Skip to main content
Log in

Leading Effective Global Virtual Teams: The Consequences of Methods of Communication

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between communication and team effectiveness within the context of global virtual teams, arguing that a range of communication methods may impact upon the team’s effectiveness. To explore this relationship empirically, we present a key informant insights based on the activities deployed by a participant in a global team. The paper reports on the team’s effectiveness, their communication strategies and the team’s psychological traits: trust, shared understanding and co-operation. Findings from the pattern matching analysis indicate that the limited range of communication methods available to a global virtual team was not a major contributing factor to a team’s effectiveness. The paper offers communication/management techniques that could be beneficial to the global virtual team leader in facilitating team effectiveness, highlighting some issues surrounding the level of dispersion within teams that could be further explored in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J Appl Psychol 83(3):377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascio WF (2000) Managing a virtual workplace. Acad Manag Exec 14(3):81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland DI, Ireland LR (2006) Project management: strategic design and implementation, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton SD, Orvis KL (2003) Overcoming barriers to information sharing in virtual teams. In: Gibson CB, Cohen SG (eds) Virtual teams that work. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 214–229

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis G, Monge P (1999) Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organ Sci 10(6):693–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards A, Wilson JR (2004) Implementing virtual teams: guide to organizational and human factors. Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS (1987) Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Inf Technol People 3(2):83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrazzi, K. (2012) Harvard Business review http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/03/how-virtual-teams-can-outperfo/

  • Gibson CB, Cohen SG (eds) (2003) Virtual teams that work. Jossey Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CB, Manuel JA (2003) Building trust: effective multicultural communication processes in virtual teams. In: Gibson CB, Cohen SG (eds) Virtual teams that work. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 59–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith TL, Neale MA (2001) Information processing in traditional, hybrid and virtual teams; from nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Res Organ Behav 23:379–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guirdham, M (2002) Interactive behaviour at work, 3rd edn. Financial Times Prentice Hall, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman RJ (1990) Groups that work (and those that don’t). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy C (1995) Trust and the virtual organization. Harv Bus Rev 73(3):40–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N (2002) Managing teams: a strategy for success, 2nd edn. Thomson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds PJ, Mortenson M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ Sci 16(3):290–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds PJ, Weisband SP (2003) Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In: Gibson CB, Cohen SG (eds) Virtual teams that work. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulnick G (2000) Doing business virtually. Commun World 17(3):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland S (2004) Managing virtual teams. In: Rees D, McBain R (eds) People management: challenges and opportunities. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 125–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PJ (1999) From new designs to new dynamics. In: Jackson P (ed) Virtual working: social and organisational dynamics. Routledge, London, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa SL, Leidner LE (1999) Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ Sci 10(6):791–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayworth Timothy R, Leidner DorothyE (2001) Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. J Manag Info Sys 18(3):7–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski ML (2008) Leading global teams. In: Mendenhall MA, Osland J, Bird A, Oddou GR, Maznevski ML (eds) Global leadership: research, practice and development. Routledge, London, pp 94–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM (2000) Global virtual team dynamics. Organ Sci 11(5):473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara-Devereaux M, Johansen R (1994) Global work: bridging distance, culture, and time. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrashkova-Volzdoska RR, McComb SA, Green SG, Compton WD (2003) Examining a curvilinear relationship between communication frequency and team performance in cross-functional project teams. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 50(3):262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2007) Research methods for business students, 4th edn. Pearson Education Ltd, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin Y (2005) Conflict resolution in virtual teams. Org Dyn 34(4):331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebdrat F, Hoegl M, Ernst H (2009) How to Manage Virtual Teams. MIT Sloan Management Review, Magazine: summer 2009 Research Feature July 01, 2009. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-manage-virtual-teams/

  • Sproull L, Kiesler S (1986) Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Manag Sci 32(11):1492–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, V., Paul, R., Nath, D., and Kapur, K. (2007). “Analyzing Factors That Affect Performance of Global Virtual Teams”. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Globally Distributed Work. Bangalore, India. July 25-27 2007.

  • Straus SG, McGrath JE (1994) Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. J Appl Psychol 79(1):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom E, de Meuse KP, Futrell D (1990) Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol 45(2):120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (1995) Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: experimental observations over time. Organ Sci 6(2):186–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (1997) Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Commun Res 23(3):342–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and method, 2nd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria N, Amelinckx A, Wilemon D (2004) Working together apart? building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams. Creat Innov Manag 13:15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00290.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Paucar-Caceres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, L., Paucar-Caceres, A. & Wright, G. Leading Effective Global Virtual Teams: The Consequences of Methods of Communication. Syst Pract Action Res 27, 607–624 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9315-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9315-2

Keywords

Navigation