Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On probabilities and loss aversion

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the most common approaches that have been adopted to analyze and describe loss aversion under prospect theory. Subsequently, it is argued that loss aversion is a property of observable choice behavior and two new definitions of loss averse behavior are advocated. Under prospect theory, the new properties hold if the commonly used utility based measures of loss aversion are corrected by a probability based measure of loss aversion and their product exceeds 1. It is shown that prominent parametric families of weighting functions, while successful in accommodating empirical findings on probabilistic risk attitudes, may not fit well with the theoretical implications of the new loss averse behavior conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellaoui M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science 46: 1497–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H. and Paraschiv C. (2007). Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science 53: 1659–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdellaoui M., Vossmann F. and Weber M. (2005). Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Science 51: 1384–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aczél, J., & Luce, R. D. (2006). A behavioral condition for Prelec’s weighting function on the positive line without assuming W(1) = 1. Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Forthcoming).

  • Aizenman J. (1998). Buffer stocks and precautionary savings with loss aversion. Journal of International Money and Finance 17: 931–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allais M. (1953). Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • al-Nowaihi A. and Dhami S. (2006). A simple derivation of Prelec’s probability weighting function. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50: 521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K.J. (1971). Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Amsterdam, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis N. and Huang M. (2001). Mental accounting, loss aversion and individual stock returns. Journal of Finance 56: 1247–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis N., Huang M. and Santos T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quaterly Journal of Economics 56: 1247–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis N. and Thaler R.H. (2003). A Survey of Behavioral Finance. In: Constantinides, G.M., Harris, M. and Stulz, R. (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Finance, pp. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron G. and Erev I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battalio R.C., Kagel J.H. and Jiranyakul K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: 25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi S. and Thaler R.H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkelaar A.B., Kouwenberg R. and Post T. (2004). Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion. Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 973–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum M.H. (2008). New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychological Review 115: 463–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt H. and Pinto J.L. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science 46: 1485–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleichrodt H. (2007). Reference-dependent utility with shifting reference points and incomplete preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 51: 266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman D., Minehart D. and Rabin M. (1999). Loss aversion in a consumption-savings model. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38: 155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks P. and Zank H. (2005). Loss averse behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31: 301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budescu D.V. and Weiss W. (1987). Reflection of transitive and intransitive preferences: A test of prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39: 184–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C.F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 61–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C.F. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics 1: 163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C.F. and Ho T.-H. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8: 167–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C.F., Loewenstein G. and Rabin M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauneuf A. and Wakker P.P. (1999). An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory for decision under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18: 137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M., Jaffray J.-Y. and Said T. (1987). Experimental comparisons of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currim I.S. and Sarin R.K. (1989). Prospect versus utility. Management Science 35: 22–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diecidue, E., Schmidt, U., & Zank, H. (2006). Parametric weighting functions. Economics Discussion Paper 0622, University of Manchester, UK.

  • Edwards W. (1955). The prediction of decisions among bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50: 201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W. (1962). Utility, subjective probability, their interaction and variance preferences. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 6: 42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn H.J. and Hogarth R.M. (1985). Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psychological Review 92: 433–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn H.J. and Hogarth R.M. (1986). Decision making under ambiguity. Journal of Business 59: S225–S250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg D. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ert, E., Erev, I. (2007). Loss aversion in decisions under risk and the value of a symmetric simplification of prospect theory. Working Paper, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

  • Etchart-Vincent N. (2004). Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28: 217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fennema H. and Assen M. (1999). Measuring the utility for losses by means of the tradeoff method. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17: 277–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy U. and Potters J. (1997). An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein W.M. and Einhorn H.J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review 94: 236–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes F.J. (2005). Portfolio choice and trading volume with loss-averse investors. Journal of Business 78: 675–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez R. and Wu G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology 38: 129–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey J.C. and Schoemaker P.J.H. (1980). Prospect theory’s reflection hypothesis: A critical examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 25: 395–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershey J.C. and Schoemaker P.J.H. (1985). Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent?. Management Science 31: 1213–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth R.M. and Einhorn H.J. (1990). Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science 36: 780–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt C.A. and Laury S.K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92: 1644–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber J., Ariely D. and Fischer G. (2002). Expressing preference in a principal-agent task: A comparison of choice, rating, and matching. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87: 66–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien B. and Salanié B. (2000). Estimating preferences under risk: The case of racetrack bettors. Journal of Political Economy 108: 503–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. and Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. and Tversky A. (2000). Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Köbberling V. and Wakker P.P. (2003). Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: A generalized and simplified technique. Mathematics of Operations Research 28: 395–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köbberling V. and Wakker P.P. (2005). An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory 122: 119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore P.M., Baker J.R. and Witte A.D. (1992). The influence of probability on risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Organizations 17: 377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laury, S. K., & Holt, C. A. (2005). Further reflections on prospect theory. Working Paper, The Andrew Young School of Political Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

  • Loehman E. (1998). Testing risk aversion and nonexpected utility theories. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 33: 285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes L.L. and Oden G.C. (1999). The role of aspiration level in risky choice: A comparison of cumulative prospect theory and SP/A theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 43: 286–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R.D. (1991). Rank- and sign- dependent linear utility models for binary gambles. Journal of Economic Theory 53: 75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R.D. (2000). Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce R.D. (2001). Reduction invariance and Prelec’s weighting functions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 45: 167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R.D. and Fishburn P.C. (1991). Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4: 29–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Haridon, O. (2006). Behavior in the loss domain: An experiment using the probability tradeoff consistency condition. Working Paper, GRID Cachan, Paris.

  • Markowitz H. (1952). The utility of wealth. The Journal of Political Economy 60: 151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland G.H., Schulze W.D. and Coursey D.L. (1993). Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myagkov M. and Plott C.R. (1997). Exchange economies and loss exposure: Experiments exploring prospect theory and competitive equilibria in market environments. American Economic Review 87: 801–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson W.S. (2002). Comparative risk sensitivity with reference-dependent preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24: 131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J.W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32: 122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prelec D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66: 497–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J. (1981). Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 25: 160–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 3: 323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68: 1281–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57: 571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U. (2003). Reference-dependence in cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47: 122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U. and Traub S. (2002). An experimental test of loss aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25: 233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U. and Zank H. (2005). What is loss aversion?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30: 157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U. and Zank H. (2006). Linear cumulative prospect theory with applications to portfolio selection and insurance demand. Decisions in Economics and Finance 30: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U. and Zank H. (2008). Risk aversion in cumulative prospect theory. Management Science 54: 208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt U., Starmer C. and Sugden R. (2008). Third-generation prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36: 203–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S.L. and Lopes L.L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12: 535–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmann A.H. (2002). Optimal saving rules for loss-averse agents under uncertainty. Economics Letters 77: 27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith K., Dickhaut J.W., McCabe K. and Pardo J.V. (2002). Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk certainty, gains and losses. Management Science 48: 711–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starmer C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 332–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (2003). Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory 111: 172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. and Fox C. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review 102: 269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1039–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P.P. (1994). Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory and Decision 36: 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P.P. (2001). Testing and characterizing properties of nonadditive measures through violations of the sure-thing principle. Econometrica 69: 1039–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P.P. and Tversky A. (1993). An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 147–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P.P. and Zank H. (2002). A simple preference-foundation of cumulative prospect theory with power utility. European Economic Review 46: 1253–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber E.U. and Bottom W.P. (1989). Axiomatic measures of perceived risk: Some tests and extensions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2: 113–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G. and Gonzalez R. (1996). Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Science 42: 1676–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G. and Gonzalez R. (1998). Common consequence conditions in decision making under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16: 115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G., Zhang J. and Abdellaoui M. (2005). Testing prospect theories using tradeoff consistency. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30: 107–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zank H. (2001). Cumulative prospect theory for parametric and multiattribute utilities. Mathematics of Operations Research 26: 67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics, School of Social Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

    Horst Zank

Authors
  1. Horst Zank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Zank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zank, H. On probabilities and loss aversion. Theory Decis 68, 243–261 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9117-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-008-9117-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation