Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Islam and Democracy in Turkey: Employing Political Culture as an Indicator

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade the agenda of local and global politics is heavily marked by the encounter of two powerful currents, namely democracy and political Islam. On the one hand Islam as a religion itself is facing a cultural dialectic between a modern and an authentic form, producing a synthesis which is only to be criticized again by a new radical antithesis. Within that framework political Islam is perceived to be a tool for this current antithesis, attacking the states for impiety and materialism. Democracy, on the other hand, is becoming dominant as a criterion of good government, the “only game in town”, with its inherent complexity which reveals itself in each particular context. The two currents are not necessarily irreconcilable, but they produce a number of different effects on each other whenever they meet. The fundamental contention of this article is to demonstrate this relationship within the Turkish setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayramoğlu, A. (2006). Çağdaşlık Hurafe Kaldırmaz. İstanbul: Tesev Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beinin, J., & Stork, J. (1997). Political Islam: Essays from middle east report. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N. (1991). The good society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulaç, A. (2001). Din, Devlet ve Demokrasi (religion, state and democracy). Istanbul: Zaman Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çaha, Ö. (1999). İslam ve democracy. Islamiyat, 22(2), 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çaha, Ö., & Aras, B. (2000). Fethullah Gulen and his liberal Turkish Islam movement. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 4(4), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çarkoğlu, A., & Toprak, B. (2006). Değişen Türkiye’de Din, Toplum ve Siyaset (religion, society and politics in Turkey). İstanbul: TESEV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh Chull, S., & Huoyan, S. (1997). Political ambivalence in South Korea and Taiwan1997. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 109–124. doi:10.1353/jod.1997.0050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eickelman, D. F., & Piscatori, J. (1996). Muslim politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entelis, J. (1997). Islam, democracy, and the state in North Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, B. (1991). Political protest and cultural revolution: Nonviolent direct action in the 1970s and 1980s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmer, Y. (1999). Devrim, Evrim, Statüko: Türkiye’de Sosyal Siyasal Ekonomik Değerler [revolution, evolution and status-quo: Social, political and economic values in Turkey]. İstanbul: TESEV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (1996). Islam and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filali-Ansary, A. (2003). Muslims and democracy. In L. Diamond, M. F. Plattner, & D. Brumberg (Eds.), Islam and democracy in middle east (pp. 193–207). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (1996). The forbidden modern: Civilization and veiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (1997). Secularism and Islamism in Turkey: The making of elites and counter-elites. The Middle East Journal, 51(1), 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorski, P., & Altınordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 4.1–4.31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heper, M., & Toktaş, Ş. (2003). Islam, modernity, and democracy in contemporary Turkey: The case of recep Tayyip Erdogan. The Muslim World, 93(2), 157–185. doi:10.1111/1478-1913.00019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (1995). Understanding classical sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1984). Will more countries become democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218. doi:10.2307/2150402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). Democracies: Third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(1), 12–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A. A. (2006). Reassessing support for Islam and democracy in the Arab world? World Affairs, 169(2), 51–63. doi:10.3200/WAFS.169.2.51-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanra, B. (2005). Democracy, Islam and dialogue: The case of Turkey. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 515–539. doi:10.1111/j.1477-7053.2005.00163.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepel, G. (2003). Jihad: the trail of political Islam. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyman, F. (2007). Modernity, secularism and Islam: The case of Turkey. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(2), 215–234. doi:10.1177/0263276407075008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, M. (1997). Latin America’s smiling mask. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 125–134. doi:10.1353/jod.1997.0042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. H., & Mainwaring, S. (1986). Religion and popular protest in Latin America. In Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman, P. R. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marradi, A. (1981). Factor analysis as an aid in the formulation and refinement of empirically useful concepts. In E. F. Borgatta & D. J. Jackson (Eds.), Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research (pp. 17–18). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, R., & Thiel, H. (1998). ‘Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa. Journal of Democracy, 9(1), 95–110. doi:10.1353/jod.1998.0010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. D. (1984). The origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pals, D. (1996). Seven theories of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridhman, G. (1995). The international context of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. In R. Gunter, P. Diamandaurus, & H. Puhle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective (p. 169). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The search for a new Ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (1991). The emergence of liberation theology: Radical religion and social movement theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action:symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286. doi:10.2307/2095521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M. (2002). Islam and democracy in the middle east: The impact of religious orientations on attitudes toward democracy in four Arab countries. Comparative Politics, 34(3), 337–354. doi:10.2307/4146957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M., & Altınoğlu, E. (2004). Political culture in Turkey: Connections among attitudes toward democracy, the military and Islam. Democratization, 11(1), 21–50. doi:10.1080/13510340412331294122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uyanık, M. (2001). Islam Siyaset Felsefesinde Sivil Itaatsizlik (civil disobedience in political Islam). Istanbul: Kaktüs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation. The American Political Science Review, 81, 3–21. doi:10.2307/1960776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. H. (1995). Constructing the public good: Social movements and cultural resources. Social Problems, 42(1), 124–144. doi:10.1525/sp.1995.42.1.03x0458p.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zald, M. N., & McCarthy, J. D. (1987). Social movements in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, W. (1992). Democracy and Islam: The cultural dialectic. Annals, of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 524(1), 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Toros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toros, E. The Relationship Between Islam and Democracy in Turkey: Employing Political Culture as an Indicator. Soc Indic Res 95, 253–265 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9458-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9458-1

Keywords

Navigation