Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Regression-Based Models to Predict Fecal Bacteria Numbers at Select Sites within the Illinois River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Illinois River Watershed is a multi-facet basin with ecological and economic importance to its local stakeholders in northwest Arkansas and northeast Oklahoma, USA. The numbers, transport and sources of fecal bacteria in streams was identified as a research priority of the USDA NRI Water and Watershed Program in 2006, and the objective of this study was to evaluate the relation between fecal bacteria and other measured physicochemical parameters in water samples collected from selected sites throughout the Illinois River Watershed. An existing database (i.e., National Water Information Systems, NWIS) from the US Geological Survey (USGS) was used in this project. The data obtained includes discharge, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, Escherichia coli (E. coli), fecal coliform, and fecal streptococci among several other physic-chemical parameters. A synthetic model, based on multi-regression analysis, was developed to predict fecal bacteria numbers at these selected sites based on available USGS NWIS data, and the multiple regressions were significant at almost every site for all three bacteria groups. However, the physicochemical parameters used in the equations were very different across sites and fecal bacteria groups, suggesting that the development of such predictive models is site and bacteria group specific even within one watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashbolt, N. J., Grabow, W. K., & Snozzi, M. (2001). Indicators of microbial water quality. In L. Fewtrell & J. Bartram (Eds.), Water quality: Guidelines, standards and health (pp. 289–316). London: IWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter-Potter, W. R., & Gilland, W. R. (1988). Bacterial pollution in runoff from agricultural lands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 17, 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossong, C. R., Stevens, M. R., Doerfer, J. T., & Glass, B. R. (2006). Summary and evaluation of the quality of stormwater in Denver, Colorado, water years 1998-2001: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 05–5150. 94 pp.

  • Christensen, V. G. (2001). Characterization of surface-water quality based on real-time monitoring and regression analysis, Quivira National Wildlife Refuge, south-central Kansas, December 1998 through June 2001. Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4248. 33 pp.

  • Christensen, V. G., Jian, X., & Ziegler, A. C. (2000). Regression analysis and real-time water-quality monitoring to estimate constituent concentrations, loads, and yields in the Little Arkansas River, south-central Kansas, 1995-99. Water Resources Investigations Report 00-4126. 36 pp.

  • Christensen, V. G., Rasmussen, P. P., & Ziegler, A. C. (2002). Real-time water quality monitoring and regression analysis to estimate nutrient and bacteria concentrations in Kansas streams. Water Science and Technology, 45(9), 205–219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. L., & Norris, J. R. (2000). Occurrence of fecal coliform bacteria in selected streams in Wyoming, 1990–99. Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4198. 8 pp.

  • Craig, D. L., Fallowfield, H. J., & Cromar, N. J. (2001). The effects of temperature and sediment characteristics on survival of Escherichia coli in recreational coastal water and sediment. Environmental Health, 1, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. R., Coyne, M. S., Daniel, T. C., Vendrell, P. F., Murdoch, J. F., & Moore, P. A., Jr. (1997). Indicator bacteria concentrations of two northwest Arkansas streams in relation to flow and season. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 40(1), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eleria, A., & Vogel, R. M. (2005). Predicting fecal coliform bacteria levels in the Charles River, Massachusetts, USA. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(5), 1195–1209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fries, J. S., Characklis, G. W., & Noble, R. T. (2006). Attachment of fecal indicator bacteria to particles in the Neuse River Estuary. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(10), 1338–1345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, J. M., Evans, D. A., & Green, W. R. (2005). Comparability of suspended-sediment concentration and total suspended-solids data for two sites on the L’Anguille, Arkansas, 2001 to 2003. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 05-5193, 16 pp.

  • Green, W. R., & Haggard B. E. (2001). Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and loads in the Illinois River, Arkansas, 1997–1999. US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigation Report 01-4217. 12 pp.

  • Guber, A. K., Shelton, D. R., Pachepsky, Y. A., Sadeghi, A. M., & Sikora, L. J. (2006). Rainfall-induced release of fecal coliforms and other manure constituents: comparison and modeling. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(12), 7531–7539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habteselassie, M., Bischoff, M., Blume, E., Applegate, B., Reuhs, B., Brouder, S., et al. (2008). Environmental controls of the fate of Escherichia coli in soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 190, 143–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyer, K. E., & Moyer, D. L. (2003). Patterns and sources of fecal coliform bacteria in three streams in Virginia, 1999-2000. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4115. 84 pp.

