Skip to main content
Log in

Towards completeness: Husserl on theories of manifolds 1890–1901

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Husserl’s notion of definiteness, i.e., completeness is crucial to understanding Husserl’s view of logic, and consequently several related philosophical views, such as his argument against psychologism, his notion of ideality, and his view of formal ontology. Initially Husserl developed the notion of definiteness to clarify Hermann Hankel’s ‘principle of permanence’. One of the first attempts at formulating definiteness can be found in the Philosophy of Arithmetic, where definiteness serves the purpose of the modern notion of ‘soundness’ and leads Husserl to a ‘computational’ view of logic. Inspired by Gauss and Grassmann Husserl then undertakes a further investigation of theories of manifolds. When Husserl subsequently renounces psychologism and changes his view of logic, his idea of definiteness also develops. The notion of definiteness is discussed most extensively in the pair of lectures Husserl gave in front of the mathematical society in Göttingen (1901). A detailed analysis of the lectures, together with an elaboration of Husserl’s lectures on logic beginning in 1895, shows that Husserl meant by definiteness what is today called ‘categoricity’. In so doing Husserl was not doing anything particularly original; since Dedekind’s ‘Was sind und sollen die Zahlen’ (1888) the notion was ‘in the air’. It also characterizes Hilbert’s (1900) notion of completeness. In the end, Husserl’s view of definiteness is discussed in light of Gödel’s (1931) incompleteness results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachelard S. (1968). A study of Husserl’s formal and transcendental logic, Lester E. Embree (Transl.). Northwestern University Press, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldus R. (1928). Zur Axiomatik der Geometrie I. Über Hilberts Vollständigkeitsaxiom. Mathematische Annalen 100: 321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottazzini, U. (1986). The higher calculus: A history of real and complex analysis from Euler to Weierstrass, Warren Van Egmond (Transl.). New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, London, Paris, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.

  • Corcoran J. (1980). Categoricity. History and Philosophy of Logic 1: 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran J. (1981). From categoricity to completeness. History and Philosophy of Logic 2: 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva J.J. (2000). Husserl’s two notions of completeness, Husserl and Hilbert on completeness and imaginary elements in mathematics. Synthese 125: 417–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedekind, R. (1888). Was sind und was sollen die Zahlen? In Wooster Woodruff Beman (Transl.), Essays on the theory of numbers (pp. 29–115). Chicago: The Open Court [1901].

  • Dorier J.-L. (1995). A general outline of the genesis of vector space theory. Historia Mathematica 22: 227–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreben B. and Kanamori A. (1997). Hilbert and set theory. Synthese 110: 77–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enderton, H. B. (1972). A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

  • Etchemendy J. (1990). The concept of logical consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald W. (1996). From Kant to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics. Vols I and II. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreirós J. (1999). Labyrinth of thought, a history of set theory and its role in modern mathematics. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman B.I. (1892). On the properties of a one-dimensional manifold. Mind 1(New Series 4): 518–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassmann, H. (2000). Extension theory. Lloyd C. Kannenberg (Transl.), American Mathematical Society, London Mathematical Society [1862].

  • Grattan-Guinness, I. (2000). The search for mathematical roots, 1870–1940. Logics, set theories and the foundations of mathematics from Cantor through Russell to Gödel. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Hartimo, M. (2003). Husserl’s prolegomena: A search for the essence of logic. In Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Ed.), Husserl’s Logical Investigations (pp. 123–146). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.

  • Hilbert, D. (1902). The foundations of geometry. E. J. Townsend (Transl.), Chicago: Open Court.

  • Hilbert D. (1935). Gesammelte Abhandlungen Vol 3. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. O. (1995). Husserl and Hilbert on completeness, In J. Hintikka (Ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel. Synthese Library v. 251. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Hill C.O. and Haddock R. (2000). Husserl or Frege. Meaning, objectivity and mathematics. Open Court, Chicago and La Salle, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1979). Development of mathematics in the 19th century. M. Ackerman (Transl.), Massachusetts: Math Sci Press. Translation of Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19 Jahrhundert. Teil I, Berlin, 1928.

  • Kusch M. (1995). Psychologism, A case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge. Routledge, London, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmar D. (1989). Phänomenologie der Mathematik. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Boston, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke D. (1977). From Hilbert to Husserl: First introduction to phenomenology, especially that of formal mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8: 71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majer U. (1997). Husserl and Hilbert on completeness: A neglected chapter in early twentieth century foundation of mathematics. Synthese 110: 417–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P.J. (1982). Numbers in presence and absence: A study of Husserl’s philosophy of mathematics. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague, Boston, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty J.N. (1982). Husserl and Frege. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Monna A.F. (1973). Hermann Hankel. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde 21(3): 64–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Peucker H. (2002). Von der Psychologie zur Phänomenologie, Husserls Weg in die Phänomenologie der Logischen Untersuchungen. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Post E.L. (1936). Finite combinatory processes—formulation I. Journal of Symbolic Logic 1(3): 103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann E. and Schuhmann K. (2001). Husserls Manuskripte zu seinem Göttinger Doppelvortrag von 1901. Husserl Studies 17: 87–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann K. (1977). Husserl-Chronik. Denk- und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm R., Schröder E. and Sohncke L. (1878). Hermann Grassmann. Sein Leben und seine mathematisch-physikalischen Arbeiten. Mathematische Annalen 14: 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tieszen, R. (2005). Phenomenology, logic, and the philosophy of mathematics. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo: Cambridge University Press.

  • Toepell M. (1986). On the origins of David Hilbert’s Grundlagen der Geometrie. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 35(4): 329–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen D. (1984). Four letters from Edmund Husserl to Hermann Weyl. Husserl Studies 1: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen O. (1904). A system of axioms for geometry. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 5: 343–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb J.C. (1980). Mechanism, mentalism and metamatemathics. Essay on finitism. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl H. (1949). Philosophy of mathematics and natural science. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard D. (1984). Logic and the objectivity of knowledge: A study of Husserl’s early philosophy. Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Zach R. (1999). Completeness before Post: Bernays, Hilbert and the development of propositional logic. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5(3): 331–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirja Helena Hartimo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartimo, M.H. Towards completeness: Husserl on theories of manifolds 1890–1901. Synthese 156, 281–310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-0008-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-0008-y

Keywords

Navigation