Abstract
Human Rights to Water and Sanitation (HRWS) have been consolidated as relevant frameworks to measure different levels of services. It is essential to move forward with specific initiatives that interpret the content of these human rights and operationalize them through specific metrics. However, some critical issues emerge in attempting this. Different approaches are proposed in this article to tackle this challenge: (1) utilizing a participatory technique to discuss the relative importance of the normative criteria to define water and sanitation services, (2) defining a short list of key indicators to measure the different dimensions of HRWS, and (3) assessing the impact of different weighting systems in the constructing an aggregated index, which has been proposed as a useful tool to monitor water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) from a rights perspective. Two municipalities (in Mozambique and Nicaragua) were selected as initial case studies. The results suggest that there is a common understanding among the experts about prioritization of the HRWS criteria. Differences in the relative importance given to the HRWS criteria can be explained due to the particularities of the local context. Further, the research suggests that expert opinions may be partially conditioned by targets and indicators proposed at the international level. Although the influence of weighting techniques on aggregated measures and their utilization in the decision-making process are limited, this methodology has a great potential for adapting specific WASH metrics to different regional, national, and/or local contexts taking into account the HRWS normative content.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In some cases, one positive or negative answer to a given indicator led to other indicators not being assessed. For instance, those households practicing open defecation were not evaluated against the other sanitation criteria—they were categorized as “not applicable”.
In those cases where one household had no data to assess one or more specific dimensions, a weighted mean of other dimensions was calculated to assess the final index value.
The “non-applicable” and “unknown” categories have been added to the non-respondents for simplicity considerations. This category includes, for instance, those households (1) practicing open defecation, (2) with no children under three, and (3) not connected to community systems managed by a committee.
References
AquaFed. (2014). Human right to safe drinking water and sanitation. The International Federation of Private Water Operators, http://www.aquafed.org/page-5-59.html#7.
Bain, R. E. S., Gundry, S. W., Wright, J. A., Yang, H., Pedley, S., & Bartram, J. K. (2012). Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: Lessons from five Countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90, 228A–235A.
Bao, P. C., Aramaki, T., & Hanaki, K. (2013). Assessment of stakeholders’ preferences towards sustainable sanitation scenarios. Water and Environment Journal, 27, 58–70. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00327.x.
Baquero, O. F., de Palencia, A. J. F., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2015). Measuring disparities in access to water based on the normative content of the human right. Social Indicators Research, in press. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0976-8.
Blancas, F. J., Contreras, I., & Ramírez-hurtado, J. M. (2013). Constructing a composite indicator with multiplicative aggregation under the objective of ranking alternatives. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64, 668–678. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.90.
Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59, 115–151. doi:10.1023/A:1016275505152.
Bryan, B. A., Grandgirard, A., & Ward, J. R. (2010). Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems, 13, 539–555. doi:10.1007/s10021-010-9339-0.
Cho, D., Ogwang, T., & Opio, C. (2010). Simplifying the water poverty index. Social Indicators Research, 97, 257–267. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9501-2.
COHRE WaterAid COSUDE and UN-HABITAT. (2008). Sanitation: A human rights imperative. In Right to water programme (Ed.), Center on housing rights and evictions. Geneve.
Duke, J. M., & Aull-Hydeb, R. (2002). Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 42, 131–145. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00053-8.
Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (2005). National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics, 10, 391–434. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/430.
Feitelson, E., & Chenoweth, J. (2002). Water poverty: Towards a meaningful indicator. Water Policy, 4, 263–281. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00029-6.
Flores, O., Jiménez, A., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2013). Monitoring access to water in rural areas based on the human right to water framework: A local level case study in Nicaragua. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 605–621. doi:10.1080/07900627.2012.757017.
Flores, O., Jiménez, A., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2015). Reporting progress on human right to water and sanitation through UN water global monitoring mechanisms. Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 5, 310–321. doi:10.2166/washdev.2015.151.
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165–169. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0.
Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of Country performance: A critical assessment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Gallego-Ayala, J., Dos Santos-Dimene, C., Munhequete, A., & Amos, R. (2014). Assessing the performance of urban water utilities in Mozambique using a water utility performance index. Water SA, 40, 665–675. doi:10.4314/wsa.v40i4.12.
Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juizo, D. (2012). Performance evaluation of River Basin Organizations to implement integrated water resources management using composite indexes. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 50–52, 205–216. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2012.08.008.
Gallego-Ayala, J., & Juizo, D. (2014). Integrating stakeholders’ preferences into water resources management planning in the incomati river. Water Resources Management, 28, 527–540. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0500-3.
Garriga, R. G., Jiménez, A., & Foguet, A. P. (2013). Water-sanitation-hygiene mapping: An improved approach for data collection at local level. Science of the Total Environment, 463–464, 700–711. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.005.
Garriga, R. G., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2010). Improved method to calculate a water poverty index at local scale. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136, 1287–1298. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000255.
Garriga, R. G., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2013). Unravelling the linkages between water, sanitation, hygiene and rural poverty: The WASH poverty index. Water Resources Management, 27, 1501–1515. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0251-6.
Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Atance, I. (2004). Identification of public objectives related to agricultural sector support. Journal of Policy Modeling, 26, 1045–1071. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.07.005.
Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Sanchez-Fernandez, G. (2010). Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 69, 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.027.
Grošelj, P., Hodges, D. G., & Stirn, L. Z. (2015). Participatory and multi-criteria analysis for forest (ecosystem) management: A case study of Pohorje, Slovenia. Forest Policy and Economics (in press). doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.006.
Hajkowicz, S. (2006). Multi-attributed environmental index construction. Ecological Economics, 57, 122–139. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.023.
INIDE (2005). Censo 2005. Instituto Nacional de Información para el Desarrollo. Retrived from http://www.inide.gob.ni/.
Irujo, A. E. (2007). The right to water. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23, 267–283. doi:10.1080/07900620601182968.
Jemmali, H., & Sullivan, C. A. (2014). Multidimensional analysis of water poverty in MENA region: An empirical comparison with physical indicators. Social Indicators Research, 115, 253–277. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0218-2.
Jensen, M. H., Villumsen, M., & Petersen, T. D. (2014). The AAAQ framework and the right to water. International indicators for availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality. An issue paper of the AAAQ toolbox. Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Human Rights.
Jiménez, A., Cortobius, M., & Kjellén, M. (2014a). Water, sanitation and hygiene and indigenous peoples: a review of the literature. Water International, 39, 277–293. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.903453.
Jiménez, A., Mtango, F., & Cairncross, S. (2014b). What role for local government in sanitation promotion? Lessons from Tanzania. Water Policy, 16(6), 1104–1120. doi:10.2166/wp.2014.203.
Jiménez, A., & Pérez-Foguet, A. (2012). Quality and year-round availability of water delivered by improved water points in rural Tanzania: Effects on coverage. Water Policy, 14, 509–523. doi:10.2166/wp.2011.026.
Joint Monitoring Programme. (2014). WASH targets and indicators post-2015: Recommendations from International Consultations. Updated April 2014. Retrieved from http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/post-2015-WASH-targets-factsheet-12pp.pdf Accessed 02 Jan 2015.
Joint Monitoring Programme. (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking-water-2015 update and MDG assessment Geneva/New York, JMP, http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/JMP-Update-report-2015_English.pdf. Accessed 03 Nov 2015.
Jonsson, U. (2003). Human rights approach to development programming, UNICEF. Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office.
Kim, Y., Kee, Y., & Lee, S. J. (2015). An analysis of the relative importance of components in measuring community wellbeing: Perspectives of citizens, public officials, and experts. Social Indicators Research, 121, 345–369. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0652-4.
Komnenic, V., Ahlers, R., & Zaag, P. V. D. (2009). Assessing the usefulness of the water poverty index by applying it to a special case: Can one be water poor with high levels of access? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34, 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2008.03.005.
Langford, M. (2010). A poverty of rights: Six ways to fix the MDGs. IDS Bulletin, 41, 83–91. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00108.x.
Langford, M., Bartram, J., & Roaf, V. (2014). Revisiting dignity: The human right to sanitation. In M. Langford & A. F. S. Russell (Eds.), The right to water: Theory, practice and prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, G. K. L., & Chan, E. H. W. (2008). The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach for assessment of Urban renewal proposals. Social Indicators Research, 89, 155–168. doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9228-x.
Lohani, B., & Todino, G. (1984). Water quality index for Chao Phraya River. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 110, 1163–1176. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1984)110:6(1163).
Molle, F., & Mollinga, P. (2003). Water poverty indicators: Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy, 5, 529–544.
Moriarty, P., Smits, S., Butterworth, J., & Franceys, R. (2013). Trends in rural water supply: Towards a service delivery approach. Water Alternatives, 6, 329–349.
Munda, G. (2012). Choosing aggregation rules for composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 109, 337–354. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9911-9.
Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2005). Non-compensatory composite indicators for ranking Countries: A defensible setting. Ispra: Joint Research Centre European Commission.
OECD-JRC. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Methodology and user guide. París: OECD.
ONGAWA–Engineering for Human Development. (2015). A proposal to broadly measure the human right to water and sanitation: The reality of the rural area of Nicaragua. http://www.ongawa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ongawa-resumen-ejecutivo-BAJA.pdf.
Pérez-Foguet, A., & Garriga, R. G. (2011). Analyzing water poverty in basins. Water Resources Management, 25, 3595–3612. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9872-4.
Qureshi, M. E., & Harrison, S. R. (2003). Application of the analytic hierarchy process to riparian revegetation policy options. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 2, 441–458. doi:10.1007/s11842-003-0030-6.
Roaf, V., Khalfan, A., & Langford, M. (2005). Monitoring implementation of the right to water: A framework for developing indicators. Global issue papers No. 14. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.
Ruiz-Villaverde, A., González-Gómez, F., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2013). Public choice of urban water service management: A multi-criteria approach. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 29, 385–399. doi:10.1080/07900627.2012.721668.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24, 19–43. doi:10.1287/inte.24.6.19.
Saisana, M., & Saltelli, A. (2008). Expert panel opinion and global sensitivity analysis for composite indicators. In F. Graziani (Ed.), Computational methods in transport: Verification and validation (pp. 251–275). Berlin: Springer.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2007). Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry. Ecological Indicators, 7, 565–588. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004.
Sullivan, C. (2002). Calculating a water poverty index. World Development, 30, 1195–1210. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9.
Sullivan, C., Meigh, J., Giacomello, A. M., & Fediw, P. (2003). The water poverty index: Development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, 27, 189–199. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.00054.
Un Special Rapporteur on the Human Right to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation (2014). Monitoring compliance with the human rights to water and sanitation (chapter 5). Realising the human rights to water and sanitation: A handbook by the UN special Rapporteur Catarina de Albuquerque.
UNDP. (2015). Human development report 2015: Work for human development. New York: UNDP.
United Nations. (2002). The right to water. E/C.12/2002/1. General comment no. 15 of the Economic and Social Council. New York: UN.
United Nations. (2009a). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/HRC/12/24. In Human Rights Council (Ed.), New York: UN.
United Nations. (2009b). Statement-Twelfth session of the Human Rights Council, A/HRC/12/24. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/WaterAndSanitation/SRWater/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx, Accessed 2 Jan 2015.
United Nations. (2010a). Declaration on the right to water. A/RES/64/292. General assembly. New York: UN. http://www.un.org/en/ga/64/resolutions.shtml Accessed 15 April 2015.
United Nations. (2010b). Human rights and access to safe drinking water and sanitation. A/HRC/RES/15/9. New York: UN. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/166/33/PDF/G1016633.pdf?OpenElement Accessed 15 April 2015.
United Nations. (2010c). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/HRC/15/31. New York: UN.
United Nations. (2012). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Alburquerque. A/67/270. New York: UN. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N12/456/53/PDF/N1245653.pdf?OpenElement Accessed 11 Feb 2015.
United Nations General Assembly. (2014). Report of the open working group of the general assembly on sustainable development goals, resolution A/68/970. New York.
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). The human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation-resolution A/RES/70/169. 2015.
Washwatch.org. (2014). http://www.washwatch.org/en/.
World Health Organization and Unicef. (2010). Rapid assessment of drinking-water quality in the Republic of Nicaragua. Country report of the pilot project implementation in 2004–2005. Geneva.
WSP. (2012). Economic impact of poor sanitation in Africa: Mozambique. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program.
Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Zhou, D. Q. (2010). Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach. Social Indicators Research, 96, 169–181. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9472-3.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all families who participated in the study. Further thanks go to ONGAWA–Engineering for Human Development, San Sebastián de Yalí Municipality, Ministry of Health (MINSA), and students from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua (UNAN-León) in Nicaragua, and to the the Municipality of Manhiça, for their valuable contribution during field work, in Mozambique. This study was mainly funded by the Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) [references 0010–2011, 0014–2012, 0001–2013] and the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo [references 11-CAP2-1562 and 07-CO-068]. We also acknowledge the participation of thirty-seven anonymous experts in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baquero, O.F., Gallego-Ayala, J., Giné-Garriga, R. et al. The Influence of the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation Normative Content in Measuring the Level of Service. Soc Indic Res 133, 763–786 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1374-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1374-6