Abstract
We use the tetrad formalism to calculate a matrix square root occurring in the de Rham-Gabadadze-Tolley potential. In the minimal case, we obtain the constraints and their algebra. We show that the number of gravitational degrees of freedom corresponds to the massless and massive gravity fields. The Boulware-Deser ghost is eliminated because of two second-class constraints.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. J. Isham, A. Salam, and J. Strathdee, Phys. Lett. B, 31, 300–302 (1970); Phys. Rev. D, 3, 867–873 (1971).
B. Zumino, “Effective Lagrangians and broken symmetries,” in: Brandeis University Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory (S. Deser, M. Grisaru, and H. Pendleton, eds.), Vol. 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (1970), pp. 437–500.
T. Damour and I. I. Kogan, Phys. Rev. D, 66, 104024 (2002).
C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 231101 (2011); arXiv:1011.1232v2 [hep-th] (2010); Phys. Lett. B, 711, 190–195 (2012); arXiv:1107.3820v1 [hep-th] (2011).
D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. D, 6, 3368–3382 (1972).
S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, JHEP, 1202, 126 (2012); arXiv:1109.3515v2 [hep-th] (2011).
S. F. Hassan and R. A. Rosen, JHEP, 1204, 123 (2012); arXiv:1111.2070v1 [hep-th] (2011).
K. Hinterbichler and R. A. Rosen, JHEP, 1207, 047 (2012); arXiv:1203.5783v3 [hep-th] (2012).
S. Alexandrov, K. Krasnov, and S. Speziale, JHEP, 1306, 068 (2013); arXiv:1212.3614v2 [hep-th] (2012).
S. Alexandrov, Gen. Rel. Grav., 46, 1639 (2014); arXiv:1308.6586v4 [hep-th] (2013).
J. Kluson, “Hamiltonian formalism of bimetric gravity in vierbein formulation,” arXiv:1307.1974v3 [hep-th] (2013).
V. O. Soloviev and M. V. Chichikina, Theor. Math. Phys., 176, 1163–1175 (2013); arXiv:1211.6530v3 [hep-th] (2012); V. O. Soloviev and M. V. Tchichikina, Phys. Rev. D, 88, 084026 (2013); arXiv:1302.5096v6 [hep-th] (2013).
R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and Ch. W. Misner, “The dynamics of general relativity,” in: Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research (L. Witten, ed.), Wiley, New York (1962), pp. 227–265; arXiv:gr-qc/0405109v1 (2004).
K. Kuchař, J. Math. Phys., 17, 777–791, 792–800, 801–820 (1976); 18, 1589–1597 (1977).
D. Comelli, F. Nesti, and L. Pilo, JHEP, 1307, 161 (2013); arXiv:1305.0236v1 [hep-th] (2013).
S. Deser and C. J. Isham, Phys. Rev. D, 14, 2505–2510 (1976); J. E. Nelson and C. Teitelboim, Ann. Phys., 116, 86–104 (1978); M. Henneaux, Gen. Rel. Grav., 9, 1031–1045 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
__________
Translated from Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika, Vol. 182, No. 2, pp. 350–364, February, 2015.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soloviev, V.O. Bigravity in Hamiltonian formalism: The tetrad approach. Theor Math Phys 182, 294–307 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-015-0263-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11232-015-0263-5