Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Interpolation Methods for the Prediction of Reference Evapotranspiration—An Application in Greece

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate four interpolation methods, concerning their suitability for spatial prediction of long-term mean daily reference evapotranspiration (calculated by Penman–Monteith equation) for each month in Greece. The methods studied were ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance squared (IDS) and their modifications in which elevation data was incorporated into the interpolation process. The modified methods were named residual kriging (RK), and gradient-plus-inverse distance squared (GIDS). Apart from interpolation methods, two different approaches were studied in order to define what the proper sequence of steps is in the case of the interpolation of reference evapotranspiration. More particularly the ‘calculate first, interpolate later’ (CI) procedure was compared to the reverse procedure, namely ‘interpolate first, calculate later’ (IC). The assessment criteria of the methods accuracy were: mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The results revealed that the incorporation of elevation significantly improved the performance of interpolation methods. On the contrary, procedures CI and IC were very similar since they had no effect on the performance of the four interpolation methods studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M., 1998, Crop evapotranspiration–-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Antonic, O., Krizan, J., Marki, A., and Bukovec, D., 2001, ‘Spatio-temporal interpolation of climatic variables over large region of complex terrain using neural networks’, Ecol. Model. 138, 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, M., Loftis, J. C., and Hubbard, K. G., 1997, ‘Application of geostatistics to evaluate partial weather station networks’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 84, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechini, L., Ducco, G., Donatelli, M., and Stein, A., 2000, ‘Modelling, interpolation and stochastic simulation in space and time of global solar radiation’, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 81, 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, H. P. & Criddle, W. D., 1950, ‘Determining water requirements in irrigated areas from climatological and irrigation data’, USDA Soil of Conservation Service, Tech Paper 96.

  • Boer, E. P. J., deBeurs, K. M., and Hartkamp, A. D., 2001, ‘Kriging and thin plate splines for mapping climate variables’, Int. J. Appl. Earth Observation Geoinform. 3, 146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borga, M. and Vizzaccaro, A., 1997, ‘On the interpolation of the hydrologic variables: Formal equivalence of multiquadratic surface fitting and kriging’, J. Hydrol. 195, 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourennane, H., King, D., Chery, P., and Bruand, A., 1996, ‘Improving the kriging of a soil variable using slope gradient as external drift’, Eur. J. Soil Sci. 47, 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T. M. & Webster, R., 1980, ‘Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. I. The semi-variogram and punctual kriging’, J. Soil Sci. 31, 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A. and McDonnell, R. A., 1998, Principles of Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprio, J. M., 1974, ‘The solar thermal unit concept in problems related to plant development and potential evapotranspiration’, in H. Lieth (ed.), Phenology and Seasonality Modeling. Ecological Studies, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 353–364.

  • Caruso, C. and Quarta, F., 1998, ‘Interpolation methods comparison’, Comput. Math. Appl. 35, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalezios, N. R., Loukas, A., and Bampzelis, D., 2002, ‘Spatial variability of reference evapotranspiration in Greece’, Phys. Chem. Earth 27, 1031–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. N., Hay, J. E., Stow, C. D., and Harris, D., 1998, ‘High-resolution studies of rainfall on Norfolk Island. Part II: Interpolation of rainfall data’, J. Hydrol. 208, 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P., 1999, ‘Geostatistics in soil science: State-of-the-art and perspectives’, Geoderma 89, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts, P., 2000, ‘Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall’, J. Hydrol. 228, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, G. H., 1974, ‘Estimation of potential and crop evapotranspiration’, Trans. ASAE 17, 701–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holawe, F. and Dutter, R., 1999, ‘Geostatistical study of precipitation series in Austria: Time and space’, J. Hydrol. 219, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, M. F., 1995, ‘Stochastic space–time weather models from ground-based data’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 73, 237–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso, S. B., Reginato, R. J., and Jackson, R. D., 1977, ‘An equation for potential evaporation from soil, water and crop surfaces adaptable to use by remote sensing’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 4, 187–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E. and Haise, H. R., 1963, ‘Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation’, J. Irrig. Drain. Div., ASCE 89, 15–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. G. and Thornton, P. K., 1999, ‘Fitting a third-order Markov rainfall model to interpolated climate surfaces’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 97, 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining Geostatistics, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollias, V. J., Kalivas, D. P., and Yassoglou, N. J., 1999, ‘Mapping the soil resources of a recent alluvial plain in Greece using fuzzy sets in a GIS environment’, Eur. J. Soil Sci. 50, 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, E. T., 1977, ‘A simple formula for estimating evaporation rates in various climates using temperature data alone’, Agric. Meteorol. 18, 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkink, G. F., 1957, ‘Ekzameno de la formula de Penman’, Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 5, 290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Cob, A., 1996, ‘Multivariate geostatistical analysis of evapotranspiration and precipitation in mountain terrain’, J. Hydrol. 174, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1965, Les Variables Regionalisees et leur Estimation, Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1971, The Theory of Regionalized Variables and Its Application, Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique, Fontenebleau, Paris.

  • Monteith, J. L., 1965, ‘Evaporation and environment’, Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the Society of Experimental Biology, Vol. 19, University Press, Cambridge, pp. 205–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalder, I. A. and Wein, R. W., 1998, ‘Spatial interpolation of climatic normals: Test of a new method in the Canadian boreal forest’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 92, 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannatier, Y., 1996, VARIOWIN: Software for spatial data analysis in 2D, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazafiriou, G. Z., 1984, Principles and Practice on Irrigation (in Greek), Ziti Publications, Thessaloniki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman, H. L., 1948, ‘Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Ser. A), Vol. 193, London, pp. 120–145.

  • Penman, H. L., 1963, ‘Vegetation and hydrology’, Tech. Commun. 53, 125, Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, England.

  • Phillips, D. L. and Marks, D., 1996, ‘Spatial uncertainty analysis: Propagation of interpolation errors in spatially distributed models’, Ecol. Model. 91, 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. T., McKenney, D. W., Nalder, I. A., Hutchinson, M. F., and Kesteven, J. L., 2000, ‘A comparison of two statistical methods for spatial interpolation of Canadian monthly mean climate data’, Agric. Forest Meteorol. 101, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, C. H. B. and Taylor, R. J., 1972, ‘On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters’, Monthly Weather Rev. 100, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, G. and Katerji, N., 2000, ‘Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: A review’, Eur. J. Agron. 13, 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanhill, G. A., 1961, ‘Comparison of methods of calculating potential evapotranspiration from climatic data’, Israel J. Agric. Res., Bet-Dagan, 11, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatyer, R. O. and McIlroy, I. G., 1961, ‘Practical micro-climatology with special reference to water in soil–plant–atmospheric relationships’, GSIRO Austr. 1–296.

  • Tanner, C. B., 1967, ‘Measurement of evapotranspiration’, in Irrigation of Agricultural Lands. Agronomy II, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, Chapter 29, pp. 534–574.

  • Thornthwaite, C. W., 1948, ‘An approach towards a rational classification of climates’, Geograph. Rev. 38, 55–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. E., Running, S. W., and White, M. A., 1997, ‘Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain’, J. Hydrol. 190, 214–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turc, L., 1961, ‘Evaluation des besoins en eau d’irrigation, évapotranspiration potentielle, formule climatique simplifiée et mise a jour’, Annals Agron. 12, 13–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel, C. H. M., 1966, ‘Potential evaporation: The combination concept and its experimental verification’, Water Resour. Res. 2, 455–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltz, M. and Webster, R., 1990, ‘A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information’, J. Soil Sci. 41, 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. G. Mardikis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mardikis, M.G., Kalivas, D.P. & Kollias, V.J. Comparison of Interpolation Methods for the Prediction of Reference Evapotranspiration—An Application in Greece. Water Resour Manage 19, 251–278 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-3179-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-005-3179-2

Key words

Navigation