Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of agricultural drought characteristics through a two-dimensional copula

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 20 June 2015

Abstract

The potential of a copula model for the description of the joint probability distribution of two agricultural drought characteristics, the relative onset RO and the relative severity RS, is investigated in Perugia (Central Italy) in reference to a sunflower crop. The 1924–2009 time series of daily precipitation and maximum and minimum temperature were used to simulate, by means of the AquaCrop model, the root-zone soil water dynamics (SW t ) and the crop yield under rainfed conditions. The seasonal values of RO and RS were quantified, by applying the theory of runs to SW t (assumed as the drought reference variable), with a threshold equal to the crop critical point. The analysis shows that the best-fitting marginal distribution for both RO and RS is a truncated Gumbel distribution. The dependence structure of RO and RS, investigated by graphical and analytical techniques, was modeled by a Student copula, which is able to adequately reproduce both the overall and upper tail dependence among variables. Lastly, the Student copula was applied to obtain joint probabilities and bivariate return periods for RO and RS. These results, compared with the expected estimated yields, provide useful information for drought planning and management. For example, for the case study considered, it was found that the condition RO ≥ 0.43 (i.e., onset before the end of June) and RS ≥ 0.22 has a 5-year return period and is frequently associated with critical yields, and that the condition RO ≥ 0.47 (i.e., onset before mid-June) and RS ≥ 0.25 has a 10-year return period and is almost certainly associated with critical yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irr and drain paper 56. UN-FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarti IM, Laha RG, Roy J (1967) Handbook of methods of applied statistics, vol I. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Singh VP, Guo S (2011) Drought analysis based on copulas. 2011 symposium on data-driven approaches to droughts. Paper 45. Purdue e-pubs. Purdue University, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  • Frahm G, Junker M, Schmidt R (2005) Estimating the tail-dependence coefficient: properties and pitfalls. Insur Math Econ 37(1):80–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganguli P, Janga Reddy M (2012) Risk assessment of droughts in Gujarat using bivariate copulas. Water Resour Manag 26:3301–3327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Favre A (2007) Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Remillard B, Beaudoin D (2009) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insur Math Econ 44:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Z, AghaKouchak A (2013) Multivariate standardized drought index: a parametric multi-index model. Adv Water Resour 57:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim RR Jr (2002) A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(8):1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt ED, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA, Arkebauer TJ, Dutcher AL (2009) The development and evaluation of a soil moisture index. Int J Climatol 29(5):747–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janga Reddy M, Ganguli P (2012) Application of copulas for derivation of drought severity–duration–frequency curves. Hydrol Process 16(11):1672–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe H (1997) Multivariate model and dependence concepts. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kao SC, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma MW, Song S, Ren LL, Jiang SH, Song JL (2013) Multivariate drought characteristics using trivariate Gaussian and Student t copulas. Hydrol Process 27:1175–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannocchi F, Todisco F, Vergni L (2009) A new methodology for the risk analysis and economic impact assessment of agricultural droughts. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 135(5):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doeskin NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Proc8th Conf Applied Climatol, California, pp 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirabbasi R, Fakheri-Fard A, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Bivariate drought frequency analysis using the copula method. Theor Appl Climatol 108:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirakbari M, Ganji A, Fallah S (2010) Regional bivariate frequency analysis of meteorological droughts. J Hydrol Eng 15(12):985–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391(1–2):202–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Singh VP (2011) Drought modeling - a review. J Hydrol 403(1–2):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan B, Srinivasan R (2005) Development and evaluation of soil moisture deficit index (SMDI) and evapotranspiration deficit index (ETDI) for agricultural drought monitoring. Agric For Meteorol 133:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E (2009) AquaCrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J 101:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras VO, Hali AJ (1988) Quantification of temperature, photoperiod and population effect on plant leaf area in sunflower crop. Crop Res J 18:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghafian B, Mehdikhani H (2014) Drought characterization using a new copula-based trivariate approach. Nat Hazards 72:1391–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C (2007) On the use of copulas in hydrology: theory and practice. J Hydrol Eng 12(4):369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori G, De Michele C (2015) Multivariate real-time assessment of droughts via copula-based multi-site Hazard Trajectories and Fans. J Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.056

    Google Scholar 

  • Serinaldi F, Bonaccoroso B, Cancelliere A, Grimaldi S (2009) Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Phys Chem Earth 34(10–12):596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT (2006) Fitting drought duration and severity with two-dimensional copulas. Water Resour Manag 20:795–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Feng S, Nadarajah S (2007) Assessment of hydrological droughts for the Yellow River, China, using copulas. Hydrol Process 21:2157–2163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau JT, Modarres R (2009) Copula-based drought severity-duration-frequency analysis in Iran. Meteorol Appl 16(4):481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst State Univ Paris 8:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Song SB, Singh VP (2010) Meta-elliptical copulas for drought frequency analysis of periodic hydrologic data. Stoch Env Res Risk A 24:425–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Raes D, Fereres E (2009) Aqua crop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron J 101:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic M, Albrizio R, Zivotic L, Abi Saab M, Stockle C, Steduto P (2009) Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J 101:509–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todisco F, Vergni L, Mannocchi F (2009) An operative approach to the agricultural droughts risk management. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 135(5):654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todisco F, Mannocchi F, Vergni L (2013) Severity–duration–frequency curves in the mitigation of drought impact: an agricultural case study. Nat Hazards 65:1863–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong G, van Lanen HAJ, Torfs PJJF (2013) Probabilistic analysis of hydrological drought characteristics using meteorological drought. Hydrol Sci J 58(2):253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yevjevich V (1967) An objective approach to definitions and investigations of continental hydrologic droughts. Hydrology paper No. 23. Colorado State University, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusof F, Hui-Mean F, Suhaila J, Yusof Z (2013) Characterisation of drought properties with bivariate copula analysis. Water Resour Manag 27:4183–4207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xiao M, Singh VP, Chen X (2013a) Copula-based risk evaluation of droughts across the Pearl River basin, China. Theor Appl Climatol 111:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xiao M, Singh VP, Chen X (2013b) Copula-based risk evaluation of hydrological droughts in the East River basin, China. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27:1397–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zin WZW, Jemain AA, Ibrahim K (2013) Analysis of drought condition and risk in peninsular Malaysia using standardised precipitation index. Theor Appl Climatol 111:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Vergni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vergni, L., Todisco, F. & Mannocchi, F. Analysis of agricultural drought characteristics through a two-dimensional copula. Water Resour Manage 29, 2819–2835 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0972-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0972-4

Keywords

Navigation