Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclical Behaviors of Sunspot-Group Tilt Angles in Solar Cycles 21 – 23

  • Research
  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the Debrecen Photoheliographic Data (DPD) sunspot catalog, we investigate the cyclical behaviors of tilt angles of all sunspot groups (SGs) and SGs with angular separation constraint \(S > 2.5^{\circ}\) in Solar Cycles (SCs) 21 – 23. It is found that, the cyclical behaviors of tilt angles during SC 23 are different from those of SCs 21 and 22, confirmed by using the SDD sunspot catalog where possible, which are embodied in the following five aspects: (i) For all SGs (SGs with separation constraint), the percentage of SGs with larger absolute values of tilt angles in the declining phase than during the maximum phase is about 80% (60%) in SCs 21 and 22. In SC 23, the percentage of SGs with larger absolute values of tilt angles during the declining phase is about 1.10 times (at least not lower than) that during the maximum. (ii) During SCs 21 – 23, the yearly mean of tilt angles decreases with time for all SGs (SGs with separation constraint) and the slopes of the linear regression lines are negative: −0.404, −0.910, and −0.740/−1.005 (−0.500, −1.138, and −0.764/−0.576). (iii) During SCs 21 and 22, the yearly mean of the absolute value of tilt angles generally decreases with time for all SGs (SGs with separation constraint) and the slopes of the linear regression lines also are negative: −0.347 and −0.451 (−0.504 and −0.397). (iv) During SC 23, for all SGs, the yearly mean of the absolute value of tilt angles generally increases with time and the slope of the linear regression line is positive: 0.281/0.429. For SGs with separation constraint, the linear regression line to the yearly mean of the absolute value of tilt angles is almost horizontal and its slope is −0.008/0.014. (v) The yearly mean of latitude of SGs decreases steadily with time during each SC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The SG data used in our analysis are taken from the DPD sunspot catalog, which are available at http://fenyi.solarobs.epss.hu/test/tiltangle/dpd/, and the SDD sunspot catalog, which are available at http://fenyi.solarobs.epss.hu/test/tiltangle/sdd/.

Notes

  1. http://fenyi.solarobs.epss.hu/test/tiltangle/dpd/

  2. http://fenyi.solarobs.epss.hu/test/tiltangle/sdd/

References

  • Babcock, H.W.: 1961, The topology of the Sun’s magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys. J. 133, 572. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranyi, T.: 2015, Comparison of Debrecen and Mount Wilson/Kodaikanal sunspot group tilt angles and the Joy’s law. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 447, 1857. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranyi, T., Győri, L., Ludmány, A.: 2016, On-line tools for Solar Data Compiled at the Debrecen Observatory and their extensions with the Greenwich sunspot data. Solar Phys. 291, 3081. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S., Broomhall, A.-M., Chaplin, W.J., Elsworth, Y.: 2012, Thinning of the Sun’s magnetic layer: the peculiar solar minimum could have been predicted. Astrophys. J. 758, 43. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, W.: 1930, Gesetzmäßigkeiten in der Anordnung der Sonnenflecken zu Gruppen. Astronomische Mitteilungen der Eidgenössischen Sternwarte Zurich 13, 67. ADS.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, R.H., Jiang, J., Schmitt, D., Schussler, M.: 2010, Surface flux transport modeling for solar cycles 15 – 21: effects of cycle-dependent tilt angles of sunspot groups. Astrophys. J. 719, 264. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Charbonneau, P.: 2020, Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 17, 4. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dasi-Espuig, M., Solanki, S.K., Krivova, N.A., Cameron, R., Penuela, T.: 2010, Sunspot group tilt angles and the strength of the solar cycle. Astron. Astrophys. 518, A7. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • de Toma, G., White, O.R., Chapman, G.A., Walton, S.R., Preminger, D.G., Cookson, A.M.: 2004, Solar cycle 23: an anomalous cycle? Astrophys. J. 609, 1140. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Silva, S., Choudhuri, A.R.: 1993, A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions. Astron. Astrophys. 272, 621. ADS.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G.H., Fan, Y., Longcope, D.W., Linton, M.G., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2000, The solar dynamo and emerging flux - (invited review). Solar Phys. 192, 119. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, P.-X.: 2020a, Phase relation between large and simple sunspot groups in solar cycles 22 – 24. Solar Phys. 295, 23. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, P.X.: 2020b, Curious changes in association of complex sunspot groups with X-ray flares (≥M1) in solar cycles 22 – 24. Astrophys. J. 894, 77. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Győri, L., Baranyi, T., Ludmány, A.: 2011, Photospheric data programs at the Debrecen Observatory. In: Prasad Choudhary, D., Strassmeier, K.G. (eds.) Physics of Sun and Star Spots, IAU Symp. 273, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 403. DOI. ADS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Győri, L., Ludmány, A., Baranyi, T.: 2017, Comparative analysis of Debrecen sunspot catalogues. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 1259. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, K.L.: 1992, The cyclic behavior of solar activity. In: Harvey, K.L. (ed.) The Solar Cycle, ASP Conference Series 27, ASP, San Francisco, 335. ADS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R.F.: 1991, Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 136, 251. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, R., Davies, G.R., Chaplin, W.J., Elsworth, Y., Basu, S., Hale, S.J., Ball, W.H., Komm, R.W.: 2017, The Sun in transition? Persistence of near-surface structural changes through cycle 24. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, 1935. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, V.G.: 2012, Joy’s law and its features according to the data of three sunspot catalogs. Geomagn. Aeron. 52, 999. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Q., Jiang, J., Wang, Z.-F.: 2021, Sunspot tilt angles revisited: dependence on the solar cycle strength. Astron. Astrophys. 653, A27. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, B.K., Karak, B.B., Mandal, S., Banerjee, D.: 2020, Magnetic field dependence of bipolar magnetic region tilts on the Sun: indication of tilt quenching. Astrophys. J. Lett. 889, L19. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilcik, A., Yurchyshyn, V.B., Ozguc, A., Rozelot, J.P.: 2014, Solar cycle 24: curious changes in the relative numbers of sunspot group types. Astrophys. J. Lett. 794, L2. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, R.B.: 1969, A magneto-kinematic model of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 156, 1. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K.J., Yun, H.S., Gu, X.M.: 2001, Hemispheric variation in solar activity. Astrophys. J. 554, L115. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Ulrich, R.K.: 2012, Long-term measurements of sunspot magnetic tilt angles. Astrophys. J. 758, 115. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J.: 2018, A systematic study of hale and anti-Hale sunspot physical parameters. Astrophys. J. 867, 89. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • López Fuentes, M.C., Démoulin, P., Mandrini, C.H., Pevtsov, A.A., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L.: 2003, Magnetic twist and writhe of active regions. On the origin of deformed flux tubes. Astron. Astrophys. 397, 305. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B.H., Norton, A.A.: 2013, Recovering Joy’s law as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude. Solar Phys. 287, 215. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagovitsyn, Y.A., Osipova, A.A., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2021, Tilt angle and lifetime of sunspot groups. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501, 2782. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Dasi-Espuig, M., Krivova, N.A., Solanki, S.K.: 2015, Sunspot areas and tilt angles for solar cycles 7 – 10. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A73. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Senthamizh Pavai, V., Arlt, R., Diercke, A., Denker, C., Vaquero, J.M.: 2016, Sunspot group tilt angle measurements from historical observations. Adv. Space Res. 58, 1468. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sivaraman, K.R., Gupta, S.S., Howard, R.F.: 1999, Measurement of Kodaikanal white-light images - IV. Axial tilt angles of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 189, 69. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenflo, J.O., Kosovichev, A.G.: 2012, Bipolar magnetic regions on the sun: global analysis of the SOHO/MDI data set. Astrophys. J. 745, 129. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, L.R., Liu, Y., Yang, J., Alexander, D.: 2015, The role of the kink instability of a long-lived active region AR 9604. Solar Phys. 229, 237. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tlatov, A., Illarionov, E., Sokoloff, D., Pipin, V.: 2013, A new dynamo pattern revealed by the tilt angle of bipolar sunspot groups. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 432, 2975. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., Green, L.M.: 2015, Evolution of active regions. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 12, 1. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1989, Average properties of bipolar magnetic regions during sunspot CYCLE-21. Solar Phys. 124, 81. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 1991, Magnetic flux transport and the Sun’s dipole moment: new twists to the Babcock-Leighton model. Astrophys. J. 375, 761. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M., Colaninno, R.C., Baranyi, T., Li, J.: 2015, Active-region tilt angles: magnetic versus white-light determinations of Joy’s law. Astrophys. J. 798, 50. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-M.: 2017, Surface flux transport and the evolution of the Sun’s polar fields. Space Sci. Rev. 210, 351. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.M.: 1987, On the prospect of using butterfly diagrams to predict cycle minimum. Solar Phys. 111, 255. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R.M., Hathaway, D.H., Reichmann, E.J.: 1996, On the behavior of the sunspot cycle near minimum. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 19967. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yiğit, E., Kilcik, A., Elias, A.G., Dönmez, B., Ozguc, A., Yurchshyn, V., Rozelot, J.-P.: 2018, Critical frequencies of the ionospheric F1 and F2 layers during the last four solar cycles: sunspot group type dependencies. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 171, 157. DOI. ADS.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the reviewer very much for the careful reading and the constructive comments that improved the original version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11903077), the Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province, China (Grant Nos. 202101AT070019, 202201AS070042), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Peng-Xin Gao wrote the manuscript text, prepared all figures, and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng-Xin Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, PX. Cyclical Behaviors of Sunspot-Group Tilt Angles in Solar Cycles 21 – 23. Sol Phys 298, 21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02117-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02117-6

Keywords

Navigation