Abstract
We use recently digitized sunspot drawings from Mount Wilson Observatory to investigate the latitudinal dependence of tilt angles of active regions and its change with solar cycle. The drawings cover the period from 1917 to present and contain information as regards polarity and strength of magnetic field in sunspots. We identified clusters of sunspots of same polarity, and used these clusters to form “bipole pairs”. The orientation of these bipole pairs was used to measure their tilts. We find that the latitudinal profile of tilts does not monotonically increase with latitude as most previous studies assumed, but instead, it shows a clear maximum at about 25 – 30 degree latitudes. Functional dependence of tilt (\(\gamma\)) on latitude (\(\varphi\)) was found to be \(\gamma= (0.20\pm0.08) \sin(2.80 \varphi) + (-0.00\pm0.06)\). We also find that latitudinal dependence of tilts varies from one solar cycle to another, but larger tilts do not seem to result in stronger solar cycles. Finally, we find the presence of a systematic offset in tilt of active regions (non-zero tilts at the equator), with odd cycles exhibiting negative offset and even cycles showing the positive offset.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babcock, H.W.: 1961, The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys. J. 133, 572. DOI . ADS .
Baumann, I., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M., Solanki, S.K.: 2004, Evolution of the large-scale magnetic field on the solar surface: A parameter study. Astron. Astrophys. 426, 1075. DOI . ADS .
Cameron, R.H., Jiang, J., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M.: 2010, Surface flux transport modeling for solar cycles 15–21: Effects of cycle-dependent tilt angles of sunspot groups. Astrophys. J. 719, 264. DOI . ADS .
Canfield, R.C., Pevtsov, A.A.: 1998, Helicity of solar active-region magnetic fields. In: Balasubramaniam, K.S., Harvey, J., Rabin, D. (eds.) Synoptic Solar Physics, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 140, 131. ADS .
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R., Peñuela, T.: 2010, Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. Astron. Astrophys. 518, A7. DOI . ADS .
Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R., Peñuela, T.: 2013, Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle (Corrigendum). Astron. Astrophys. 556, C3. DOI . ADS .
Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Howard, R.F.: 1995, Comparisons between theory and observation of active region tilts. Astrophys. J. 438, 463. DOI . ADS .
Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Longcope, D.W., Linton, M.G., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2000, The solar dynamo and emerging flux (Invited review). Solar Phys. 192, 119. DOI . ADS .
Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153. DOI . ADS .
Holder, Z.A., Canfield, R.C., McMullen, R.A., Nandy, D., Howard, R.F., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2004, On the tilt and twist of solar active regions. Astrophys. J. 611, 1149. DOI . ADS .
Howard, R.F.: 1991, Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 136, 251. DOI . ADS .
Ivanov, V.G.: 2012, Joy’s law and its features according to the data of three sunspot catalogs. Geomagn. Aeron. 52, 999. DOI . ADS .
Kosovichev, A.G., Stenflo, J.O.: 2008, Tilt of emerging bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun. Astrophys. J. Lett. 688, L115. DOI . ADS .
Leighton, R.B.: 1969, A magneto-kinematic model of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 156, 1. DOI . ADS .
Li, J., Ulrich, R.K.: 2012, Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys. J. 758, 115. DOI . ADS .
Longcope, D., Linton, M., Pevtsov, A., Fisher, G., Klapper, I.: 1999, Twisted flux tubes and how they get that way. In: Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, Geophysical Monograph Series 111, 93. DOI . ADS .
McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2013, Recovering Joy’s law as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude. Solar Phys. 287, 215. DOI . ADS .
McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2016, Tilt angle and footpoint separation of small and large bipolar sunspot regions observed with HMI. Astrophys. J. 818, 7. DOI . ADS .
McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A., Li, J.: 2014, Re-examining sunspot tilt angle to include anti-hale statistics. Astrophys. J. 797, 130. DOI . ADS .
Mursula, K., Zieger, B.: 2001, Long-term north-south asymmetry in solar wind speed inferred from geomagnetic activity: A new type of century-scale solar oscillation? Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 95. DOI . ADS .
Mursula, K., Hiltula, T., Zieger, B.: 2002, Latitudinal gradients of solar wind speed around the ecliptic: Systematic displacement of the streamer belt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1738. DOI . ADS .
Nagy, M., Lemerle, A., Labonville, F., Petrovay, K., Charbonneau, P.: 2017, The effect of “rogue” active regions on the solar cycle. Solar Phys. 292, 167. DOI . ADS .
Norton, A.A., Gilman, P.A.: 2005, Recovering solar toroidal field dynamics from sunspot location patterns. Astrophys. J. 630, 1194. DOI . ADS .
Pevtsov, A.A., Clette, F.: 2014, To understand future solar activity, one has to know the past. EOS. DOI .
Pevtsov, A.A., Berger, M.A., Nindos, A., Norton, A.A., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2014, Magnetic helicity, tilt, and twist. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 285. DOI . ADS .
Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: 1992, Numerical Recipes in Fortran. The Art of Scientific Computing. ADS .
Pulkkinen, P.J., Brooke, J., Pelt, J., Tuominen, I.: 1999, Long-term variation of sunspot latitudes. Astron. Astrophys. 341, L43. ADS .
Sattarov, I., Pevtsov, A.A., Hojaev, A.S., Sherdonov, C.T.: 2002, X-Ray bright points and photospheric bipoles during cycles 22 and 23. Astrophys. J. 564, 1042. DOI . ADS .
Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., Howard, R.F.: 1999, Measurement of Kodaikanal white-light images, IV: Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 189, 69. DOI . ADS .
Stenflo, J.O., Kosovichev, A.G.: 2012, Bipolar magnetic regions on the Sun: Global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. Astrophys. J. 745, 129. DOI . ADS .
Tian, L., Liu, Y., Yang, J., Alexander, D.: 2005, The role of the kink instability of a long-lived active region AR 9604. Solar Phys. 229, 237. DOI . ADS .
Tlatov, A.G., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2010, The latitude of ephemeral regions as an indicator for solar-cycle strength. Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 81, 814. ADS .
Tlatov, A.G., Vasil’eva, V.V., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2010, Distribution of magnetic bipoles on the sun over three solar cycles. Astrophys. J. 717, 357. DOI . ADS .
Tlatova, K.A., Vasil’eva, V.V., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2015, Long-term variations in the sunspot magnetic fields and bipole properties from 1918 to 2014. Geomagn. Aeron. 55, 896. DOI . ADS .
Yeates, A.R., Baker, D., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2015, Source of a prominent poleward surge during solar cycle 24. Solar Phys. 290, 3189. DOI . ADS .
Zirin, H.: 1988, Astrophysics of the Sun, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. ADS .
Zolotova, N.V., Ponyavin, D.I., Marwan, N., Kurths, J.: 2009, Long-term asymmetry in the wings of the butterfly diagram. Astron. Astrophys. 503, 197. DOI . ADS .
Acknowledgements
Work of individual co-authors was supported by their national grants and projects: the Academy of Finland to the ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence (project no. 272157), the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR, project 18-02-00098), the Russian Science Foundation (RSF, project 15-12-20001), and NASA’s grant NNX15AE95G. The authors are members of international team on Reconstructing Solar and Heliospheric Magnetic Field Evolution Over the Past Century supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI), Bern, Switzerland. The National Solar Observatory (NSO) is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tlatova, K., Tlatov, A., Pevtsov, A. et al. Tilt of Sunspot Bipoles in Solar Cycles 15 to 24. Sol Phys 293, 118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1337-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-018-1337-y