Skip to main content
Log in

Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two insurance experiments using real-money consequences and multiple rounds to provide experience are described. In the first experiment, subjects bid for insurance to prevent a fixed loss of $4 at probabilities ranging from .01 to .9. Mean bids were near expected value except at the lowest probability of.01, for which a very bimodal distribution was observed (some subjects bid zero and others bid much more than expected value). A second experiment explored this bimodality at a probability of .01 with loss increased to $40. A similar bimodal distribution was obtained that persisted over 50 rounds of experience. These laboratory results are consistent with field evidence for low-probability hazards, for which people appear either to dismiss the risks or to worry too much about them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Coppinger, Vicki M., Vernon L. Smith, and Jon A. Titus. (1980). “Incentives and Behavior in English, Dutch, and Sealed-Bid Auctions,”Economics Inquiry 18, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Ronald G., David S. Brookshire, and William D. Schulze. (1986).Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Ward (1954). “The Theory of Decision Making.” Pslychological Bulletin 41, 380–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, I. and M.E. Blume. (1975). “The Demand for Risky Assets,”American Economic Review 65, 900–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Glenn W. (1989). “Theory and Misbehavior in First-Price Auctions,”American Economic Review 79, 749–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Julie R., Gary H. McClelland, and William D. Schulze. (1992). “Hypothetical and Real Consequences in Experimental Auctions for Insurance against Low-probability Risks,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5, 107–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard R., William H. Desvousges, and Paul Slovic. (1988). “Nevada's Predicament: Public Perceptions of Risk from the Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository,”Environment, 30(8), 16–20, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, P. Slovic, B. Borkan, and N. Katz. (1978).Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, George and Jane Mather (1990). “Dynamic Processes in Risk Perception,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, Mark J. (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis without the Independence Axiom,”Econometrica 50, 227–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Gary H. and Beverly H. Hackenberg. (1976). “Subjective Probabilities for Sex of Next Child: U.S. College Students and Philippine Villagers,”Journal of Population 1, 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, Gary H., William D. Schulze, and Brian Hurd, (1990). “The Effect of Risk Beliefs on Property Values: A Case Study of a Hazardous Waste Site,”Risk Analysis 10, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert C. and Richard T. Carson (1989).Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo. (1986). “The Motivation to Elaborate in a Relatively Objective Manner.” In R.E. Petty and J.T. Cacioppo (eds.),Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D. and Ward Edwards. (1966). “Conservatism in a Simple Probability Inference Task,”Journal of Experimental Psychology 72, 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showers, Carolin and Nancy Cantor. (1985). “Social Cognition: A Look at Motivated Strategies,”Annual Review of Psychology 36, 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sarah Lichtenstein. (1981). “Informing the Public about the Risks from Ionizing Radiation,”Health Physics 41, 589–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vernon L. (1976). “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory,”American Economic Review 66, 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vernon L. and James M. Walker. (1993). “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics,” Economic Inquiry 31, 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. Kerry and William H. Desvousges. (1987). “An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes,”Journal of Political Economy 95, 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. and Eric J. Johnson. (1990). “Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice,”Management Science 36, 643–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders,”Journal of Finance 16, 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We would like to thank Alan Carlin, Ann Fisher, Risa Palm, and David Brookshire for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article, and Rebecca Boyce, Julie Irwin, Glenn Russell, and Joy Smith for research assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge support from the University of Colorado Council on Research and Creative Work for human subject payments and from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation for support for research design and analysis provided as part of Cooperative Agreement #CR812054. All errors, opinions and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McClelland, G.H., Schulze, W.D. & Coursey, D.L. Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events. J Risk Uncertainty 7, 95–116 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065317

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065317

Key words

Navigation