Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ureteral reconstruction for complex strictures: a review of the current literature

  • Urology - Review
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Frequently employed procedures for ureteral reconstruction include balloon dilation, pyeloplasty and ureteral re-implants. However, these procedures do not work for complex ureteral disease. The goal of this literature review is to report on techniques and success rates for the following techniques: buccal graft ureteroplasty, appendiceal interposition, transureteroureterostomy, ileal ureter and autotransplantation.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search for English-language original and review articles was conducted using PubMed. The following terms were queried: “ureteral reconstruction”, “buccal graft”, “appendiceal interposition”, “ileal ureter”, “transureteroureterostomy”, “autotransplantation”.

Results

Procedures involving the buccal mucosa or appendix offer minimally invasive techniques and low morbidity with good short-term success. Drawbacks to appendiceal interposition include the availability and length of appendix, and 10–20% of patients may have insufficient appendix upon intra-operative assessment. Transureteroureterostomy is typically limited to extensive exonerations due to concerns of injury to the contralateral kidney, even with reported success rates > 90%. Ileal ureter may carry a risk of metabolic acidosis in patients with renal insufficiency along with bowel-related complications. Ileal ureter and autotransplantation are reserved for the most severe cases due to their high morbidity but do offer options for the complex patient.

Conclusion

Ureteral stricture disease not amenable to pyeloplasty, ureteroureterostomy or ureteroneocystostomy offers a challenge to urologist. Careful patient selection with pre-operative assessment of renal and bladder is vital to a successful operation with minimal complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All articles mentioned in this review are freely searchable on PubMed.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Nakada SY, Best SL (2015) Management of upper urinary tract obstruction. Campbell-Walsh urology, 11th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1135–1139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee Z, Lee M, Koster H et al (2020) A multi-institutional experience with robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft: an updated analysis of intermediate-term outcomes. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroepfl D, Loewen H, Klevecka V, Musch M (2010) Treatment of long ureteric strictures with buccal mucosal grafts. BJU Int 105:1452–1455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08994.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao LC, Weinberg AC, Lee Z et al (2018) Robotic ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts: a multi-institutional experience. Eur Urol 73:419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waldorf B, Lee Z, Kidd L et al (2017) Robotic buccal ureteroplasty: a review of the current literature. Curr Urol Rep 18:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0683-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Naude JH (1999) Buccal mucosal grafts in the treatment of ureteric lesions. BJU Int 83:751–754. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00019.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee Z, Waldorf BT, Cho EY et al (2017) Robotic ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for the management of complex ureteral strictures. J Urol 198:1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badawy AA, Abolyosr A, Saleem MD, Abuzeid AM (2010) Buccal mucosa graft for ureteral stricture substitution: initial experience. Urology 76:971–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dagash H, Sen S, Chacko J et al (2008) The appendix as ureteral substitute: a report of 10 cases. J Pediatr Urol 4:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jun MS, Stair S, Xu A et al (2020) A multi-institutional experience with robotic appendiceal ureteroplasty. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen X, Xv M, Liu G et al (2012) Ureteral replacement with appendix in a pediatric group: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr Surg 22:329–331. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1313335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gn M, Lee Z, Strauss D, Eun D (2018) Robotic appendiceal interposition with right lower pole calycostomy, downward nephropexy, and psoas hitch for the management of an iatrogenic near-complete ureteral avulsion. Urology 113:e9–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao H, Zhou H, Yang F et al (2018) Laparoscopic appendiceal interposition pyeloplasty for long ureteric strictures in children. J Pediatr Urol 14:551.e1-551.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Obaidah A, Mane SB, Dhende NP et al (2010) Our experience of ureteral substitution in pediatric age group. Urology 75:1476–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.07.1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yarlagadda VK, Nix JW, Benson DG, Selph JP (2017) Feasibility of intracorporeal robotic-assisted laparoscopic appendiceal interposition for ureteral stricture disease: a case report. Urology 109:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duty BD, Kreshover JE, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR (2015) Review of appendiceal onlay flap in the management of complex ureteric strictures in six patients. BJU Int 115:282–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Antonelli A, Zani D, Dotti P et al (2005) Use of the appendix as ureteral substitute in a patient with a single kidney affected by relapsing upper urinary tract carcinoma. ScientificWorldJournal 5:276–279. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas A, Eng MM, Hagan C et al (2004) Appendiceal substitution of the ureter in retroperitoneal fibrosis. J Urol 171:2378. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000125333.41865.52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pisters PW, Pettaway CA, Liu P et al (2012) Is transureteroureterostomy performed during multi-organ resection for non-urothelial malignancy safe and effective? J Surg Oncol 106:62–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Richter S, Kollmar O, Lindemann W, Schilling MK (2007) Transureteroureterostomy allows renal sparing radical resection of advanced malignancies with rectosigmoid invasion. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:949–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-006-0235-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawamura J, Tani M, Sumida K et al (2017) The use of transureteroureterostomy during ureteral reconstruction for advanced primary or recurrent pelvic malignancy in the era of multimodal therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:135–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2672-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joung JY, Jeong IG, Seo HK et al (2008) The efficacy of transureteroureterostomy for ureteral reconstruction during surgery for a non-urologic pelvic malignancy. J Surg Oncol 98:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwaszko MR, Krambeck AE, Chow GK, Gettman MT (2010) Transureteroureterostomy revisited: long-term surgical outcomes. J Urol 183:1055–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barry JM (2005) Surgical atlas transureteroureterostomy. BJU Int 96:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05552.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Armatys SA, Mellon MJ, Beck SDW et al (2009) Use of ileum as ureteral replacement in urological reconstruction. J Urol 181:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roth JD, Monn MF, Szymanski KM et al (2017) Ureteral reconstruction with ileum: long-term follow-up of renal function. Urology 104:225–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung BI, Hamawy KJ, Zinman LN, Libertino JA (2006) The use of bowel for ureteral replacement for complex ureteral reconstruction: long-term results. J Urol 175:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00061-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumgarten AS, Shah BB, Patel TB, Wiegand LR (2017) Robotic ileal interposition for radiation-induced ureteral stricture disease. Urology 104:9–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.02.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Juwono T, Balbona J, Heinsimer KR, Herron TR, Davis D, Wiegand LR (2020) Hand-Sewn or Stapled? A Single Institution Experience on Bowel Anastomosis in Reconstructive Urologic Procedures. Soc Int Urol, 40th Congress. Accessed 10 Oct 2020

  30. Bodie B, Novick AC, Rose M, Straffon RA (1986) Long-term results with renal autotransplantation for ureteral replacement. J Urol 136:1187–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45278-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruiz M, Hevia V, Fabuel JJ et al (2017) Kidney autotransplantation: long-term outcomes and complications. Experience in a tertiary hospital and literature review. Int Urol Nephrol 49:1929–1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1680-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Fazlalizadeh R et al (2017) A nationwide analysis of kidney autotransplantation. Am Surg 83(2):162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sood A, Jeong W, Ahlawat R et al (2015) Minimally invasive renal autotransplantation. J Surg Oncol 112:717–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stiegler P, Schemmer P (2018) Robot-assisted transplant surgery - vision or reality? A comprehensive review. Visc Med 34:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kroczak T, Reynolds LF, Ordon M (2018) Robotic autotransplantation and management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures: the future is here. Curr Urol Rep 19:10–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0781-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Araki M, Wada K, Mitsui Y et al (2017) Robotic renal autotransplantation: first case outside of North America. Acta Med Okayama 71:351–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R (2014) Completely intracorporeal robotic renal autotransplantation. J Urol 192:1516–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.2589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee JY, Alzahrani T, Ordon M (2015) Intra-corporeal robotic renal auto-transplantation. J Can Urol Assoc 9:E748–E749. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Arora S, Campbell L, Tourojman M et al (2017) Robotic buccal mucosal graft ureteroplasty for complex ureteral stricture. Urology 110:257–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hefermehl LJ, Tritschler S, Kretschmer A et al (2020) Open ureteroplasty with buccal mucosa graft for long proximal strictures: a good option for a rare problem. Investig Clin Urol 61:316–322. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.3.316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong W, Hong P, Ding G et al (2019) Technical considerations and outcomes for ileal ureter replacement: a retrospective study in China. BMC Surg 19:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0472-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Monn MF, Roth JD, Bihrle R, Mellon MJ (2018) Long term outcomes in the use of ileal ureter for radiation-induced ureteral strictures. Int Urol Nephrol 50:1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1904-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim A, Nam W, Song SH et al (2018) Use of the ileum for ureteral stricture and obstruction in bilateral, unilateral, and single-kidney cases. Urology 111:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Matlaga BR, Shah OD, Hart LJ, Assimos DG (2003) Ileal ureter substitution: a contemporary series. Urology 62:998–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00766-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Webster JC, Lemoine J, Seigne J et al (2005) Renal autotransplantation for managing a short upper ureter or after ex vivo complex renovascular reconstruction. BJU Int 96:871–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05729.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tran G, Ramaswamy K, Chi T et al (2015) Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation: safety, efficacy and long-term durability. J Urol 194:738–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.089

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA

    Alyssa Bilotta

  2. Department of Urology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA

    Lucas R. Wiegand & Kevin R. Heinsimer

Authors
  1. Alyssa Bilotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas R. Wiegand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kevin R. Heinsimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to inception, literature review, data analysis, writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin R. Heinsimer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilotta, A., Wiegand, L.R. & Heinsimer, K.R. Ureteral reconstruction for complex strictures: a review of the current literature. Int Urol Nephrol 53, 2211–2219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02985-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-02985-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation