Abstract
Introduction
Seroconversion response to Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is limited in uremic patients because of impaired humoral and cellular immune activity. Recent studies show that high-flux (HF) hemodialysis (HD) membranes can improve T cell functions and decrease the proinflammatory cytokine activation more effectively than low-flux (LF) membranes. In regard to HF membranes may have immune modulator effects; we compared the antibody responses to hepatitis B vaccination between HF HD and LF HD membranes.
Methods
One thousand four hundred and eight patients on HD programmed for 4 h three times a week at three different centers with HF or LF membranes were scanned. Anti-HBs levels of these patients who were vaccinated with recombinant DNA HBV vaccine on the 0, 1st, 2nd and 6th month from the beginning were recorded on the 0, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month of vaccination schedule.
Results
Seroconversion rate was 84.2% in HF group and 52.7% in LF group on the 6th month (P < 0.01). Ratio of the patients who had >100 IU/l antibody titers in HF group was 22.8%, while it was 10.9% in LF group (P < 0.01). Also on the 9th, 12th and 24th month; seroconversion rates in HF group were higher than LF group: 91.1–70.9% (P < 0.05), 95.0–81.8% (P < 0.05), 92.1–83.7% (P > 0.05), respectively. Ratio of the patients who did not show any seroconversion was higher in LF group than HF group; on the 6th month as 15.8–47.3% (P < 0.001), on the 9th month 8.9–29.1% (P < 0.05), on the 12th month as 5.0–18.2% (P < 0.05), and on the 24th month as 7.9–16.4% (P > 0.05), respectively.
Conclusion
We showed that ratio of anti-HBs seroconversion response to hepatitis B vaccination in patients receiving HD with HF membranes was higher than LF membranes. This finding suggests that HF membranes may improve immune modulator effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Dulai G (2004) Meta-analysis: the effect of age on immunological response to hepatitis B vaccine in end-stage renal disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:1053–1062
Tsouchnikas I, Dounousi E, Xanthopolou K, Papakostantinou S, Thomoglou V, Tsakiris D (2007) Loss of hepatitis B immunity in hemodialysis patients acquired either naturally or after vaccination. Clin nephrol 68(4):228–234
Stevens CE, Alter HJ, Taylor PE et al (1984) Hepatitis B vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. Immunogenicity and efficacy. N Engl J Med 311:496
Buti M, Viladomiu L, Jardi R et al (1992) Long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 12:144
Fabrizi F, Martin P (2001) Hepatitis B vaccine and dialysis: current issues. Int J Artif Organs 24:683–694
Cheung AK, Levin NW, Greene T, Agodoa L, Bailey J, Beck G, Clark W, Levey AS, Leypoldt JK, Ornt DB, Rocco MV, Schulman G, Schwab S, Teehan B, Eknoyan G, for the HEMO Study Group (2003) Effect of high-flux hemodialysis on clinical outcomes: results of the HEMO Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:3251–3263
Lonneman G, Novick D, Rubinstein M, Passlick-Deetjen J, Lang D, Dinarello CA (2003) A switch to high-flux helixone membranes reverses suppresed interferon gamma production in patients on low-flux dialysis. Blood Purif 21:225–231
Bordoni V, Piroddi M, Galli F et al (2006) Oxidant and carbonyl stres-related apoptosis in end-stage kidney disease: impact of membrane flux. Blood Purif 24:149–156
Daugirdas JT (1995) Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2(4):295–304
Grzegorzewska AE, Banachowicz W (2008) Evaluation of hemodialysis adequacy using online Kt/V and single-pool variable-volume urea Kt/V. Int Urol Nephrol 40(3):771–778
Verkade MA, van Druningen CJ, Op de Hoek CT, Weimar W, Betjes MG (2007) Decreased antigen-spesific T-cell proliferation by moDC among hepatitis B vaccine non-responders on hemodialysis. Clin Exp Med 7:65–71
Girndt M, Köhler H (2002) Hepatitis B virus infection in hemodialysis patients. Semin Nephrol 22(4):340–350
Stachowski J, Pollok M, Barth C, Maciejewski J, Baldamus CA (1994) Non-responsiveness to hepatitis B vaccination in haemodialysis patients: association with impaired TCR/CD3 antigen receptor expression regulating co-stimulatory processes in antigen presentation and recognition. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:144–152
Girndt M, Kohler H, Schiedelm-Weick E, Schlaek J, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde KH, Fleicher B (1995) Production of interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-10 in vitro correlates with the clinical immune defect in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 47:559–565
Descamps-Latscha B, Chatenoud L (1996) T cells and B cells in chronic renal failure. Semin Nephrol 16:183–191
Caillat ZS, Gimenez JJ, Wambergue F (1998) Distinct HLA class II alleles determine to antibody response to vaccination with hepatitis B surface antigen. Kidney Int 53:1626–1630
Cheung AK, Rocco MV, Yan G et al (2006) Serum beta-2 microglobulin levels predict mortality in dialysis patients: results of the HEMO study. J Am Soc Nephrol 17(2):546–555
Vanholder R, Ringoir S, Dhondt A, Hakim R (1991) Phagocytosis in uremic and hemodialysis patients: a prospective and cross sectional study. Kidney Int 39:320–327
Ward RA, Ouseph R, McLeish KR (2003) Effect of high-flux hemodialysis on oxidant stress. Kidney Int 63:353–369
Girndt M, Heisel O, Köhler H (1999) Influence of dialysis with polyamide versus hemophane hemodialysis on monokines and complement activation during a four month long term study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:676–682
Schindler R, Lonnemann G, Schaffer J (1994) The effect of ultrafiltered dialysate on the cellular content of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Nephron 68:229–233
Schiffl H, Wendinger H, Lang SM (2002) Ultrapure dialysis fluid and response to hepatitis B vaccine. Nephron 91:530–531
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dede, F., Yıldız, A., Aylı, D. et al. Modulation of the immune response to HBV vaccination by hemodialysis membranes. Int Urol Nephrol 42, 1069–1075 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9616-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9616-z