Abstract
An implicit theory of ability approach to motivation argues that students who believe traits to be malleable (incremental theorists), relative to those who believe traits to be fixed (entity theorists), cope more effectively when academic challenges arise. In the current work, we integrated the implicit theory literature with research on top dog and underdog status to predict self-efficacy in an academic context. To examine our predictions, we assessed college students’ (N = 165) implicit theories of mathematical ability and manipulated their underdog versus top dog status in a math competition. We hypothesized that holding an incremental (vs. entity) theory would interact with competition status (underdog vs. top dog) to predict mathematical self-efficacy. When in an underdog position, incremental (vs. entity) theories boosted students’ mathematical self-efficacy. Moreover, a mediated moderation model revealed that the experience of less helplessness accounted for greater self-efficacy in mathematical ability among academic underdogs with incremental (vs. entity) theories. Implications for teaching practices are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmavaara A., Houston D. M. (2007) The effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents’ academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck’s self-theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 613–632
Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Allison S. T., Burnette J. L. (2009) Fairness and preference for underdogs and top dogs. In: Kramer R., Tenbrunsel A., Bazerman M. (eds) Social decision making: Social dilemmas, social values, and ethical judgments. Psychology Press, New York, NY
Allison S. T., Goethals G. R. (2008) Deifying the dead and downtrodden: Sympathetic figures as exceptional leaders. In: Hoyt C. L., Goethals G. R., Forsyth D. R. (eds) Leadership at the crossroads: Psychology and leadership. Praeger, Westport, CT
Allison S. T., Goethals G. R. (2011) Heroes: What they do and why we need them. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Aronson J., Fried C. B., Good C. (2002) Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 113–125
Au C., Watkins D. (1997) Towards a causal model of learned hopelessness for Hong Kong adolescents. Educational Studies 23: 377–392
Bandura A. (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 1–26
Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. H., Dweck C. S. (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development 78: 246–263
Braten I., Stromso H. I. (2005) The relationship between epistemological beliefs, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning among Norwegian postsecondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75: 539–565
Brehm J. W. (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. Academic Press, New York, NY
Burnette J. L. (2010) Implicit theories of body weight: Entity beliefs can weigh you down. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36: 410–422
Burnette J. L., Pollack J. M., Hoyt C. L. (2010) Individual differences in implicit theories of leadership ability and self-efficacy: Predicting responses to stereotype threat. Journal of Leadership Studies 3: 46–56
Chen L. H., Chen M., Lin M., Kee Y. H., Kuo C. F., Shui S. (2008) Implicit theory of athletic ability and self-handicapping in college students. Psychological Reports 103: 476–484
Chen J. A., Pajares F. (2010) Implicit theories of ability of Grade 6 science students: Relation to epistemological beliefs and academic motivation and achievement in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology 35: 75–87
DeCuir-Gunby J. T., Aultman L. P., Schutz P. A. (2009) Investigating transactions among motives, emotional regulation related to testing, and test emotions. Journal of Experimental Education 77: 409–436
Diener C. I., Dweck C. S. (1978) An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 451–462
Dweck C. S. (1975) The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 674–685
Dweck C. S. (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41: 1040–1048
Dweck C. S. (2000) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. PA: Psychology Press, Philadelphia
Dweck C. S. (2009) Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17: 391–394
Dweck C. S., Elliott E. S. (1983) Achievement motivation. In: Mussen P., Hetherington E. M. (eds) Handbook of child psychology. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 643–691
Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 25: 109–116
Dweck C. S., Molden D. C. (2005) Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In: Elliot A. J., Dweck’s C. S. (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 122–140
Finkel E. J., Burnette J. L., Scissors L. E. (2007) Vengefully ever after: Destiny beliefs, state attachment anxiety, and forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 871–886
Finney S. J., Schraw G. J. (2003) Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28: 161–186
Folkman S., Lazarus R. S., Gruen R. J., DeLongis A. (1986) Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 571–579
Franiuk R., Cohen D., Pomerantz E. M. (2002) Implicit theories of relationships: Implications for relationship satisfaction and longevity. Personal Relationships 9: 345–367
Good C., Aronson J., Inzlicht M. (2003) Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24: 645–662
Hejazi E., Shahraray M., Farsinejad M., Asgary A. (2009) Identity styles and academic achievement: Mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Social Psychology of Education 12: 123–135
Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Lin D., Wan W. (1999) Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 588–599
Howell A. J., Buro K. (2009) Implicit beliefs, achievement goals, and procrastination: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences 19: 151–154
Kasimatis M., Miller M., Marcussen L. (1996) The effects of implicit theories on exercise motivation. Journal of Research in Personality 30: 510–516
Kenny D. A., Kashy D. A., Bolger N. (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzey G. (eds) Handbook of social psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 233–265
Kim J., Allison S. T., Eylon D., Goethals G., Markus M., McGuire H., Hindle S. (2008) Rooting for (and then abandoning) the underdog. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 2550–2573
Kim C. W., Dembo M. H. (2001) Social-cognitive factors influencing success on college entrance exams in South Korea. Social Psychology of Education 4: 95–115
Knee C. R. (1998) Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 360–370
Kray L. J., Haselhuhn M. (2007) Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: Longitudinal and experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 49–64
Kray L. J., Thompson L., Galinksy A. (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 942–958
Levy S. R., Stroessner S. J., Dweck C. S. (1998) Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1421–1436
Mangels J. A., Butterfield B., Lamb J., Good C. D., Dweck C. S. (2006) Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social-cognitive-neuroscience model. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience 1: 75–86
Marshall M. A., Brown J. D. (2004) Expectations and realizations: The role of expectancies in achievement settings. Motivation and Emotion 28: 347–361
Molden D. C., Dweck C. S. (2006) Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist 61: 192–203
Ollfors M., Andersson S. I. (2007) Ability of stress, sense of control, and self-theories to predict Swedish high school students’ final grades. Educational Research and Evaluation 13: 143–169
Ommundsen Y. (2003) Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in physical education classes. Educational Psychology 23: 141–157
Peterson C. (1995) Entity and incremental world views: Some lessons from learned helplessness theory and research. Psychological Inquiry 6: 307–311
Piper W. (1930) The little engine that could. Platt & Munk, New York, NY
Robins R. W., Pals J. L. (2002) Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity 1: 313–336
Rydell R. J., Hugenberg K., Ray D., Mackie D. M. (2007) Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 549–558
Scharnhorst G. (1980) Horatio Alger, Jr. Boston. MA: Twayne Publishers.
Scheier M. F., Carver C. S. (1992) Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research 16: 201–228
Schunk D. H. (1989) Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review 1: 173–208
Schwarz N., Clore G. L. (2007) Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In: Kruglanski A.W., Higgins E. T. (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 141–166
Seligman M. E. P., Maier S. F. (1967) Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology 74: 1–9
Shell D. F., Murphy C. C., Bruning R. H. (1989) Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 91–100
Sobel M. E. (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural models. In: Leinhardt S. (ed.) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 290–312
Spencer H. (1873) The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). NY: Appleton, New York
Stevenson, S. J. (2006) Understanding strenuous and moderate intensity exercise participation and motivation: A social-cognitive perspective. Master’s thesis, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX.
Tabernero C., Wood R. E. (1999) Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in self-regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 78: 104–127
Thompson T., Musket S. (2005) Does priming for mastery goals improve the performance of students with an entity view of ability?. British Journal of Educational Psychology 7: 391–409
Valas H. (2001) Learned helplessness and psychological adjustment II: Effects of learning disabilities and low achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45: 101–114
Vandello J. A., Goldschmied N., Richards D. A. R. (2007) The appeal of the underdog. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33: 1603–1616
Weiner B. (1991) The meaning and measurement of explanatory style: Unresolved issues. Psychological Inquiry 2: 43–44
Williams T., Williams K. (2010) Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 453–466
Wilson T. D., Gilbert D. T. (2003) Affective forecasting. In: Zanna M. P. (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 35). Academic Press, San Francisco, CA, pp 345–411
Zeidner M., Mathews G. (2005) Evaluation anxiety: Current theory and research. In: Elliot A. J., Dweck C. S. (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 141–166
Zimmerman B. J. (2000) Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 82–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, J.L., Burnette, J.L., Allison, S.T. et al. Against the odds: academic underdogs benefit from incremental theories. Soc Psychol Educ 14, 331–346 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9147-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9147-6