Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing MSA Algorithm by New Fitness-Distance-Balance Selection Method to Optimize Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs Operation

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal operation of cascade hydropower reservoirs is a complex high-dimensional engineering problem. Developing an appropriate model to solve such problems requires an efficient search method proportional to the dimensions of the problem. Accordingly, this research employed the new fitness-distance-balance (FDB) selection method in the moth swarm algorithm (MSA) to achieve promoted FDB-MSA with a high performance in solving complex large-scale problems. To ensure the efficiency of the developed algorithm, five benchmark functions of Shekel, Six-Hump Camel, McCormick, Goldstein-Price and Rosenbrock were used. Then, the FDB-MSA was used for optimization of hydropower generation of a real five-reservoir system along Karun River at Iran. This is the largest cascade reservoir system in Iran, which supplies more than 90% of the country’s hydropower demand. The results of the developed algorithm were compared with those of genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. It was found that the FDB-MSA could successfully increase the hydropower generation by 59.5% (6724 GW) compared to the actual generation of energy over a 180-months operational period. The corresponding values for PSO and GA algorithms were 54.3% and 9.2% respectively. In addition, the results revealed the superiority of FDB-MSA to GA and PSO, so that, it demonstrated the smallest difference (3.41%) between nominal and optimal power generation compared to the PSO (6.58%) and GA (33.89%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

References

  • Akbarifard S, Sharifi MR, Qaderi K (2020) Data on optimization of the karun-4 hydropower reservoir operation using evolutionary algorithms. Data Brief 29:105048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizipour M, Ghalenoei V, Afshar MH, Solis SS (2016) Optimal operation of hydropower reservoir systems using weed optimization algorithm. Water Resour Manag 30(11):3995–4009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros MT, Tsai FT, Yang SL, Lopes JE, Yeh WW (2003) Optimization of large-scale hydropower system operations. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(3):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmani S, Yebdri D (2020) Hybrid algorithm of particle swarm optimization and Grey Wolf optimizer for reservoir operation management. Water Resour Manag 34:4545–4560

  • Dezab Consulting Engineering CO (2010) Systematic studies report on Dez and Karun basin. Water resources planning studies. Ministry of Energy of Iran. First edition

  • Ehteram, M., Binti Koting, S., Afan, H. A., Mohd, N. S., Malek, M. A., Ahmed, A. N., ... & El-Shafie, A. (2019). New evolutionary algorithm for optimizing hydropower generation considering multireservoir systems. Appl Sci 9(11): 2280

  • Jevtic M, Jovanovic N, Radosavljevic J, Klimenta D (2017) Moth swarm algorithm for solving combined economic and emission dispatch problem. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 23(5):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman HT, Aras S, Gedikli E (2020) Fitness-distance balance (FDB): a new selection method for meta-heuristic search algorithms. Knowl-Based Syst 190:105169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luque-Chang A, Cuevas E, Pérez-Cisneros M, Fausto F, Valdivia-González A, Sarkar R (2020) Moth swarm algorithm for image contrast enhancement. Knowl-Based Syst 212:106607

  • Madadi MR, Akbarifard S, Qaderi K (2020) Performance evaluation of improved symbiotic organism search algorithm for estimation of solute transport in Rivers. Water Resour Manag 34:1453–1464

  • Mantegna RN (1994) Fast, accurate algorithm for numerical simulation of levy stable stochastic processes. Phys Rev E 49(5):4677–4683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcfadyen A, Corke P, Mejias L (2014) Visual predictive control of spiral motion. IEEE Trans Robot 30(6):1441–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed AAA, Mohamed YS, El-Gaafary AA, Hemeida AM (2017) Optimal power flow using moth swarm algorithm. Electr Power Syst Res 142:190–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed AA, Sule BF, Salami AW, Adeogun AG (2019) Optimization of energy generation based on operations and ecological integrity requirements. Slovak J Civil Eng 27(3):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair SJ, Sasikumar K (2019) Fuzzy reliability-based optimization of a hydropower reservoir. J Hydroinf 21(2):308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Séguin S, Audet C, Côté P (2017) Scenario-tree modeling for stochastic short-term hydropower operations planning. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143(12):04017073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen J, Cheng C, Wang S, Yuan X, Sun L, Zhang J (2020) Multi-objective optimal operations for an interprovincial hydropower system considering peak-shaving demands. Renew Sust Energ Rev 120:109617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Cheng C, Lund JR, Niu W, Miao S (2018) Stochastic dynamic programming for hydropower reservoir operations with multiple local optima. J Hydrol 564:712–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yucesan M, Kahraman G (2019) Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: a model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. Energy Policy 126:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Wu Z, Cheng CT, Zhang SQ (2011) Improved particle swarm optimization algorithm for multi-reservoir system operation. Water Sci Eng 4(1):61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Jia B, Chen X, Qin H, He Z, Liu G (2019) Identifying efficient operating rules for hydropower reservoirs using system dynamics approach—a case study of three gorges reservoir, China. Water 11(12):2448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Yang X, Ling Y, Zhang J (2018) Meta-heuristic moth swarm algorithm for multilevel thresholding image segmentation. Multimed Tools Appl 77(18):23699–23727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Research Council of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz for financial support (GN: SCU.WH99.26878). Also, we acknowledge the Khuzestan Water and Power Authority.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Saeid Akbarifard: Methodology, Writing, Original draft preparation, Data analysis. Mohamad Reza Sharifi: Conceptualization, Data collection, Supervision. Kourosh Qaderi: Visualization, Review, Supervision. Mohamad Reza Madadi: Review, English editing, Revision preparation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Akbarifard.

Ethics declarations

Consent for Publication

the authors declare their consent to publication of this manuscript by “Water Resources Management” journal.

Consent to Participate

The authors declare their consent to participate in this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharifi, M.R., Akbarifard, S., Qaderi, K. et al. Developing MSA Algorithm by New Fitness-Distance-Balance Selection Method to Optimize Cascade Hydropower Reservoirs Operation. Water Resour Manage 35, 385–406 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02745-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02745-8

Keywords

Navigation