Abstract
Lushi basin, named after the Lushi County, is one of the sub-basins of the Yellow River basin in China. The basin is suffering from severe soil erosion problems, especially during the “wet” season. In order to identify the proper soil management approaches for the basin, an erosion model is designed to estimate the soil erosion and sediment yield during single events. The hydrological model used for the estimations in the study is the BTOPMC model, which is developed based on the TOPMODEL. Under the model structure of BTOPMC, a modified form of the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was incorporated as a core module of the erosion component. In the modification, the runoff ratio, an important determinant of soil erosion, was brought into the USLE equation and consequent modifications were made to the soil erodibility and slope length factors. A concept of total sediment transport capacity for single events is applied in the model to route the surface erosion from each discrete cell to the basin outlet. The BTOPMC model was used in simulating the river discharges and sediment yields for 29 events in the Lushi basin. Its acceptable performance validates the model’s predictive ability in simulating the basin-scale erosions during individual rainstorms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold JG, Allen PM (1996) Estimating hydrologic budgets for three Illinois watersheds. J Hydrol (Amst) 176:57–77. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02782-3
Beven KJ, Lamb R, Quinn P, Romanovicz R, Freer J (1995) TOPMODEL. In: Signh VP (ed) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, pp 627–668
Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS at catchment scale. Water Resour Manage 21:1635–1647. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9118-z
Bingner RL, Murphee CE, Mutchler CK (1989) Comparison of sediment yield models on various watershed in Mississippi. Trans ASAE 32(2):529–534
Cunge KA (1969) On the subject of a flood propagation method (Muskingum method). J Hydraul Res 7(2):205–230
Dagan G, Bresler E (1983) Unsaturated flow in spatially variable fields, 1. Derivation of model of infiltration and redistribution. Water Resour Res 19(2):413–420. doi:10.1029/WR019i002p00413
Desmet PJJ, Govers G (1966) A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv 51:427–433
Duiker SJ, Flanagan DC, Lal R (2001) Erodibility and infiltration characteristics of five major soils of southwest Spain. Catena 45:103–121. doi:10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00145-X
Dunne T, Zhang WH, Aubry BF (1991) Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff. Water Resour Res 27(9):2271–2285. doi:10.1029/91WR01585
Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu N (2002) Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion. Water Resour Manage 16:447–467. doi:10.1023/A:1022282125760
Foster GR, Lombardi F, Moldenhauer WC (1982) Evaluation of rainfall-runoff erosivity factors for individual storms. Trans ASAE 25:124–129
Hawkins RH, Cundy TW (1987) Steady-state analysis of infiltration and overland flow for spatially-varied hillslopes. Water Resour Bull 23(2):251–256
Hudson N (1985) Soil conservation. Batsford Academic and Educational, London
Jain MK, Kothyari UC, Raju KGR (2005) GIS based distributed model for soil erosion and rate of sediment outflow from catchments. J Hydraul Eng 131(9):755–769. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:9(755)
Kinnell PIA (1997) Runoff ratio as a factor in the empirical modeling of soil erosion by individual rainstorms. Aust J Soil Res 35:1–13. doi:10.1071/S95085
Kinnell PIA (2003) Event erosivity factor and errors in erosion predictions by some empirical models. Aust J Soil Res 41:991–1003. doi:10.1071/SR02123
Kinnell PIA (2005) Alternative approaches for determining the USLE-M slope length factor for grid cells. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:674–680. doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.0047
Kinnell PIA (2007) Runoff dependent erosivity and slope length factors suitable for modeling annual erosion using the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Hydrol Process 21(20):2681–2689. doi:10.1002/hyp.6493
McCool DK, Brown LC, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Meyer LD (1987) Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE 30:1387–1396
Meyer LD, Wischmeier WH (1969) Mathematical simulation of the processes of soil erosion by water. Trans ASAE 12:754–759
Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K et al (1998) The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:527–544. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199806)23:6<527::AID-ESP868>3.0.CO;2-5
Neibling WH, Foster GR (1977) Estimating deposition and sediment yield from overland flow processes. In: Proc. International Symposium on Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics and Sediment Control. University of Kentucky, Lexingtong, KY pp 75–86
Nearing MA, Lane LJ, Lopes VL (1994) Modeling soil erosion. In: Lad R (ed) Soil erosion: research methods, pp 127–156
Ni JR, Li XX, Borthwick AGL (2008) Soil erosion assessment based on minimum polygons in the Yellow River basin, China. Geomorphology 93:233–252
Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manage 21:729–746. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9061-z
Philip JR (1957) The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Sci 83:435–448
Reeves M, Miller EE (1975) Estimating infiltration for erratic rainfall. Water Resour Res 11(1):102–110. doi:10.1029/WR011i001p00102
Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook No. 703, USDA Agricultural Research Services, Washington, DC
Risse LM, Nearing MA, Nicks AD, Laflen JM (1993) Error assessment in the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:825–833
Santos FL, Reis JL, Martins OC, Castanheira NL, Serralheiro RP (2003) Comparative assessment of infiltration, runoff and erosion of sprinkler irrigated soils. Biosystems Eng 86(3):355–364. doi:10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00135-1
Sherman LK (1943) Comparison of F-curves derived by the methods sharp and Holtan and of Sherman and Mayer. Trans Am Geophys Union 24:465–467
Shi XZ, Yu DS, Warner ED (2004) Soil database of 1:1,000,000 digital soil survey and reference system of the Chinese Genetic Soil Classification System. Soil Surv Horiz 45(4):111–148
Sivapalan M, Wood EF (1986) Spatial heterogeneity and scale in the infiltration response of catchments. In: Gupta VK et al (eds) Scale problems in hydrology. D. Reidel, Boston, pp 81–106
Takeuchi K, Ao TQ, Ishidaira H (1999) Introduction of block-wise use of TOPMODEL and Muskingum–Cunge method for the hydro-environmental simulation of a large ungauged basin. Hydrol Sci J 44(4):633–646
Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA Agricultural Research Services Handbook 537. USDA, Washington, DC, pp 57
Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1994) Agricultural non-point source pollution model. AGNPS User’s Guide. USDA-ARS. Version 4.03
Yu B, Rose CW, Yin D, Anecksamphat C (2001) Re-interpretation of USLE datasets for physically based erosion models with examples from southern China and northern Thailand. In: Stott DE, Mohtar RH, Steinhardt GC (2001) Sustaining the Global Farm. 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, Purdue University 929–934
Yu DS, Shi XZ, Weindorf DC (2006) Relationships between permeability and erodibility of cultivated Acrisols and Cambisols in subtropical China. Pedosphere 16(3):304–311. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60056-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, G., Hapuarachchi, P., Ishidaira, H. et al. Estimation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield During Individual Rainstorms at Catchment Scale. Water Resour Manage 23, 1447–1465 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9335-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9335-8