Skip to main content
Log in

Adhesion Mechanics between Nanoscale Silicon Oxide Tips and Few-Layer Graphene

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the adhesive contact between a nanoscale tip and a silicon oxide substrate covered with graphene were performed, modelling experimental atomic force microscopy pull-off measurements. Simulations showed a slight increase in the pull-off force as layer number increased. This small enhancement was within reported experimental error, agreeing with the experimental findings of layer-independent adhesion forces. Pull-off forces did not vary with the elastic strain in the system for a given number of layers, but were influenced by the greater adhesive stresses for tip–graphene interaction compared with tip–substrate interactions. FEM simulations were also performed on suspended graphene and showed that the adhesive forces increased slightly beyond one layer of graphene, but then varied little from two to four layers of graphene. The results indicate that while there is some local delamination of the graphene sheets from the substrate, the adhesive stresses between the graphene layers in multilayer graphene effectively prevent out-of-plane mechanical deformation of the graphene layers that could result from tip–graphene interactions. Thus, the increased pull-off forces observed beyond one monolayer results from a change in the amount of material between the tip and substrate, or in this case the number of graphene layers, thus increasing the van der Waals force between tip and graphene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Bayati, A.H., Orrman-Rossiter, K.G., van den Berg, J., Armour, D.: Composition and structure of the native Si oxide by high depth resolution medium energy ion scattering. Surf. Sci. Lett. 241(1–2), A5 (1991). doi:10.1016/0167-2584(91)91058-5

  2. Allen, M.P., Tildesley, D.J.: Computer Simulation of Liquids. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carlotti, G., Doucet, L., Dupeux, M.: Elastic properties of silicon dioxide films deposited by chemical vapour deposition from tetraethylorthosilicate. Thin Solid Films 296, 102–105 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpick, R.W., Salmeron, M.: Scratching the Surface: fundamental investigations of tribology with atomic force microscopy. Chem. Rev. 97(4), 1163–1194 (1997)

  5. Clarke, J.H.R.: Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics in Polymer Sciences. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cranford, S.W., Buehler, M.J.: Mechanical properties of graphyne. Carbon 49(13), 4111–4121 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng, Z., Smolyanitsky, A., Li, Q., Feng, X.Q., Cannara, R.J.: Adhesion-dependent negative friction coefficient on chemically modified graphite at the nanoscale. Nat. Mater. 11(12), 1032–1037 (2012). doi:10.1038/nmat3452

  8. Derjaguin, B.V.: Untersuchungen über die Reibung und Adhäsion, IV - Theorie des Anhaftens kleiner Teilchen. Kolloid-Zeitschrift 69(2), 155–164 (1934). doi:10.1007/BF01433225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egberts, P., Han, G.H., Liu, X.Z., Johnson, A.C., Carpick, R.W.: Frictional behavior of atomically thin sheets: hexagonal-shaped graphene islands grown on copper by chemical vapor deposition. ACS nano 8(5), 5010–5021 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feiler, A.A., Stiernstedt, J., Theander, K., Jenkins, P., Rutland, M.W.: Effect of capillary condensation on friction force and adhesion. Langmuir 23(2), 517–522 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Filleter, T., Bennewitz, R.: Structural and frictional properties of graphene films on SiC(0001) studied by atomic force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 81(15), 155,412 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Filleter, T., McChesney, J., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., Emtsev, K.V., Seyller, T., Horn, K., Bennewitz, R.: Friction and dissipation in epitaxial graphene films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(8), 086,102 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.086102

  13. Gao, W., Huang, R.: Effect of surface roughness on adhesion of graphene membranes. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 44(45), 452,001 (2011). doi:10.1088/0022-3727/44/45/452001

  14. Huang, Y., Wu, J., Hwang, K.: Thickness of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B 74(24), 245,413 (2006). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245413

  15. Jacobs, T.D., Lefever, J.A., Carpick, R.W.: Measurement of the length and strength of adhesive interactions in a nanoscale silicon–diamond interface. Adv. Mater. Interface 2(9), 1400547 (2015). doi:10.1002/admi.201400547

  16. Koenig, S.P., Boddeti, N.G., Dunn, M.L., Bunch, J.S.: Ultrastrong adhesion of graphene membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6(9), 543–546 (2011). doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.123

  17. Lee, C., Li, Q., Kalb, W., Liu, X.Z., Berger, H., Carpick, R.W., Hone, J.: Frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets. Science 328(5974), 76–80 (2010). doi:10.1126/science.1184167

  18. Lee, C., Li, Q., Kalb, W., Liu, X.Z., Berger, H., Carpick, R.W., Hone, J.: Frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets. Science 328(5974), 76–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887), 385–388 (2008). doi:10.1126/science.1157996

  20. Liu, F., Ming, P., Li, J.: Ab initio calculation of ideal strength and phonon instability of graphene under tension. Phys. Rev. B 76(6), 064,120 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.76.064120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, X.Z., Li, Q., Egberts, P., Carpick, R.W.: Nanoscale adhesive properties of graphene: the effect of sliding history. Adv. Mater. Interface 1(2), 1300053 (2014). doi:10.1002/admi.201300053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maboudian, R., Carraro, C.: Surface chemistry and tribology of MEMS. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 55, 35–54 (2004). doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094445

  23. Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S.V., Grigorieva, I.V., Firsov, A.A.: Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696), 666–669 (2004). doi:10.1126/science.1102896

  24. Rafiee, J., Mi, X., Gullapalli, H., Thomas, A.V., Yavari, F., Shi, Y., Ajayan, P.M.: Koratkar, N.a.: Wetting transparency of graphene. Nat. Mater. 11(3), 217–222 (2012). doi:10.1038/nmat3228

  25. Ramakrishna, S.N., Clasohm, L.Y., Rao, A., Spencer, N.D.: Controlling adhesion force by means of nanoscale surface roughness. Langmuir 27(16), 9972–9978 (2011). doi:10.1021/la201727t

  26. Stuart, S.J., Tutein, A.B., Harrison, J.A.: A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 112(14), 6472–6486 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Szlufarska, I., Chandross, M., Carpick, R.W.: Recent advances in single-asperity nanotribology. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41(12), 123,001 (2008). doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/12/123001

  28. Urbakh, M., Meyer, E.: Nanotribology: The renaissance of friction. Nat. Mater. 9(1), 8–10 (2010). doi:10.1038/nmat2599

  29. Weast, R.C., Astle, M.J., Beyer, W.H., et al.: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, vol. 69. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yakobson, B.I., Brabec, C.J., Berhnolc, J.: Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: Instabilities beyond linear response. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76(14), 2511–2514 (1996)

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.G. and P.E. would like to acknowledge funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Discovery Grant program, funding from the University of Calgary Seed Grant program and University of Calgary Startup Funding. The authors would also like to acknowledge fruitful conversations with Dr. Salvatore Federico at the University of Calgary. Q.L. would like to thank the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11422218, 11432008) and the Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology of Tsinghua University (SKLT2015D01). R.W.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation, Grant Number CMMI-1401164.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Egberts.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 217 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

Additional pull-off simulations have been conducted with a 7.5 nm radius on both supported and suspended graphene. The results from these additional simulations show the same trend in terms of an increasing pull-off force with number of graphene layers, as well as a slight increase in the observed work of adhesion. These results are graphically depicted in Fig. 10 as well as Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Normal force versus tip–sample separation curves for pull-off simulations of a 7.5-nm tip containing 1–4 layers of silicon oxide supported graphene in a configuration 1 and b configuration 2, and of suspended graphene in c configuration 1 and d configuration 2. The insets highlight the variance in the minima of the normal force versus tip–sample separation curves. The color scheme is as follows: colors denote the number of graphene layers. Black, red, blue, and green represent 4-layer (4L), 3-layer (3L), 2-layer (2L), and 1-layer (1L), respectively (Color figure online)

Table 6 Pull-off forces, work of adhesion, and tip–graphene separation at \(F_{PO}\) for simulations conducted in configuration 1 and with 1 to 4 layers of graphene in the contact with a 7.5-nm-radius tip
Table 7 Pull-off forces, work of adhesion, and tip–graphene separation at \(F_{PO}\) for simulations conducted in configuration 2 and with 1 to 4 layers of graphene in the contact with a 7.5-nm-radius tip
Table 8 Pull-off forces, work of adhesion, and tip–graphene separation at \(F_{PO}\) for simulations conducted in configuration 1 and with 1–4 layers of suspended graphene in the contact with a 7.5-nm-radius tip
Table 9 Pull-off forces, work of adhesion, and tip–graphene separation at \(F_{PO}\) for simulations conducted in configuration 2 and with 1 to 4 layers of suspended graphene in the contact with a 7.5-nm-radius tip

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, P., Li, Q., Liu, XZ. et al. Adhesion Mechanics between Nanoscale Silicon Oxide Tips and Few-Layer Graphene. Tribol Lett 65, 61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0837-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-017-0837-5

Keywords

Navigation