Abstract
There is no list of bipolar active regions (ARs) with reverse polarity (anti-Hale regions), although statistical investigations of such ARs (bearing the imprint of deep subphotospheric processes) are important for understanding solar-cycle mechanisms. We studied 8606 ARs from 1 January 1989 to 31 December 2018 to detect anti-Hale regions and to compile a catalog. The Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) and the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) data, as well as the Debrecen Photoheliographic Data, the Mount Wilson Observatory catalog and drawings, and the USAF/NOAA Solar Region Summary were used. Complex, ambiguous cases related to anti-Hale region identification were analyzed. Two basic and four additional criteria to identify an AR as an anti-Hale region were formulated. The basic criteria assume that: i) dominant features of an AR have to form a bipole of reverse polarity with sunspots/pores of both polarities being present; ii) magnetic connections between the opposite polarities have to be observed. A catalog of anti-Hale regions (275 ARs) is compiled. The catalog contains: NOAA number, date of the greatest total area of sunspots, coordinates, and corrected sunspot area for this date. The tilt and the most complex achieved Mount Wilson magnetic class are also provided. The percentage of anti-Hale groups meeting the proposed criteria is \(\approx3.0\%\) from all studied ARs, which is close to early estimations by authors who had examined each AR individually: \(\approx2.4\%\) by Hale and Nicholson (Astrophys. J. 62, 270, 1925) and \(\approx3.1\%\) by Richardson (Astrophys. J. 107, 78, 1948). The enhancement of the anti-Hale percentage in later research might be related to: i) increasing sensitivity of instruments (considering smaller and smaller bipoles); ii) the ambiguities in the anti-Hale region identification. The catalog is available as the Supplementary Information and at the CrAO website (sun.crao.ru/databases/catalog-anti-hale/).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramenko, V.I., Zhukova, A.V., Kutsenko, A.S.: 2018, Contributions from different-type active regions into the total solar unsigned magnetic flux. Geomag. Aeron. 58, 1159. DOI. ADS.
Babcock, H.W.: 1961, The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-YEAR cycle. Astrophys. J. 133, 572. DOI. ADS.
Baranyi, T., Győri, L., Ludmány, A.: 2016, On-line tools for solar data compiled at the Debrecen Observatory and their extensions with the Greenwich sunspot data. Solar Phys. 291, 3081. DOI. ADS.
Blackman, E.G., Field, G.B.: 2002, New dynamical mean-field dynamo theory and closure approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 265007. DOI. ADS.
Brandenburg, A., Sokoloff, D., Subramanian, K.: 2012, Current status of turbulent dynamo theory. From large-scale to small-scale dynamos. Space Sci. Rev. 169, 123. DOI. ADS.
Brandenburg, A., Subramanian, K.: 2005, Astrophysical magnetic fields and nonlinear dynamo theory. Phys. Rep. 417, 1. DOI. ADS.
Hagenaar, H.J.: 2001, Ephemeral regions on a sequence of full-disk Michelson Doppler Imager magnetograms. Astrophys. J. 555, 448. DOI. ADS.
Hale, G.E., Nicholson, S.B.: 1925, The law of Sun-spot polarity. Astrophys. J. 62, 270. DOI. ADS.
Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of Sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153. DOI. ADS.
Hazra, G., Choudhuri, A.R., Miesch, M.S.: 2017, A theoretical study of the build-up of the Sun’s polar magnetic field by using a 3D kinematic dynamo model. Astrophys. J. 835, 39. DOI. ADS.
Howard, R.F.: 1989, The magnetic fields of active regions – part one. Solar Phys. 123, 271. DOI. ADS.
Jiang, J., Cameron, R.H., Schüssler, M.: 2015, The cause of the weak Solar Cycle 24. Astrophys. J. Lett. 808, L28. DOI. ADS.
Kazantsev, A.P.: 1968, Enhancement of a magnetic field by a conducting fluid. Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 26, 1031. ADS.
Khlystova, A.I., Sokoloff, D.D.: 2009, Toroidal magnetic field of the Sun from data on Hale-rule-violating sunspot groups. Astron. Rep. 53, 281. DOI. ADS.
