Skip to main content
Log in

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Objective Quality of Life of Chinese Residents: 2006 to 2009

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study performs a comprehensive evaluation of the objective quality of life (QOL) of the 31 provincial administrative divisions in Mainland China from 2006 to 2009 with principal component analysis (PCA). The objective QOL in China generally decreases gradually from the eastern coastal regions to the western inland regions, with a significant gap between the east and the west. Furthermore, the QOL shows an irrational developmental pattern with the natural conditions and the geographical position as the foundations, and economic development as the dominant factor. Cluster analysis is then used to analyze further the regional structural characteristics of the QOL in China. The results indicate the existence of mutual distinctions and internal differentiations among the eastern, middle, and western regions. The temporal analysis shows that the QOL in China demonstrates a continuous increase from 2006 to 2009, with a growth rate that speeds up annually. However, the increase does not mean a harmonious development in all aspects of society, but the rapid progress of socio-economic well-being, and the slow development or even deterioration of eco-environment and social security. The tendencies of the QOL in the four socio-economic regions coincide with that of the national average and the QOL of the middle and western regions increase significantly faster than that of the eastern region. However, the disparities between the eastern region and the middle and western regions expand because of the huge base of regional development differences in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since its first release in 1990, HDI has been widely used to measure and rank relative human development in various countries. HDI measures the average achievements in a country or region in three basic dimensions of human development (i.e., health, education, and economy) (UNDP 2004). HDI is comprehensive, simple, and easy to understand; thus, it has achieved wide attention from many countries. Different from the objective weight given by PCA in this paper, HDI uses equal weights for all three-dimensional indicators when synthesizing the multi-dimensional measurements of human development into a single composite index.

  2. Refer to Yang and Hu (2008) for a detailed description of the properties of R 2 and semi-partial R 2.

  3. Four socio-economic regions are divided in China, namely, the eastern, northeastern, middle and western regions. The eastern region includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong, and Hainan. The northeastern region includes Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang. The middle region includes Shanxi, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Hunan. The western region includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Tibet, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang (National Bureau of Statistics of China 2010).

References

  • Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Beijing statistical yearbook 2010. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59, 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci, F., & Pisani, S. (1995). A multiattribute measure of human development. Social Indicators Research, 36, 145–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. K., Kwan, C. C. A., & Shek, T. L. D. (2005). Quality of life in Hong Kong: The CUHK Hong Kong quality of life index. Social Indicators Research, 71, 259–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, N., Osborn, J., & Blank, G. (1986). Geographic perspectives on the wealth of nations, Department of Geography Research Paper No. 220. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, A. C. (1991). The human development index: Handle with care. Population and Development Review, 17, 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, D. (2003). Principal component analysis on human development indicators of china. Social Indicator Research, 61, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S. (2003). Objective quality of life in Korea and the OECD countries. Social Indicators Research, 62, 481–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. C. (1992). Some thoughts on the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 27, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. C. (1993). A compound index of national development. Social Indicators Research, 28, 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, N. C. (2004). Values reflected in the human development index. Social Indicators Research, 66, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2010). China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998a). A modified human development index. World Development, 26, 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorbakhsh, F. (1998b). The human development indices: Some technical issues and alternative indices. Journal of International Development, 10, 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, C. L., & Luo, Q. (2004). A study on the regional disparities of human development in china. Economic Survey, 6, 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (1982a). Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment, and income: A principal component representation. Journal of Development Economics, 11, 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (1982b). Intercountry inequalities in income and basic-needs indicators: A recent perspective. World Development, 20, 899–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhya Ser A, 26, 329–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, R. E., & Wang, H. W. (1997). Multivariate statistical data analysis: Theory, methods and examples. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Shanghai statistical yearbook 2010. Beijing: China Statistics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slottje, D. J. (1991). Measuring the quality of life across countries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 684–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somarriba, N., & Pena, B. (2009). Synthetic indicators of quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 94, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, F. H., Wei, X., Wang, X. Z., & Shao, J. P. (2005). The quality of life in China provincial capital in 2002. Chinese Journal of Population Sciences, 1, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, K. L. (1999). Social development in China: Progress and problems. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29, 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2004). Human development report 2004: Cultural liberty in today’s diverse world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2008). China human development report 2007/2008: Basic public services for 1.3 billion people. China Translation and Publishing Corporation: Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2010). China human development report 2009/2010: China and a sustainable future: towards a low carbon economy and society. Beijing: China Translation and Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, R., Ma, Y., & Sastry, S. (2006). Generalized principal component analysis: Modeling & segmentation of multivariate mixed data. Available at: http://yima.csl.illinois.edu/psfile/book-VMS.pdf.

  • Wang, B. J. (2007). Multivariate data analysis. Beijing: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2011). World development indicators 2011. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.

  • Yang, Y. H., & Hu, A. G. (2008). Investigating regional disparities of China’s human development with cluster analysis: A historical perceptive. Social Indicator Research, 86, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. H., Hu, A. G., & Zhang, N. (2005). An alternative to human development index with principal component analysis. Economic Research Journal, 7, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X., & Liu, D. (2009). Quantitative analysis on life quality of urban population in china. Population Journal, 4, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Humanity and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education, PRC (No. 10YJC840069), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71173099 & 70903002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peigang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Z., Wang, P. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Objective Quality of Life of Chinese Residents: 2006 to 2009. Soc Indic Res 113, 1075–1090 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0128-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0128-3

Keywords

Navigation