Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiobjective Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network Under Epistemic Uncertainty

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A methodology is proposed for optimal design of groundwater quality monitoring networks under epistemic uncertainty. The proposed methodology considers spatiotemporal pollutant concentrations as fuzzy numbers. It incorporates fuzzy ordinary kriging (FOK) within the decision model formulation for spatial estimation of contaminant concentration values. A multiobjective monitoring network design model incorporating the objectives of fuzzy mass estimation error and spatial coverage of the designed network is developed. Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is used for solving the monitoring network design model. Performances of the proposed model are evaluated for hypothetical illustrative system. Evaluation results indicate that the proposed methodology perform satisfactorily under uncertain system conditions. These performance evaluation results demonstrate the potential applicability of the proposed methodology for optimal groundwater contaminant monitoring network design under epistemic uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ababou R (1988) Three-dimensional flow in random porous media” Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, [URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/14675]

  • Affandi A, Watanabe K (2007) Daily groundwater level fluctuation forecasting using soft computing technique. Nature Science 5(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Afshar A, Maririo M, Ebtehaj M, Moosavi J (2007) Rule-based fuzzy system for assessing groundwater vulnerability. J Environ Eng 133(5):532–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Design (2003) Long-term groundwater monitoring: the state of the art. Reston, VA

  • Bandemer H, Gebhardt A (2000) Bayesian fuzzy kriging. Fuzzy Set Syst 112:405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A, Bogardi I, Kelly WE (1987) Imprecise (Fuzzy) information in Geostatistics. Math Geol 20(4):287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A, Bogardi I, Kelly WE (1990a) Kriging with imprecise (Fuzzy) variograms I: theory. Math Geol 22(1):63–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A, Bogardi I, Kelly WE (1990b) Kriging with imprecise (Fuzzy) variograms II: application. Math Geol 22(1):81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisht DCS, Raju M, Joshi M (2009) Simulation of water table elevation fluctuation using fuzzy-logic and ANFIS. Comput Model New Tech 13(2):16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadalavada S, Datta B (2008) Dynamic optimal monitoring network design for transient transport of pollutants in groundwater aquifers. Water Resour Manag 22:651–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Dhiman SD (1996) Chance-constrained optimal monitoring network design for pollutants in groundwater. J Water Resour Plann Manag 122(3):180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Chakrabarty D, Dhar A (2009a) Simultaneous identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources and estimation of aquifer parameters. J Hydrol 376(1–2):48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Chakrabarty D, Dhar A (2009b) Optimal dynamic monitoring network design and identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources. Water Resour Manag 23(10):2031–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta B, Chakrabarty D, Dhar A (2011) Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using classical optimization with linked simulation. J Hydro-env Res 5(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Singapore

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar A, Datta B (2007) Multiobjective dynamic monitoring network design for groundwater pollution detection. J Water Resour Plann Manag 133(4):329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar A, Datta B (2009) Global optimal design of ground water monitoring network using embedded kriging. Ground Water 47(6):806–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar A, Datta B (2010) Logic based design of groundwater monitoring network for redundancy reduction. J Water Resour Plann Manag 136(1):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P (1988) Interval valued random functions and the kriging of intervals. Math Geol 20(3):145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P (1989) Fuzzy kriging. Fuzzy Set Syst 33:315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon B (2004) Prediction of ground water vulnerability using an integrated GIS based Neuro-Fuzzy techniques. J Spat Hydrol 4(2):1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou C, Woldt W, Bogardi I, Dahab M (1995) Steady state ground water flow simulation with imprecise parameters. Water Resour Res 31(11):2709–2719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte O, Rosario R (2007) Fuzzy techniques for environmental-impact assessment in the mineral deposit of punta Gorda (Moa,Cuba). Environ Technol 28(6):659–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Harbaugh AW, Banta ER, Hill MC, McDonald MG (2000) MODFLOW-2000, the US Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00–92

  • Herrera GS, Pinder GF (2005) Space-time optimization of groundwater quality sampling networks. Water Resour Res 41:W12407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Wong P, Gedeon T (1998) Spatial interpolation using fuzzy reasoning and genetic algorithms. J Geogr Inform Decis Anal 2(2):204–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH, Qin XS, Xiao HN, Li YP (2007) Environmental risk assessment for groundwater contamination through integrated fuzzy techniques. Env Info Arch 5:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kholghi M, Hosseini SM (2009) Comparison of groundwater level estimation using neuro-fuzzy and ordinary kriging. Environ Model Assess 14:729–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollat JB, Reed PM (2007) A computational scaling analysis of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms in long-term groundwater monitoring applications. Adv Water Resour 30(3):408–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollat JB, Reed PM, Kasprzyk JR (2008) A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical bayesian optimization algorithm for large multi-objective monitoring network design problems. Adv Water Resour 31(5):828–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaiciga HA, Charbeneau RJ, Everett LG, Fogg GE, Hobbs BF, Rouhani S (1992) Review of ground-water quality monitoring network design. J Hydraul Eng 118(1):11–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW (1988) A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. USGS Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 6, Chapter A1

  • Meyer PD, Brill ED Jr (1988) A method for locating wells in a groundwater monitoring network under conditions of uncertainty. Water Resour Res 24(8):1277–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugunthan P, Shoemaker CA (2004) Time varying optimization for monitoring multiple contaminants under uncertain hydrogeology. Bioremediation Journal 8(3–4):129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammetoglu A, Yardimci A (2005) A fuzzy logic approach to asses ground water pollution environmental monitoring and assessment. Water Resour Manag 118(2):337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozbek MM, Pinder GF (2006) Non-probabilistic uncertainty in subsurface hydrology and its applications: an overview. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 6(1–2):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, Chen B (2006) Environmental risk assessment for groundwater contamination through integrated fuzzy techniques. Env Info Arch 4:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed P, Minsker BS (2004) Striking the balance: long-term groundwater monitoring design for conflicting objectives. J Water Resour Plann Manag 130(2):140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunila R, Laine E, Kremenova O (2004) Fuzzy model and kriging for imprecise soil polygon boundries. Geospatial Information Research: Bridging the pacific and Atlantic, University of Gavle,Sweden, pp 489–495

  • Wu J, Zheng C, Chien CC, Zheng L (2006) A comparative study of Monte Carlo simple genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm and noisy genetic algorithm for cost-effective sampling network design under uncertainty. Adv Water Resour 29(6):899–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Pinder GF, Herrera GS (2005) Least cost design of groundwater quality monitoring networks. Water Resour Res 41:W08412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng C, Wang PP (1999) MT3DMS, a modular three-dimensional multi-species transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems; documentation and user's guide. U.S. AERDCC Report SERDP-99-1, Vicksburg, MS

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anirban Dhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhar, A., Patil, R.S. Multiobjective Design of Groundwater Monitoring Network Under Epistemic Uncertainty. Water Resour Manage 26, 1809–1825 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9988-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9988-1

Keywords

Navigation