Abstract
The Human Development Index (HDI) of a nation, proposed by UNDP (1990), is the average of its score, relative to all other nations, on three basic indicators: GDP per person, life expectancy and literacy. The HDI and its components are examined critically with respect to accuracy, sensitivity, and discriminant power. Differential implications for evaluating a particular project or regulation are derived, suggesting some ways to improve the HDI. It is concluded that the HDI is potentially a powerful instrument for world social development and bears examination for validity and consistency with public objectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gall, P.: 1990, ‘What really matters: human development’, UNDP Bulletin, May, pp. 4–12.
Hart, C.: 1990, ‘The making of the human development report’, May, pp. 13–14.
Johnston, D. F.: 1988, ‘Toward a comprehensive quality-of-life index’, Social Indicators Research, 20, 4, pp. 473–496.
Lind, N. C., J. S.Nathwani, and E.Siddall: 1990, ‘Measurement of safety in relation to social well-being’, Report, Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, ON.
Liu, B.-C.: 1976, Quality of Life Indicator in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: A Statistical Analysis (Praeger, New York).
Morris, D. M.: 1979, ‘Measuring the Condition of the World's Poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index’, (Pergamon Press, Oxford).
Selen, J.: 1985, ‘Multidimensional descriptions of social indicators’, Social Indicators Research, 17, 4, November, pp. 435–445.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme): 1990, Human Development Report 1990, Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lind, N.C. Some thoughts on the human development index. Soc Indic Res 27, 89–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300511
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300511