Abstract
Leaf area index (LAI, the one-sided foliage area per unit ground surface area) is a key determinant of plant productivity which has a large influence on water and energy exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere. The variation in forest LAI across landscapes and environmental gradients and its causes are not sufficiently understood. We measured the LAI of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) by litter trapping in 23 closed, mature stands across gradients of rainfall and soil acidity or fertility. With a mean LAI of 7.4 m2 m−2 (minimum: 5.6, maximum: 9.5 m2 m−2), beech stands maintained a comparably high leaf area index with relatively small variation along steep environmental gradients. Contrary to expectation, decreasing water availability (rainfall gradient from 1030 to 520 mm yr−1) or increasing soil acidity (pH 3–7) had no significant effect on LAI. Stand leaf mass (M l) increased slightly with soil fertility (C/N ratio, base saturation). We regressed parameters of site water availability (rainfall), soil fertility or acidity (pH, base saturation, C/N ratio, exchangeable Mg and Al content), and stand structure (stand age and stem density) against LAI and M l in order to detect environmental controls of stand leaf area. Stand age was the most influential factor for both LAI and M l (negative relationship). Stem density and the base saturation of the soil affected M l significantly, but had a weak influence on LAI. We conclude that the leaf area index of beech is mainly under control of age-related physiological factors, whereas the influence of soil chemistry and rainfall is comparably low.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrektson A., Aronsson A. and Tamm C.O. 1977. The effect of fertilization on primary production and nutrient cycling in the forest ecosystems. Silva Fennica 11: 233–239
Ares A. and Fownes J.H. 1999. Water supply regulates structure, productivity, and water use efficiency of Acacia koa forest in Hawaii. Oecologia 121: 458–466
Battaglia M., Cherry M.L., Beadle C.L., Sands P.J. and Hingston A. 1998. Prediction of leaf area index in Eucalyptus plantations: effects of water stress and temperature. Tree Physiol. 18: 521–528
Bolstad P.Y., Vose J.M. and McNulty S.G. 2000. Forest productivity, leaf area, and terrain in southern Appalachian deciduous forests. For. Sci. 47: 419–427
Bray J.R. and Gorham E. 1964. Litter production in forests of the world. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2: 101–157
Burton A.J., Pregitzer K.S. and Reed D.D. 1991. Leaf area and foliar biomass relationships in northern hardwood forests located along an 800 km acid deposition gradient. For. Sci. 37: 1011–1059
Chalupa V. 1961. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Blattproduktion der Buchen- und Eichenbestände. Pr Vyzk Ustavu Lesn 23: 35–62
Chason J.W., Baldocchi D.D., Huston M.A. 1991. A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating forest canopy leaf area. Agric. For. Meteorol. 57: 107–128
Cutini A., Matteucci G. and Mugnozza G.S. 1998. Estimation of leaf area index with the Li-Cor LAI 2000 in deciduous forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 105: 55–65
Danckelmann B. 1887. Streuertragstafel für Buchen- und Fichtenhochwaldungen. Zeitschrift Forst- Jagdwesen 19: 577–587
Dean T.J. and Long J.N. 1988. Bias in leaf area-sapwood area ratios and its impact on growth analysis in Pinus contorta. Trees 2: 104–112
DeAngelis D.L., Gardner R.H. and Shugart H.H. 1981. Productivity of forest ecosystems studied during the IBP. In: Reichle D.E. (ed.), Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. Int Biol Progr No. 23. Cambridge Univ. Press, London, pp. 567–672
Dufrene E. and Bréda N. 1995. Estimation of deciduous forest leaf area index using direct and indirect methods. Oecologia 104: 156–162
Ebermayer E. 1876. Die gesamte Lehre der Waldstreu mit Rücksicht auf die chemische Statik des Waldbaues, Springer, Berlin
Ellenberg H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 5th ed. Ulmer, Stuttgart
Eschrich W., Burchardt R. and Essiamah S. 1989. The induction of sun and shade leaves of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): anatomical studies. Trees 3: 1–10
Gholz H.L. 1982. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 63: 469–481
Gholz H.L., Fitz F.K. and Waring R.H. 1976. Leaf area difference associated with old-growth forest communities in the western Oregon Cascades. Can. J. For. Res. 6: 49–57
Gower S.T., Vogt K.A. and Grier C.C. 1992. Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 43–65
Gower S.T., Kucharik C.J. and Norman J.M. 1999. Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 70: 29–51
Grier C.C. and Running S.W. 1977. Leaf area of mature northwestern coniferous forests: relation to site water balance. Ecology 58: 893–899
Hagemeier M. 2002. Funktionale Kronenarchitektur mitteleuropäischer Baumarten am Beispiel von Hängebirke, Waldkiefer, Traubeneiche, Hainbuche, Winterlinde und Rotbuche. Diss. Bot. 361: 1–154
Harrington R.A., Fownes J.H., Meinzer F.C. and Scowcroft P.G. 1995. Forest growth along a rainfall gradient in Hawaii: Acacia koa stand structure, productivity, foliar nutrients, and water- and nutrient-use efficiencies. Oecologia 102: 277–284
Harrington R.A., Fownes J.H. and Vitousek P.M. 2001. Production and resource use efficiencies in N- and P-limited tropical forests: a comparison of responses to long-term fertilization. Ecosystems 4: 646–657
Hebert M.T. and Jack S.B. 1998. Leaf area index and site water balance of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) across a precipitation gradient in East Texas. For. Ecol. Manage. 105: 273–282
Heller H. 1971. Estimation of photosynthetically active leaf area in forests: methods for beech leaves. In: Ellenberg H. (eds), Integrated Experimental Ecology: methods and Results of Ecosystem Research in the German Solling Project. Springer, Berlin, pp. 45–47
Herbert D.A. and Fownes J.H. 1995. Phosphorus limitation of forest leaf area and net primary production on a highly weathered soil. Biogeochemistry 29: 223–235
Herbert D.A. and Fownes J.H. 1999. Forest productivity and efficiency of resource use across a chronosequence of tropical montane soils. Ecosystems 2: 242–254
Hofmann G. and Jenssen M. 1997. Laubmassen und ihre Entwicklung in mitteleuropäischen Rotbuchenwäldern. Beiträge Forstwirtschaft Landschschaftsökologie 31: 97–103
Holst T., Hauser S., Kirchgäßner A., Matzarakis A., Mayer H., Schindler D. 2004. Measuring and modelling plant area index in beech stands. Int. J. Biometeorol. 48: 192–201
Hsiao T.C., Silk W.K. and Jing J. 1985. Leaf growth and water deficits: biophysical effects. In: Baker NR, Davies WR and Ong CK (eds), Control of Leaf Growth. Soc. Expl. Biol. Sem. Ser. Vol. 27. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 239–266
Hüttermann A., Ulrich B., Godbold D.L. and Fritz E. 1988. Changes in forest soils and tree vitality as a consequence of acid deposition. Proceed US/FRG Res Symp, Vermont 1987. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall, Pennsylvania, pp. 495–504
Jaro Z. 1959. The leaf area in some forest types. Erdeszeti Kut 6: 103–110
Jarvis P.G. and Leverenz J.W. 1983. Productivity of temperate, deciduous and evergreen forests. In: Lange O.L., Nobel P.S., Osmond C.B. and Ziegler H. (eds), Encycl Plant Physiol New Ser, Physiological Plant Ecology, Vol 12D. Springer, Berlin, pp. 233–280
Jose S. and Gillespie A.R. 1997. Leaf area-productivity relationships among mixed-species hardwood forest communities of the Central Hardwood region. For. Sci. 43: 56–64
Lambers H., Chapin III F.S. and Pons T.L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology, Springer, Berlin
Le Dantec V., Dufrene E. and Saugier B. 2000. Interannual and spatial variation in maximum leaf area index of temperate deciduous stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 134: 71–81
Long J.N. and Smith F.W. 1990. Determinant of stemwood production in Pinus contorta var. latifolia forest: the influence of site quality and stand structure. J. Appl. Ecol. 27: 847–856
Meiwes K.-J., König N., Khanna P.K., Prenzel J. and Ulrich B. 1984. Chemische Untersuchungsverfahren für Mineralböden, Auflagehumus und Wurzeln zur Charakterisierung und Bewertung der Versauerung in Waldböden. Berichte Forschzentrum Waldökosysteme Universität Göttingen 7: 1–67
Möller C.M. 1945. Untersuchungen über Laubmenge, Stoffverlust und Stoffproduktion des Waldes. Forstl Forsöksv Danmark 17: 1–287
Murach D. and Ulrich B. 1988. Destabilization of forest ecosystems by acid deposition. GeoJournal 17: 253–260
Neilson R.P. 1995. A model for predicting continental-scale vegetation distribution and water balance. Ecol. Appl. 5: 362–385
Newbould P.J. 1967. Methods of Estimating the Primary Production of Forests. IBP handbook no 2, Willmer Brothers, Birkenhead, UK
Nihlgard B. and Lindgren L. 1977. Plant biomass, primary production and bioelements of three mature beech forests in South Sweden. Oikos 28: 95–104
Pierce L.L., Running S.W. and Walker J. 1994. Regional-scale relationships of leaf area index to specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen contents. Ecol. Appl. 4: 313–321
Pook E.W. 1986. Canopy dynamics of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. IV Contrasting responses to two severe droughts. Aust. J. Bot. 34: 1–14
Prskawetz M. and Lexer M.J. 2000. Evaluierung des LI-COR LAI-2000 zur Ermittlung des Blattflächenindex in Buchenjungbeständen. Allgemeine Forst- u. Jagdzeitung 171: 185–191
Running S.W., Nemani R.R., Peterson D.L., Ban L.E., Potts D.F., Pierce L.L. and Spanner M.A. 1989. Mapping regional forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by coupling satellite data with ecosystem simulation. Ecology 70: 1090–1101
Runyon J., Waring R.H., Goward S.N. and Welles J.M. 1994. Environmental limits on net primary production and light-use efficiency across the Oregon transect. Ecol. Appl. 4: 226–237
Ryan M.G., Binkley D. and Fownes J.H. 1997. Age-related decline in forest productivity: pattern and process. Adv. Ecol. Res. 27: 213–262
Schipka F., Heimann J. and Leuschner Ch. 2005. Regional variation in canopy transpiration of Central European beech forests. Oecologia 143: 260–270
Shidei T. and Kira T. (eds) 1977. Primary Productivity of Japanese forests, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo
Swank W.T., Swift L.W. and Douglass J.E. 1988. Streamflow changes associated with forest cutting, species conversions and natural disturbances. In: Swank W.T. and Crossley D.A. Jr., (eds), Forest Ecology and Hydrology at Coweeta. Ecol. Stud., Vol. 66. Springer, New York, pp. 297–312
Taiz L., Zeiger E. 1998. Plant Physiology, 2nd ed. Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, Massachusetts
Thomas S.C. and Winner W.E. 2000. Leaf area index of an old-growth Douglas-fir forest estimated from direct structural measurements in the canopy. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1922–1930
Van Dijk A. and Bruijnzeel L.A. 2001. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 1. Model description. J. Hydrol. 247: 230–238
Van Praag H.J. and Sougnez-Remy S. 1986. Mesure de l’index foliaire dans une Hetraie et une Pessière des Hautes-Fagnes. Société Royal Botanique Belgique 119: 107–113
Vose J.M. and Allen H.L. 1988. Leaf area, stemwood growth and nutrition relationships in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 34: 546–563
Whitehead D. and Jarvis P.G. 1981. Coniferous forests and plantations. In: Kozlowski T.T. (ed.), Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Woody Plant Communities, Vol. VI. Academic Press, New York, pp. 49–152
Woodward F.I. 1987. Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
We thank Dirk Hölscher (Göttingen) for his constructive criticism of an earlier draft of the manuscript. This study was conducted while the authors were at the Department of Ecology, University of Kassel, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leuschner, C., Voß, S., Foetzki, A. et al. Variation in leaf area index and stand leaf mass of European beech across gradients of soil acidity and precipitation. Plant Ecol 186, 247–258 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9127-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9127-2