  • Jamieson, R. C., Joy, D. M., Lee, H., Kostaschuk, R., & Gordon, R. J. (2004). Persistence of enteric bacteria in alluvial streams. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 3, 203–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. C., Joy, D. M., Lee, H., Kostaschuck, R., & Gordon, R. (2005). Transport and deposition of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in natural streams. Water Research, 39, 2665–2675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, E. K., Kurz, R., Vincent, R., Rodriguez-Palacios, C., Farrah, S. R., & Rose, J. B. (2001). The effects of seasonal vairability and weather on microbial fecal pollution and enteric pathogens in a subtropical estuary. Estuaries, 24, 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A., Williams, K. E., Esham, E. C., & Lowe, R. P. (2000). Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecological Applications, 10, 1047–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R. W. (2006). Contaminant losses in overland flow from cattle, deer, and sheep dung. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 174, 211–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meals, D. W., & Braun, D. C. (2006). Demonstration of methods to reduce E. coli runoff from dairy manure application sites. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1088–1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. (2003). Wastewater engineering: treatment disposal, and reuse (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A., Benham, B. L., & Mostaghimi, S. (2008). Bacterial transport from agricultural lands fertilized with animal manure. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 189, 127–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead, R. W., Davies-Colley, R. J., Donnison, A. M., & Nagels, J. W. (2004). Faecal bacteria yields in artificial flood events: quantifying in-stream stores. Water Research, 38, 1215–1224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevers, M. B., & Whitman, R. L. (2005). Nowcast modeling of Escherichia coli concentrations at multiple urban beaches of southern Lake Michigan. Water Research, 39, 5250–5260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. M., & Niemi, J. S. (1991). Bacterial pollution of waters in Pristine and agricultural lands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 20(3), 620–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, R. T., & Fuhrman, J. A. (2001). Enteroviruses detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reactions from the coastal waters of Santa Monica Bay, California: low correlation to bacterial indicator levels. Hydrobiologia, 460, 175–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. C., Haggard, B. E., & Reed, W. R. (2002). Hydrologic characteristics of Bear Creek near Silver Hill and Buffalo River near St. Joe, Arkansas, 1999–2000. Water Resources Investigations Report 02-4024. Little Rock, Ark.: U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Rasmussen, P. P., & Ziegler, A. C. (2003). Comparison and continuous estimates of fecal coliform and Escherichia coli bacteria in selected Kansas streams, May 1999 through April 2002. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 03-4056. 87pp.

  • Schumacher, J. G. (2004). Fecal bacteria in streams and land-applied poultry litter in the Upper Shoal Creek Basin, southwestern Missouri, 2001–2002. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4243. 39 pp.

  • Servais, P., Garcia-Armisen, T., George, I., & Billen, G. (2007). Fecal bacteria in the rivers of the Seine drainage network (France): sources, fate and modeling. Science of the Total Environment, 375, 152–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soupir, M. L., Mostaghimi, S., Yagow, E. R., Hagedorn, C., & Vaughan, D. H. (2006). Transport of fecal bacteria from poultry litter and cattle manures applied to pastureland. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 169, 125–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southwest Paddler (SWP). 2007. Illinois River Description. <http://www.southwestpaddler.com> Accessed February 1, 2007.

  • Sullivan, T. J., Snyder, K. U., Gilbert, E., Bischoff, J. M., Wustenberg, M., Moore, J., et al. (2005). Assessment of water quality in association with land use in the Tillamook Bay Watershed, Oregon, USA. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 161, 3–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiagarajan, A., Gordon, R., Madani, A., & Stratton, G. W. (2007). Discharge of Escherichia coli from agricultural surface and subsurface drainage water: tillage effects. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 182, 3–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Unc, A., & Goss, M. J. (2004). Transport of bacteria from manure and protection of water resources. Applied Soil Ecology, 25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2003). Bacterial water quality standards for recreational waters (Freshwater and Marine Waters) Status Report. EPA-823-R-03-008.

  • Vogel, J. R., Stoeckel, D. M., Lamendella, R., Zelt, R. B., Santo Domingo, J. W., Walker, S. R., et al. (2007). Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools. Journal of Environmental Quality, 63, 718–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, K. L., & Wahl, T. L. (1988). Effects of regional groundwater level declines on stream flow in the Oklahoma panhandle. In Proc. Water Use Data for Water Resources Management, 239–249. Middleburg, Va.: American Water Resources Association.

  • Wahl, K. L., & Tortorelli, R. L. (1997). Changes in flow in the Beaver–North Canadian River basin upstream from Canton Lake, western Oklahoma. Water Resources Investigations Report 96–4304. Little Rock, Ark.: U.S. Geological Survey.

  • Wang, L., Mankin, K. R., & Marchin, G. L. (2004). Survival of fecal bacteria in dairy cow manure. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 47, 1239–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. L., Haggard, B. E., & Chaubey, I. (2004). Water quality at the Buffalo National River, Arkansas, 1991–2001. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 47(2), 407–417.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K. D., & Thackston, E. L. (1999). Housing density and bacterial loading in urban streams. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125, 1177–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the USDA NRI Water and Watersheds Program in 2006, and the authors would like to thank W.R. Green and T.S. Soerens for serving on this thesis committee and provided helpful comments on the thesis manuscript chapter. This paper simply evaluated fecal bacteria numbers in relation to existing recommendation from the US Environmental Protection Agency, and it does not suggest that these sites violate or exceed specific water quality standards in Arkansas and Oklahoma. The data used in this paper are available publicly, and the states can or have used this data to evaluate impairments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian E. Haggard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

David, M.M., Haggard, B.E. Development of Regression-Based Models to Predict Fecal Bacteria Numbers at Select Sites within the Illinois River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Water Air Soil Pollut 215, 525–547 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0497-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0497-7

Keywords

Navigation