Abstract
In the presented work, etherification of glycerol with TBA was investigated in a continuous flow and also in a batch reactor using nine different commercial solid acid catalysts, namely Amberlyst-15, Amberlyst-36, Amberlyst-35, Amberlyst-16, Relite EXC8D, Lewatit K2629, H-Beta, H-Mordenite and Nafion SAC-13. Results proved the advantages of flow reactor to achieve quite high glycerol conversion values in very short residence times, due to efficient contact of reactants with the solid catalyst, which was caused by higher catalyst to reactant ratio within the reactor. Results of batch reactor experiments obtained in the temperature range of 80–200 °C proved the importance of operating temperature on the catalytic performance of these materials. Amberlyst-15, which has the highest Brønsted acidity, gave the highest glycerol conversion at 90–100 °C. However, this material is unstable at temperatures higher than 110 °C. Performances of Amberlyst-36 and Relite EXC8D were the best in the range of 110–150 °C, which started to become unstable at 150 °C. Although the catalytic performance of Nafion-SAC-13 was not as good as Amberlyst type resins at temperatures up to 150 °C, its thermal stability was higher and could be used up to 200 °C. Although Brønsted acidity was the most important property of these materials in the etherification reaction of glycerol, results also proved the importance of diffusion resistance on the observed conversion values, which limited the penetration of glycerol to the active acid sites, especially in the catalysts with smaller pore diameters and at lower temperatures. Increased significance of swelling at higher temperatures, especially with Amberlyst-36 which had lower cross-linking in its structure and less rigidity, contributed to the penetration of the reactants to the active sites. Water produced during the etherification reaction was also shown to cause deactivation of the catalysts by reversible adsorption on the acid sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rutz D, Janssen R (2007) Biodiesel technology handbook. WIP Renewable Energies, München
Karinen RS, Krause AOI (2006) Appl Catal A 306:128–133
Melero JA, Vicente G, Paniagua M, Morales G, Muñoz P (2012) Bioresource Technol 103:142–151
Pagliaro M, Ciriminna R, Kimura H, Rossi M, Pina CD (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:2–20
Celik E, Ozbay N, Oktar N, Calik P (2008) Ind Eng Chem Res 47:2985–2990
Oktar N, Murtezaoglu K, Dogu G, Gonderten I, Dogu T (1999) J Chem Technol Biotechnol 74:155–161
Dogu T, Boz N, Aydın E, Oktar N, Murtezaoglu K, Dogu G (2001) Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5044–5051
Boz N, Dogu T, Murtezaoglu K, Dogu G (2004) Appl Catal A 268:175–182
Boz N, Dogu T (2005) AlChE J 51:631–640
Obali Z, Dogu T (2008) Chem Eng J 138:548–555
Serio MD, Casale L, Tesser R, Santacesaria E (2010) Energy Fuel 24:4668–4672
Klepacova K, Mravec D, Bajus M (2006) Chem Pap 60:224–230
Klepacova K, Mravec D, Alexander K, Bajus M (2007) Appl Catal A 328:1–13
Behr A, Obendorf L (2003) Eng Life Sci 2:185–189
Melero JA, Vincente G, Morales G, Panaigua M, Moreno JM, Roldan R, Ezquerro A, Perez C (2008) Appl Catal A 346:44–51
Zhao W, Yang B, Yi C, Lei Z, Xu J (2010) Ind Eng Chem Res 49:12399–12404
Klepacova K, Mravec D, Bajus M (2005) Appl Catal A 294:141–147
Frusteri F, Arena F, Bonura G, Cannilla C, Spadaro L, Blassi OD (2009) Appl Catal A 367:77–83
Ozbay N, Oktar N, Dogu G, Dogu T (2010) Int J Chem React Eng 8: Article A18.
Ozbay N, Oktar N, Dogu G, Dogu T (2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:8788–8895
Sigma-Aldirch Co. Home Page, http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/sigma-aldrich/home.html
Rohm and Haas Co. Home Page, http://www.rohmhaas.com/wcm/index.page
Degirmenci L, Oktar N, Dogu G (2009) Ind Eng Chem Res 48:2566–2576
Resindion S.R.L. Home page, http://www.resindion.com/
Zhou Y, Woo LK, Angelici RJ (2007) Appl Catal A 333:238–244
Macko T, Adler M, Pasch H, Joeri FD, Raphael A (2004) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 27:1743–1758
Zeochem AG, Home Page, http://www.zeochem.com/en/index.htm
Corma A (1995) Chem Rev 95:540–559
Varisli D, Dogu T, Dogu G (2008) Ind Eng Chem Res 47:4071–4076
Naohara H, Yoshimoto T, Toshima N (2010) J Power Sources 195:1051–1053
Dogu T, Aydin E, Boz N, Murtezaoglu K, Dogu G (2003) Int J Chem Reactor Eng 1:A6
Oktar N, Murtezaoglu K, Dogu T, Dogu G (1999) Can J Chem Eng 77:406–412
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Gazi University Research Fund Projects (06/2007-13, 06/2010-29, 06/2010-31, 06/2011-43 and 06/2012-17) and Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey Project (TUBITAK-108M329). N. Ozbay was awarded scholarship by Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK-BIDEB: 2211).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozbay, N., Oktar, N., Dogu, G. et al. Activity Comparison of Different Solid Acid Catalysts in Etherification of Glycerol with tert-Butyl Alcohol in Flow and Batch Reactors. Top Catal 56, 1790–1803 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0116-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0116-0