Abstract
Recent research shows that, as students interpret the demands of the assessment tasks, they vary their approaches to learning in order to cope with the assessment tasks. Three research questions are central in the present paper: (1) Do students who participate in a constructivist learning environment change their perception of assessment demands towards more deep level demands? (2) Do students in a constructivist learning environment change their approaches to learning towards a more deep approach to learning? (3) Is there a relation between change in approaches to learning and change in the perceptions of the assessment demands? Students following the course ‘Education and psychology’ of the teacher training program at the University of Antwerp completed questionnaires during the first, the second and the final lesson of the course. One questionnaire measured their approaches to learning and the other their general perceptions of the assessment demands. The course ‘Education and psychology’ can be labelled as a ‘constructivist learning environment’ with congruent assessment methods. Results of the paired sampled t-tests indicated that students indeed do change their perceptions of assessment demands towards more deep level demands. However, the results also indicated that students did not change their approach to learning towards a more deep approach. On the contrary, students seem to develop more surface approaches to learning during the course. Correlation analyses indicated that only changes of perceptions of assessment demands towards less surface levels are significantly related to changes in approaches to learning, towards a more surface approach. Results of the stepwise multiple regression analyses indicated that students’ approach to learning at the beginning of the course seems to have a higher impact on the extent to which they change their approach to learning than how students perceive the demands of the assessment within the course. These results point us to the complexity of the relationship between the learning environment, the students’ perceptions of assessment demands, and students’ approaches to learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of student learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.
Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149.
Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search for qualities, standards (pp. 13–36). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Crooks, T. J., & Mahalski, P. A. (1985). Relationships among assessment practices, study methods, and grades obtained. Research and Development in Higher Education, 8, 234–240.
Curry, L. (2000). Individual differences in cognitive style, learning style and instructional preference in medical education. In G. Norman, C. van der Vleuten & D. Newble (Eds.), International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 263–276). London: Kluwer.
Dart, B. (1997). Adult learners’ metacognitive behaviour in higher education. In P. Sutherland (Ed.), Adult learning: A reader (pp. 30–43). London: Kogan Page.
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Harris, K. R., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Integrated, constructivist education: Challenge and reality. Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 115–127.
Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 395–407.
Lea, S. J., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes toward student-centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’? Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning. II. Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
Newble, D. I., & Jaeger, K. (1983). The effects of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Medical Education, 17, 165–171.
Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2005). Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environment Research, 8(1), 67–93.
Nijhuis, J., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2008). The extent of variability in learning strategies and students’ perceptions of the learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 2, 121–134.
Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8(4), 411–427.
Ramsden, P. (1984). The context of learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 144–163). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15, 1–20.
Scouller, K. (1996). July Influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches, perceptions and preferences: The assignment essay versus the short answer examination. Paper presented at the 1996 HERDSA Conference, Perth, Australia. Retrieved March 15, 2005, from. http://www.herdsa.org.au/confs/1996/scouller.html.
Scouller, K., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267–279.
Segers, M., Nijhuis, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 223–242.
Snelgrove, S., & Slater, J. (2003). Approaches to learning: Psychometric testing of a study process questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43, 496–505.
Stes, A., Gijbels, D., & Van Petegem, P. (2008). Student-focused approaches to learning in relation to context and teacher characteristics. Higher Education, 55, 255–267.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S., Schelfhout, W., & Gielen, S. (2006). On the dynamics of students’ approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment. Learning & Instruction, 16, 279–294.
Tang, C. (1994). Effects of modes of assessment on students’ preparation strategies. In G. Gibbs (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice (pp. 151–170). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Retrieved May 14, 2005, from. http://teaching.polyu.edu.hk/datafiles/R126.pdf.
Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessment. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.
Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction, 11, 87–111.
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and the quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265–275.
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the University. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 355–442.
Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001.
Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: a cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspective on thinking, learning and cognitive styles. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Watkins, D., & Regmi, M. (1996). Toward the cross-cultural validation of a Western model of student approaches to learning. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 547–560.
Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 85–99.
Zhang, L. F. (2000). University students’ learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs 3P model. Journal of Psychology, 134, 37–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gijbels, D., Segers, M. & Struyf, E. Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instr Sci 36, 431–443 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7