Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Landscape Planning and Management Tool for Land and Water Resources Management: An Example Application in Northern Ethiopia

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land and water degradation due to on-site soil/nutrient loss and off-site pollution/sedimentation are serious environmental problems. Landscape planning and management tools are essential to implement best management practices targeted at locations where they are needed most. Although many soil/water-landscape studies have been published in the last 2 decades, progress in developing operational tools for supporting landscape planning to minimize land and water degradation in developing regions is still modest. Some of the existing tools are data demanding and/or complicated to be useful to data scarce regions. Some require detailed understanding of the hydrological and modelling processes and thus less applicable to local stakeholders involved in land use planning and management. A user-friendly LAndscape Planning and MAnagement Tool (LAPMAT) developed to facilitate land management decision-making. LAPMAT is a menu-oriented interactive graphical user interface that can aid decision makers identify hotspot areas of soil erosion and evaluate the effects of alternative land use management practices at a catchment scale. The modelling framework and its interfaces are designed to guide the user through a series of menus that: 1) allow input model parameters, adjusting coefficients, visualizing input parameters and executing the model; 2) enable changing land use and management practices and re-evaluating potential consequences; 3) allow viewing results in tabular, graphical or map form side-by-side; and 4) (re)-evaluating the respective impacts of management/conservation options. The framework has been applied to assess the severity of soil erosion and simulate the impact of different land management practices using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) adjusted for sediment delivery ratio in an example catchment of northern Ethiopia. The results showed average sediment yield rate of 55 t ha−1 y−1. Conservation measures targeted at high soil loss areas and gullies gave the maximum reduction in sediment yield by about 80 %. Since LAPMAT allows users handle the selection of management/planning options and provide fast and responsive outputs, it can assist in effective multi-stakeholder negotiations over land-use planning where the minimization of land/water degradation is the ultimate goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aynekulu E, Solomon A, Aleme E (2000) Soil and water conservation report. Unpublished Field Report, CoSAERT, Mekelle, Ethiopia

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Alberts EE, Thompson AL (2004) Grass barrier and vegetative filter strip effectiveness in reducing runoff, sediment, nitrogen, and phosphorus loss. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1670–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogena H (2001) Analyzing and modeling solute and sediment transport at different spatial and temporal scales. A case study of the catchments of the Wahnbach River, Germany. Unpublished PhD Thesis Dissertation, University of Bonn, Germany

  • Borin M, Vianello M, Morari F, Zanin G (2005) Effectiveness of buffer strips in removing pollutants in runoff from cultivated field in North-East Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdary VM, Chakraborthy D, Jeyaram A, Murthy YVNK, Sharma JR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Multi-criteria decision making approach for watershed prioritization using analytic hierarchy process technique and GIS. Water Resour Manag 27:3555–3571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roo APJ (1998) Modelling runoff and sediment transport in catchments using GIS. Hydrol Process 12:905–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dregne HE (2002) Land degradation in the drylands. Arid Land Res Manag 16:99–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dregne HE, Chou N-T (1992) Global desertification dimensions and costs. In: Dregne HE (ed) Degradation and restoration of arid lands. Texas Tech. University, Lubbock, pp 249–282

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Swaify SA (1990) Research needs and applications to reduce erosion and sedimentation in the tropics. In: Ziemer RR, O’Lounghlin CL, and Hamilton LS (eds) Research needs and applications to reduce erosion and sedimentation in tropical steeplands. Proceedings of the Fijji Symposium. IAHS-AISH Publ. no. 192, pp 3–13

  • Eweg H, Van Lammeren R (1996) The application of a geographical information system at the rehabilitation of degraded and degrading areas. A case study in the Highlands of Tigray, Ethiopia. Centre for Geographical Information Processing, Agricultural University Wageningen, 79p

  • Fernandez C, Wu JQ, McCool DK, Stöckle CO (2003) Estimating water erosion and sediment yield with GIS, RUSLE, and SEDD. J Soil Water Conserv 58(3):128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapalli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR (1990) Process-based modelling of soil erosion by water on agricultural land. In: Boardman J, Foster IDL and Dearing JA (eds) Soil erosion on agricultural land. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp 429–446

  • Gallant JC, Wilson JP (2000) Primary topographic attributes. In: Wilson, JP, Gallant JC (eds) Terrain analysis: principles and application. John Wiley & Sons, pp 51–86

  • Garg V, Jothiprakash V (2012) Sediment yield assessment of a large basin using PSIAC approach in GIS environment. Water Resour Manag 26:799–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebrehawariat G, Haile H (1999) Reservoir sedimentation survey conducted on three micro dams in Tigray. CoSAERT, Tigray

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland DJ, Bowen G, Eswaran H, Rhodes R, Valentin C (1994) Soil, water, and nutrient management research: a new agenda. IBSRAM Position Paper. IBSRAM, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Haan CT, Barfield BJ, Hayes JC (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic Press, 588p

  • Hurni H (1985) Erosion - productivity - conservation systems in Ethiopia. Proceedings 4th International Conference on Soil Conservation, Maracay, Venezuela, pp 654–674

  • Istanbulluoglu E, Tarboton DG, Pack RT, Luce C (2002) A probabilistic approach for channel initiation. Water Resour Res 38(12):1325–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC (2000) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):771–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaini P, Artita K, Nicklow JW (2012) Optimizing structural best management practices using SWAT and genetic algorithm to improve water quality goals. Water Resour Manag 26:1827–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korteling B, Dessai S, Kapelan Z (2013) Using information-Gap decision theory for water resources planning under severe uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 27:1149–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le QB, Seidl R, Scholz RW (2012) Feedback loops and types of adaptation in the modelling of land-use decisions in an agent-based simulation. Environ Model Softw 27–28:83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legas AB, Mohammed AA, Tamene L (2012) Land use/cover dynamics and their effects in the Gerado catchment, northeastern Ethiopia. Int J Environ Stud 1–18. doi:10.1080/00207233.2011.637701

  • Machado MJ, Perez-Gonzalez A, Benito G (1996) Assessment of soil erosion using a predictive model. In: Feoli E (ed) Rehabilitation of degrading and degraded areas of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Department of Biology, University of Trieste, Trieste, pp 237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR (1996) Environmental modeling with GIS. In: Goodchild MF, Steyaert LT, Parks BO, Johnston C, Maidment D, Glendinning S (eds) GIS and environmental modeling: progress and research issues. GIS World, Inc, Fort Collins, pp 315–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR, Olivera JF, Calver A, Eatherral A, Fraczek W (1996) A unit hydrograph derived from a spatially distributed velocity field. Hydrol Process 10(6):831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCuen RH (1998) Hydrologic analysis and design. Second Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. p 814

  • McIntosh BS, Ashcough JC II, Twery M, Chew J, Elmahdi A, Haase D, Harou JJ, Hepting D, Cuddy S, Jakeman AJ, Chen S, Kassahun A, Lautenbach S, Matthews K, Merritt W, Quinn NWT, Rodriguez-Roda I, Sieber S, Stravenga M, Sulis A, Ticehurst J, Volk M, Wrobel M, van Delden H, El- Sawah S, Rizzoli A, Voinov A (2011) Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices. Environ Model Softw 26:1389–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville N, Morgan RPC (2001) The influence of grass density on effectiveness of contour grass strips for control of soil erosion on low angle slopes. Soil Use Manage 17:278–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt WS, Letcher RA, Jakemna AJ (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environ Model Softw 18:761–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SN, Semmens DJ, Goodrich DC, Hernandez M, Miller RC, Kepner WG, Guertin DP (2007) The automated geospatial watershed assessment tool. Environ Model Softw 22:365–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Hofierka J, Zloch M, Iverson LR (1996) Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10:629–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Mitas L, Brown WM, Johnston DM (1997) GIS tools for erosion/deposition modelling and multidimensional visualization. Geographic Modelling and Systems Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Mitas L, Brown M (2001) Mutiscale simulation of land use impact on soil erosion and deposition patterns. In: Stott DE, Montar RH and Steinhardt GC (eds) Sustaining the global farm. Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting held at Purdue University and the USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, pp 1163–1169

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Modelling erosion and deposition: topographic effects. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 29:1624–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME (1998) The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutua BM, Klik A, Loiskandl W (2006) Modelling soil erosion and sediment yield at catchment scale: the case of Masinga catchment, Kenya. Land Degrad Dev 17:557–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process based soil erosion model for USDA-water erosion prediction project technology. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 32:1587–1593

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic VV, Simonovic SP, Milicevic DB (2013) Analytical support for integrated water resources management: a new method for addressing spatial and temporal variability. Water Resour Manag 27:401–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkonya E, von Braun J, Mirzabaev A, Le QB, Kwon HY, Kato A, Kirui O, Gerber N (2013) Economics of land degradation initiative: methods and approach for global and national assessments. ZEF-IFPRI Discussion Paper. Center for Development Research (ZEF), p 34

  • Pansak W, Hilger T, Dercon G, Konkaew T, Cadisch G (2008) Changes in relationship between soil erosion and N loss pathways after establishing soil conservation systems in uplands of Northeast Thailand. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SJ, McSweeney K, Lowery B (2001) Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma 103:249–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, Valentin C (2003) Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena 50:91–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Gregory PJ, Whalley WR, Quinton JN, Hopkins DW, Whitmore AP, Hirsch PR, Goulding KWT (2011) Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services. Food Policy 36:S72–S87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinton JN, Govers G, Van Oost K, Bardgett RD (2010) The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling. Nat Geosci 3:311–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KHVD, Kumar DS (2004) Spatial decision support system for watershed management. Water Resources Manag 18:407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS, Dougill AJ (2010) Linking degradation assessment to sustainable land management: a decision support system for Kalahari pastoralists. J Arid Environ 74(1):149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agricultural Handbook 703

  • Reynolds JF, Smith DMS, Lambin EF, Turner BL II, Mortimore M, Batterbury SPJ, Downing TE, Dowlatabadi H, Fernandez RJ, Herrick JE, Huber-Sannwald E, Jiang H, Leemans R, Lynam T, Maestre FT, Ayarza M, Walker B (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Grainger A, Stafford Smith DM, Bastin G, Garcia-Barrios L, Fernández RJ, Janssen MA, Jürgens N, Scholes RJ, Veldkamp A, Verstraete MM, Von Maltitz G, Zdruli P (2011) Scientific concepts for an integrated analysis of desertification. Land Degrad Dev 22:166–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steegen A, Govers G, Nachtergaele J, Takken I, Beuselinck L, Poesen J (2000) Sediment export by water from an agricultural catchment in the Loam Belt of Central Belgium. Geomorphology 33:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefano CD, Ferro V, Porto P (1999) Linking sediment yield and caesium-137 spatial distribution at basin scale. J Agric Eng Res 74:41–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefano CD, Ferro V, Porto P, Rizzo S (2005) Testing spatially distributed sediment delivery model (SEDD) in a forested basin by Cesium-137 technique. J Soil Water Conserv 60:148–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugumaran R, DeGroote JP (2011) Spatial decision support systems: principles and practices. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group

  • Sun L, Lu W, Yang O, Martín JD, Li D (2013) Ecological compensation estimation of soil and water conservation based on cost-benefit analysis. Water Resour Manag 27:2709–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamene L, Vlek PLG (2007) Assessing the potential of changing land use for reducing soil erosion and sediment yield of catchments: a case study in the highlands of Northern Ethiopia. Soil Use Manag 23:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamene L, Vlek PLG (2008) Soil erosion in Northern Ethiopia: patterns, determinants, and management implications. In: Braimoh AK, Vlek PLG (Eds) Impact of land use change on soil resources. Springer, pp 73–100

  • Tamene L, Park S, Dikau R, Vlek PLG (2006) Analysis of factors determining sediment yield variability in the highlands of Northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology 76:76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamene L, Abegaz A, Aynekulu A, Woldearegay K, and Vlek PLG (2011). Estimating sediment yield risk of reservoirs in northern Ethiopia using expert knowledge and semi-quantitative approaches. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 16:293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten G, Poesen J (2002) Evaluating an integrated approach to catchment management to reduce soil loss and sediment pollution through modelling. Soil Use Manag 19:386–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Vervoort JM, Kok K, van Lammeren R, Veldkamp T (2010) Stepping into futures: exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social- ecological systems. Futures 42(6):604–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1983) The sediment delivery problem. J Hydrol 65:209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

  • Wilk J, Jonsson AC (2013) From water poverty to water prosperity—a more participatory approach to studying local water resources management. Water Resour Manag 27:695–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1958) Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Trans Am Geophys Union 39(2):285–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR (1987) Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Process Landf 12:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all those who contributed to the idea of developing such land management-planning tool and provided suggestions and comments at different levels. We hope to join forces and expand its features. We are also very grateful for the valuable comments, corrections and suggestions by the editor, the associate editor and the anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Chitedze Agricultural Research Station, P.O. Box 158, Lilongwe, Malawi

    Lulseged Tamene

  2. Natural and Social Science Interface (NSSI), Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), ETH Zurich, Universitaestrasse 22, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland

    Quang Bao Le

  3. University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF), Walter-Flex-Str. 3, 53113, Bonn, Germany

    Paul L. G. Vlek

Authors
  1. Lulseged Tamene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Quang Bao Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul L. G. Vlek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lulseged Tamene or Quang Bao Le.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 1792 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tamene, L., Le, Q.B. & Vlek, P.L.G. A Landscape Planning and Management Tool for Land and Water Resources Management: An Example Application in Northern Ethiopia. Water Resour Manage 28, 407–424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0490-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0490-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation