Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of task presentation on students’ performances in introductory statistics courses

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on academic learning indicates that many students experience major difficulties with introductory statistics and methodology courses. We hypothesized that students’ difficulties may depend in part on the fact that statistics tasks are commonly viewed as related to the threatening domain of math. In two field experiments which we carried out in the ecological context of introductory statistics courses, the representation of a statistics task administered to undergraduate students in Psychology (Study 1; n = 127) and Biology (Study 2; n = 166) was manipulated. In both studies we found that students who reported the least favorable prior attainments in math had their performance thwarted when the task was presented as related to the math domain, whereas no performance impairment was observed when the task was presented as related to the verbal/linguistic domain. Implications of the findings for the design and delivery of introductory statistics and research methodology courses are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biglan A. (1973) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. The Journal of Applied Psychology 57: 195–203. doi:10.1037/h0034701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnot V., Croizet J.-C. (2007) Stereotype internalization and women’s math performance: The role of interference in working memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 857–866. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broers N.J., Imbos T. (2005) Charting and manipulating propositions as methods to promote self-explanation in the study of statistics. Learning and Instruction 15: 517–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunot S., Huguet P., Monteil J.-M. (2000) Performance feedback and self-focused attention in the classroom: When past and present interact. Social Psychology of Education 3: 277–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehl M.M., Alexander P.A., Murphy P.K. (2002) Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general?. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27: 415–449. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadinu M., Maas A., Rosabianca A., Kiesner J. (2005) Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science 16: 572–579. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carugati F., Selleri P. (2004) Intelligence, educational practices and school reform: organizations change, representations persist. European Journal of School Psychology 2: 149–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro Sotos A.E., Vanhoof S., Van den Noortgate W., Onghena P. (2007) Students’ misconceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education. Educational Research Review 2: 98–113. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambon M. (1990) La représentation des disciplines scolaires par les parents d’élèves: Enjeux de valeurs, enjeux sociaux. Revue Française de Pédagogie 92: 31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croizet J.C., Després G., Gauzins M.E., Huguet P., Leyens J.-P., Méot A. (2004) Stereotype threat undermines intellectual performance by triggering a disruptive mental load. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 721–731. doi:10.1177/0146167204263961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher K., Crandall C.S. (2008) Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 1639–1655. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00362.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Paolis, P. (2005). Prototypes of the psychologist and professionalisation: Diverging social representations of a developmental process. In G. Duveen & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 144–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1st Ed.: 1990).

  • Dickhauser O. (2005) A fresh look: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model with frame-specific academic self-concepts. Educational Research 47(3): 279–290. doi:10.1080/00131880500287211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Europeans, science and technology. Eurobarometer 55.2. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_154_en.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2008.

  • Garfield J., Ahlgren A. (1988) Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19: 44–63. doi:10.2307/749110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield J., Ben-Zvi D. (2007) How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review. Revue Internationale de Statistique 75: 372–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould S.J. (1992) Bully for brontosaurus: reflections in natural history. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Green J., Nelson G., Martin A.J., Marsch H.W. (2006) The causal ordering of self-concept and academic motivation and its effect on academic achievement. International Education Journal 7: 534–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauff H.M., Fogarty G.J. (1996) Analysing problem solving behaviour of successful and unsuccessful statistics students. Instructional Science 24: 397–409. doi:10.1007/BF00125577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer B.K. (2000) Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 378–405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer B., Pintrich P. (2002) Epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet P., Brunot S., Monteil J.-M. (2001) Geometry versus drawing: changing the meaning of the task as a means to change performance. Social Psychology of Education 4: 219–234. doi:10.1023/A:1011374700020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huguet P., Régner I. (2007) Stereotype threat among schoolgirls in quasi-ordinary classroom circumstances. Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 545–560. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz I., Roberts S.O., Robinson J.M. (1965) Effects of task difficulty, race of administrator, and instructions on digit-symbol performance of negroes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 53–59. doi:10.1037/h0022080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M. (1992) Teaching statistics to biologists. Journal of Biological Education 26: 200–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen E., Rui E. (1995) Computer-supported complex learning: An environment for learning experimental methods and statistical inference. Machine-Mediated Learning 5: 149–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W. (1986) Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal 23: 129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W. (2005) Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. German Journal of Educational Psychology 19: 119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W., O’Mara A. (2008) Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34: 542–552. doi:10.1177/0146167207312313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W., Parker J.W. (1984) Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 213–231. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W., Trautwein U., Ludtke O., Koller O., Baumert J. (2005) Academic self concept, interest, grades and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development 76: 397–416. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh H.W., Yeung A.S. (2001) An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioral Research 36: 389–420. doi:10.1207/S15327906389-420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason L. (2003) High school students’ beliefs about math, mathematical problem-solving, and their achievement in math: A cross-sectional study. Educational Psychology 23: 73–85. doi:10.1080/01443410303216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn M.K., Roth W.-M. (1999) Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher 28: 14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteil, J.-M., & Huguet, P. (1991). Insertion sociale, catégorisation sociale et activités cognitives. Psychologie Française, 36, 35–46. Social insertion, social categorization, and cognitive activities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteil J.-M., Huguet P. (2001) The social regulation of classroom performances: A theoretical outline. Social Psychology of Education 4: 359–372. doi:10.1023/A:1011345022870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MPI. (2008). La dispersione scolastica [Early school leaving]. Rome: Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione, Servizio Statistico. http://www.pubblica.istruzione.it/mpi/pubblicazioni/2008/allegati/dispersione_2007.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2008.

  • Mugny G., Carugati F. (1989) Social Representations of Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtonen M. (2005) University Students’ Research Orientations: do negative attitudes exist toward quantitative methods?. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49: 263–280. doi:10.1080/00313830500109568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtonen M., Lehtinen E. (2003) Difficulties experienced by education and sociology students in quantitative methods courses. Studies in Higher Education 28: 171–185. doi:10.1080/0307507032000058064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtonen M., Lehtinen E. (2005) Conceptions of Research and Methodology Learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 49: 217–224. doi:10.1080/00313830500109519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtonen M., Titterton N. (2004) Learning difficulties in quantitative methods courses in relation to earlier mathematics achievement and study success in university. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 9: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

  • Onwuegbuzie A.J., Wilson V.A. (2003) Statistics anxiety: Nature, etiology, antecedents, effects, and treatments—a comprehensive review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education 8: 195–209. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Op’t Eynde P., De Corte E., Verschaffel L. (2002) Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs: A quest for conceptual clarity and a comprehensive categorization. In: Leder G.C., Pehkonen E., Törner G.(eds) Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterrieth, P. A. (1944). Le test de copie d’une figure complexe. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 206–356. The complex figure copy test.

  • Pajares F., Schunk D.H. (2001) Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In: Riding R., Rayner S.(eds) Perception. Ablex Publishing, London, pp 239–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker L.E., Lepper M.R. (1992) Effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 625–633. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen M.B., Well C.T. (1998) Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education 39: 365–384. doi:10.1023/A:1018785219220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmader T., Johns M. (2003) Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 440–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld A.H. (1989) Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behaviour. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20: 338–355. doi:10.2307/749440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw G., Sinatra G.M. (2004) Epistemological development and its impact on cognition in academic domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 95–102. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaton M., Marsh M.W., Dumas F., Huguet P., Monteil J.-M., Régner I. et al (2008) In search of the big fish: Investigating the coexistence of the big-fish-little-pond effect with the positive effects of upward comparisons. The British Journal of Social Psychology 47: 73–103. doi:10.1348/014466607X202309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier P. (2000) How to improve statistical thinking: Choose the task representation wisely and learn by doing. Instructional Science 28: 227–262. doi:10.1023/A:1003802232617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier P., Gigerenzer G. (2001) Teaching bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 130: 380–400. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stricker L.J., Ward W.C. (2008) Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined: A reply. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 1656–1663. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00363.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend M.A.R., Moore D.W., Tuck B.F., Wilton K.M. (1998) Self-concept and anxiety in university students studying social science statistics within a co-operative learning structure. Educational Psychology 18: 41–54. doi:10.1080/0144341980180103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. (2000) Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yzerbyt W.Y., Muller D., Judd C.M. (2004) Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40: 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bologna, Piazza Aldo Moro, 90, Cesena, 47023, Italy

    Carlo Tomasetto, Maria Cristina Matteucci, Felice Carugati & Patrizia Selleri

Authors
  1. Carlo Tomasetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Cristina Matteucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felice Carugati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Patrizia Selleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Tomasetto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomasetto, C., Matteucci, M.C., Carugati, F. et al. Effect of task presentation on students’ performances in introductory statistics courses. Soc Psychol Educ 12, 191–211 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9081-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9081-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation