Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urodynamically diagnosed detrusor hypocontractility: should transurethral resection of the prostate be contraindicated?

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) suffering from hypocontractile detrusor were generally regarded unsuitable for surgery. This prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on BPH patients diagnosed detrusor hypocontractility on urodynamic study (UDs).

Methods

Twenty patients were included in the study with mean age of 74.20 ± 7.93 years (range: 57–88). Outcomes were determined by patients’ self-assessment questionnaires, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life (QoL), and UDs parameters including maximum uroflow rate (Qmax), postvoid urine volume (PVR), bladder compliance, maximal cystometric capacity (MCC), and maximum detrusor pressure (Pdetmax).

Results

Median follow-up duration was 12 months (range: 10–16). After TURP, IPSS/QoL, Qmax, PVR, and Pdetmax were significantly improved and there were no significant differences with regard to bladder compliance and MCC.

Conclusion

UDs may play a very limited role in detecting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in BPH patients with hypocontractile detrusor. TURP may obtain a promising effect on such patients with unidentified BOO. These patients should not be arbitrarily excluded from surgical indications simply based on UDs findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abarbanel J, Marcus EL (2007) Impaired detrusor contractility in community-dwelling elderly presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 69:436–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson AS, Griffiths C, Neal DE (1996) Conventional urodynamics and ambulatory monitoring in the definition and management of bladder outflow obstruction. J Urol 155:506–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Javle P, Jenkins SA, Machin DG et al (1998) Grading of benign prostatic obstruction can predict the outcome of transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol 160:1713–1717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Venrooij GE, Boon TA, de Gier RPE (1995) International prostate symptom score and quality of life assessment versus urodynamic parameters in males with benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms. J Urol 153:1516–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gotoh M, Yoshikawa Y, Kondo AS (1999) Prognostic value of pressure-flow study in surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol 17:274–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Mastrigt R, Rollema HJ (1992) The prognostic value of bladder contractility in transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 148:1856–1860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Machino R, Kakizaki H, Ameda K (2002) Detrusor instability with equivocal obstruction. A predictor of unfavorable symptomatic outcomes after transurethral prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn 21:444–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrams P (1994) In support of pressure-flow studies for evaluating men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 44:153–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Han DH, Jeong YS, Choo MS et al (2008) The efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate in the patients with weak bladder contractility index. Urology 71(4):657–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fusco F, Groutz A, Blaivas JG (2001) Videourodynamic studies in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a comparison of community based versus referral urological practices. J Urol 166:910–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas AW, Cannon A, Bartlett E (2005) The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up of untreated detrusor underactivity. BJU Int 96:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Belenky A, Abarbanel Y, Cohen M (2003) Detrusor resistive index evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography as a potential indicator of bladder outlet obstruction. Urology 62:647–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. De la Rosette JJM, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S et al (2001) EAU guidelines on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 40:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madersbacher S (2004) Urodynamics prior to prostatectomy: pro. Eur Urol 45:557–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rischmann P (2004) Urodynamics prior to prostatectomy: con. Eur Urol 45:561–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keji Xie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ou, R., Pan, C., Chen, H. et al. Urodynamically diagnosed detrusor hypocontractility: should transurethral resection of the prostate be contraindicated?. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 35–39 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-0010-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-0010-2

Keywords

Navigation