Skip to main content
Log in

Adoption of Stream Fencing Among Dairy Farmers in Four New Zealand Catchments

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of dairy farming on water quality in New Zealand streams has been identified as an important environmental issue. Stream fencing, to keep cattle out of streams, is seen as a way to improve water quality. Fencing ensures that cattle cannot defecate in the stream, prevents bank erosion, and protects the aquatic habitat. Stream fencing targets have been set by the dairy industry. In this paper the results of a study to identify the factors influencing dairy farmers’ decisions to adopt stream fencing are outlined. Qualitative methods were used to gather data from 30 dairy farmers in four New Zealand catchments. Results suggest that farm contextual factors influenced farmers’ decision making when considering stream fencing. Farmers were classified into four segments based on their reasons for investing in stream fencing. These reasons were fencing boundaries, fencing for stock control, fencing to protect animal health, and fencing because of pressure to conform to local government guidelines or industry codes of practice. This suggests that adoption may be slow in the absence of on-farm benefits, that promotion of stream fencing needs to be strongly linked to on-farm benefits, and that regulation could play a role in ensuring greater adoption of stream fencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Assael H (1998) Consumer Behaviour and marketing action. South-Western, Cincinnati, 718 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ, Matzke A, Uselman S (1999) Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54:419–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Betteridge K, Wilcock B, Costall D, Shearman D, Roach C (2005) Impacts of dairy intensification on stream-water quality in a south Taranaki catchment. In: Currie LD, Hanly JA (eds), Developments in fertiliser application technologies and nutrient management. Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, Wellington. pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock T, Sergeant J (2002) Small sample market research. International Journal of Market Research 44:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland A-M, Bewsell D, Kaine G (2006) Adoption of sustainable irrigation management practices by stone and pome fruit growers in the Goulburn/Murray Valleys, Australia. Irrigation Science 24:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck O, Niyogi DK, Townsend CR (2004) Scale-dependence of land use effects on water quality of streams in agricultural catchments. Environmental Pollution 130:287–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AM (2002) Clean streams: a water body enhancement strategy for Environment Waikato. Environment Waikato Technical Report TR2002/19. Environment Waikato, Hamilton, 17 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso BS (2000) Comparative analysis of New Zealand and US approaches for agricultural nonpoint source pollution management. Environmental Management 25:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso BS (2001) Risk-based targeting of diffuse contaminant sources at variable spatial scales in a New Zealand high country catchment. Journal of Environmental Management 63:249–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis A, Robertson A (2003) Understanding landholder management of river frontages: The Goulburn Broken. Ecological Management and Restoration 4:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexcel Limited (2004) Clean streams: a guide to managing waterways on Southland Farms. Dexcel, 42 pp. Available at: http://www.dexcel.co.nz/main.cfm?id=296&nid=83

  • de Klein CAM, Monaghan RM (2005) The impact of potential nitrous oxide mitigation strategies on the environmental and economic performance of dairy systems in four New Zealand catchments. Environmental Sciences 2:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick B (1998) Subject: Convergent interviewing: a technique for data collection. Available at: http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/iview.html; accessed December 2003

  • Drewry JJ (2004) Survey of stream fencing within dairy best practice catchments. Unpublished report. AgResearch Ltd, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaine G (2004) Consumer behaviour as a theory of innovation adoption in agriculture. Social Research Team Working Paper 01-04. AgResearch, Hamilton, 26 pp

  • Kaine G, Johnson F (2004) Water policy in New Zealand and Australia: we’re not playing for tiddlywinks. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grasslands Association conference 66:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaine G, Bewsell D, Boland A, Linehan C (2005) Using market research to understand the adoption of irrigation management strategies in the stone and pome fruit industry. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45:1181–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macgregor CJ, Warren CR (2006) Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone in Scotland: The view from the farm. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 113:108–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell RW, Wilcock RJ (2004) Particulate phosphorus transport within stream flow of an agricultural catchment. Journal of Environmental Quality 33:2111–2121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith A, Smith Z, Lavender R (2003) Waikakahi stream: assessment of water quality and ecosystem monitoring, 1995 to 2002. Environment Canterbury Technical Report, R03/14. Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, 169 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment (2003) Dairying and Clean Streams Accord. Fonterra Co-operative Group, Local Government New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, 6 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for the Environment (2004) The Dairying and Clean Streams Accord: sSnapshot of progress—2003/2004. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan RM, Smeaton D, Hyslop MG, Stevens DR, de Klein CAM, Smith LC, Drewry JJ, Thorrold BS (2004) A desktop evaluation of the environmental and economic performance of model dairy farming systems within four New Zealand catchments. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association Conference 66:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan RM, Wilcock RJ, Smith LC, Tikkisetty B, Thorrold BS, Costall D (2007) Linkages between land management activities and water quality in an intensively farmed catchment in southern New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Marshall GR, Barr N, Curtis A, Vanclay F, Wilkinson R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation technologies by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46:1407–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parminter TG, Wilson J (2002) National farmer survey on riparian management. AgResearch Ltd Client Report. AgResearch Ltd, Hamilton, 24 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Parminter TG, Tarbotton IS, Kokich C (1998) A study of farmer attitudes towards riparian management practices. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association Conference 60:255–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn J, Wilcock B (2002) Clean dairying, clean waterways: true sustainability. AgScience 8:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes HM, Leland LS Jr, Niven BE (2002) Farmers, streams, information, and money: Does informing farmers about riparian management have any effect? Environmental Management 30:665–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CM, Wilcock RJ, Vant WN, Smith DG, Cooper AB (1993) Towards sustainable agriculture: freshwater quality in New Zealand and the influence of agriculture. MAF Policy Technical Paper 93/10. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, 107 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikkisetty B (2004) The role of riparian management in improving water quality. Primary Industry Management 7:13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock RJ (2006) Personal communication

  • Wilcock RJ, Duncan MJ (2003) Best Practice dairying catchments for sustainable growth—a review of water quality. NIWA Client Report HAM2003-007. NIWA, Hamilton, 58 pp

  • Wilcock RJ, Nagels JW, Rodda HJE, O’Connor MB, Thorrold BS, Barnett JW (1999) Water quality of a lowland stream in a New Zealand dairy farming catchment. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33:683–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock RJ, Monaghan RM, Quinn JM, Campbell AM, Duncan MJ, McGowan AW, Betteridge K (2006) Land use and water quality interactions in the intensive dairying catchment of the Toenepi Stream, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 40:123–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the farmers interviewed in this study for giving up their time and sharing their experiences. This research was funded by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology in New Zealand (contract no. C01X0308). Thanks go also to colleagues Bruce Small and Chris Linehan for their comments on early versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise Bewsell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bewsell, D., Monaghan, R. & Kaine, G. Adoption of Stream Fencing Among Dairy Farmers in Four New Zealand Catchments. Environmental Management 40, 201–209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0184-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-006-0184-z

Keywords

Navigation