Skip to main content
Log in

Strategizing in NPOs: A Case Study on the Practice of Organizational Change Between Social Mission and Economic Rationale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the main results of a longitudinal case study of a strategic change process in a cooperative bank. Pursuing both a “social” mission and an explicitly economic rationale, this particular nonprofit organization provides an exemplary research setting for inquiring into the delicate and contradictory interplay of mission focus and commercial imperatives. Departing from the practice perspective as a micro-view on everyday strategizing—an approach that seems to have not found its way into NPO-research yet—allows us to take an in-depth look at how people go about the process of making strategy despite the tensions between mission and profit. Our data yields three patterns of strategizing practices that aim at fostering economic growth without damaging the social mission, namely supporting diverse positions, protecting stabilized relationships, and relating to organizational experiences. Building upon our empirical results, we tentatively conceptualize “balancing practices” as potentially important acts of strategizing in NPOs.

Résumé

Cet article présente les principaux résultats d’une étude de cas longitudinale sur le processus de changement stratégique d’une banque coopérative. En poursuivant tant une mission «sociale» que des raisons explicitement économiques, cette organisation à but non-lucratif particulière fournit un cadre de recherche exemplaire pour examiner les interactions délicates et contradictoires entre l’attention portée à la mission et les impératifs commerciaux. S’écartant de la pratique comme une vision partielle sur la fabrique de la stratégie au quotidien, la méthode qui semble ne pas avoir encore trouvé sa voie dans la recherche sur les organisations à but non-lucratif, permet un regard en profondeur sur la façon dont les personnes entreprennent des décisions en termes de stratégie, malgré les tensions existant entre la mission et les profits. Nos données ont produit trois caractéristiques des pratiques de stratégie dont le but est d’encourager la croissance économique sans porter atteinte à la mission sociale, à savoir le soutien à des prises de décision diverses, la protection des relations stabilisées et le partage d’expériences d’organisation. Partant de résultats empiriques, nous modélisons approximativement les «pratiques d’équilibrage» en tant qu’actions potentiellement importantes pour les stratégies des organisations à but non-lucratif.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Artikel legt die Hauptergebnisse einer Langzeitstudie über den Prozess des Strategiewechsels in einer Genossenschaftsbank dar. Eine “soziale” Mission und eine ausdrücklich ökonomische Rationale verfolgend ist diese Nonprofit-Organization ein ideales Feld, um das delikate und widersprüchliche Zusammenspiel von Missionsschwerpunkt und kommerziellen Geboten zu erforschen. Abweichend von der Praxis-Perspektive als Mikrosicht auf tagtägliche Strategieentwicklung—ein Ansatz, der noch nicht seinen Weg in die NPO-Forschung gefunden zu haben scheint—können wir einen tiefen Einblick nehmen, wie Leute trotz Spannungsverhältnis von Mission und Profit Strategien formen. Unsere Data zeigt drei Modellpraktiken von Strategieentwicklung, die auf ökonomisches Wachstum ohne Schädigung der sozialen Mission zielen, und zwar verschiedene Positionen unterstützen, stabilisierte Beziehungen schützen und sich organisatorische Erfahrungen beziehen. Aufbauend auf unseren empirischen Resultaten formen wir den vorläufigen Begriff “balancing practices” (ausgleichende Praktiken), potentiell wichtige Handlungen bei der Entwicklung von Strategien in NPOs.

Resumen

Este trabajo presenta los principales resultados del estudio de caso longitudinal realizado en el proceso de cambio estratégico de una cooperativa de crédito. Esta organización sin ánimo de lucro, que persigue tanto una misión social como un fin explícitamente económico, ofrece un entorno de investigación ejemplar para estudiar la delicada y contradictoria interacción entre el objetivo social y los imperativos comerciales. Partiendo de una perspectiva práctica y enfocándonos en las estrategias diarias (un enfoque que no parece haber encontrado su lugar en la investigación de las OSAL) nos adentramos para averiguar cómo abordan las personas el proceso de adopción de estrategias pese a la tensión entre la misión y los beneficios. Nuestros datos nos han proporcionado tres patrones de estrategias prácticas cuyo objetivo es fomentar el crecimiento económico sin dañar la misión social, es decir, apoyar las distintas posiciones, proteger las relaciones estabilizadas y compartir las experiencias organizativas. Basándonos en nuestros resultados empíricos, intentamos definir el concepto de “equilibrar las prácticas” como un acto potencialmente importante a la hora de elaborar estrategias en las OSAL.

摘要

本论文以一家合作银行为例,介绍了对策略变革过程所做的纵向个案研究的主要结果。根据”社会”使命和明确的经济理性,该特定的非盈利机构提供了一种用于调查使命焦点与商业规则之间微妙及矛盾关系的可效仿的研究模式。从作为日常策略制定的微观研究(一种似乎尚未融入到非营利机构研究中的方法)的实践观点出发,可使我们深入考虑人们如何制定策略而无需虑及使命与利益之间的矛盾关系。我们的数据得出了三种旨在促进经济增长而不损害社会使命的策略制定模式,即:支持不同立场、保护稳定关系和结合机构经验。根据我们的经验结果,我们将”平衡实践”的概念暂定为非营利机构策略制定中的潜在重要举措。

ملخص

هذا البحث يعرض النتائج الرئيسية لدراسة حالة طولية لحدوث عملية تغيير إستراتيجي في البنك التعاوني. يتابع كل من المهمة الإجتماعية وصراحة المنطق الاقتصادي، هذه المنظمة الغير ربحية على وجه الخصوص توفر إعداد بحوث مثالية للتحقيق في التفاعل الدقيق والمتناقض من تركيز المهمة والضرورات التجارية. المغادرين من منظور الممارسة باعتبارها عرض صغير على وضع الاستراتيجيات اليومية – النهج الذي لا يبدو أنه قد وجد طريقه إلى المنظمة الغير ربحية (NPO) للبحث حتى الآن - ويتيح لنا أن نأخذ في ذلك نظرة متعمقة في كيفية أن الناس ينفذوا عملية صنع الإستراتيجية على الرغم من التوترات بين المهمة والربح. بياناتنا أثمرت على ثلاثة أنماط من ممارسات سياسية التي تهدف إلى تعزيز النمو الإقتصادي دون إلحاق الضرر بالمهمة الإجتماعية ، خصوصاً المواقف الداعمة المتنوعة، حماية العلاقات المستقرة و المتصلة بالخبرات التنظيمية. بناءاً على نتائجنا التجريبية، نحن مبدئياً نتصور “تحقيق التوازن بين الممارسات” بوصفها أعمال محتمل أن تكون مهمة للتخطيط الإستراتيجي في المنظمة الغير ربحية (NPO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Relatedly, studies of so-called multiple identity organizations have forcefully described how the enactment of different organizational identities and thus of incompatible concerns and expectations breed organizational conflict. Not surprisingly, perhaps, much of the empirical work underlying these texts has been conducted in nonprofit organizations (e.g., Pratt and Foreman 2000; Glynn 2000; Pratt and Rafaeli 1997; Golden-Biddle and Rao 1997; Gamm 1996; Gioia and Thomas 1996; Rodwin 1995).

References

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations, theory, management, policy. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (2003). Management control in nonprofit organizations. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, T. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15(3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. (2007). Strategic change management in public sector organisations. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E. M. (1998). Productivity in public and nonprofit organizations, strategies and techniques. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyes, T., & Jäger, U. (2006). Nonprofit-organizations and society. An organization-theoretical view. ZögU, 34, 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeld, W. (1994). What affects nonprofit survival? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (1996). Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice. New York and Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (2000). Discourse analysis as organizational analysis. Organization, 7(3), 513–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, R. (2004). Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda. European Management Review, 1(1), 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, K. (2006). The institutional and technical structuring of nonprofit ventures: Case study of a U.S. hybrid organization caught between two fields. Voluntas, 17, 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, R. (2002). Strategic management for voluntary nonprofit organization. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, R., Marnoch, G., & Williamson, A. (2006). The adoption of strategic management by third sector organizations: Findings from a census of organizations in Northern Ireland. Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, 34, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamm, L. D. (1996). Dimensions of accountability for not-for-profit hospitals and health systems. Health Care Management Review, 21(2), 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graddy, E. A., & Morgan, D. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 605–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeme, L., & Les, H. (2004). Sociétés cooératives d’intérêt collectiv: The arrival of social entreprise within the French social economy. Voluntas, 15(3), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsi, T., & Thomas, H. (2005). Strategic management and change in high dependency environment: The case of a philanthropic organization. Voluntas, 16(4), 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, D. C., & Young, D. R. (1993). Nonprofit organizations in a market economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M. J. (2002). Essai: Doing time in organization theory. Organization Studies, 23(6), 869–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig, B., Jegers, M., & Lapsley, I. (2004). Challenges in managing nonprofit organizations: A research overview. Voluntas, 15(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, J., & Seidl, D. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 175–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Wright, G. (2002). Confronting strategic inertia in a top management team: Learning from failure. Organization Studies, 23(6), 949–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, E. A. (2006). The ironic value of loyalty dispute resolution strategies in worker cooperatives and conventional organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2), 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, A. P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koteen, J. (1997). Strategic management in public and nonprofit organizations: Thinking and acting strategically on public concerns. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Ph., & Andreasen, A. R. (1991). Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, R. A. (2004). Editor’s notes. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(2), 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marting, E. C., & Miller, J. L. (2003). NGOs and the development of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Understanding large-scale interorganizational systems. Voluntas, 14(2), 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKillop, D. G., Briscoe, R., McCarthy, O., Ward, M., & Ferguson, C. (2003). Irish credit unions: Exploring the gender mix. Voluntas, 14(3), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton-Stone, M., & Crittenden, W. (1993). A guide to journal articles on strategic management in nonprofit organizations 1977 to 1992. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 4(2), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. Prentice Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage: Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C. (1993). Formulation processes and tactics used in organizational decision making. Organizational Science, 4(2), 226–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. L. (1998). Research note: A journey into narrative analysis. A methodology for discovering meanings. Journal of Teaching in physical Education, 17(2), 244–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, S. M. (1995). Strategic management for nonprofit organizations, theory and cases. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, E., & Broadbridge, A. (2004). Managing change in nonprofit organizations: Insights from the UK charity retail sector. Voluntas, 15(3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N. (1995). Telling organizational tales: On the role of narrative fiction in the study of organizations. Organization Studies, 16(4), 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Foreman, P. O. (2000). Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 18–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 862–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwin, M. A. (1995). Conflicts in managed care. New England Journal of Medicine, 332(9), 604–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G., Finley, D. S., & Galloway, J. R. (2001). Strategic planning in social service organizations. Toronto: CSPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salipante, P. F., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1995). Managing traditionality and strategic change in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxon-Harrold, S. K. E. (1990). Competition, resources, and strategy in the british nonprofit sector. In H. K. Anheier & W. Seibel (Eds.), The third sector comparative studies of nonprofit organizations (pp. 123–153). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations. Synthesis, analysis, and future directions. Administration & Society, 31(3), 378–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Toepler, St. (2006). Caveat Venditor? Museum merchandising, nonprofit commercialization, and the case of the metropolitan museum in New York. Voluntas, 17(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl, K., & Simina, H. (2004). Strategic management of public interest organizations. Voluntas, 15(2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2003). The work of strategizing and organizing: For a practice perspective. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1), 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R., & Salamon, L. M. (2003). Commercialization, social ventures, and for-profit competition. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 423–446). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs Jäger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jäger, U., Beyes, T. Strategizing in NPOs: A Case Study on the Practice of Organizational Change Between Social Mission and Economic Rationale. Voluntas 21, 82–100 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9108-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-009-9108-x

Keywords

Navigation