center (2007) Bonham Reservoir (050825) period of record monthly climate summary, 7/1/1963 to 6/30/2007. Online data: wrcc@dri.edu. Accessed 27 Nov 2007

  • Whitehouse HE, Bayley SE (2005) Vegetation patterns and biodiversity of peatland plant communities surrounding mid-boreal wetland ponds in Alberta, Canada. Can J Bot 83:621–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind-Mulder HL, Vitt DH (2000) Comparisons of water and peat chemistries of a post-harvested and undisturbed peatland with relevance to restoration. Wetlands 20(4):616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winters DS, Bohn B, Cooper DJ, Eaglin G, Hamerlinck JD, Hirsch C, Poff NL, Quimby CM, Rahel FJ, Rau P, Scaife D, Staley DM, Wohl EE (2006) Conceptual framework and protocols for conducting multiple scale aquatic, riparian, and wetland ecological assessments for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Species Conservation Project, Lakewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf EC, Cooper DJ (2015) Fens of the Sierra Nevada, California, USA: patterns of distribution and vegetation. Mires and Peat 15: in press

  • Yeend WE (1965) Quaternary geology of the Grand Mesa area western Colorado. Doctoral thesis. U of Wisconsin, Ann Arbor

  • Yeend WE (1973) Slow-sliding slumps, Grand Mesa, Colorado. Mt Geol 10:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoltai SC, Vitt DH (1995) Canadian wetlands: environmental gradients and classification. Vegetatio 118:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported in part by the USDA Forest Service (USFS), Gunnison Ranger District. We appreciated the statistical assistance from Joanna Lemly. Special thanks to Drs. Bill Weber, Ron Wittmann and Richard Andrus for bryophyte identification. We also thank Mark Hatcher, Linda Bledsoe, and Mike Brown, USFS, for logistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gay Austin.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Historic aerial photographs of impacts in Kennecott Fen on Grand Mesa. Top left clockwise, 1936, 1956, 1978, 2011. The 1936 and 1956 photographs indicate that the primary peat mass is still intact. The 1978 photograph shows flooding (dark color) and the peat mass breaking apart. In the Earth Google (2011) photograph the peat mass has sunken to the bottom of the reservoir and any remaining plant communities are drowning.

Appendix 2

Descriptions of the 16 fen, marsh, wet meadow, and modified fen plant communities.

Semi-aquatic communities

  1. (1)

    Nuphar lutea ssp. polysepalaPotamogeton nodosus a non-peat forming floating aquatic plant community, occurred in fen pools (n = 10) and marshes (n = 1). Similar communities occur in Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994; Heidel and Laursen 2003; Lemly 2007), Alaska (Viereck et al. 1992), Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, California, and British Columbia (NatureServe 2008).

  2. (2)

    Eleocharis macrostachya—Potamogeton foliosus; a semi-aquatic non-peat-forming plant community, occurred primarily in the pools of basins that had been modified for reservoir use. Similar communities (A2) occur primarily in hydrologically modified fens on Grand Mesa and marshes with fluctuating water levels across North America (Kartesz 1999).

Large sedge communities

  1. (3)

    Carex vesicaria dominated a peat-forming plant community that was distributed widely across the study area, primarily in fens and wet meadow basins. Standing water occurred during measurement periods. Similar communities occur in Colorado (Carsey et al. 2003), Wyoming (Heidel and Laursen 2003; Heidel and Jones 2006), Montana, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, and California (NatureServe 2008).

  2. (4)

    Carex utriculata dominated a peat-forming plant community that was widespread in the study area. Carex utriculata dominated vegetation occurs widely in Alaska (Viereck et al. 1992), Colorado (Cooper 1990; Carsey et al. 2003), and Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994; Heidel and Laursen 2003).

  3. (5)

    Carex saxatilis—Drepanocladus aduncus was the most widespread peat-forming plant community in fens (n = 54) and wet meadows (n = 9) in the study area. Similar communities occur in Colorado (Carsey et al. 2003), Alaska (Aiken et al. 1999), western Canada (Gignac et al. 2004), Utah, Montana, and Washington (Natureserve 2008).

Floating mat and bryophyte communities

  1. (6)

    Menyanthes trifoliata dominated a peat-forming plant community found only in seasonal to perennial pools in basins and small depressions. It is rare in the study area and occurred only in undisturbed sites. Similar communities occur in Alaska (Dachnowski-Stokes 1941; Viereck et al. 1992).

  2. (7)

    Carex limosa—Sphagnum teres—Calliergon cordifolium is a peat-forming plant community that occurred only in basins with consistent soil saturation and mean water table depth of 6 cm. Similar communities are found in Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994; Heidel and Laursen 2003; Heidel and Jones 2006; Lemly 2007), Montana (Cooper and Jones 2004), Colorado (Johnson and Steingraeber 2003), Minnesota (Glaser et al. 1981), California (Wolf and Cooper 2015), and Canada (Gignac et al. 2004).

  3. (8)

    Calliergon stramineum—Carex limosa—Menyanthes trifoliata is a peat-forming plant community found in basins with open water.

  4. (9)

    Sphagnum teres—Calliergon cordifolium—Carex canescens, a peat-forming plant community found in basin fens with floating peat mats. This community is similar to C. canescens communities in Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994; Heidel and Laursen 2003) and Canada (Gignac et al. 2004).

Small sedge communities

  1. (10)

    Carex aquatilis—Drepanocladus aduncus is the second most widespread peat-forming plant community found in fens (n = 37) and wet meadows (n = 3). Stands occur along wetter margins of fens or as the dominant community in wet meadows. Similar communities are common in Colorado (Johnston 1987; Cooper 1990; Carsey et al. 2003), Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994; Heidel and Laursen 2003; Heidel and Jones 2006), Montana (Cooper and Jones 2004), and Canada (Gignac et al. 2004).

  2. (11)

    Carex simulata—Drepanocladus aduncus, a peat producing community in fens (n = 16) and wet meadows (n = 2) occurred on gently sloping hillsides and small depressions. These stands had higher EC and high canopy cover of D. aduncus. Similar communities occur in mid to high elevations in Colorado (Cooper 1990; Carsey et al. 2003; Rocchio 2004), Wyoming (Heidel and Laursen 2003; Lemly 2007), Montana (Cooper and Jones 2004), California (Wolf and Cooper 2015), Nevada, Utah, Oregon, and Idaho (NatureServe 2008).

  3. (12)

    Eleocharis quinqueflora—Drepanocladus aduncus—Carex simulata, a widespread peat-forming plant community found in fens (n = 24) and wet meadows (n = 7) on slopes and in depressions. Similar communities occur across the western United States (NatureServe 2008), including Colorado (Cooper 1990; Carsey et al. 2003), Wyoming (Heidel and Laursen 2003; Lemly 2007), and Montana (Cooper and Jones 2004).

  4. (13)

    Carex illotaAulacomnium palustre—Pedicularis groenlandica, a peat-forming community found along the margins of seven basin fens and one wet meadow. Similar communities occur in Wyoming (Cooper and Andrus 1994), California (Wolf and Cooper 2015), Colorado (Carsey et al. 2003), and Oregon (NatureServe 2008).

  5. (14)

    Eleocharis acicularis—Hippuris vulgaris, a non-peat forming plant community found only in hydrologically modified fens with flooding, drainage, fluctuating water tables, and bare peat. Similar communities occur in Colorado, Wyoming, and California and typically has little plant diversity (NatureServe 2008).

Shrub and Forest communities

  1. (15)

    Salix planifolia—Calamagrostis canadensis occurred on the margins of fens and wet meadows. This type is common on Grand Mesa and in Colorado (Cooper 1990; Carsey et al. 2003; Johnson and Steingraeber 2003), Alaska (Viereck et al. 1992), Utah, and Wyoming (NatureServe 2008).

  2. (16)

    Picea engelmannii—Salix planifolia—Climacium dendroides occurred on the margins of fens and wet meadows. Of 13 stands, 11 were fens. Johnston (1987) classified a Picea engelmannii community in Colorado which is possibly related to a similar community (F1) on Grand Mesa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Austin, G., Cooper, D.J. Persistence of high elevation fens in the Southern Rocky Mountains, on Grand Mesa, Colorado, U.S.A.. Wetlands Ecol Manage 24, 317–334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9458-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9458-7

Keywords

Navigation