Skip to main content
Log in

The Determination of Reference Evapotranspiration for Spatial Distribution Mapping Using Geostatistics

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is an essential variable in the agrohydrological systems and its estimation on a regional scale is limited to its spatial variability. This study compares two approaches for preparation of spatial distribution maps of ET0 in Mazandaran province of Iran. In the first approach, ET0 was calculated using climatic data and Hargreaves-Samani equation in weather stations locations and then were interpolated. In the second approach, the components of the Hargreaves-Samani equation were interpolated and then ET0 maps were prepared by applying the Hargreaves-Samani equation and suitable commands in GIS. The 10-year climatic data for 51 weather stations (46 stations for preparing ET0 maps and 5 stations as validation station) were gathered over Mazandaran province. Semivariograms were calculated and the best semivariogram model was selected on the basis of the least value of Residual Sums of Squares (RSS). The spatial correlation of the data was compared on the basis of Nugget to Sill ratio. The data were interpolated using Ordinary Kriging method and the interpolation error was computed by cross validation technique based on Root Mean Square Standardized Error (RMSSE). The predicted ET0 values were compared to the computed ET0 in validation stations and sensitivity analysis was conducted. Results show the second approach had better spatial correlation and lower interpolation error and the difference between these two approaches were not significant. Therefore, the accuracy of the ET0 maps is more related to the method of computing ET0 than the type of climatic data is being interpolated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi SH, Sedghamiz A (2008) Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping. Environ Monit Assess 138(1–3):357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Irrigation and drainage paper no.56. F.A.O, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Loftis JC, Hubbard KG (1997) Application of geostatistics to evalu-ate partial weather station networks. Agr Forest Meteorol 84:255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assaf H, Saadeh M (2009) Geostatistical assessment of groundwater nitrate contamination with reflection on DRASTIC vulnerability assessment: the case of the upper Litani Basin, Lebanon. Water Resour Manag 23(4):775–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barca E, Calzolari MC, Passarella G, Ungaro F (2013) Predicting shallow water table depth at regional scale: optimizing monitoring network in space and time. Water Resour Manag 27(15):5171–5190

    Google Scholar 

  • Basistha A, Arya DS, Goel NK (2008) Spatial distribution of rainfall in Indian Himalayas—a case study of uttarakhand region. Water Resour Manag 22(10):1325–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechini L, Ducco G, Donatelli M, Stein A (2000) Modelling, interpolation and stochastic simulation in space and time of global solar radiation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 81:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso C, Quarta F (1998) Interpolation methods comparison. Comput Math Appl 35(12):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creutin JD, Obled C (1982) Objective analyses and mapping techniques for rainfall fields: an objective comparison. Water Resour Res 18(2):413–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca RH, Amegee KY (1987) Analysis of evapotranspiration as a regionalized variable. In: Hillel D (ed.). Advances in Irrigation. 4:181±220

  • Dalezios NR, Loukas A, Bampzelis D (2002) Spatial variability of reference evapotranspiration in Greece. Phys Chem Earth A B C 27(23–24):1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delbari M, Khaiat Kholqi M, Mahdian MH (2004) Evaluation of geostatistical methods for soil hydraulic conductivity assessment in Shibab and Poshtab-paein in Sistan plain, Olume keshavarzi Iran magazine. 35(1)

  • Delhomme JP (1978) Kriging in hydrosciences. Adv Water Resour 1:251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diodato N, Tartari G, Bellocchi G (2010) Geospatial rainfall modelling at eastern Nepalese highland from ground environmental data. Water Resour Manag 24(11):2703–2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1992) Expert consultation on revision of FAO methodologies for crop water requirements. FAO, Rome, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1994) Water for life. World Food day 1994, Rome

  • Farshi AA, Shariati MR, Jarollahi R, Ghaemi MR, Shahabifar M, TavallaeiMM (1997) An estimate of water requirement of main field crops and orchards in Iran. Nashre Amuzesh Keshavarzi press. 2:629

  • Ganjizadeh R, Borumandnasab S, Soltani mohammadi A, Ganjizadeh H (2013) determination of reference evapotranspiration using interpolation methods and comparison to experimental methods (A case study in Golestan province), first conference of water crisis, Isfahan

  • Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, NewYork, p 561

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite GW, Droogers P (2000) Comparing evapotranspiration estimates from satellites, hydrological models and field data. J Hydrol 229:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manghi F, Mortazavi B, Crother C, Hamdi MR (2009) Estimating regional groundwater recharge using a hydrological budget method. Water Resour Manag 23(12):2475–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardikis MG, Kalivas DP, Kollias VJ (2005) Comparisonof interpolationmethods for the prediction of reference evapotranspiration—an application in Greece. Water Resour Manag 19:251–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marofi S, Tabari H, Zare Abyaneh H (2011) Predicting spatial distribution of snow water equivalent using multivariate non-linear regression and computational intelligence methods. Water Resour Manag 25(5):1417–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Cob A (1996) Multivariate geostatistical analysis of evapotranspiration and precipitation in mountain terrain. J Hydrol 174:19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masoud AA (2014) Groundwater quality assessment of the shallow aquifers west of the Nile Delta (Egypt) using multivariate statistical and geostatistical techniques. J Afr Earth Sci 95:123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalder IA, Wein RW (1998) Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest. Agric For Meteorol 92:211–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noshadi M, Sepaskhah AR (2005) Application of geostatistics for potential evapotranspiration estimation. Iran J Sci Technol Trans B Eng 29(No. B3)

  • Phillips DL, Marks D (1996) Spatial uncertainty analysis: propagation of interpolation errors in spatially distributed models. Ecol Model 91:213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RahimZadeh F, Khoshkam M (2003) Moisture series changes in country synoptic stations, the third regional conference and the first climate change national conference, 53–62. Isfahan University of Technology

  • Rana G, Katerji N (2000) Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: a review. Eur J Agron 13:125–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura F, Spano D, Duce P, Snyder RL (1999) An evaluation of common evapotranspiration equations. Irrig Sci 18:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber D, England E (1994) Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II. Math Geol 26:589–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester, p 271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Kang S, Zhang L, Liu J (2010) Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest china. Agric Water Manag J 97(2010):1506–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Nan Z, Cheng G (2005) Methods for estimating irrigation needs of spring wheat in the middle Heihe basin, China. Agric Water Manag 75(2005):54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rouzbeh Nazari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamali, M.I., Nazari, R., Faridhosseini, A. et al. The Determination of Reference Evapotranspiration for Spatial Distribution Mapping Using Geostatistics. Water Resour Manage 29, 3929–3940 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1037-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1037-4

Keywords

Navigation