Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Its Change

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a framework for thinking about oppression and how to overcome it. It considers the value premise underlying the use of the term “oppression.” It then discusses the nature of oppression, the forms it takes, and what keeps it in place. In its final two sections, it focuses on awakening the sense of injustice and the strategies and tactics for overcoming injustice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S. L., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Judd, C. M. (2000). In Deutsch, M., and Coleman, P. T. (eds.), The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

  • Crosby, F. (1982). Relative Deprivation and Working Women. Oxford University Press, New York.

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1947). L’Ancien Regime. Trans, M. W. Patterson. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

  • Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a theory of revolution. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27: 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1990). Forms of social organization: Psychological consequences. In Himmelweit, H. T., and Gaskell, G. (eds.), Societal Psychology. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and Coleman, P. T. (2000). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and Collins, M. E. (1951). Interracial Housing. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., and Steil, J. M. (1988). Awakening the sense of injustice. Soc. Justice Res. 2: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Acquiescence. Markham, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Am. Psychol. 16: 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1937).

  • Galtung, J. (1964). Foreign policy position as a function of social position. J. Peace Res. 1: 206–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D. G. (1998). Confronting Injustice and Oppression. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (1999). Civilized Oppression. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc., Lanham, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., Bonata, B., et al. (2005). Encyclopedia of Selected Peaceful Societies (on website http://www.peacefulsocieties.org).

  • Himmelstrand, V. (1969). Tribalism, nationalism, rank-equilibration, and social structures. J. Peace Res. 2: 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. L. (ed.). (1990). Nonviolence in Theory and Practice. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S., and Willis, R. (eds.). (1989). Societies at Peace: Anthropological Perspectives. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Diener, E., and Schwarz, N. (eds.). (1999). Well-beings: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G., and Fry, D. P. (eds.). (2004). Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies around the World. Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (2000). Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, P. (1990). Community and Confluence. Gestalt Institute of Cleveland Press, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1994). A Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Little Brown, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1995). A Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela, Paperback edition. Little Brown, London.

  • Mead, M. (ed.). (1937). Cooperation and Competition: Among Primitive Peoples. Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, K. M. (ed.). (2004). Social Inequality. Russell Sage foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, L. (1994). Intolerance: A General Survey. Mc-Gill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1987). Limits of Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Antecedents of the Scope of Justice. University Microfilms International, Dissertation Information Service, Ann Arbor, MI. Order #8724072 [Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(08B), 2500].

  • Opotow, S. V. (1990). Deterring moral exclusion: A summary. J. Soc. Issues 46: 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1995). Drawing the line: Social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. In Bunker, B. B., and Rubin, J. Z. (eds.), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (1996a). Is justice finite? The case of environmental inclusion. In Montada, L., and Lerner, M. (eds.), Social Justice in Human Relations: Current Societal Concerns about Justice, Vol. 3. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 213–230.

  • Opotow, S. V. (1996b). Affirmative action, fairness, and the scope of justice. J. Soc. Issues 52: 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. V. (2001). Social injustice. In Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., and Winter, D. D. (eds.), Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century. Prentice-Hall, New York, pp. 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, R., and Wysong, E. (1999). The New Class Society. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. (1967). Social evaluation theory. In Levine, D. (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

  • Petty, R. E., and Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, R. S., Vogele, W. B., Krueglar, C., and McCarthy, R. M. (eds.). (1997). Protest, Power and Change: An Encyclopedia of Nonviolent Action from Act-up to Women’s Suffrage. Garland Publishing Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. C. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J. K., and Levine, K. (2004). U.S. Black–White inequality. In Neckerman, K. M. (ed.), Social Inequality. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (1971). The Politics of Nonviolent Action: An Encyclopedia of Thought and Action. Pilgrim Press, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., and Pratto, F. (1999).

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Boeckman, R. J., Smith, H. J., and Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. I. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morton Deutsch.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper, entitled “Oppression and Conflict,” was presented as a plenary address at the Annual meeting of the International Society of Justice Research in Skovde, Sweden on June 17, 2002. This paper was the starting point of an ongoing, informal seminar on social justice held at Teachers College, Columbia University. The other participants in the seminar included Peter Coleman, Michelle Fine, Beth Fisher-Yoshida, Janet Gerson, Eric Marcus, Susan Opotow, Ellen Raider, Esther Salomon, Janice Steil, and Melissa Sweeney. From the discussions of theory, research, and practice during the meetings of the seminar, emerged plans for a Conference on Interrupting Oppression and Sustaining Justice. Its aim was to stimulate interaction about overcoming oppression among scholars from different academic fields, social and political activists, and graduate students in different disciplines. The Conference took place on February 27 and 28, 2004 at Teachers College. This issue of Social Justice Research presents some papers that were prepared before the Conference (and revised afterwards) and some that emerged from the Conference. Other papers from the Conference can be found under the heading of IO&SJ at the website of the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution of Teachers College: http://www.tc.edu/icccr/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deutsch, M. A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Its Change. Soc Just Res 19, 7–41 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-9998-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-9998-3

Key Words

Navigation