Kraichnan, R.H., Nagarajan, S.: 1967, Growth of turbulent magnetic fields. Phys. Fluids 10, 859. DOI. ADS.
Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1980, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory, Pergamon, Oxford. ADS.
Künzel, H.: 1965, Zur Klassifikation von Sonnenfleckengruppen. Astron. Nachr. 288, 177. ADS.
Lefèvre, L., Clette, F.: 2014, Survey and merging of sunspot catalogs. Solar Phys. 289, 545. DOI. ADS.
Leighton, R.B.: 1964, Transport of magnetic fields on the Sun. Astrophys. J. 140, 1547. DOI. ADS.
Lemen, J.R., Title, A.M., Akin, D.J., Boerner, P.F., Chou, C., Drake, J.F., Duncan, D.W., Edwards, C.G., Friedlaender, F.M., Heyman, G.F., Hurlburt, N.E., Katz, N.L., Kushner, G.D., Levay, M., Lindgren, R.W., Mathur, D.P., McFeaters, E.L., Mitchell, S., Rehse, R.A., Schrijver, C.J., Springer, L.A., Stern, R.A., Tarbell, T.D., Wuelser, J.-P., Wolfson, C.J., Yanari, C., Bookbinder, J.A., Cheimets, P.N., Caldwell, D., Deluca, E.E., Gates, R., Golub, L., Park, S., Podgorski, W.A., Bush, R.I., Scherrer, P.H., Gummin, M.A., Smith, P., Auker, G., Jerram, P., Pool, P., Soufli, R., Windt, D.L., Beardsley, S., Clapp, M., Lang, J., Waltham, N.: 2012, The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Phys. 275, 17. DOI. ADS.
Li, J.: 2018, A systematic study of Hale and anti-Hale sunspot physical parameters. Astrophys. J. 867, 89. DOI. ADS.
Li, J., Ulrich, R.K.: 2012, Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys. J. 758, 115. DOI. ADS.
López Fuentes, M.C., Demoulin, P., Mandrini, C.H., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2000, The counterkink rotation of a non-Hale active region. Astrophys. J. 544, 540. DOI. ADS.
López Fuentes, M.C., Démoulin, P., Mandrini, C.H., Pevtsov, A.A., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2003, Magnetic twist and writhe of active regions. On the origin of deformed flux tubes. Astron. Astrophys. 397, 305. DOI. ADS.
McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A., Li, J.: 2014, Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-Hale statistics. Astrophys. J. 797, 130. DOI. ADS.
Moffatt, H.K.: 1978, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ADS.
Mordvinov, A.V., Kitchatinov, L.L.: 2019, Evolution of the Sun’s polar fields and the poleward transport of remnant magnetic flux. Solar Phys. 294, 21. DOI. ADS.
Moses, D., Clette, F., Delaboudinière, J.-P., Artzner, G.E., Bougnet, M., Brunaud, J., Carabetian, C., Gabriel, A.H., Hochedez, J.F., Millier, F., Song, X.Y., Au, B., Dere, K.P., Howard, R.A., Kreplin, R., Michels, D.J., Defise, J.M., Jamar, C., Rochus, P., Chauvineau, J.P., Marioge, J.P., Catura, R.C., Lemen, J.R., Shing, L., Stern, R.A., Gurman, J.B., Neupert, W.M., Newmark, J., Thompson, B., Maucherat, A., Portier-Fozzani, F., Berghmans, D., Cugnon, P., van Dessel, E.L., Gabryl, J.R.: 1997, EIT observations of the extreme ultraviolet Sun. Solar Phys. 175, 571. DOI. ADS.
Parker, E.N.: 1955, Hydromagnetic dynamo models. Astrophys. J. 122, 293. DOI. ADS.
Rädler, K.-H., Kleeorin, N., Rogachevskii, I.: 2003, The mean electromotive force for MHD turbulence: the case of a weak mean magnetic field and slow rotation. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 97, 249. DOI. ADS.
Richardson, R.S.: 1948, Sunspot groups of irregular magnetic polarity. Astrophys. J. 107, 78. DOI. ADS.
Ryutova, M.: 2018, Physics of Magnetic Flux Tubes, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib. 455. DOI. ADS.
Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., Rosenberg, W., Springer, L., Tarbell, T.D., Title, A., Wolfson, C.J., Zayer, I., MDI Engineering Team: 1995, The solar oscillations investigation – Michelson Doppler Imager. Solar Phys. 162, 129. DOI. ADS.
Scherrer, P.H., Schou, J., Bush, R.I., Kosovichev, A.G., Bogart, R.S., Hoeksema, J.T., Liu, Y., Duvall, T.L., Zhao, J., Title, A.M., Schrijver, C.J., Tarbell, T.D., Tomczyk, S.: 2012, The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) investigation for the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Solar Phys. 275, 207. DOI. ADS.
Schunker, H., Baumgartner, C., Birch, A.C., Cameron, R.H., Braun, D.C., Gizon, L.: 2020, Average motion of emerging solar active region polarities. II. Joy’s law. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A116. DOI. ADS.
Smith, S.F., Howard, R.: 1968, Magnetic classification of active regions. In: Kiepenheuer, K.O. (ed.) Structure and Development of Solar Active Regions, IAU Symp. 35, Reidel, Dordrecht. 33. ADS.
Sokoloff, D., Khlystova, A.I.: 2010, The solar dynamo in the light of the distribution of various sunspot magnetic classes over butterfly diagram. Astron. Nach. 331, 82. DOI. ADS.
Sokoloff, D., Khlystova, A., Abramenko, V.: 2015, Solar small-scale dynamo and polarity of sunspot groups. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 451, 1522. DOI. ADS.
Stenflo, J.O., Kosovichev, A.G.: 2012, Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. Astrophys. J. 745, 129. DOI. ADS.
Sur, S., Brandenburg, A., Subramanian, K.: 2008, Kinematic \(\alpha\)-effect in isotropic turbulence simulations. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 385, L15. DOI. ADS.
Tlatov, A.G., Vasil’eva, V.V., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2010, Distribution of magnetic bipoles on the Sun over three solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 717, 357. DOI. ADS.
van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., Green, L.M.: 2015, Evolution of active regions. Liv. Rev. Solar Phys. 12, 1. DOI. ADS.
Vitinsky, Y.I.: 1986, On sunspot groups with irregular magnetic polarities. Byull. Soln. Dannye Akad. Nauk SSSR 9, 86. ADS.
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1989, Average properties of bipolar magnetic regions during sunspot cycle-21. Solar Phys. 124, 81. DOI. ADS.
Wang, Y.-M., Colaninno, R.C., Baranyi, T., Li, J.: 2015, Active-region tilt angles: magnetic versus white-light determinations of Joy’s law. Astrophys. J. 798, 50. DOI. ADS.
Yazev, S.A.: 2011, Activity complexes on the Sun during the 23rd solar cycle. Geomag. Aeron. 51, 879. DOI. ADS.
Yazev, S.A.: 2015, Activity complexes on the Sun in Solar Cycle 24. Astron. Rep. 59, 228. DOI. ADS.
Zeldovich, Y.B., Ruzmaikin, A.A., Sokoloff, D.D.: 1990, The Almighty Chance, World Scientific, Singapore. DOI. ADS.
Zhukova, A.: 2018, A catalog of active regions of the 24th solar cycle. Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Obs. 114, 74.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to L.V. Ermakova and A.S. Kutsenko for consulting on complex, ambiguous ARs. Efforts of A.V. Zhukova on the catalog compilation were supported by the RSF (Project 18-12-00131). A.I. Khlystova thanks the support of the RFBR’s grants 18-02-00085 and 19-52-45002. The work of A.I. Khlystova was supported by the basic financial program of the FSR II.16. D.D. Sokoloff is grateful for the RFBR support under the grant 18-02-00085. V.I. Abramenko would like to acknowledge partial support of the MSHE of RF (Research 0831-2019-0006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhukova, A., Khlystova, A., Abramenko, V. et al. A Catalog of Bipolar Active Regions Violating the Hale Polarity Law, 1989 – 2018. Sol Phys 295, 165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01734-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-020-01734-9