Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the Irrigation Advisory Services’ Recommendations and Farmers’ Irrigation Management: A Case Study in Southern Spain

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Local Irrigation Advisory Services (LIAS) carry out essential work to achieve an efficient use of irrigation water at field and irrigation scheme level, which is crucial in Mediterranean irrigation systems. However, it is unusual to find agronomic and economic assessments of LIAS advice. In this work, the LIAS operating in the Genil–Cabra Irrigation Scheme (southern Spain) was evaluated during the first 5 years of its advice. Acceptance by farmers of the LIAS recommendations was evaluated by using agronomic indicators, such as ARIS (Annual Relative Irrigation Supply). ARISLIAS (actual irrigation applied v. recommendation of LIAS) with values ranging from about 0.23 for wheat and sunflower, and 0.94 for maize, also detecting a high variability between farmers, which indicated a scant acceptance of the LIAS recommendations. The economic evaluation of irrigation was made through two economic indicators, Irrigation Water Productivity (IWP) and Irrigation Water Benefit (IWB). IWP values varied significantly between different crops: around 0.23 € m−3 in wheat, sunflower and maize, about 0.53 € m−3 in cotton and sugar beet, and values higher than 2.0 € m−3 in garlic, for optimal irrigation schedules. For IWB, trends were similar, emphasizing the low IWB values in wheat and sunflower (average values of 0.06 and 0.13 € m−3, respectively). Consideration of these economic indicators by LIAS could not only help to obtain more suitable and economically profitable irrigation schedules, but also contribute towards a greater acceptance of advisory services by farmers, by shifting the emphasis from maximizing production to maximizing irrigation profitability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Tasumi M, Trezza R (2007a) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)-Model. J Irrigat Drain Eng 133:380–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Tasumi M, Morse A, Trezza R, Wright JL, Bastiaanssen W, Kramber W, Lorite IJ, Robison CW (2007b) Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)-Applications. J Irrigat Drain Eng 133:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriaza M, Gómez-Limón JA (2006) How decoupling could mean dismantling of the cotton sector in Spain. New Medit 1:4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaza M, Gómez-Limón JA (2007) Policy implications of the decoupling of the EU cotton subsidies. J Int Agr Trade Dev 3:87–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzani G, Di Pasquale S, Gallerani V, Morganti S, Raggi M, Viaggi D (2005) The sustainability of irrigated agricultural systems under the Water Framework Directive: first results. Environ Model Software 20:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos MG, Burton MA, Molden DJ (2005) Irrigation and drainage performance assessment. Practical guidelines. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM, Styles SW (1999) Modern water control and management practices in irrigation: impact on performance. Water Reports 19. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt CM, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Solomon KH, Bliesner RD, Hardy LA, Howell TA, Eisenhauer DE (1997) Irrigation performance measures: efficiency and uniformity. J Irrigat Drain Eng 123:423–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JE (1942) Irrigation by Sprinkling. California Agricultural Experiment Station, Bull. 670. University of California, Berkley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • CIMIS (2000) CIMIS (California Irrigation Management Information System). Agriculture Resource Book. Department of Water Resources, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho MB, Villalobos FJ, Mateos L (2003) Modelling root growth and the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum of cotton crops. Agr Water Manag 60:99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córcoles JI, de Juan JA, Ortega JF, Tarjuelo JM, Moreno MA (2010) Management evaluation of Water Users Associations using benchmarking techniques. Agr Water Manag 98:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Eching S (2002) Role of technology in irrigation advisory services: The CIMIS experience. 18th Congress and 53rd IEC meeting of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID). FAO/ICID International workshop on Irrigation Advisory Services and Participatory Extension Management. 24 July 2002. Montreal, Canada

  • English M (2002) Irrigation advisory services for optimum use of limited water. 18th Congress and 53rd IEC meeting of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID). FAO/ICID International workshop on Irrigation Advisory Services and Participatory Extension Management. 24 July 2002. Montreal, Canada

  • Faci JM, Bensaci A, Slatni A, Playán E (2000) A case study for irrigation modernisation. I. Characterisation of the district and analysis of water delivery records. Agr Water Manag 42:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farré I, Faci JM (2006) Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agr Water Manag 83:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58:147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández MD, González AM, Carreño J, Pérez C, Bonachela S (2007) Analysis of on-farm irrigation performance in Mediterranean greenhouses. Agr Water Manag 89:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortes PS, Platonor AR, Pereira LS (2005) GISARED–A GIS based irrigation scheduling simulation model to support improved water use. Agr Water Manag 77:159–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Vila M, Fereres E (2012) Combining the simulation crop model AquaCrop with an economic model for the optimization of irrigation management at farm level. Eur J Agron 36:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Vila M, Lorite IJ, Soriano MA, Fereres E (2008) Management trends and responses to water scarcity in an irrigation scheme of Southern Spain. Agr Water Manag 95:458–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Vila M, Fereres E, Mateos L, Orgaz F, Steduto P (2009) Deficit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agron J 101:477–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavilán P, Lorite IJ, Tornero S, Berengena J (2006) Regional calibration of Hargreaves equation for estimating reference ET in a semiarid environment. Agr Water Manag 81:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agr Water Manag 96:1275–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D, García M (2010) Using AquaCrop to derive deficit irrigation schedules. Agr Water Manag 98:213–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannini A, Bagnoni V (2002) Evolution of irrigation support services in Tuscani. 18th Congress and 53rd IEC meeting of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID). FAO/ICID International workshop on Irrigation Advisory Services and Participatory Extension Management. 24 July 2002. Montreal, Canada

  • Lorite IJ (2002) Modelo para el análisis de la gestión del agua en zonas regables. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain. In Spanish

  • Lorite IJ, Mateos L, Fereres E (2004a) Evaluating irrigation performance in a Mediterranean environment. I. Model and general assessment of an irrigation scheme. Irrigat Sci 23:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite IJ, Mateos L, Fereres E (2004b) Evaluating irrigation performance in a Mediterranean environment. II. Variability among crops and farmers. Irrigat Sci 23:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite IJ, Mateos L, Fereres E (2005) Impact of spatial and temporal aggregation of input parameters on the assessment of irrigation scheme performance. J Hydrol 300:286–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite IJ, Mateos L, Orgaz F, Fereres E (2007) Assessing deficit irrigation strategies at the level of an irrigation district. Agr Water Manag 91:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín de Santa Olalla F, Calera A, Domínguez A (2003) Monitoring irrigation water use by combining Irrigation Advisory Service, and remotely sensed data with a geographic information system. Agr Water Manag 61:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam JL, Keller J (1978) Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, Utah

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden DJ, Gates TK (1990) Performance measures for evaluation of irrigation/water delivery systems. J Irrigat Drain Eng 116:804–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoro A, López-Fuster P (2005) Los Servicios de asesoramiento de riegos: el ejemplo del SAR de Albacete. In: Martín de Santa Olalla F, López-Fuster P, Calera A (eds) Agua y Agronomía. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, Spain, pp 433–466, In Spanish

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoro A, López-Fuster P, Fereres E (2011) Improving on-farm water management through an irrigation scheduling service. Irrigat Sci 29:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega JF, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM (2005) Improving water management: The irrigation advisory service of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Agr Water Manag 77:37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones PH, Unland H, Ojeda W, Sifuentes E (1999) Transfer of irrigation scheduling technology in Mexico. Agr Water Manag 40:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos C, Lorite IJ, Tasumi M, Allen RG, Fereres E (2008) Integrating satellite-based evapotranspiration with simulation models for irrigation management at the scheme level. Irrigat Sci 26:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos C, Lorite IJ, Tasumi M, Allen RG, Fereres E (2010) Performance assessment of an irrigation scheme using indicators determined with remote sensing techniques. Irrigat Sci 28:461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid E, Sinabell F (2007) On the choice of farm management practices after the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2003. J Environ Manage 82:332–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra T, Zilberman D, Goodwin BK, Hyvonen K (2005) Replacement of agricultural price supports by area payments in the European Union and the effects on pesticide use. Am J Agr Econ 87:870–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirsath PB, Singh AK (2010) A comparative study of daily pan evaporation estimation using ANN, regression and climate based models. Water Resour Manag 24:1571–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Muñoz G (2002) Irrigation advisory services for effective water use: a review of experiences. 18th Congress and 53rd IEC meeting of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID). FAO/ICID International workshop on Irrigation Advisory Services and Participatory Extension Management. 24 July 2002. Montreal, Canada

  • USDA-SCS (1972) National engineering handbook. USDA-Soil Conservation Service, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (1975) Soil Taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Handbook 436. Soil Survey Staff, USDA, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1991) Runoff and water erosion. In: Hanks J, Ritchie JT (eds) Modelling plant and soil systems. ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 439–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2003) Improving water productivity through deficit irrigation: examples from Syria, the North China Plain and Oregon, USA. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp 301–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM (2004) Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agr Water Manag 69:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the support provided by Mr. Berlanga (district manager) and the rest of staff of GCIS-CS irrigation district. This study was supported by the project TRT06-00014 of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio J. Lorite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorite, I.J., García-Vila, M., Carmona, MA. et al. Assessment of the Irrigation Advisory Services’ Recommendations and Farmers’ Irrigation Management: A Case Study in Southern Spain. Water Resour Manage 26, 2397–2419 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0023-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0023-3

Keywords

Navigation