Skip to main content
Log in

Stigmas arrangement, reproductive system, and maternal reproductive success in two species of Stigmaphyllon (Malpighiaceae): does pollinator size matter?

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most species of Neotropical Malpighiaceae are pollinated by oil-collecting bees of diverse sizes, but the effect of pollinator size on their reproductive success has still not been addressed in the literature. We performed a comparative description of stigma arrangements, analyzing the reproductive system and reproductive success and assessing pollinator sizes in Stigmaphyllon bonariense and Stigmaphyllon jatrophifolium. We collected flowers in three natural populations, conducting pollinator censuses and captures and performing manipulative experiments to determine the plants breeding system. We analyzed the morphology of stigmas and their receptivity and calculated the perimeter of the triangle formed by the stigmas (ST). Pollinator sizes, potential area for pollen transfer (PAPT), and the frequency of visits were also calculated. Stigma arrangement resulted in inverted triangles, and the ST was smaller in S. jatrophifolium than in S. bonariense. The overlap between ST and PAPT suggests that pollinators of all sizes were efficient in pollinating S. jatrophifolium, whereas only large and very large pollinators where efficient in S. bonariense. Moreover, very large pollinators had the highest visit frequencies. Our results indicated that both species are obligate xenogamous, pollinator-dependent, and present pollen limitation. We observed an increase in reproductive success related to the marked turnover in pollinator assemblage throughout the flowering season. These findings suggest that fruit and seed sets vary according to the context of the pollinators and that large pollinators would have the best performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N.A. Ramirez for helping with the statistical figures. To the Administración de Parque Nacionales (Regional NEA) and Ministerio de Ecología y Recursos Naturales Renovables, province of Misiones for the permission to conduct part of this study in protected areas of Argentina. The manuscript benefited from critical reading by R.F. de Almeida and one anonymous reviewer. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 11220170100429C), Argentina and the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020130200203BA) for the financial support for this research.

Funding

Financial support for this research was provided by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 11220170100429C), Argentina and the Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACyT 20020130200203BA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by AAA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AAA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The statistical analyses were carried out by HJM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adan Alberto Avalos.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Simon Pierce.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avalos, A.A., Marrero, H.J., Ferrucci, M.S. et al. Stigmas arrangement, reproductive system, and maternal reproductive success in two species of Stigmaphyllon (Malpighiaceae): does pollinator size matter?. Plant Ecol 222, 1263–1279 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01176-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01176-8

Keywords

Navigation