Skip to main content

A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Morton Deutsch: A Pioneer in Developing Peace Psychology

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice ((BRIEFSPIONEER,volume 30))

  • 590 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, my purpose is to provide a framework for thinking about oppression and how to overcome it. Oppression is, I believe, at the root of many of the most serious, enduring conflicts in the world today. The paper is divided into the following sections. The first considers the value premise underlying my use of the term ‘oppression’ (4.2). The second is a discussion of the nature of oppression (4.3). The third addresses the question, “What forms does oppression take?” (4.4). The fourth asks, “What keeps oppression in place?” (4.5). The fifth addresses the awakening of the sense of injustice (4.6). The sixth provides a discussion of the strategies and tactics for overcoming oppression, which often involve violent conflict with groups in power (4.7). In the final section of my paper, I will discuss some nonviolent strategies and tactics for overcoming oppression (4.8). My discussion will not focus on the different contexts in which oppression occurs, such as the family, work, education, and between ethnic, religious, and racial groups. There is an excellent discussion of the different contexts of oppression in the book, Social Inequality (Neckerman 2004), which presents extensive empirical data about inequality in various contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This text was first published as: Deutsch, M. (2006). A Framework for Thinking about Oppression and Its Change. Social Justice Research, 19(1), 7–41. Print ISSN: 0885-7466, Online ISSN: 1573-6725 Permission to republish this text was granted by Springer Permissions in Heidelberg on 11 November 2014.

  2. 2.

    An earlier version of this paper, entitled “Oppression and Conflict,” was presented as a plenary address at the Annual meeting of the International Society of Justice Research in Skovde, Sweden on June 17, 2002. This paper was the starting point of an ongoing, informal seminar on social justice held at Teachers College, Columbia University. The other participants in the seminar included Peter Coleman, Michelle Fine, Beth Fisher-Yoshida, Janet Gerson, Eric Marcus, Susan Opotow, Ellen Raider, Esther Salomon, Janice Steil, and Melissa Sweeney. From the discussions of theory, research, and practice during the meetings of the seminar, emerged plans for a Conference on Interrupting Oppression and Sustaining Justice. Its aim was to stimulate interaction about overcoming oppression among scholars from different academic fields, social and political activists, and graduate students in different disciplines. The Conference took place on February 27 and 28, 2004 at Teachers College. This issue of Social Justice Research presents some papers that were prepared before the Conference (and revised afterwards) and some that emerged from the Conference. Other papers from the Conference can be found under the heading of IO & SJ at the website of the International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution of Teachers College: <http://www.tc.edu/icccr/>.

  3. 3.

    Also, it should be noted that the social science literature on “quality-of-life” and “subjective well-being” indicates that there is a low contribution, beyond the poverty level, of greater income to subjective well-being in advanced economies (Kahneman et al. 1999; Lane 2000). The oppressors’ drive for superior wealth, accompanied by conspicuous consumption, often impairs social relations, a key component of subjective well-being.

References

  • Alinsky, S.D., 1971: Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S.L.; Gruenfeld, D.H.; Judd, C.M., 2000: in: Deutsch, M.; Coleman, P.T. (Eds.): The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F., 1982: Relative Deprivation and Working Women (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A., 1947: L’Ancien Regime (Trans. Patterson, M.W.) (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.C., 1962: “Toward a Theory of Revolution”, in: American Sociological Review, 27: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., 1973: The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., 1985: Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., 1990: “Forms of Social Organization: Psychological Consequences”, in: Himmelweit, H.T.; Gaskell, G. (Eds.): Societal Psychology (London: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M.; Coleman, P.T., 2000: The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M.; Collins, M.E., 1951: Interracial Housing (Minneapolis, MA: University of Minnesota).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M.; Steil, J.M., 1988: “Awakening the Sense of Injustice”, in: Social Justice Research, 2: 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M., 1971: Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Acquiescence (Chicago: Markham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., 1954: “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes”, in: American Psychologist, 16: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A., 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J., 1964: “Foreign Policy Position as a Function of Social Position”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 1: 206–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil, D.G., 1998: Confronting Injustice and Oppression (New York, NY: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T.R., 1970: Why Men Rebel (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J., 1999: Civilized Oppression (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.; Bonata, B. et al., 2005: Encyclopedia of Selected Peaceful Societies (http://www.peacefulsocieties.org).

  • Himmelstrand, V., 1969: “Tribalism, Nationalism, Rank-Equilibration, and Social Structures”, in: Journal of Peace Research, 2: 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R.L. (Ed.), 1990: Nonviolence in Theory and Practice (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, S.; Willis, R. (Eds.), 1989: Societies at Peace: Anthropological Perspectives (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.; Diener, E.; Schwarz, N. (Eds.), 1999: Well-Beings: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G.; Fry, D.P. (Eds.), 2004: Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies around the World (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.E., 2000: Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, P., 1990: Community and Confluence (Cleveland, OH: Gestalt Institute of Cleveland Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E.A.; Tyler, T.R., 1988: The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N., 1994: A Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela (London: Little Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N., 1995: A Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela, Paperback edition (London: Little Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (Ed.), 1937: Cooperation and Competition: Among Primitive Peoples (Boston: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neckerman, K.M. (Ed.), 2004: Social Inequality (New York: Russell Sage foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, L., 1994: Intolerance: A General Survey (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 1987: “Limits of Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Antecedents of the Scope of Justice” (Dissertation Information Service, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI. Order #8724072) [Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(08B), 2500].

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 1990: “Deterring Moral Exclusion: A summary”, in: Journal of Social Issues, 46: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 1995: “Drawing the Line: Social Categorization, Moral Exclusion, and the Scope of Justice”, in: Bunker, B.B.; Rubin, J.Z. (Eds.): Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass): 347–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 1996a: “Is Justice Finite? The Case of Environmental Inclusion”, in: Montada, L.; Lerner, M. (Eds.): Social Justice in Human Relations: Current Societal Concerns about Justice, Volume 3 (New York: Plenum Press): 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 1996b: “Affirmative Action, Fairness, and the Scope of Justice”, in: Journal of Social Issues, 52: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S.V., 2001: “Social Injustice”, in: Christie, D.J.; Wagner, R.V.; Winter, D.D. (Eds.): Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century (New York: Prentice-Hall): 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, R.; Wysong, E., 1999: The New Class Society (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T., 1967: “Social Evaluation Theory”, in: Levine, D. (Ed.): Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R.E.; Wegener, D.T., 1998: “Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables”, in: Gilbert, D.T.; Fiske, S.T.; Lindzey, G. (Eds.): The Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 1, 4th edition (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, R.S.; Vogele, W.B.; Krueglar, C.; McCarthy, R.M. (Eds.), 1997: Protest, Power and Change: An Encyclopedia of Nonviolent Action from Act-up to Women’s Suffrage (New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W.C., 1966: Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, J.K.; Levine, K., 2004: “U.S. Black-White Inequality”, in: Neckerman, K.M. (Ed.): Social Inequality (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G., 1971: The Politics of Nonviolent Action: An Encyclopedia of Thought and Action (Philadelphia, PA: Pilgrim Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J.; Pratto, F., 1999: [No title or other information here].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., 1982: Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T.R.; Boeckman, R.J.; Smith, H.J.; Huo, Y.J., 1997: Social Justice in a Diverse Society (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.I., 1990: Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morton Deutsch .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deutsch, M. (2015). A Framework for Thinking About Oppression and Conflict. In: Morton Deutsch: A Pioneer in Developing Peace Psychology. SpringerBriefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15440-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics