Abstract
Agricultural non-point source pollution, common in water supply catchments worldwide, can have significant environmental and human health impacts, and its mitigation poses a challenge for policymakers. We used deliberative multi-criteria evaluation (DMCE) to identify a mix and sequence of policy instruments (or policy design) to address agricultural non-point source pollution using a case study of Cryptosporidium contamination in the Myponga River water supply catchment, South Australia. The major impediments to adoption of on-farm water quality management and benefits for ecosystem services were identified using a landholder survey for use as decision criteria in DMCE. The DMCE approach involved stakeholders in policy design during two community fora held in the catchment. We developed six policy scenarios and quantified their impact on decision criteria. The relative importance of decision criteria was quantified using swing weights and consensus was reached on the preferred policy scenario. The mix, sequence, and targeting of instruments in the preferred policy scenario were refined based on information obtained through the deliberative process. Impediments to adoption included a lack of both information/knowledge and financial resources. The recommended policy scenario involved targeted information, followed by an incentive program, and finally the regulation of a mandatory code of practice for water quality management. Detailed, catchment-specific context obtained through DMCE was critical for refining an effective mix and sequence of policy instruments. The techniques may be readily used to select and schedule policy instruments for effective mitigation of agricultural non-point source pollution in other drinking water supply catchments elsewhere.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ATOMonaghan RM, Kaine G (2008) Information for primary producers 2008. Australian Tax Office, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Accessed online February 28, 2009: http://www.ato.gov.au/content/downloads/NAT1712_06_2008_BW.pdf
BDA Group and EconSearch (2005) An investigation of policy mix options to achieve water quality outcomes in Adelaide’s drinking water supply area: consultation draft. Report prepared for the South Australian Environment Protection Authority
Bewsell D, Monaghan RM, Kaine G (2007) Adoption of stream fencing among dairy farmers in four New Zealand catchments. Environ Manag 40:201–209
Bryan BA, Kandulu J (2009) Cost-effective alternatives for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in drinking water and enhancing ecosystem services. Water Resour Res 45:W08437. doi:10.1029/2008WR007606
Bryan BA, Kandulu J, Deere DA, White M, Frizenschaf J, Crossman ND (2009) Adaptive management for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in source water: a case study in an agricultural catchment in South Australia. J Environ Manag 90:3122–3134
Chang CL, Hsu TH, Wang YJ, Lin JY, Yu SL (2010) Planning for implementation of riparian buffers in the Feitsui reservoir watershed. Water Resour Manage 24:2339–2352
Collins R, McLeod M, Hedley M, Donnison A, Close M, Hanly J, Horne D, Ross C, Davies-Colley R, Bagshaw C, Matthews L (2007) Best management practices to mitigate faecal contamination by livestock of New Zealand waters. NZ J Agric Res 50:267–278
Connor JD, Ward J, Bryan BA (2008a) How cost-effective are conservation auctions? Aust J Agric Resour Econ 52:303–319
Connor JD, Ward J, Clifton C, Proctor W, Hatton MacDonald DH (2008b) Designing, testing and implementing a trial dryland salinity credit trading scheme. Ecol Econ 67:574–588
Connor JD, Hatton MacDonald DH, Morrison M, Cast A (2009) Evaluating policy options for managing diffuse source water quality in Lake Taupo, New Zealand. Environmentalist 29:348–359. doi:10.1007/s10669-008-9197-x
Davies BB, Hodge ID (2006) Farmers’ preferences for new environmental policy instruments: determining the acceptability of cross compliance for biodiversity benefits. J Agric Econ 57:393–414
de Loë RC, Bjornlund H (2008) Irrigation and water security: the role of economic instruments and governance. Wit Trans Ecol Envir 112:35–42
EPACroke BFW, Beatson PJ, Ashbolt NJ, Deere DA (2008) Myponga watercourse restoration project final report 2000-07. South Australian Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide
Ferguson CM, Croke BFW, Beatson PJ, Ashbolt NJ, Deere DA (2007) Development of a process-based model to predict pathogen budgets for the Sydney drinking water catchment. J Water Health 2:187–208
Government of Western Australia (2010) Small landholder information service. http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/PC_92609.html. Website accessed 24-10-2010
Greiner R, Miller O (2008) Reducing diffuse water pollution by tailoring incentives to region specific requirements: empirical study for the Burdekin River basin (Australia). In: Aravossis K, Brebbia CA, Gomez H (eds) Environmental economics and investment assessment II. WIT, Ashurst, pp 31–42
Greiner R, Patterson L, Miller O (2009) Motivations, risk perceptions and adoption of conservation practices by farmers. Agric Syst 99:86–104
Gunningham N, Sinclair D (2005) Policy instrument choice and diffuse source pollution. J Environ Law 17:51–81
Harrington W, Morgenstern RD, Sterner T (2004) Choosing environmental policy. Resources for the Future Press, Washington
Horan RD, Ribaudo MO (1999) Policy objectives and economic incentives for controlling agricultural sources of nonpoint pollution. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:1023–1035
Hrudey SE, Hrudey EJ (2004) Safe drinking water—lessons from recent outbreaks in affluent nations. IWA, London
Huang GH, Xia J (2001) Barriers to sustainable water-quality management. J Environ Manag 61:1–23
Jansen A, Robertson A (2001) Relationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. J Appl Ecol 38:63–75
Jones N, Evangelinos K, Gaganis P, Polyzou E (2010) Citizens’ perceptions on water conservation policies and the role of social capital. Water Resour Manage. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9711-z
Kim S, Gillespie JM, Paudel KP (2008) Rotational grazing adoption in cattle production under a cost-share agreement: does uncertainty have a role in conservation technology adoption? Aust J Agric Resour Econ 52:235–252
Loomis JB, Allen B (2008) Using non market valuation to inform the choice between permits and fees in environmental regulation. Environ Resour Econ 40:329–337
Lovell ST, Sullivan WC (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:249–260
Ma Y, Chen LD, Zhao XF, Zheng HF, Lu YH (2009) What motivates farmers to participate in sustainable agriculture? Evidence and policy implications. Int J Sustain Dev World 16:374–380
MacGregor CJ, Warren CR (2006) Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a nitrate vulnerable zone in Scotland: the view from the farm. Agric Ecosyst Environ 113:108–119
MacKenzie WR, Hoxie NJ, Procter ME, Gradus MS, Blair KA, Peterson DE, Kazmierczak JJ, Addiss DG, Fox KR, Rose JB, Davis JP (1994) A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of Cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. New Engl J Med 331:161–167
MacLeod CJA, Scholefield D, Haygarth PM (2007) Integration for sustainable catchment management. Sci Total Environ 373:591–602
Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R (2009) Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Am Econ Rev 99:1714–1739
Muller N, Tong D, Mendelsohn R (2009) Regulating NOx and SO2 emissions in Atlanta BE. J Econ Anal Poli 9:2–3
Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP, Marttunen M (2004) Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: a case of lake regulation policy. Environ Model Softw 19:537–547
NHMRC (2004) Australian drinking water guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government, Canberra
Pannell DJ (2008) Public benefits, private benefits, and policy mechanism choice for land-use change for environmental benefits. Land Econ 84:225–240
Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation technologies by rural landholders. Aust J Exp Agric 46:1407–1424
Proctor W, Drechsler M (2006) Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environ Plan C, Gov Policy 24:169–190
Prokopy LS, Floress K, Klotthor-Weinkauf D, Baumgart-Getz A (2008) Determinants of agricultural best management practice adoption: evidence from the literature. J Soil Water Conserv 63:300–311
Renn O (2006) Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 23:34–43
Rhodes HM, Leland Jr LS, Niven BE (2002) Farmers, streams, information, and money: does informing farmers about riparian management have any effect? Environ Manag 30:665–677
Romstad E (2004) Methodologies for agri-environmental policy design. In: Brouwer F (ed) Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment: governance, policy, and multifunctionality. advances in ecological economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 56–77
Sarker A, Ross H, Shrestha KK (2008) A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: an Australian case study. Ecol Econ 68:461–471
Smith GR (2007) Logical decisions decision support software: user’s manual. Evergreen, USA. http://www.logicaldecisions.com
Sterner T (2003) Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management. Resources for the Future Press, Washington
Stirling A (2006) Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23:95–107
Strauss P, Leone A, Ripa MN, Turpin N, Lescot JM, Laplana R (2007) Using critical source areas for targeting cost-effective best management practices to mitigate phosphorus and sediment transfer at the watershed scale. Soil Use Manage 23:144–153
von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ward J, Connor JD, Hatton MacDonald D (2008) Designing tradable credit policy for diffuse source salinity ex ante. Soc Nat Resour 21:930–943
Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 107:507–529
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bryan, B.A., Kandulu, J.M. Designing a Policy Mix and Sequence for Mitigating Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in a Water Supply Catchment. Water Resour Manage 25, 875–892 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9731-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9731-8