Skip to main content
Log in

The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In public goods experiments, stochastic choice, censoring and motivational heterogeneity give scope for disagreement over the extent of unselfishness, and whether it is reciprocal or altruistic. We show that these problems can be addressed econometrically, by estimating a finite mixture model to isolate types, incorporating double censoring and a tremble term. Most subjects act selfishly, but a substantial proportion are reciprocal with altruism playing only a marginal role. Isolating reciprocators enables a test of Sugden’s model of voluntary contributions. We estimate that reciprocators display a self-serving bias relative to the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni J. (1988). Why free-ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics 37, 291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni J. (1995). Cooperation in public-goods experiments - kindness or confusion?. American Economic Review 85, 891–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley N. (2000). Control without deception: individual behaviour in free-riding experiments revisited. Experimental Economics 3, 215–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandts J., Schram A. (2001). Cooperation and noise in public good experiments: applying the contribution function approach. Journal of Public Economics 79, 399–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C.F. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland W.S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Gomes M., Crawford V.P., Broseta B. (2001). Cognition and behaviour in normal form games: an experimental study. Econometrica 69(5):1193–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R.T.A. (1999), Contributions to public goods: altruism or reciprocity? Working Paper #96-08-01, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Davis D.D., Holt C.A. (1993) Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public good experiments. American Economic Review 90(4):980–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro P.J., Rondeau D., Poe G.L. (2003). Detecting other-regarding behavior with virtual players. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55, 99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher U., Gächter S., Fehr E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters 71, 397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goeree J.K., Holt C.A., Laurie S.K. (2002). Private costs and public benefits: unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behaviour. Journal of Public Economics 83, 255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houser D., Kurzban R. (2002). Revisiting kindness and confusion in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 92, 1062–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac R.M., Walker J.M. (1998). Nash as an organising principle in the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence. Experimental Economics 1, 191–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban R., Houser D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality 15, 37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard J.O. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In: Roth A., Kagel J. (eds) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 111–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay B. (1983). The geometry of mixture likelihoods. Annals of Statistics 11, 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G., Moffatt P.G., Sugden R. (2002). A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 103–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan G., Peel D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. New York, Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt P.G., Peters S.A. (2001). Testing for the presence of a tremble in economic experiments. Experimental Economics 4, 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan J., Sefton M. (2000). Funding public goods with lotteries. Review of Economic Studies 67, 785–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson F.D. (1976). On a general computer algorithm for the analysis of models with limited dependent variables. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5, 493–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey T.R., Prisbrey J.E. (1997) Anomalous behaviour in public goods experiments: how much and why?. American Economic Review 87, 829–846

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83, 1281–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton M., Steinberg R. (1996). Reward structures in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics 61, 263–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1984). Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Economic Journal 94, 772–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimann J. (1994). Individual behaviour in a free-riding experiment. Journal of Public Economics 54, 185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willinger M., Ziegelmeyer A. (2001) Strength of the social dilemma in a public goods experiment: an exploration of the error hypothesis. Experimental Economics 4(2):131–44

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter G. Moffatt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bardsley, N., Moffatt, P.G. The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions. Theor Decis 62, 161–193 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9013-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9013-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation