Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Is the minimally invasive treatment as good as transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the development of new technologies, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of the benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). In general, new minimally invasive treatments have not demonstrated better outcomes than TURP in evidence based medicine trials published to date, and should be reserved for patients who prefer to avoid surgery, who are unsuitable candidates for surgery or who no longer respond favorably to medication.

TUMT and TUNA appears to be more effective than medical therapy but less effective than TURP. Both treatments can be given under topical anesthesia or local prostatic or perineal block.

Efficacy of transurethral vaporization appears similar to TURP, but the studies are short-term and the glands operated on are relatively small. In patients with small prostates, the transurethral incision of the prostate can also be a good option, associated with less morbidity than TURP.

Bipolar resection of the prostate is similar to TURP in effectiveness, but the data are inconclusive regarding blood loss, length of catheterization and hospital stay.

Long-term comparative trials are needed to determine if the minimally invasive therapies are superior to standard TURP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R, et al (2001) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology 58:642–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen JT, Nickel JC, Marshall VR, et al (1997) Finasteride significantly reduces acute urinary retention and need for surgery in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 49:839–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, et al (2003) The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 349:2387–2398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McConnel JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RE, et al (1994) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: diagnosis and treatment. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin 8:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wheelahan J, Scott NA, Cartmill R, et al (2000) Minimally invasive non-laser thermal techniques for prostatectomy: a systematic review. BJU Int 86:977–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Ancona FC, Francisca EA, Witjes WP, et al (1998) Transurethral resection of the prostate vs high-energy thermotherapy of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term results. Br J Urol 81:259–264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed M, Bell T, Lawrence WT, et al (1997) Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron version 2.5) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized, controlled, parallel study. Br J␣Urol 79:181–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffman RM, MacDonald R, Monga M, et al (2004) Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review. BJU Int 94:1031–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlstrand C, Walden M, Geirsson G, et al (1995) Transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral resection for symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: a prospective randomized study with a 2-year followup. Br J Urol 76:614–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Norby B, Nielsen HV, Frimodt-Moller PC, et al (2002) Transurethral interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate and transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection or incision of the prostate: results of a randomized, controlled study in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 90:853–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, et al (2002) Feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH – a randomized controlled multicenter study. Urology 60:292–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Floratos DL, Kiemeney LA, Rossi C, et al (2001) Long-term followup of randomized transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral prostatic resection study. J Urol 165:1533–1538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Issa MM (1996) Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate: report of initial US clinical trial. J Urol 156:413–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. AUA. AUA Guideline on Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 170:530–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruskewitz R, Issa MM, Roehrborn CG, et al (1998) A prospective, randomized 1-year clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation to transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 159:1588–1593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Issa MM, Myrick SE, Symbas NP (1998) The TUNA procedure for BPH: basic procedure and clinical results. Infect Urol 11:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hill B, Bel Ville W, Bruskewitz R, et al (2004) Transurethral needle ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J␣Urol 171:2336–2340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cimentepe E, Unsal A, Saglam R (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing transurethral needle ablation with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results at 18 months. J Endourol 17:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Campo B, Bergamaschi F, Corrada P, et al (1997) Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) of the prostate: a clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Urology 49:847–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steele GS, Sleep DJ (1997) Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate: a urodynamic based study with 2-year followup. J Urol 158:1834–1838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Millard RJ, Harewood LM, Tamaddon K (1996) A study of the efficacy and safety of transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Neurourol Urodyn 15:916–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyle P, Robertson C, Vaughan ED, et al (2004) A meta-analysis of trials of transurethral needle ablation for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 94:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandrasekar P, Virdi JS (2001) Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA) – a prospective study, six year follow-up. In: AUA Annual Meeting Clinical Abstracts. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins

  24. Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Djavan B, et al (2000) Two-year results of transurethral resection of the prostate versus four ‹less invasive’ treatment options. Eur Urol 37:695–701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramon J, Lynch TH, Eardley I, et al (1997) Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a collaborative multicentre study. Br J Urol 80:128–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, et al (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172:1926–1929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, et al (2004) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 172:1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan AH, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, et al (2003) A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams). J Urol 170:1270–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gilling PJ, Mackey M, Cresswell M, et al (1999) Holmium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 1-year followup. J Urol 62:1640–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tooher R, Sutherland P, Costello A, et al (2004) A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 171:1773–1781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Muschter R, Whitfield H (1999) Interstitial laser therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 35:147–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liedberg F, Adell L, Hagberg G, et al (2003) Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic enlargement – a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 37:494–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Ala-Opas M (1999) Contact laser prostatectomy compared to TURP in prostatic hyperplasia smaller than 40 ml. Six-month follow-up with complex urodynamic assessment. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Keoghane SR, Lawrence KC, Gray AM, et al (2000) A double-blind randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation of transurethral resection vs contact laser vaporization for benign prostatic enlargement: a 3-year follow-up. BJU Int 85:74–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sengor F, Kose O, Yucebas E, et al (1996) A comparative study of laser ablation and transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a 6-month follow-up. Br J Urol 78:398–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cowles RS 3rd, Kabalian JN, Childs S, et al (1995) A prospective randomized comparison of transurethral resection to visual laser ablation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 46:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gujral S, Abrams P, Donovan JL, et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate and laser therapy in men with chronic urinary retention: the CLasP study. J Urol 164:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoffman RM, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ (2004) Laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic obstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. CD001987

  39. Hoffman RM, MacDonald R, Slaton JW, et al (2003) Laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review. J Urol 169:210–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Poulakis V, Dahm P, Witzsch U, et al (2004) Transurethral electrovaporization vs transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatic obstruction: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 94:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nuhoglu B, Ayyildiz A, Fidan V, et al (2005) Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: is it any better than standard transurethral prostatectomy? 5-year follow-up. J Endourol 19:79–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Larsen EH, Dorflinger T, Gasser TC, et al (1987) Transurethral incision versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy: a preliminary report. Scand J Urol Nephrol 104:83–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dorflinger T, Jensen FS, Krarup T, et al (1992) Transurethral prostatectomy compared with incision of the prostate in the treatment of prostatism caused by small benign prostate glands. Scand J Urol Nephrol 26:333–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Riehmann M, Knes JM, Heisey D, et al (1995) Transurethral resection versus incision of the prostate: a randomized, prospective study. Urology 45:768–775

    Google Scholar 

  45. Saporta L, Aridogan IA, Erlich N, et al (1996) Objective and subjective comparison of transurethral resection, transurethral incision and balloon dilation of the prostate. Eur Urol 29:439–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jahnson S, Dalen M, Gustavsson G, et al (1998) Transurethral incision versus resection of the prostate for small to medium benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol 81:276–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang Q, Peters TJ, Donovan JL, et al (2001) Transurethral incision compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for bladder outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Urol 165:1526–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Starkman JS, Santucci RA (2005) Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 95:69–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fung BT, li SK, Yu CF, et al (2005) Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporessection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Asian J Surg 28:24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, et al (2005) Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled trial. J Endourol 19:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang S, Lin WC, Chang HK, et al (2004) Gyrus plasmasect: is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate? Urol Int 73:258–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Unicamp R. Augusta 2347, 3° andar, 01413-000, São Paulo, Brazil

    Emerson Luís Zani & Nelson Rodrigues Netto Jr.

Authors
  1. Emerson Luís Zani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nelson Rodrigues Netto Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelson Rodrigues Netto Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zani, E.L., Netto, N.R. Is the minimally invasive treatment as good as transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia?. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 161–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9053-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9053-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation